Automotive Deals HPCC Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it Stephen Marley Fire TV Stick Health, Household and Grocery Back to School Handmade school supplies Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer TarantinoCollection TarantinoCollection TarantinoCollection  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Water Sports STEM
Customer Review

34 of 38 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Prints great X-rays, October 27, 2011
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Canon PIXMA MG8220 Wireless Inkjet Photo All-In-One Printer (5293B002) (Office Product)
We bought this printer to make hard copies of dental X-rays. It replaced a $1,000+ Xerox printer. The staff is very happy with it, they say the print quality is much better than the old Xerox, but it does take about 90 seconds to print a full page glossy X-ray at maximum quality. The old Xerox would take about 10 seconds to print the same image.

If high photo quality and fast business printing are a must I would look elsewhere, but if you can wait 60 to 90 seconds for a full page highest quality photo print - it is a great printer and well perfectly in our office.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-4 of 4 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 28, 2011 9:19:29 PM PDT
O. Lindo says:
Do you finished the first set of ink cartriges?
I'm wondering how much they last under your typical ussage.
TKS

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 9:53:41 PM PDT
The first set of cartridges went very fast, but I think this is because they are the 'starter' ink. We used up the gray cartridge in about a week and the first black one in about 2 weeks. I will know soon how fast it goes though these 2nd set of cartridges in about another 2 weeks or so. We print around 15 to 30 full quality x-ray images a day.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 3, 2014 9:28:45 AM PST
Digger says:
Are you still happy with this printer? We need it for the same thing, but for more like 3-4/week.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 3, 2014 11:52:44 AM PST
We switched to two Epson WorkForce Pro WP-4020. There was nothing wrong with the original Canon printer, but because we print so many x-rays the staff complained about having to keep replacing the cartridges. The WP-4020 has huge cartridges compared to the other printer. If your office only prints a few x-rays a week either printer will work fine. I do think the Canon might have a bit higher quality x-ray prints compared to the Epson, but only by a tiny margin. Good luck!
‹ Previous 1 Next ›