11 of 26 people found the following review helpful
A work of courage and authenticity,
This review is from: Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons (Paperback)
Congratulations to Mr. Toms for having the courage to write the book that had to be written about Michael Jackson, but no one else dared. The irony of this detailed and cogent look into Jackson's heart and soul is that it is being condemned by those who ought to embrace it: Jackson's most faithful fans. Blinded by admiration and anti-pedophile hysteria, they refuse to acknowledge the elephant in Jackson's bedroom. This gentle, decent, and enormously talented man loved children, and his life was made miserable for it. He was hounded by a pit-bull prosecutor bent on revenge and vilified by the yellow-rag journalists who jumped on the scapegoat bandwagon. This book tells that sad story with loving sympathy. So why do Jackson's fans now unanimously reject it? Because they know the story is true, and unless they accept the truth about their hero, they are left to protest too much in the darkness of denial. But the truth and this book still stand.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-7 of 7 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Nov 26, 2010 1:11:15 AM PST
if there were facts that proved that jackson was a pedophile, why did they not come out at the trial in 2005? or at the 2 grand juries that were convened in 1993 and which refused to issue an indictment due to lack of evidence? how could this author have access to info that the prosecutors in l.a. and santa barbara did not have after spending over 10 years looking, having spent over 3 million $, having put up a website with a hotline for people to report instances of pedophilia, and after having a ten-year fbi investigation into jackson? can you explain this? how come all these many investigators over such a long period of time with such large resources did not come up with the fool-proof case that you are claiming this author did?? just doesn't make sense. and that's why rational people, including jackson fans, are not buying the bs.
In reply to an earlier post on May 7, 2011 11:22:26 AM PDT
The elephant in the room here is that this book is trying to make a distorted argument in favor of pedophilia and slanders an innocent man in the process.
Posted on Jun 10, 2011 11:36:31 AM PDT
u are totaly crazy if u believe this self proclaimed pedophile who was even arrested
In reply to an earlier post on Jan 1, 2012 1:12:09 AM PST
D. Watson says:
Well, that facts about MJ being a pedo would have come out in the 1993 but the trial never happened. I wonder why. Oh, yes, that`s right. Michael Jackson paid the kid out.
In reply to an earlier post on May 3, 2014 7:27:10 PM PDT
T. Marchand says:
Lol another desperate attempt from a known troll. It's absolutely hilarious that anyone would still be trying to use that argument. Fool!
Posted on Dec 1, 2014 7:34:39 PM PST
I for one will never accept any lie from a convicted pedo, so I wont be filling his pockets with my well earned cash. keep hustling though, yeesh, more bottom feeders.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›