Customer Review

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars The Duckman, July 24, 2004
Watch is beautiful and looks good in an adventurous or casual environment with it's gold face. It is a bit heavier than many sport watches (i.e. Casio, Suunto, etc.) with resin bands. As far as the resin band, it tends to split after months of use necessitating replacement. I've owned two of these watches in five years and have cycled through 6 watchbands.

Overall, the watch is a good value, and even after battery replacements waterproof integrity has not been compromised.

Give us a more durable band Casio. If you did this, the AMW320D-9EV Analog/Digital Watch would be a superlative watch.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-3 of 3 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Jun 16, 2012 9:52:34 AM PDT
Toine says:
The watch has a nice weight to it, which gives it some substantiality. I didn't have a problem with the band tearing after much use, but even if so, the watch is quite fine, considering the price. So a watch band replacement shouldn't knock it down 2 stars - should still stay at 5 stars!

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 21, 2012 5:42:43 AM PDT
J.L.H. says:
Apparently band durability is more important to him than it might be to you & i. That's okay though, because he presented his points objectively enough so that prospective buyers can make their own conclusion in that regard.

22mm seiko urethane dive straps are very durable. Just 1/2 the cost of the watch per current pricing.

In reply to an earlier post on Aug 13, 2013 4:33:09 PM PDT
Gary says:
Can't agree. The reviewer has a point. If you have to replace the watch band often, it could easily exceed the original price of the watch.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item not available
Reviewer


Location: Indiana

Top Reviewer Ranking: 22,879,441