Automotive Holiday Deals Books Gift Guide Books Gift Guide Shop Men's Athletic Shoes Learn more nav_sap_plcc_6M_fly_beacon $5 Albums egg_2015 All-New Amazon Fire TV Subscribe & Save Gifts Under $50 Amazon Gift Card Offer bf15 bf15 bf15 $30 Off Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 Kindle Black Friday Deals Black Friday Video Game Deals Outdoor Deals on HTL
Customer Review

78 of 98 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Variable CGI, a bad script and indifferent performances make this a hard slog, February 2, 2013
This review is from: Battlestar Galactica: Blood & Chrome [Blu-ray] (Blu-ray)
It is the tenth year of the Cylon War. The Colonial Fleet is gradually being worn down by their former slaves turned enemies, the Cylons. Bill Adama, a newly-graduated pilot assigned to the battlestar Galactica, takes part in what should be a simple escort mission but turns into a major operation which could have important ramifications for the entire war.

Blood and Chrome started life as a proposed full spin-off series of the new(er) Battlestar Galactica. The first spin-off, Caprica, had been a failure and was cancelled after one season. Popular opinion has it that the show was too talky, too cerebral and simply too dull, having moved away from the dogfights and political infighting that made the original series so compelling. For this second spin-off, the proposal was to make a balls-to-the-wall action show, a Top Gun in space with Vipers and Cylons. Setting the show during the First Cylon War would also allow the show to resolve some storylines from Caprica - which took place about sixteen years earlier - and foreshadow some of the events of BSG itself (which starts about forty-two years later).

In the event, it never happened. Blood and Chrome - the proposed pilot episode of the spin-off - was not picked up and, unless the imminent DVD/Blu-Ray release sells like gangbusters, will not be in the future. As it stands, it is left behind as a curiosity and, it has to be said, not a particularly compelling one.

Blood and Chrome was not filmed in the traditional manner. With the existing (massive and expensive-to-maintain) Galactica sets all destroyed at the end of filming, the producers were forced to rely on greenscreens and digital scans to reproduce the original sets. In fact, they were able to adjust the sets to reflect the fact that it's forty years earlier, with less-advanced technology available. The same 'bones' of the original structures are there, but the detailing is different. This works quite well, giving the sense that this is the same ship at a different point in its lifespan. The quality of the greenscreen sets is rather variable, with most of them falling into the 'somewhat fake but you don't notice after a while' category. Some of them are pretty good: the CIC set is surprisingly well-done, though the fact that it's quite a dark set helps. On the other hand, scenes on the ice planet and inside the abandoned facility there are blatantly fake. There's also rather too much lens flare going on in the CGI scenes, which gets distracting after a while.

Other CGI is reasonable, though the decision was made to use very fast cuts. This meant both an insane number of CGI shots (this 120-minute TV movie has more than 1,800 shots, compared to 1,488 for the three-and-a-half hour cinematic film The Return of the King) and almost no time to appreciate them. Whilst the original show was guilty of fast-paced cutting at times which made it difficult to follow what was going on, Blood and Chrome takes this to a new level. The confrontation between the Colonial heavy cruiser Osiris and a Cylon basestar should be a tense, epic moment, but instead turns into a confusing melee of badly-cut CGI shots and explosions. Given that Blood and Chrome has resources available to it that Ronald Moore and his team would have killed to have on the original BSG pilot a decade ago, it's a shame to see them wasted in such a fashion.

That leaves the writing and acting to back up the effects and, unfortunately, neither are very accomplished. There's some attempts at characterisation which should be a lot stronger than it is, since the show really only has to focus on Adama, his co-pilot Coker and their civilian passenger Becca for most of its length. Instead it's all a bit half-hearted and actors Luke Pasqualino, Ben Cotton and Lili Bordan seem uninspired by the material, which is cliched and trite. A few attempts to lampshade the macho pilot genre of action films and series fall flat (as the show immediately employs many of those tropes with no sense of irony or intelligence). Later in the movie there is an attempt to discuss the rights and wrongs of the war and its immense bodycount, but it's all rather tepid compared to the issues that the original BSG raised on a regular basis. There's also a cameo appearance by a BSG regular which helps place the TV movie a bit better in the timeline, but even this misfires as it causes confusion with the flashback scenes in the BSG TV movie Razor, which supposedly happens two years after Blood and Chrome.

What we are left with, then, is a confusing morass of explosions, a ton of CGI (some impressive, most not), some cliched writing and indifferent performances, with occasional bursts of effort. What Blood and Chrome does prove, conclusively, is that BSG is at its heart about compelling characters, ethical conflicts and difficult-to-answer questions. Removing the ambiguity in favour of explosions and space dogfights clearly does not work. However, given that in a few years (when technology has improved a bit more) a lot more shows may be made this way, it's certainly worth watching as a hint of the future of TV production.

Blood and Chrome (**½) will be available on 19 February.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-4 of 4 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Jun 1, 2013 1:24:37 AM PDT
W.T.Hoffman says:
Excellent review. I liked the lens flair (so that's what it's called), having seen it employed to such an extent on PROMETHEUS. However, its probably just a flavor-of-the-day cinematic device, like the cinema verite, jingling camera, of the 2000s series. I am AMAZED that they had the coin to pay for 1800 effect shots. Since you didn't count them yourself (I'm assuming), they must have mentioned this in the DVD commentary. CGI shots in live cinema are exploding, in part because the programs to create them are falling in price. You're right, this is the future of TV movies, but more than that, any movie with a set that's hard to create. (READ: all SCIFI, and action adventure special effects.) Live action SCIFI has almost been replaced by live action actors in virtual CGI shots. When you freeze the DVD, its appallingly clear how trepid and lackluster most of these shots appear. THE HOBBIT is filled with them. During the LOTR films, I couldn't always tell where live action and CGI shots merged. However, I have no problem at all seeing this, with the current HOBBIT film. I based by review on watching the movie on youtube a couple of times. You studied the film, obviously, and could pull it apart better for that reason. Its ironic that the most beloved review, was made by someone who just watched five minutes of the film, and thought it was wonderful. (I don't think its good cinema at all, but gave it four stars coz I was so addicted to the BS series at the time.) The fast cuts, which bothered you, also might be the future of scifi film editing, since video game esthetics seem to have come into play. I think we both agree, tho, this film is eye candy, and lacks the philosophical substance, and social critiques, of the 2000 Battlestar Galactica. Unless you want to consider the very LACK of substance, the computer gloss, and the acting placed backseat to the effect shots, as some kind of ironic commentary on our entire society. I doubt they intend that, but who knows.

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 2, 2014 4:31:19 AM PST
The effects were done in-house so might not have been paying per-shot. However, the in-house people did hire outside people too. There's a 23 minute visual effects featurette on the Blu-Ray release.

Posted on Feb 12, 2014 8:47:09 PM PST
chiqui says:
B&CG worth renting and following regaurdless of filming techniques or budget... definitely worth following the series... so say we all! great new cast of actors characters...but the cylons I relate less to now that they're evolving no longer human kinda like techno babble... I want to relate to the cylons 6 and 8 anyways and ellen and thai...and son of lee who's got to be a hybrid I just know it...starbuck can't die off... she just cant...maybe her character is "the harbager of death" but you can't kill love according to the legacy...lords of kobolt help the legacy continue... "So say we all"

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 12, 2014 8:56:21 PM PST
chiqui says:
you sound a lot like Dr. G.Baltar;) it's alright but there is some truth... i'm so impressed by the four astronomical season that if the series continues... might disappoint... either way I'll watch:)
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details