Truck Month Best Books of the Month Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Eric Clapton Father's Day Gift Guide 2016 Fire TV Stick Get Ready for Summer and Save 15% The Baby Store Shop now Amazon Cash Back Offer DrThorne DrThorne DrThorne  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis Shop Now SnS
Customer Review

329 of 357 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars "...I'm Sorry I Didn't Build You A Better Ship Rose..." - TITANIC in 3D, April 7, 2012
This review is from: Titanic (Four-Disc Combo: Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / Digital Copy) (Blu-ray)

Holidaying in Ireland, I happened on the preview day of James Cameron's "Titanic in 3D" at the new Odeon Cinema in The Point Area of Dublin's refurbished docklands (or "The Quays" as they're known locally). We caught the first showing on 5 April 2012 - debuting on their all-bells-and-whistles "iSense Screen". "iSense" features razor sharp Real-3D imaging on a gigantic screen with state-of-the-art surround sound. So myself and the two kids popped along - donned the crazy specs - and started to watch. The sheer spectacle of what came next has prompted me to write this review...

I've seen about 10 films in 3D - some like "Despicable Me" have impressed and actually met the hype - the rest have either felt gimmicky or a downright hindrance - or worse a crass monetary exploitation. Even the new Aardman Animation feature film "The Pirates..." - which we'd seen some days earlier - is not great in 3D (although it's a top movie and thoroughly recommended). But Cameron's complete reshaping of "Titanic" into a 3D realm is a different beast. It's incredible and at times I was genuinely gobsmacked. I saw the film on its original outing in 1997 (which was a cinematic experience to say the least) and I'd estimate that 65 to 75% of this version has been improved by the 3D process with the remaining portions varying between not changed at all or just slightly better - but definitely better.

So what's changed? Scenes that were somehow 'ordinary' before are now 'dimensional' - at times you feel you could reach out and actually touch them...

Examples - the front railings of the sunken liner at the bottom of the Atlantic at the beginning of the film, the unmanned sub that is filming it then making its way through the insides of the wreck - you now feel the machine and its cables - the space around it - the bubbling of the water - the barnacles and silt disturbed to the left and right. When the engine room ship-sized pistons kick into gear as the last boilers are lit - their size and power; the drinks glasses on the table at dinner as Bruce Ismay pompously tells of how he arrived at the ship's name - they have space around them and you feel you could almost lift them off the tablecloths. Even something as unassuming as Molly Brown's decorative hat as she talks to Jack (at a later dinner table setting) now reaches out of the screen into the aisles with extraordinary depth. Winslet's costumes are glorious too - her radiant eyes and lustrous hair. The feeling of sea air and wind on the ship's gangways when Rose and Jack walk and talk and discuss art is accentuated - more realistic.

But if I was to note just one scene that sums up how improved this version is - it would be the one where Rose tries to kill herself by jumping off the back of the ship. As she steps over the railings and the camera looks down at the cold wash below - suddenly the distance and the hugeness of the ship becomes 'real' - looking downward and with that added depth - you can 'feel' that fall...that freezing water below...

The sound is huge too - groaning steel - creaking wood - the water crashing out of the screen right into your face as it floods corridors...

There were occasions where 3D didn't work - where the effect was detrimental rather than an enhancement - the boarding of the great ship at Southampton was one scene where too much was going on in the crowd sequences for the 3D to catch up. Other offences would be that one character on screen would be razor-sharp image-wise (usually the one talking) - while those beside them or to the left of them - would be slightly blurred. But these were rare.

What you also forget is what an incredible movie "Titanic" is. Like that other maverick filmmaker Ridley Scott ("Blade Runner", "Gladiator" and "The Kingdom Of Heaven") - James Cameron isn't afraid of spectacle - he embraces it. He brings it to the screen with bravado and a passion for 'detail' that few have matched. His new 3D rendering of "Titanic" is the same - it seems like he's worked everything to give you the viewer as much as possible - or at least more than you saw the last time. And when the actual sinking finally comes in the early hours of 15 April 1912 - the horror and heartbreak still has the power to make your heart race and bring a tear to the eye. Captain Smith holding the wheel as the ocean crashes through the glass into the bridge area, the ship's funnel that breaks loose and collapses on the bodies below, the propellers rising out of the water, bodies bouncing off the ship's steel structures as the huge hull rises up and they slide downwards to their death - the camera panning back as Rose emerges from the swell to an ocean of bodies flaying about in the agony of the icy Atlantic - the guilty faces on the lucky ones in the boats that got away - hearing their screams and cries for help - yet not going back for survivors - and knowing they should...

Cameron's version of the sad tale has heart too - through all that technical excellence it doesn't forget to show - and somehow respect - the human cost. There's the rage and helplessness of the third class passengers locked into steerage below while the 'quality' on the decks above get the 'priority' placing in the lifeboats their tickets paid for - the band unselfishly playing "Nearer My God To Thee" as the ship goes down by the head, the priest praying with terrified passengers trying to give them strength, the elderly couple holding each other tightly on the bed as the sea floods their cabin - the Irish mum telling her two children of 'Tir na N'Og' - the mythical 'land of the young' as the inevitable closes in around her beloved...

Then of course there's the cast - Bill Paxton as the obsessed present-day treasure-seeker, Gloria Stuart as the elderly Rose recounting the tragedy to an enrapt crew, Jonathan Hyde as Bruce Ismay - the White Star Line egotist who ordered the number of lifeboats to be reduced from 48 to 16 (compliant with Board of Trade laws at the time) so as not to clutter up the promenade decks for the first-class passengers - and then once onboard practically ordering Captain Smith to open all engines to full speed ahead despite the danger (only to save himself in one of the last lifeboats - an act infamous now in history). Frances Fisher is Rose's social-climbing mum, Billy Zane as Rose's manipulative and jealous boor of a fiancé, David Warner as his dastardly man-servant, Bernard Hill as the overwhelmed and ill-fated Captain Smith, 'new money' Kathy Bates as the 'unsinkable' Molly Brown - all of them exemplary. Victor Garber adds huge gravitas too as the ship's architect Thomas Andrews - a decent man grappling with his thoughts as it all falls apart around him (his dialogue titles this review).

But the movie belongs to its two young leads - Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet as Jack and Rose - a 17-year-old lady of art and means who falls in love with a 20-year old street-rat who paints to survive. While DiCaprio is good and couldn't go anywhere for a few years due to screaming girls (he was 22 at the time) - it's Winslet who impresses the most. She is sensational in the role - voluptuous, ballsy and humane. She also exudes an acting confidence that is staggering for a 21-year-old. In my book only Kiera Knightley gets this close to that kind of inner belief.

With regard to the 3D Film on BLU RAY (Sept 2012) - it arrives in multiple versions - a 2D Standard Blu Ray set, this 4-disc 3D version and a DELUXE BOX SET with memorabilia. There are 6 hours of extras, over 25 deleted scenes and endless in-depth interviews. It's a feast of detail. And there's also no doubt in my mind that Cameron has given '3D' a huge boost with this extraordinary rendering of his 1997 classic...

To sum up - even if you don't want to see this film again - and suffer through that dreadful Celine Dion schlock song at the end - think of James Cameron's "Titanic in 3D" as sheer cinematic spectacle. My kids are 18 and 14 - and given that their generation is so easily bored and their timespan for attention virtually nil - they didn't notice the three-hours-plus playing time go by. In fact my son Sean announced at the end "...that was a great film Dad...really good." I could see it in his young face - he was genuinely moved by what he'd just seen.

Praise indeed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 7 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 38 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Apr 8, 2012 8:01:02 AM PDT
BornSlippyZ says:
Nice review, I saw this on Good Friday and it was in a Sony 4K projector auditorium. This will be one I buy in 3D and I wish I had money to buy a Sony 4K projector. I will 'settle' for my Sony HW30ES, and 100" screen. I would highly pass on the 3D tv if you have the room for a projector setup.

Posted on Apr 9, 2012 3:11:14 PM PDT
Mark, I have to say that your review was absolutely "fabulous"!! Your wording was truly professional indeed. And to BornSlippyZ, evidently you have not seen the newest LG Cinema screens in a completely dark room. The 3D experiences are so flawless, genuine, sharp, and miraculous, that, all my friends, family, and myself, have often caught ourselves just swearing in sheer amazement; literally to such an extent, that we no longer even have the slightest desire to go to the theatre any longer. This is no joke. When I combine the new LG Cinema 3D screen with a Denon 3311CI receiver and extra-large Sony speakers in a 7.1 surround-sound setup, the resulting experience is "better" than visiting an advanced Harkins 3D Theatre.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 13, 2012 3:04:46 PM PDT
BornSlippyZ says:
I have not seen the LG 3D tv but the best tv's I have seen to date for 3d are the Panasonic VT plasma. But honestly there isn't a tv that comes close to a front projector setup. Sure entry price is more $$$, but if you have a room dedicated to home theater, this is the way to go IMHO.
I will agree Denon Avr's are great and I am upgrading to 4311ci or
going with Anthem MRX 700. I have some hungry KLF 20's (Klipsch) and I will be getting a new Paradigm center channel/in ceiling surrounds. Anyhoo, you should check out an actual home theater shop, non big box store, and look at some Sony projectors.

Posted on Apr 15, 2012 3:31:11 PM PDT
Kevin says:
Loved your review. Glad that someone actually reviewed the update which is what we all want to know. You did an incredible job with that.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 15, 2012 11:56:31 PM PDT
Mark Barry says:
Thanks to you all...

Over here in Blighty - there's been so many programs on the event that the public are saturated with the tragedy. Some of them have admittedly been good (mostly factual accounts), but others have been bad - and even worse - ever so slightly exploitive. I mention all of this because re-watching Cameron's "Titanic" on that huge screen with all that 3D effort he put into it - in hindsight I'm reminded of how 'right' he got it.

I'm still not 100% sure that 3D will last and isn't just a fad the film-companies have resurrected because there's money in it - having said that - if you want to see what the format
'can' do (and in the hands of a master/fully-commited filmmaker) - then see "Titanic" in 3D at the cinema if you can.


Posted on Apr 16, 2012 9:53:37 AM PDT
Ken Volok says:
Nice review overall but you shoot yourself in the foot when you complain about some objects or characters being in sharp focus while others around them are not in focus. That is called.. FOCUS! To be more precise the other characters or objects are out of the focal plain, of which each shot only has one. the more light, the greater your field of depth, less light, less space to move around and still be in focus. There will never be any getting around this either because your eye can only focus in one plain at a time.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 19, 2012 5:42:03 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Apr 19, 2012 5:45:51 AM PDT]

Posted on Aug 30, 2012 8:26:46 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Sep 3, 2012 1:37:03 PM PDT
Holy Macarone! What a "straight from the heart review"! You have convinced me to get a copy of the Titanic 3D movie.

I look forward to your upcoming reviews of the great 3D movies. They are enjoyable to have.

Thank you Mr. Berry.

Lorenzo L. Llanillo

Posted on Sep 6, 2012 6:54:50 AM PDT
Mr. Barry,
Titanic is one of my favorite movies, and you've convinced me to preorder the 3D Blu Ray. Thank you for the truly awesome review. I can picture every scene as you describe it and can hardly wait to see it in 3D. Thanks again. Ginger
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next ›