Winter Driving Best Books of the Month Men's Leather Watches Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon $5 Albums All-New Amazon Fire TV Beauty V-Day Valentine's Day Cards Bring a little greenery into your home Amazon Gift Card Offer jstfd6 jstfd6 jstfd6  Amazon Echo All-New Fire Kindle Paperwhite Lisa Loeb AMO Winter Sports on Amazon.com SnS
Customer Review

24 of 25 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars AccuEvolution Ultra Low Self Discharge - Size C, August 12, 2009
This review is from: AccuEvolution C NiMH Precharged Low Self Discharge Rechargeable Batteries - high drain, all other use (Electronics)
I heartily agree with the earlier reviews, this IS a very impressive battery, and you have to shop for good prices. I have found excellent prices on this battery here on Amazon - simply by looking around.

A bit of caution: Size C Low Self Discharge batteries are often just a AA LSD inserted into a C shell. This is NOT the case with the AccuEvolution. The AccuEvolution C is a real battery through and through - with a capacity of 4,500 mAHs (over twice as much as a 2,200 mAH re-wrap). This is why the AccuEvolution is noticeably heavy.

Real cost: I recently came across an interesting article online that compares the actual cost per amp hour of a typical alkaline battery vs this battery. A name brand size C alkaline on sale for $0.94 is shown to cost $46.81 for 100 mill amp hours, while an AccuEvolution size C priced at $9.98 costs just $0.19 (including cost of electricity and charger) per 100 milli amp hours. This is a difference of slightly over 300%.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 2 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Dec 14, 2011 10:46:06 PM PST
Not sure where these numbers came from, but here's my result: $73 per kWh for Alkaline vs. $9.80 kWh for AccuEvolution. calculation: AccuEvolution gives 4500 mAh; Non rechargeable "Bunny" batteries "C size" show 8500 mAh capacity. In common units, Power = Watts = 1000 x mA x V. Energy = kWh = 1,000,000 x mA x V. Alkalines put out about 1.5 Volts; rechargeables about 1.2 Volts. So for one discharge cycle, AccuEvolution gives about 0.0054 kWh; Bunny gives about 0.0128 kWh. But you get about 100 discharge cycles from AccuEvolution; only one discharge cycle with bunny. Price per discharge $0.94 for Bunny, $0.050 per AccuEvolution discharge. A charger probably would give you over 10,000 battery charges over its lifetime; cheapest I saw for one that does size C was $12.00; which gives $0.00120 per charge. Figure 60% coulometric charging efficiency, so it takes 0.009 kWh of power to charge the battery; at $0.20 per kWh for powerline electricity; that gives $0.0018 per charge. So AccuEvolution is $0.053 per discharge including battery, electricity, and charger cost. So cost per kWh is about $73 for Bunny and $9.80 for AccuEvolution. Did not take into account that depth of discharge typically will not go below 10 - 20% before the battery is considered flat. Also, assumed a flat discharge curve (voltage vs. amp hours), but at high power draws this is not the case, especially with Alkaline. Did not take into account the charger's internal efficiency, but it should be close to 70%. First two would be advantage AccuEvolution, last one advanatage Bunny, but this was not a close race that would be won chasing pennys in cost.

In reply to an earlier post on Aug 16, 2012 6:12:13 AM PDT
Dr. Goode, or anyone: would love to see that article. Can you give us the reference? Thanks.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: Oklahoma, USA

Top Reviewer Ranking: 24,711,193