Customer Review

50 of 62 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars It's the Oil, Stupid, April 14, 2003
This review is from: The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed The Jewish People (Paperback)
This is a withering expose, almost unintended and beyond its basic purpose of documenting the 'secret war against the Jews', of the most unintelligent aspect of government a la Machiavel, the Intelligence factor lurking in the shadows. The problem, of course, is that the facts of unnamed 'sources' from the 'old spies' are not fully trustworthy and the whole book is no doubt plausibly deniable. The material requires cautious reading therefore because of the danger of still further disinformation. What a portrait starting with Jack Philby, Ibn Saud, and the Oil Companies, of sordid politicians and their obscure affairs, starring notably the infamous Allen Dulles! The book outstrips its theme in many ways, and while I am all ears to any case for the behind-the-scenes espionage against the Jews (the evidence is certainly convincing), the implications move beyond this question to how we are to take our politics at all, given this degree of dishonesty by all parties, up to and including Bush 41, the object it appears of Syrian blackmail. If one cannot take all the claims as established, one can certainly take the warning to beware of politicians once and for all as beyond redemption.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-3 of 3 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Feb 18, 2010 10:53:40 PM PST
It's hard to read and understand what you wrote, and I have a degree in English literature. Not a single sentence makes sense.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 25, 2013 8:15:28 PM PDT
Hope that degree wasn't very expensive!

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 11, 2014 2:48:26 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 11, 2014 2:51:20 AM PDT
In defense of Radford's degree, the reviewer seems deliberately to have obscured their points amidst clouds of unnecessary clauses. Said clauses are poorly written, to boot. I understand punning with "intelligence" and wanting to bring up Machiavelli, but what means "the most unintelligent aspect of government a la Machiavelli"? The CIA, for instance, may be the stupidest part of government, though it has fierce competition. But how could intelligence be the stupidest part of Machiavellian government? Wouldn't it need spies more than most? It's just this sort of haphazard piling on of ideas that justifies the above poster in not knowing what the reviewer is on about.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: New York City

Top Reviewer Ranking: 128,425