Industrial-Sized Deals TextBTS15 Shop Women's Handbags Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon Melanie Martinez Storm Fire TV Stick Off to College Essentials Find the Best Purina Pro Plan for Your Pet Shop Popular Services Home Theater Setup Plumbing Services Assembly Services Shop all tmnt tmnt tmnt  Amazon Echo Fire HD 6 Kindle Voyage The Walking Dead\ Shop Now Deal of the Day
Customer Review

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Collection of Scholarly Views, However Bias, April 18, 2012
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Understanding the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Reader From the Biblical Archaeology Review (Paperback)
Wonderful scholarly viewpoints and well worth the read, however the book's authors are partisan to much of the traditional monotheistic views of the Judea-Christian consensus. While Hershel Shanks and a list of scholars write beautifully, with clarity and cover a host of issues, including some very informative pieces by Father Frank Cross, they represent a protective consensus of the traditional views. Two of the articles, one by Shanks and another by James C. Vanderkam do mention the findings and thesis of J.L.Teicher, Barbara Thiering, O'Callahan and Eisenman, however they are passing and condemnatory. Eisenman has no voice in this collection and is simply stated as "widely rejected."

Shank's goes so far to label the thesis of Baigent and Leigh as "hogwash," "ludicrous" and as "foolish supposition." Perhaps he is correct in is assessment of Catholic liberalism, but only under a reactionary stance. And only once in the entire book is John Allegro, one of the original Dead Sea Scroll scholars, even mentioned. And this small blurb only goes so far as to condemn him as man whose "reading of the text was so bad" that it justified Strugnell's critical editing, or as more appropriately stated by Eisenman as a "hatchet job." Not only does Eisenman have no voice in this publication, but Vanderkam's is included with consent to his thesis on John the Baptist as the "teacher of righteousness," which falls far short from Eisenman's extensive work, one of the chief persons associated with the Huntington Library responsible for the release of the Dead Sea Scrolls from the private libraries of the cartel scholars. Yet why isn't Eisenman's views included without condemnation as a valuable scholarly argument? The very reason Allegro complained about for 40 years.

There is much valuable information, but ultimately the book is bias to the religious scholars in protecting the faiths they represent.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Be the first person to comment on this review.

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 


Review Details