Customer Review

5.0 out of 5 stars One of the best things out there - on a par with William Wallace's work, August 30, 2011
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Aristotelian-Thomistic Philosophy of Measure and the International System of Units (SI): Correlation of International System of Units With the Philosophy of Aristotle and St. Thomas (Hardcover)
This is a really good book bridging a gap that between the Categories and Modernity. It deals with the order of emanations. It forestalls Kantianism and all forms of psuedorealism as well as so called "empiricism". This means its beyond most philosophers to appreciate- which is a pity because it is part of the cure to the modern dominance of sensationalism in both its forms- german or any Idealism and British Empiricism. It deals interestingly with what I call "Wave Trigonometry" which is the Newtonian bridge to modern mathematical physics from ancient Euclidean trigonometry.

Useful and good for all those interested in Truth and the fact that being is the object of the intellect.

Only a slight criticism - and I haven't finished the book yet and that is a tendency to ascribe to Thomas Aquinas -an instrumentalism that spoils the steady unfolding from emanations "beyond" substance itself into the order of Quantitas Virtutis and real relations among substances established by the Q V's relations.

In other words there was a golden opportunity to draw a continuity between ancient and modern science as William Wallace did in "Galileo's Logic of Discovery and Proof" and his histories of science. And do this in a deeper more profound way than Wallace did.

I can understand the tendency to completely separate distinctions once they are made but we distinquish in order to unify. Besides all science requires a return to the concrete for its full realisation. The modern mathematical physics has established real truths not simply mathematical truths.

Still light years ahead of "Philosophy of Science".
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: May 26, 2012 4:02:44 PM PDT
A. Aversa says:
Whose "Philosophy of Science" do you refer to? Have you read Wallace's The Modeling of Nature: Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Nature in Synthesis? How does this book compare to that one? Thanks
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details