54 of 70 people found the following review helpful
No One is Refuting Doherty's Points,
This review is from: Challenging the Verdict: A Cross-Examination of Lee Strobel's "The Case for Christ" (Paperback)
All these religionist reviews on here attack everything but Doherty's arguments. Gimme a break you guys, I am seeing all these 1-star ratings without any of Doherty's points actually challenged. You guys keep claiming that Doherty did not interview any of Strobel's witnesses yet Strobel never interviewed any unbelievers in his own book. The book is a response and I have yet to see works that respond to his specific arguments.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-4 of 4 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Mar 13, 2010 2:17:26 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Mar 13, 2010 2:18:19 AM PST
This is a review? And the third most helpful, no less.
In reply to an earlier post on May 12, 2010 8:52:51 AM PDT
Let me humbly recommend my own review of the book, which has the most helpful votes but gets buried by amazon.com's newer rating system. Several apologists gave my review 1 star because they couldn't handle the truth.
Posted on May 2, 2011 10:41:33 AM PDT
Benjamin Prugh says:
Why would you interview a sceptic? I don't take my car to a flower shop to get work done on it.
In reply to an earlier post on Jul 8, 2013 11:42:52 AM PDT
Matthew Faulkerson says:
That analogy makes no sense whatsoever.
If Strobel really wanted to present a good case for believing in the Christian message it would have made sense to include more skeptical thinkers, rebuttals to said thinkers, and counters from the skeptical thinkers. He wasnt interested in analyzing the evidence in an objective manner given the fact he only includes on skeptic in the Case For Faith and none whatsover in the Case For Christ, he was only interested stacking the deck in his favor and preaching to the choir to make some money.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›