Customer Review

42 of 51 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Pics okay, camera seems cheap, October 18, 2010
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Kodak Easyshare C195 Digital Camera (Blue) (Electronics)
Two years ago, I bought a Kodak Easy Share, 7 megapixels, for $99.00. I love the camera but decided to buy another Kodak only this time with 14 megapixels because everyone told me that with more megapixels, the photos would be even clearer. Well, that was a waste of money for me. For one thing, my old camera is sturdier and the features easier to access, the buttons are stronger and are easier to use -- even the telescopic/wide lens work better and are not clumsy, like on the the C195 model. Sometimes, my camera will take the picture (by itself) while I'm focusing and other times, the "clicker" seems to stick. In fairness, the photos turn out looking pretty good but not any better than on my older model and, in some cases, not as good. I used this camera often so I could really test it out and be able to present a thoroughly researched review.

In summary, I did not notice any real difference between the 7 megapixels camera versus the 14. Both cameras take good pictures. However, the quality of the C195 is definitely much cheaper and it frequently does "its own thing"

I was going to use my old camera as a backup and use the new one as my primary camera. However, I am now going to reverse that order and go back to my reliable, older Kodak. It has never disappointed me and the photos are beautiful.

I guess it's true what they say about change. In many cases, change doesn't mean better especially if it doesn't produce positive results. Come to think of it, I guess that is true of anything in life. :)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 3 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-5 of 5 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Nov 1, 2010 1:31:51 PM PDT
The only time you're going to see any improvment in picture quality in a 7 meg vs. 14 meg is if you blow them way up. And as far a quality, you didn't say want model your old one is but if you have a mid to upper quality model that's older and compare it to a new low end model, of course the old is going to be better. Would you expect that a brand new KIA would be better then a five year old Cadillac just because it's newer?

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 1, 2010 1:35:33 PM PDT
My "older" model is an $89 Kodak Easy Share and the photos it takes are fantastic and definitely better than my new camera. I wouldn't expect a KIA to be better tha a Caddy because I don't buy foreign cars.:)

Posted on Mar 25, 2011 2:38:45 PM PDT
K. Hales says:
I don't think she ever said because its newer it would be better. So there was no reason for that little slap on the wrist. She said she was told the pictures would be clearer. She found out for herself it was not true.

In reply to an earlier post on Mar 25, 2011 4:42:19 PM PDT
Thank you for defending my comments. You are correct. I've used the newer camera more and still found the quality not as good as my little $89 Kodak. I actually went back to using that camera. Considering the price, pics from both cameras aren't bad but the product quality of the newer model truly is very cheap. With so many products I have found that newer isn't always better.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 17, 2014 7:41:23 PM PDT
Victoria, I was just getting ready to agree with K. Hales. Sometimes people can be so nasty in their comments, and for no reason! They could just say their piece without giving reviewers a "piece of their mind." Thanks for your review and for Hales, too.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

3.7 out of 5 stars (737 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (336)
4 star:
 (150)
3 star:
 (80)
2 star:
 (52)
1 star:
 (119)
 
 
 
$99.95 $47.99
Add to cart Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Location: Orchard Park, NY

Top Reviewer Ranking: 23,645