19 of 22 people found the following review helpful
the evidence speaks if you let it/Dr wood is right,very sane and has no axe to grind,
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11 (Hardcover)
I did NOT nor want to believe Dr Wood as I write this.
Something repels me from her analysis, for what she is essentially implying as indeed much more directly are many others who may have issues with her work or aspects of it IS that a network or group of highly-placed and very influential people out there (whoever they may be) fell so low and to such a level of treachery,perfidy, malice and sheer bare-faced evil that together they devised a fiendishly wicked plot and equally as sickening, deceitful and morally wicked, an on-going cover up so as to persuade the American public to support a general war on terror,a loss of their own civil rights and freedoms and 2 specific wars(so far) aimed at a false and malicious retribution,all this in addition to the mass murder of predominantly American citizens,including children, and high treason.
Let us make no bones about it.Dr Wood stays resolutely with the science and ONLY WITH THE SCIENCE for sure but if the science is correct and the burden of proof discharged,or is even enough to prove that the offical explanation could not have happened( and that terrorists used explosives is entirely untenable )then the charges above are total,unarguable,UNIMPEACHABLE and absolute.
9/11 was for me as for most of the world a deeply shocking event.To witness people allegedly celebrating what they saw as the come-uppance of the US Empire was equally as repulsive and like the vast majority I accepted that this was a terrorist attack but did not believe that an invasion of Afghanistan was warranted and protested the lack of real proof that Hussein in Iraq had any involvement whatsoever.This has since been accepted as the case with a public apology from the then US Secretary of State who himself was misled into presenting false evidence to the UN.
Several years passed until I read Prof Griffins "the New Pearl Harbour" wherein he makes a convincing case amongst much else that fire does not bring down sky-scrapers and never has.With the discovery of thermite material in the dust I consequently became slightly convinced through a lack of scientific background that a new explosive material had brought down the towers, having discounted the idea that fire and collison damage combined had been the cause-ignoring Tower 7- as indeed the NIST Report does, showing the structures to be highly redundant and deliberately constructed to withstand such a crisis.
But I needed to have a scientist with specific relevant skills and experience to help explain 9/11 to me and indeed was looking around and asking for some time until I heard of Judy Wood.Before however looking more closely at the book itself I want to address 2 specific related issues.Firstly ,Dr Wood and Richard Gage et al agree that the official explanation of pancake collapse is deeply and hopelessly flawed but disagree on the true cause.Wouldnt it be so helpful,sensible and more likely to bear fruit if the positive aspects of their agreement were emphasised and there was an understanding to disagree and to debate politely on the rest?Secondly, some people claim with some good reason that another investigation would just be another cover up and cite the HSCA into President Kennedys assassination as their example.Yet what else is there? Does anyone imagine that somehow criminal investigations will suddenly be opened into any of this?With President Obama having made numerous statements aimed at quenching the science and retaining the official fiction the very best that anyone can hope for beyond the court proceedings launched by Dr Wood- and where is this just now?-all that is left is another inquiry,this time one which is fully independent,properly financed and which has full powers of subpoena.
Possibly I have jumped the gun in this review by the comments above and should have written first that I find the science Dr Wood offers and the evidence she clearly lays out established proof that a new directed energy weapon pulverised the towers effectively turning them into dust in mid-air.There have been attempts to debunk Dr Wood claiming her seismic data is wrong,that toasted cars had been towed to FDR Drive and that she has underestimated the damage to the bathtub.Let us say there were something in any of these 3 claims, and she admits that the towing is possible though the evidence of nearbye Seaport explosions is purposefully omitted in the criticism.Her case,however, so much much wider than any of this, demonstrates a preponderance of evidence not simply that fire could not have brought down the towers and certainly not in the accepted time-frames but that the cause of this disaster was the employment of a highly classified top-secret new weapon- the new Hiroshima- which turned the towers into dust by molecular disassociation.Indeed the weight of evidence is so vast, wide-ranging and so clear-cut that the criticisms above are mere pin-pricks/cysts on an elephants backside in her overall assembly of the facts.Furthermore, it is very clear that Dr Wood whose training and experience in damage- cause observation increase further still the power of her understanding when wedded to her wholly relevant formidable scientific academic background wrote this book fuelled and driven by the DICTATES of conscience and that it is born from a deep scientific integrity so intrinsic to her very nature that she has felt it necessary to risk all,including ridicule from the intellectually lazy or dishonest, to get it out to a public which has been deliberately and wickedly kept in ignorance.This book is a massive work in every sense but still very readable by the non-scientist and is CERTAINLY the most important book of the last 100 years if not longer.Everything Prof Larsen claims in his powerful review is true and more.
Dr Wood has opened up 9/11 for us, FOLLOWING THE EVIDENCE AND LETTING THE DICE ROLL WHERE THEY MAY,without prisoners or hostages with brutal honesty and deep sensitivity,and is an inspired teacher......
Yes her conclusions are appalling,and make us recoil at every level from the foul disease which made this plot bud and which has sought ever since to cover it up.
Two final comments on other doubts about the book......
Firstly, some concern has been expressed about the chapter dealing with Hurricane Erin.Dr Wood reaches no final conclusions here and is completely open that a cold front was sweeping eastwards across the mainland towards New York.What however is striking is both the lack of weather information released to the American people about this huge hurricane running parallel to the US Eastern seaboard for several days,that it was so near to New York on 9/11 being visible in aerial photographs taken from there that day and the very abruptness and timing of the u turn it made and it is fitting and correct that this should be included in the book and adds to it.Secondly,similar concern has been expressed about the chapter "jumpers".If it does nothing else- and it does- this chapter brings home with an enormous jolt the reality of this tragedy and the very wickedness of what happened to ordinary people trapped in this building.Dr Wood, a trained observer,shows here from their behaviour and from the frequency of the jumping that something highly unusual beyond the appalling horrors of fire and smoke was going on within the building and that people were blown or swept out with enormous force and that no one carried anything and that others were disrobing.The criticism of her chapter seems to imply that its quite natural to jump from a burning building.In fact it's the very very last thing anyone would do and the suggestion that a queue of people desperate for oxygen pushed people some substantial distances from the towers sides entirely facile.
A TRUE SCIENTIST OF THE GALILEO TRADITION.....
An extraordinary work,a massive achievement, a profound demonstration of courage.....
Thank you Judy Wood.
Tracked by 3 customers
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-7 of 7 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Mar 19, 2012 8:22:04 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Mar 19, 2012 8:23:13 PM PDT
There's no hope of an impartial enquiry into 911 in this generation or many to come. The entire game is owned by a cabal of evil. Not even the Supreme Court would look at Judy Wood's testimony. 911 was a coup d'etat that firmly sealed control of the international system by a military-industrial-banker cabal that now operates above all laws: the politicians are merely soldiers in suits now. Only through whistle blowers like Judy Wood can the truth come out for we adults who know the score...but don't expect anyone in authority to lay the blame where it belongs: the foxes own the chicken coop.
In reply to an earlier post on Mar 25, 2012 4:49:45 PM PDT
In reply to an earlier post on Mar 25, 2012 7:33:15 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 29, 2012 8:09:13 PM PDT
By definition a "cabal" is an organisation of intriguers, hence they keep their identity a closely guarded secret. We can speculate who they are, but without solid evidence it is hard to pinpoint their actual names until or if they are exposed. For now, it is enough to know they exist- the evidence of 911 affirms that such a cabal must exist because they used a secret weapon against their own people and blamed it on someone else as a pretext to initiate an endless war and to instigate the Patriot Act, radical NDAAs and new military-legal jurisdictions that incrementally increase martial powers. The Bush-Cheney-Rice-Rumsfeld administration (and/or other members of that administration, military, intelligence, financial and weapons technology associates of that administration around the world) are circumstantial suspects because they were in power at the time, but actual culprits may take generations to uncover, especially as Obama has shown a tendency to support the official version of events. If the very federal leadership is intimidated or controlled by "them", it will be difficult indeed to identify who "they" are for the time being. Judy Wood has her own very good reasons to call 911 "the new Hiroshima". I prefer to call it "the new burning of the Reichstag" because it introduced a draconian, militant order by stealth.
Footnote: The fact that most of the "hijackers" were identified as Saudis- key American allies- lends one to deduce that at least some elements of Saudi intelligence played a key role in the conspiracy- or perhaps Israeli agents pretending to be Arabs- or perhaps Arab-American CIA agents. Given that most of the alleged hijackers were identified as Saudi citizens, it begs the question of why the US government failed to scrutinize the Saudis at all. Having Arabs (or pretend Arabs) involved would have been a very effective smoke-screen. Usama Bin Laden, was a useful asset as the Orwellian 'bogey man', but was then liquidated as his usefulness diminished and as it suited the political agenda. The main aim- of getting contractors into the Middle East to sieze oil, minerals and other commodities and for weapons development corporations to profit from various war efforts- was successful and will continue long into the future, although in a more clandestine fashion. "Sacrificing" 3000 civilians in New York was a price these psychopaths were happy to pay.
Disclaimer: All of my comments here are my opinion and not to be attributed to those of the author or of this reviewer.
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 10, 2012 4:25:05 PM PDT
Thanks Michael but I prefer history or psychology books over fiction.
"For now, it is enough to know they exist- the evidence of 911 affirms that such a cabal must exist because they used a secret weapon against their own people and blamed it on someone else as a pretext to initiate an endless war and to instigate the Patriot Act, radical NDAAs and new military-legal jurisdictions that incrementally increase martial powers."
Sorry Michael that's a very vague answer at best-especially as you noted yourself there not enough solid evidence and simply saying that a "cabal must exist" does not make it so. By the way I read online that Ms. Wood had been in a coma for six years due to an accident some years ago thus, using your logic I must assume that it must be so. Now, what I do know, is that severe head injuries can-and do cause-changes in behavior and cognitive thought disturbances.
We already know that 9/11 was planned and prepared by radical Islamicists.
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 10, 2012 7:08:39 PM PDT
I've stoppped feeding the troll.
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 11, 2012 6:04:35 AM PDT
In reply to an earlier post on Jan 19, 2014 10:48:12 AM PST
Just thinking out loud to no one or any point in particular as I have not read the book yet but have been reading on Dr. Wood's site and have been listening to interviews. I know she is so rigorous, admirably so, in following where the evidence leads and, as such, does not fall into the trap of speculation. This is what I am fighting as I move to a more logical appreciation of the discipline she has shown. What I cannot avoid is the fact that this seems to be a demonstration that was not only a psyops on the American people but, perhaps, also a demonstration to the rest of the world of what this power structure has at their disposal. The implications of this are very disturbing. And yet, so much of the truther info did nothing to allay my fears about the present. The logical dissertation and analysis of what has happened put forth by Dr. Wood have actually given me a sense of peace about all this. That there is a need to see things as they really are gives much power to those willing to wake up and see through the deceit. Just thinking and rambling aloud, as it were.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›