Customer Review

151 of 161 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Best All Around Camera On The Planet, December 17, 2010
This review is from: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 16.05 MP Live MOS Interchangeable Lens Camera with 3-inch Free-Angle Touch Screen LCD and 14-140mm HD Hybrid Lens (Black) (Electronics)
Now I know that is a bold statement and I intend to back it up. However, before I do I need to explain what I mean. I am not saying this camera is the best at everything or even anyone thing. Cameras that are the best at something are usually specialized beasts that can really only do that one thing well. What I am talking about is a camera the is so good in so many categories that it can joyfully be used for just about and photographic or video graphic purpose you may have. The GH2 is that camera.

Now that is out of the way we can get to the meat and potatoes of the review. I shoot mostly Nikon and Panasonic and I primarily shoot stills. I dabble in Video but do not proclaim myself any sort of an expert. I can say if you are looking for the best handling combo/cam with the most features then the GH2 is the one you want. Panasonic went out of its way to make this a video camera so that was its primary focus with this camera. However, there are lots of payoffs for the stills part of this camera so this is the best m4/3 stills camera by a long shot also. I will also say that the hard core video market is a niche market compared to the stills market because shallow depth of field video is hard to shoot properly and hard to edit. The average home user has neither the time nor inclination to properly storyboard and shoot this type of video. However, with that said, it is really nice to be able to shoot stills and video. And basic home videos are a snap to shoot with this camera; much more so than any other DSLR with the exception of the Sony SLT A55/33 which at least has a fast auto focus also. To shoot nice home movies, put the mode dial to iA, press the red button, and you are shooting video.

This camera is the next generation of cameras as it successfully blends the advantages of Point and Shoot cameras with the benefits of DSLRs and creates and incredibly small and powerful camera. Listed below are some of the benefits and weakness you get from this next gen camera.

What's Hot

The handling on the GH2 is bar none the best handling "DSLR" on the market. WIth smart controls, great layout, fast autofocusing, swivel screen, full time double live view, etc. Even with how good the D7000 is, it still feels clunky after using the GH2. I get into most of the details of this down below so I don't want to repeat the info here. What I will say here is that you can do things with this camera you couldn't hope to do with DSLRs and you can generally set up your photo parameters much faster with this camera. The menus on the GH2 are not very good. However, the actual camera controls are so good you will rarely even need to use the menus.

Program Shift - Forget using Aperture priority with this camera. You can leave the camera in Program mode. With program shift you can change the aperture setting and thus the shutter speed while in program mode. To do this you press the shutter release button down half way to set the exposure. Then if the numbers are in yellow you just rotate the rear dial switch to change aperture. Want a shallower depth of field or faster shutter speed, then dial in a bigger aperture (smaller number). If the numbers are not in yellow then you are currently in exposure compensation mode. All you have to do is click the rear dial switch and then rotate it. Snap. What a neat feature.

Extra Tele Convert (ETC) Mode in Video - If you shoot video you are going to love this. This is even great for home/casual video shooters. The GH2 has a 16mp sensor but like every other consumer combo/cam shoots 2K video. That means the picture is usually down-sampled to make it 2K. This has some pluses and minuses. Enter the GH2. With the ETC mode the camera uses only 2K of the sensor. This gives you an extra 2.6x crop factor. Which means your total crop factor is now 5.2x. So that brand spanking new 100-300mm you just got is now 520-1560mm with no light loss. If you put a Nikon 135mm f2 then you now have a 702mm f2! lens for video. There are some drawbacks for using ETC also but they are pretty negligible.

Auto focus - the auto focus on the GH2 is twice as fast as the GH1 and the GH1 was the fastest of previous generation. I have seen some very knowledgeable photographers saying it is as fast as mid-level DSLRs. While I think it is supposed to be a complement I don't think it is a very good comparison. I find the focus speed of DSLRs has most to do with what lens you have on. There are some lenses that focus slowly on even a D3. All of the lenses I have used on the GH1 focus very quickly except the 45-200mm. That lens tends to be my slowest. Non of the lenses I have focus as fast as a 70-200mm f/2.8 but the rest of them focus as fast if not faster than any of the other Nikon lenses I own. The best I can say about this is that you won't notice the focus speed on the GH2 as it is fast enough to get out of your way.

Smaller lighter camera - I recently went on a trip to Egypt and carried nothing but my Panasonic gear. Two camera bodies, 5 lenses, 1 flash, an iPad, and camera bag. Total weight 10lbs (3lbs of that was the bag itself). My Nikon D300 and 14-24mm lens would have weight more just by themselves (I was carrying the Panasonic 7-14mm so I did have wide covered)

Swivel Screen with full-time live view - You won't know what you are missing until you become used to this and how well it works. Want to reach up as high as you can and shoot down; No problems. Want to get as low as possible but can't lay down in the mud or water; No problem. Want to take a picture of you and your daughter but there is nobody around; No problem. Turn the screen around aim the camera at you and use the screen to frame. Something that makes photos interesting is showing the viewer something from a perspective they don't often see. The swivel screen actively encourages this. The other thing the swivel screen does is make shooting from a tripod a joy. Because of how small and light this camera is you can use a much smaller tripod. I have a 3lb tripod that can support 7lbs. Also, you can now set you camera up in all sorts of whacky positions and just rotate the screen to be able to frame and focus. Very nice. Also, with no mirror to flip up you don't have to worry about any vibrations.

Touch Focus implemented as slick as on the iPhone. As I mentioned above you can shoot from many strange angles because you can swivel the screen to almost any angle. However, if the camera did not focus on what you wanted it would be hard to change it. Now you can simply touch the screen on what you want to focus and presto it will focus on that. The GH2 is worth the price just for that.

WYSIWYG - What you see is what you get. Since you are looking at either the screen or the beautiful EVF, you are seeing what the sensor sees. With a DSLR you are seeing what the lens sees. This is an important difference. If you forgot to reset your WB or Aperture or any camera setting, you will see it before you shoot. On a DSLR you would have no idea until you looked at the pictures. Also, if it is a low light situation, the EVF will start to noise up and start to lose some of its smoothness. This is a warning to you that you need to use flash or a tripod. With a DSLR the viewer becomes darker but you don't get a very good visual cue of how your camera is seeing it. For me the most brilliant thing with WYSIWYG is setting exposure. Because I can see what the camera is doing with exposure, I usually leave the camera in P mode. Then I change the exposure by changing where I aim the camera, lock the exposure and then reframe for the subject. It works something like this. I am trying to take a picture of a person but the exposure is picking up to many bright objects, thereby dimming my subject. So, I aim the camera to include more dark areas while keeping my subject in the shoot. Then I press the shutter release button down half way to lock the exposure and focus. Then I reframe back to the original photo. This works so quickly you can try several exposures in less time than you could set one with the exposure compensation dial (which is actually exceedingly well executed on this camera also.) In a DSLR, since you don't see the exposure, you are just basically guessing at what you want and then shooting, view the photo and fix. Much slower.

Shoot about any lens you want - The distance from the lens to sensor is so short, that with the appropriate adaptor, you can put just about any lens you want on this camera. Canon, Nikon, Leica, Voigtlander, Pentax, Sony, you can use them all. Generally you need to use lenses which have aperture rings. Additionally, you do lose autofocus but there are many instances where this just doesn't matter. Macro photography is a good example. You can fit a Nikon 200mm f/4 onto the GH2 and then either get a 2:1 reproduction or a 1:1 reproduction with twice the depth of field. It is like putting on a teleconverter without the loss of light and depth of field. Brilliant.

Great for Newbies - All DSLRs are easy for anyone to use and the GH2 is no exception. The great handling makes the GH2 better for newbies in my opinion. Anyway, all you have to do is put the camera into iA mode and start shooting. This camera gets the subject correct more often then not and will make you look good. In dynamic situation, I actually use the iA mode quite a bit. I do this because the camera is good a recognizing as scene as a person, flower, scenery, etc. The camera then instantly sets numerous setting to make that scene look as good as possible. If you tried to do it yourself it could take a few minuets to set and then a few to set back. Or even worse you forget to reset it and you next pictures look bad. If I have time, then I will set the camera myself. My daughter has been using the GH1 since she was 2. Here hit rate initially was only about 10% usable picture and 1% good pictures. Her hit rate now is about 70% usable pictures and 20% good pictures with about 5% really nice pictures. She has such a different perspective that it is really interesting to see how she views the world.

Image Quality - I am reluctant to put this in the review because all modern cameras have such good IQ that it really is not relevant in most cases and any discussion encourages pixel peeping instead of photo making. I will say, if you are using this camera to make pictures to view on your monitor, or publish on the web, or print 8x10s this camera will more than meet your needs and if you do your part make some really nice photos. The GH1 has been my go to camera for the past two years and I have made some amazing pictures with it. The GH2 is better. You can argue the merits of FX vs DX vs M4/3 until you are blue in the face but the fact of the matter is it just doesn't matter in todays age and each year it continues to matter less and less. All cameras have their limitations and part of being a good photographer is know what those are and shooting around them. As far as ISO goes, with the GH1, ISO 800 was the highest I would shoot except in an emergency. With the GH2, ISO 1600 shoots clean (better than 800 on GH1) and 3200-6400 are perfectly usable.

Stills while shooting Video - The GH1 would not let you take a still photo while shooting video. The GH2 allows you to take a 14mp 16x9 picture while shooting video. So now you can be taking video and when you see something you want a still photo of just press the shutter release and now you have a photo. Brilliant.

5 fps full 16mb resolution and 40fps 4mp pictures for up to 1 second - Here is a feature I have not really seen anyone talking about. This camera has become a fantastic sports camera. It will shoot full resolution at 5 fps which is pretty pedestrian but still more than adequate for most sporting events. The 7D and A55 shoot 7 and 10 respectively. However, the GH2 pulls a trick out of its hat with an electronic shutter that will shoot 4mp pictures 40fps for up to 1 second. Now for those of you who think 4mp is yesterdays news. That is a 2400x1600 size photo. That is good enough to print a 12x8 photo from. Combine this with the fantastic new 100-300mm lens and you can shoot 40fps at 200-600mm equivalent. Wow.

I can go on and on but this review is getting too long already. Some of the features I haven't talked about are Aspect Bracketing, Advanced Scene Mode, My Color Mode, Film Mode, Face Recognition, Fn1-3 button (Function) and the C1-3 modes (Custom Modes). You can really tell that someone who enjoys making pictures designed the layout and handling for this camera. There are not a lot of cameras out there that can make that claim.'
What's Not

1/4000 top shutter speed and 1/160 flash sync speed - Panasonic has given us a partial Electronic shutter on the GH2. They were supposed to have released a full electronic shutter but instead wasted research resources on the fad know as 3D. A full electronic shutter, as we are likely to see in the GH3, will probably have a shutter speed of 1/16000 and a flash sync speed around 1/2000-1/4000. Also, it is like to be able to shoot 24+ fps for as long as the card can stand.

Construction - The switches are a cheap feeling plastic. Please panasonic put some nice metal or composite switches on this camera. I never had it fail on my GH1 but I was always worried and careful of it. This is a bit of a double edged sword as the current construction keeps the camera very light and as I said I have had no troubles with the GH1. However, The mode nob rotates too easily. When I am pulling the camera out of the camera bag I often accidentally rotate the mode nob.

Panasonic Flashes are outdated, lacking in multiple features and are heinously expensive. You may wonder the relevance of this in a camera review but if you seriously want to make nicely lit indoor pictures you are going to want a flash.

3 years into M4/3 and we are still missing critical lenses - 12mm f/1.4 25mm f/1.4 45mm f/1.4 35-100mm f/2.8 300mm f/4 300mm f/2.8 1.4/1.7/2.0 Teleconverters. All MIA. This and the flashes are the only thing really holding the M4/3 system back as a dominant professional system. To shoot events and wedding you really need the fast glass for the shallow depth of field and for catching special moments in poor lighting.


The GH1 in my opinion was a truly revolutionary camera for its day and was the best all around camera on the planet. The GH2 continues the revolution and has added some amazing new features such as touch screen, 40fps shooting speeds, ETC mode, hi ISO shooting, and the list just goes on and on. Frankly, there is not another camera that can even come close to doing all of the things this camera is capable of. It is the new best all around camera on the planet.

40 fps 4mp shooting for up to 1 sec
Touch screen focusing
Blazing fast auto focus -- twice as fast as the already fast GH-1
Clean Pictures up to 1600 ISO -- Same as D700
Best video in a combo-cam to date
Most shooting modes of any combo-cam
ETC 2.6x extra crop factor turning your 100-300mm into a 520-1560mm video lens
Multi-aspect 18mp (16 mp per aspect) sensor
Best M4/3 sensor - delivering clean images at 1600 and useable to 6400 thanks to the 3 venus microprocessors for video
IMHO Pound for pound, dollar for dollar, the best all around camera on the planet

Still only 1/160 flash sync speed
Still only 1/4000 max shutter speed
3D is a Fad -- No one wants to have to find/wear some goofy glasses to watch TV or read a book all of the time. There are good 3D picture solutions that don't require glasses but they are expensive.
3years into M4/3 and the format is still missing critical lenses. 12mm f/1.4 25mm f/1.4 45mm f/1.4 35-100mm f/2.8 300mm f/4 300mm f/2.8 1.4/1.7/2.0 Teleconverters. All MIA.

Stills Purchasing Thoughts

Panasonic GH2 with 14-140

If you buy a M4/3 system then you are going to want this superzoom as your all around lens. This lens cost $750 by itself. This means if you don't already own this lens you are faced with a tough decision. The GH1 with 14-140mm lens is selling for $950-1000. If you buy the GH1 now and then wait six months to buy the GH2 body, you should be able to get that for around $700 at that time. Then you would have two superb cameras for only $200 more than the GH2 system today. The downside is, while the GH1 is still a great camera it is not in the league of the GH2. If you do opt for this system, then the sister lens is the 100-300mm lens. This would give you a 35mm equivalent coverage of 28mm-600mm with only 2 lenses. Very very nice.

Panasonic GH2 with 14-42

This is the system that I bought simply because the body only was not available when I ordered. The 14-42 is probably Panasonic's worst lens. Optically it is fine but the construction is not up to the standards of Panasonic's other lenses. I would avoid this combo and buy the GH1 with the 14-140 lens for the same price as this camera. Then down the road buy the GH2 body only or wait for the GH2 body only. If you are just burning to have a GH2, and you only have $1000 to spend then you can still set up a good system. Get this, and the 45-200mm lens for a total of $1300. Those two lenses cover you from 28-400mm and should serve just about every need.

Panasonic GH2 Body Only

Great for anyone who already has M4/3 lenses or anyone just wanting to shoot with Leica lenses.

Video Purchasing Thoughts

Buy the GH2--period dot. There is no other consumer combo cam on the planet that can even come close to the GH2.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Tracked by 8 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 40 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Dec 17, 2010 9:05:05 PM PST
W. Nicholls says:
I just bought a D7000 because Panasonic has nothing remotely comparable to Nikon's (or Canon's) flash system. And the lens lineup for Micro Four Thirds is decidedly consumer-oriented. The small sensor needs some really fast aperture lenses for creative depth of field control. That need isn't filled by using adapters with non MFT lenses in manual mode. Panasonic's menu interface has a lot of room for improvement. I like my Panasonic G-series cameras. They're great for travel. Image quality is good enough. But if you need more than the shallow MFT system can deliver you're hosed without another camera system in your stable.

Posted on Dec 18, 2010 2:53:50 AM PST
I haven't seen better color rendition that that by GH2, at ANY price!

Posted on Dec 18, 2010 7:01:36 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 18, 2010 7:53:44 PM PST
Joseph Ogiba says:
I was going to get the Canon 60D body to use with my Pentax K mount lenses from 6.5mm to 2350mm but after seeing the first reviews comparing it to the new GH2 I decided to get the GH2 instead and wow they were right. After I charged the battery I shot a 1080p24 HD test video in 24L 17mb/sec mode and was shocked at how much better it was to the other HDSLRs in sharpness and detail. I bet in the higher 24H 24mb/sec mode it would match my Panasonic HDC-TM700 3MOS camcorder in 1080p60 mode when viewed on a large monitor or HDTV. Here are links to that video on youtube and Vimeo that has the native 1080p24 MTS 93mb file available for download that looks better on a large HDTV.

My GH2 with 50mm F1.4 Pentax FA lens:

First test Panasonic GH2 with Rokinon 85mm F1.4 @ F1.4 , 160iso, 1/50 sec in 1080p24 24H 24mb/sec mode. This was in total darkness of the dash in my 2010 Honda Fit Sport.

Fire trucks:

photo of my GH2 w/85mm F1.4:

Posted on Dec 19, 2010 10:16:40 AM PST
John M. Koch says:
These early rave reviews are written by folks who cannot have owned the devices longer than, what, two weeks?

Of course, anyone' who just sent >$1,000 on a new camera better think that he or she just made the best of all possible choices. Heaven forbid any second thoughts!

I don't own one, but would not hazard writing a review of any camera I'd not used extensively, or whose video features I'd not confirmed until after completing several edited projects. These days, it probably also makes sense to postpone purchase until the manufacturer issues the first of what often turns out to be several firmware updates. Finally, in the case of the GH2, I see a cautionary zinger (look below).

The GH2 may appeal to a prosumer, but newbies and first-time DSLR-type buyers should be cautious about some things:

1) It's only slightly smaller the entry DSLRs, yet costs more. For the price differential, you could buy another good DSLR lense (or more, if used). Those protruding lenses have weight, bob about, and are as fun to travel with as a beer gut, hernia truss, or cranky pet monkey.

2) Lack of "fast" telephoto lenses. The 300mm zoom lens (separate purchase & expensive) is OK for outdoor daytime use, but will produce blurry shots of a winter indoor sports event, or require a tripod for evening shots.

3) The tele Convert (ETC) mode in video uses less sensor space, which means fewer photons and weaker low light results. Outdoors in daytime, it might be good for zoom shots, but it's not any help indoors or with low light. The argument that the qualty is better because there is no downsampling has yet to be demostrated in professional reviews. Some dedicated videocams have 2 megapixel sensors without prompting anyone to say this, per se, accounts for superior video. Blu-rays based on RED or IMAX 8K based on large sensors, or sourced from 35mm or 70mm film, gets downsampled to 1920x1080, yet they look good. Perhaps there is less quality loss than with digital zoom, but there is still less light capture and loss of wide angle. While shooting a social event, you'd be better off in a "normal" mode.

4) Don't mess with AVCHD video unless you have a quad core PC. Don't meddle with the high bitrate 24p setting without a system on par with an i7 machine, if you intend to edit. It is all for naught if you share video via You Tube which compresses the video and sieves out much of the image quality Unless you plan to spend lots of time editing polished video works, you are better off with a model that shoots in an MP4 format that more machines can handle, yet still looks pretty good, even on You Tube.

5) Narrow depth of focus is not always a friend. It can even be a curse. Deep focus of ordinary videocams or smaller digicams is more convenient for on the go video shots of parties, vacations, holidays, or sports events. Narrow DOF increases the risk of being out of focus, particularly if you are in a scene with peope or objects moving about at assorted distances, cannot control or anticipate actions, and can't get a 2nd take. In darker settings, the AF weakens, and you get blurry results or are at the mercy of your manual skill at estimating distances and setting focus. Finally, it's simply not true that "great cinema" = narrow DOF. Consider "Citizen Kane." You can attan 90% of the de-focus effect with blur transitions or peripheral defocus toos in most editing kits, without the trouble of keeping subjects in narrow focus while shooting.

6) The zinger: the Mega OIS stabization is Panasonic's older stabilization technology. The newer Power OIS featured on its latest vidocams and P&S digicams is better and may appear in a new series of micro 4/3 lenses in late 2011.

The GH2 may be the "greatest camera in the world," for those with $1,500 or so to spend each year (or every nine months) on "the next great thing." Meanwhile, there are some good starter DSLR "kits" with two lenses for undr $800, and Panasonic itself offers a very good LX5 compact model which shoots good still photos, has a faster lens, and provides competent video for most needs. Panasonic's GF2 is smaller, cheaper, and easier to use. The competing Olympus devices also appear in some well-priced package offers that bundle some useful goodies.

One could also argue that "the world' greatest camera" is the kind featured in a cell phone, since the best pictures most people are apt to take are with the cameras they are most likely to carry and which present the fewest problems to use.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 19, 2010 10:40:00 AM PST
Joseph Ogiba says:
John M. Koch, you should get a job at Faux News. BTW stay with a point & shoot because you would not know what to do with a GH2.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 20, 2010 2:10:19 AM PST
shuTTL3bus says:
@W Nicholls,

I completely agree about the flashes and the lenses. In fact, here is a direct quote "This (lack of professional lenses) and the flashes are the only thing really holding the M4/3 system back as a dominant professional system." One thing I didn't mention is that Zeiss is making a pro-line of video lenses. So the video side is covered. It is the stills that is missing and that is being partially addressed by Voigtlander. However, I do think it is crazy that Panasonic is focusing on the niche video market and ignoring the far larger pro-stills market. I think Panasonic must have really been burned with the poorly conceived 4/3 system that they are hesitant to invest like they should in the well conceived M4/3 system. Also, I think Panasonic is really chasing a fad with the 3D stuff and that was other resources that were diverted away from stills. A brilliant as the GH2 is, it could have been dominating. If they fixed their flashes (radio wireless anyone) and introduced so pro-lenses, and gave some of their stuff to famous photos to use (Joe McNally, Bob Krist, Moose Peterson, David Hobby, Chase Jarvis, etc) then Nikon and Canon could be in real trouble. These two companies have been resting on their Lens Lines to keep them in business for a long time. If that got taken away from them, they would be in real trouble.

As far as the DOF, there are 3 variables that control DOF and they are Sensor Size, Aperture, and Distance. The sensor size is fixed so that leaves Aperture and Distance. Based on the sensor size, M4/3 would need a f/.70 to equal f/1.4 on 35mm. That is not going to happen any time soon. However, the Voigtlander 25mm f/.95 shoot really close and this has a huge impact and creates a tiny depth of field. It is a weakness of the m4/3 that it can't generate the same shallow DOF that 35mm can. However, it is also a real strength is that you get a wider DOF. When I used to shoot my kids at f/1.4 it was exceedingly difficult to get both of them in focus. Now with the wider DOF I can get them both in focus while still blurring the background. For Macro shooting, having 2x DOF is very welcome. Overall, I think the DOF is fine on M4/3 and is very useful in many instances.

What is really missing as you mentioned are the f/1.4 or faster lenses.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 20, 2010 2:13:21 AM PST
shuTTL3bus says:

Thank you for your comments. I have been amazed. I was just checking out the in camera NR and I am really impressed what Panasonic has been able to do. If you compare the NR +2 on DP Review compared to Nikon D7000, Pentax K5, Canon 7D, it is amazing what this camera can do to get rid of Noise. ISO6400 looks a little soft on GH2 but is utterly clean on NR+2 Colors are sooth and clean. Really really amazing.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 20, 2010 2:14:07 AM PST
shuTTL3bus says:
@Joseph Ogiba,

Thank you for your comments and links. I think they are really useful.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 20, 2010 3:06:48 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Dec 20, 2010 6:35:43 AM PST
shuTTL3bus says:
@John M. Koch,

Thank you for your comments. The GH2 has been out for a couple of months already. Also, I have owned a GH1 for almost 2 years and the GH2 is a new better GH1. Many of my comments are equally applicable to the GH1 and GH2. I also have shot extensively, Canon, Nikon, Leica, and Panasonic camera systems. Additionally, I have shot some Pentax and Sony systems so I think I have a pretty good feel and handle on camera systems. Additionally, two weeks is an eternity for evaluating a camera.

As far as delaying purchases waiting for firmware updates you bring up an interesting point. The fact of the matter is that cameras have become such powerful computing devices that there will inevitably be bugs. Just like computers, phones, etc. That is the price you pay for all of the technological benefits that enable one to do things with cameras today that would not even be possible in the past. Also, while there will probably be a update coming down the road, the camera works great now. Also, many of these firmware updates actually improve the performance of the camera. So I appreciate the fact the company works to improve their product even after they sell it. It would be completely different if a company foisted a non-functioning or malfunctioning camera onto the market (Nikon P7000). That is something I don't really appreciate. If you are going to wait until a camera is perfect then you will be waiting forever because there has never been and never will be a perfect camera.

As far as the zinger you plagiarized from someone, that person actually makes some relevant points and I will address all of them.

1) First off this person needs to compare apples to apples. A large part of the $1500 price is the lens. The 14-140mm steeples aperture utterly silent lens cost with OIS cost $750 by itself. The 18-55mm non OIS lens goes for $150 tops and is overpriced at that. Secondly, Panasonic sells their starter G10, and G2 for $400 and $600 respectively. Lastly, the GH2 is significantly lighter and can be significantly smaller. Take the Pani GH2 with the 20mm and compare that to the D3100 and the 35mm f/1.8 and you can see the difference. You can definitely feel the weight difference when you start toting 2 camera bodies and lenses with you.

2) The system does lack a fast telephoto and is something I criticized in the review. However, the 100-300mm at $600 is comparably priced to the 70-300mm from Nikon. It is smaller and lighter. Also, it reaches out to 600mm while the Nikon reaches out to 450mm. That is a pretty substantial difference. The Nikon 80-400mm reaches out to 600mm on a DX body but costs $2000 and weighs 4-5 times as much. As far a the speed of the 300, I have said time and again that Panasonic need a 300mm f/4 prime for this system. For Nikon they have a 200-400mm f/4 that would be 600mm on a DX body. But that lens cost $6000 and weighs 8x this lens. It is also only 1 stop faster. So that means if I were using ISO1600 for the 8lb $6000 lens then I would need ISO3200 on this 1lb $600 lens. The GH2 is well capable of that and can even pull down decent photos at ISO6400. You tell me how much you want to spend and how much weight you want to carry. Or you could opt for the $9000 10lb Nikon 400mm f/2.8. The choice is yours.

3) In my review I mentioned there are drawback to the ETC mode. One of those is the likely hood of increased noise. Got it. Whoever wrote this zinger completely misses the point of ETC when he says that you are better shooting a social even in "normal" mode. No doubt Captain Obvious. Usually, when you are shooting a social event you need to go wider not longer. So shooting ETC at a social event makes zero sense. However, when you are out at a football game in the nosebleed section or looking for birds or shooting animals, your 100mm-300mm lens is now a 520-1560mm lens. Also, if you don't like ETC you still have the option to shoot normal mode. Nobody is forcing you to use ETC.

4) To some extent I agree with this bullet. I shoot in 720p there is really no reason to shoot higher. Even standard def is good enough for most applications. However, he is not correct about AVCHD light. This compression scheme really shrinks video size and makes it easier to edit. MPEG format takes up much much more space. But he does touch on a good point. Everyone want more MP and 1080p but that eats a ton of hard drive space and processing power.

5) Absolutely correct. Shallow DOF video is difficult to shoot properly. However, if you have a fast auto focus as the GH2 does then it is much easier to shoot and you can use the GH2 for home movie style shooting. Just be aware that it will be much more difficult with the GH2 to keep subjects in multiple plains of focus in focus. However, the GH2 works fantastic for a travel stills camera and video recorder. It will save you from having to tote around another camera and worse yet charger.

6) Big deal. If you keep you shutter speeds up you don't even need OIS. Secondly, Nikon just went from their 1st Gen VR to 2nd Gen. They gained 1 stop and charge tons more. If you are waiting for the perfect system you will be waiting forever. Today's lenses work great and are here today. If you wait until late 2011 you will miss a whole year of shooting. Again your choice. I still use plenty of non-OIS lenses and my pictures still look great.

Again with the starter kits for <$800, they have much cheaper lenses than the 14-140mm. You can get the GH2 with an 14-42mm lens for $1k also. Also, you could get a G10 and 2 lenses for <$800 also.

I do agree the best camera is the one you have with you. However, camera phones lack so many abilities that I would not recommend that as an only camera for many people.

Finally, I would like to conclude with two points. First, if you are going to negatively criticize a review you should at least have the decency to read the review. You made many of the same points I did. Secondly, if you are going to quote me then you should do so accurately. I said and I quote "Best All Around Camera On The Planet". That is something different than "the world's greatest camera". If you had read my review you would know that.

Posted on Dec 20, 2010 9:38:41 AM PST
Very fast lens and even the tripod woud become absolete with future new sensors able to increase ISO sesitivity to the thousands. Why should we carry an heavy and expensive lens if we can just raise the ISO with a turn of a dial with comparable or acceptable results? It's been mentioned elsewhere that Gh2 capability of high ISO is superior to Gh1. I wonder if it's possible for the reviewer to comment about this superity of Gh2 over Gh1 especcially with respect to the Panasonic 100-300 zoom lens. Would the Gh2 yields acceptable quality at very high ISO?
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next ›

Review Details