42 of 54 people found the following review helpful
A History Lesson Inside All Of The Make Believe,
This review is from: Enchantments: A Novel (Hardcover)
Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
I love learning new things. Usually they come in the form of lessons:
"Slamming your hand in the oven hurts."
"Trees don't move, avoid running into them."
"Leave the gun...take the canoli."
but in that rare opportunity that I get to expand my brain under the assumption of pure entertainment I get giddy.
When I was in High School, Fox released a movie called "Anastasia." I loved this movie (Don't judge me!) and as a result became unabashedly obsessed with the Romanov dynasty. I watched movies about them, I scoured every National Geographic I could find, and pretty much made the local library my "B". I just couldn't get enough. But...with all of my note taking, and obsessive compulsive Wikipedia-ing I never really paid attention to Rasputin. Oh, he was there, lurking in the background like a disease, but my attention was required elsewhere so off it went. Until now. (Damn you...you kooky bastard.)
My initial reason for grabbing this book was 1 sentence:
"After Rasputin's body is pulled from the icy waters of the Neva River, his eighteen-year-old daughter, Masha, is sent to live at the imperial palace with Tsar Nikolay and his family--including the headstrong Prince Alyosha."
But instead of getting Masha with a little Alyosha foreplay, I got a Russian history lesson. A very intriguing Russian history lesson cleverly disguised as fiction.
"St. Petersburg, 1917. After Rasputin's body is pulled from the icy waters of the Neva River, his eighteen-year-old daughter, Masha, is sent to live at the imperial palace with Tsar Nikolay and his family--including the headstrong Prince Alyosha. Desperately hoping that Masha has inherited Rasputin's miraculous healing powers, Tsarina Alexandra asks her to tend to Aloysha, who suffers from hemophilia, a blood disease that keeps the boy confined to his sickbed, lest a simple scrape or bump prove fatal.
Two months after Masha arrives at the palace, the tsar is forced to abdicate, and Bolsheviks place the royal family under house arrest. As Russia descends into civil war, Masha and Alyosha grieve the loss of their former lives, finding solace in each other's company. To escape the confinement of the palace, they tell stories--some embellished and some entirely imagined--about Nikolay and Alexandra's courtship, Rasputin's many exploits, and the wild and wonderful country on the brink of an irrevocable transformation. In the worlds of their imagination, the weak become strong, legend becomes fact, and a future that will never come to pass feels close at hand."
This is the first time I can say, (with unwavering confidence) that I spent equal parts reading and investigating a book. While normally (even with historical fiction) I will take an author at his/her word, (when it comes to details) and just keep on trucking, there was something so formal about the plot (or "stories") told by Masha, (to Alyosha) that I had this historians twitch to know if they were actually true. Time and time again I found myself challenging the author, and time and time again... I was proven wrong.
"There is NO WAY some prince got pissed, dressed in drag, tricked Rasputin into coming over and then fed him cakes soaked in cyanide!"
"Oh hell no...someone does not get cut, almost in half, and live to tell about it!!!"
True...again. (feel free to look both of those up.)
Because of this, (the ridiculous accuracy of some of the most outlandish things) I found myself unable to put "Enchantments" down. I had to know the truth! (Even if it involved someone being eaten by a bear.) It wasn't necessarily about HOW the story ended, (because...well, we already know how that well that turned out,) but it was more about the personal glimpses into what happened BEFORE the end, (How the Tsar behaved under house arrest. How OTMA sewed jewels into their frillies just in case they were forced to move in the middle of the night.) that had me so enthralled.
Now yes...there were a SEVERAL parts that were fiction. (Alyosha didn't REALLY race Hermes on a bright red bike) but what can one really expect from a girl who is trying desperately to distract a dying boy? (Who knew Hemophilia was a death sentence! *shrugs*)
So what can be said other than "I was head deep in Russia and LOVED it?" Why don't we talk about Harrison's writing? It was genuinely unique. Harrison is not a newbie in the book world, but until "Enchantments" I had never read anything by her, so her brazen stanzas, and no nonsense approach to dialogue was intriguing. That's not to say that it wasn't a difficult book to read. Like I've said...(roughly 70 times now) this book read a lot like a history lesson, so there are pages and pages of historical accounts and flashbacks that, if you're not careful (in regards to pacing yourself,) might (very likely) turn you off. In other words...this isn't a book for the (streamline) plot hungry.
And at the end of the day it was sad. Not because everyone died (I hope this isn't a spoiler...God it shouldn't be) but because of the mental awareness everyone had KNOWING that they were going to die. (Imagine living with that hanging over your shoulder....Alyosha certainly did.)
Overall...good book. Detailed (almost to the point of annoyingness,) but good all the same.
This is one for bio junkies and history buffs. No one else need apply.
Tracked by 2 customers
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-8 of 8 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Mar 5, 2012 3:26:15 PM PST
T. EIB says:
Anastasia was not a disney movie. It was Fox
In reply to an earlier post on Mar 5, 2012 3:34:03 PM PST
Misty Baker says:
Hmm... could have sworn it was Disney. Anyways, thanks for the clearing that up, I fixed it :)
Posted on Mar 5, 2012 9:08:36 PM PST
Ms. Caryn L. Thomas says:
This reveiw forced me to order the book.- (Bio junkie +history buff)
Posted on Mar 5, 2012 9:35:16 PM PST
Ms. Caryn L. Thomas says:
This reveiw forced me to order the book.- (Bio junkie +history buff) (:
Posted on Mar 10, 2012 9:52:41 AM PST
Harris M. says:
God bless you, Misty, but for a self-proclaimed "Romanov" obsessive, all the "history" you claim not to be familiar with is described, in great detail, in "Nicholas and Alexandra." As a "Romanov-obsessive", you really ought to read that book before you feel entitled to comment on the historicity, or not, of Ms. Harrison's book.
Posted on Mar 20, 2012 11:37:49 AM PDT
[Deleted by the author on Mar 20, 2012 2:25:06 PM PDT]
In reply to an earlier post on Mar 20, 2012 11:45:01 AM PDT
Misty Baker says:
While it was entertaining & informative it did get a little long winded in parts & strayed from the "major" plot more than I would have liked. That said...you should know that I rarely give 5 stars (I have to be blown away) or ever 4's for that matter (though they are more common) so...a 3 isn't a bad review from me at all :) if you enjoy Harrison's writing style and the Romonov history (in general) I think it would be a good buy for you. ---hope that helps.
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 18, 2012 1:45:15 PM PDT
Anna karenina says:
I also watched and enjoyed Anastasia, but I'm one step ahead of missy . I have discovered and read Robert massie's books.I have enjoyed his books which have filled my need for Romanov history. BUt I am willing to give this a try and hope not to be disappointed.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›