28 of 32 people found the following review helpful
Self contradictory and self lauding,
This review is from: Practical Cryptography (Paperback)
From the very first pages, authors emphasize the need for public algorithms and peer review. Yet, the book is full of suggestions that appear first time in the book. They even take time to give fancy names to their new proposals. It is typical to see things like "While writing this chaper we came up with this new random number generator...". Well, the authors could have used some of public scrutiny they are so fond of.
The authors are extremely biased against algorithms designed by others. For example, they bend over backwards to blow some generic weaknesses of AES out of proportions. They even add a scary story of a bored PhD student offhandedly breaking AES. I think this not only unfair but also a bit unethical to direct generic critisism to a design and then pretent it does not apply to their own.
They must be really pissed off when their own algorithm was beaten by AES in the NIST competition.
The book is useful if all you want is a light reading about security and you can manage to read it with a grain of salt.