476 of 622 people found the following review helpful
Decent, but uses far too many cliches of historic fiction.,
This review is from: The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Classic Pew and Worship Edition, Black) (Hardcover)
With possibly one of the strongest opening lines in history, the Holy Bible really starts off swinging. Here we're not only introduced to the main character, named God, but are also informed that he's some sort of magical being (whether that's a vampire or a wizard or something, we don't know yet - we just know he can fly and shoot laser beams). The prose in this section is simply top notch, and you'll find that the action, atmosphere and language of the Holy Bible are carried off with a master's touch. But accompanying this impressive show of skill is also one of the book's greatest flaws: Verbosity. One of the first things they teach you in any writer's workshop is that every word in a novel should be integral to the story; never leave anything in that doesn't absolutely need to be there. So, while we as readers start the book all sweeping through demons and darkness like Ronnie James Dio - rocking out and firing lightbeams and building people out of dirt - it all quickly gets bogged down in unnecessary detail.
As readers we're enthralled by the mystic action; wondering exactly what kind of creature this God is, why he has these powers and what on earth he's going to do with them, and then all of a sudden we're pulled out of the action and forced to sit idly while the author describes an entire week (day by day) in God's life. I mean, that's great and all that we're getting some backstory on his character, but honestly, what happened with paragliding through Hell? I don't really care what your Wednesdays are like, or on which days you like to rest - get back to the action! Jesus, if we wanted to hear about your day, we would read your LiveJournal, Christ.
Due to the presence of these tangents, a lot of readers won't stick around for the meat of the story, and that would certainly be a shame because once it gets going, it really is one of the most exciting reads around (just to give you an idea of how good it is, the book has apparently gathered such an intense fanbase that some people give it away for free on the streets!). The first half of the book, called the Old Testament, is really more about getting a feel for the setting than it is advancing the story. During this time we get a glimpse of God's troubled past and are witness to a few key events that really allow the depth of the character to shine through (he's kind of a dark anti-hero; quick tempered and sometimes spiteful - but much like Julia Roberts in Pretty Woman, he actually has a heart of gold deep down).
The author takes this set-up time to explore the world thoroughly. But while even supporting characters are given their moment to shine, sometimes that gets distracting. For example, during Moses' adventures, we come to relate to him as a troubled sort of everyman. Sure, he was adopted by royalty, but he never really became complacent. He saw the mistreatment and suffering of the people around him, and he was moved into taking action. All good so far, right? It's kind of like Footloose or a Bruce Springsteen song: It's all about the plight of the working man. (And honestly, who exemplifies the working man more than slaves? All they do is work!)
It's a simple little story of class conflict and redemption, and then, almost without warning, everything suddenly gets magical: Oceans are parted, flaming shrubbery starts yelling at dudes and, in what is one of many disturbingly phallic metaphors littered throughout the book, Moses and the Pharaoh's magicians start slinging about their "snakes" and "staffs" to see whose is bigger. It's all quite exciting and imaginative, but it feels kind of like a bait and switch: We came into Moses' story reading The Grapes of Wrath, then wham! Moses finds out he's a Jew and everything goes Harry Potter.
In all fairness, the Jews are a notoriously magical people.
After what seems like 400 years, the Holy Bible finally finishes the setup phase and launches us into the main tale, where we meet our central character for the first time - even though it's still God. Sort of. It gets a little confusing, frankly: Our protagonist, God, is somehow also a character named Jesus Christ, who is the son of God and- listen, it's never quite clear what the genealogy is, or how God is his own son or anything (and what's up with the ghost?) but a lot of the set-up just has to be taken on faith. Now, the character of Jesus may not be the most original creation (he's kind of amalgam of three other prominent protagonists: The "awakened man" complex, like Neo from the Matrix; a bit of Superman's down home heroics; and an oddly compelling dash of Timothy Leary's "freaking out the squares" mentality) but he's oddly endearing nonetheless.
And it's a good thing Jesus is such a likable protagonist, because his cast of supporting characters seems utterly disposable at times. No sooner are you introduced to an intriguing new character than the author brutally murders them in some bizarre fashion, for no real reason and often with little to no impact on the story itself. The character of John the Baptist, for example, was a personal favorite of mine. He read like a kind of gruff bearish figure (I mentally cast him as John Goodman) and his presence lent the book an almost whimsical twist. But just as I was getting attached to him, the author has him beheaded almost as a footnote!
This is all we John the Baptist fans get for a death scene: "And he sent, and beheaded John in the prison."
The Holy Bible kills off supporting characters like horror movies kill black people. Listen, I know that was kind of a spoiler, but it's quite hard to review a book like this without spoiling something: The plot twists, turns, snakes and gyrates like Axl Rose on ecstasy. John's death was a minor spoiler, but there are some big ones I'm avoiding here (hint: Watch for Zombies!). So, without going further into details that might spoil the work, just know that The Holy Bible is a rompin' stompin' fantasy adventure full of subtle morality and intricate allegory the likes of which we haven't seen since The Lord of the Rings trilogy.
Really, there are only a few criticisms I have: The sections where the author obviously forces their own political agenda into the story are rather distracting (at one point the whole story grinds to a halt so the Jesus character can give some sort of "sermon" on this "mount"-like thing that is little more than liberal propaganda extolling the benefits of a welfare state) and at times it seems like it could've used an editor with a heavier hand (1100 pages long?! Who do you think you are, David Foster Wallace?). I must say that overall, the Holy Bible is a story everybody should read at least once. Just keep in mind that though this may seem like your run of the mill fantasy adventure, there are a myriad of vicious maulings, explicit torture scenes, rape and prostitution, so it's definitely not for children!
Oh, and though there are some hints of a sequel (a Second Coming is mentioned a few times), I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you - no official deals have been signed at this time.
So, in summation, I'd give the Holy Bible four out of five.
Tracked by 10 customers
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 77 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Feb 18, 2010 1:36:40 AM PST
Peter Durfee says:
First-rate review; really illuminating. The sort of thing Henry Raddick would have written if he'd gone in for longer essays. Thanks!
Posted on Feb 18, 2010 2:42:28 PM PST
Ian Quinn says:
Kudos, sir and/or ma'am. Kudos.
Posted on Feb 20, 2010 12:48:59 PM PST
J. Mitchell says:
Fantastic review, possibly the best I've ever read.
Posted on Mar 31, 2010 6:30:42 PM PDT
louis smith says:
Posted on Apr 1, 2010 5:08:34 PM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Apr 2, 2010 5:17:53 AM PDT]
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 10, 2010 7:43:23 PM PDT
JD Erickson says:
I'd bet God has a better sense of humor than you.
Posted on Jun 9, 2010 10:13:28 AM PDT
P. McCarthy says:
Posted on Jun 25, 2010 2:54:32 PM PDT
Sharon Davis says:
Did you read this Bible for a literature course in high school or college? If so, this is probably why the book seems like gory fantasy.
The Bible has several authors that wrote it over a 1,500 year period, not one. This edition, like most other versions, probably has one editor, but definitely not one author. The Bible is really 66 books combined into one with two major sections: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament consists of books written prior to Christ, while the New Testament contains books written after His life and death (and subsequent resurrection).
Try reading it again sometime without the idea in mind that it is fiction. You might be surprised at how much more sense it will make.
In reply to an earlier post on Jul 2, 2010 7:09:42 PM PDT
Sk Williams says:
He didn't have in mind that the Bible was fiction. The point of this Review is to mock and denigrate it.
Posted on Jul 3, 2010 11:06:01 AM PDT
J. Prather says:
This is the most accurate and amazing review I have ever read. Good job!