Customer Review

42 of 54 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Yet another remake of a classic story., August 21, 2007
Every era seems to have a connection to the "Body Snatchers" as there have been about 4 films so far that are based on the classic tale and it has spawned numerous similarily themed films and silly rip-offs (Invasion of the Pod People).

The first version and arguably the best is Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) which dealt with McCarthism. The next take on the classic came in 1978 with Invasion of the Body Snatchers and has become my favorite version of the tale. It focused on our need to be emotional even when it makes no sense, hence, the appearance of Leonard Nimoy in the film who built a career playing Spock, part emotionless Vulcan and part human, on Star Trek. Then there came Body Snatchers in 1994 and although that was a rather forgettable version, it did have something to say about the "me" and "greed" era of the 1980's.

Now we have "The Invasion" in which Nicole Kidman takes on Leonard Nimoy's supporting role in the 1978 version and makes it the starring role. She is well-supported by the new James Bond, Daniel Craig (Casino Royale, and even the actor who plays the new Felix Liter in the same Bond film. In addition, there is Jeremy Northam (The Net) who has made a nice career playing heavies, and in a moment of inspirational casting there is Veronica Cartwright playing a patient of Kidman's.

Cartwright was terrific in Alien (the first one) and has been in more supporting roles in film and television than I can remember. But why is she so memorable for being in this film? She was in the 1978 version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers with Donald Sutherland, Brooke Adams, and Leonard Nimoy. She is a consistently strong supporting actress and to see her return 30 years later in this remake is fun and it's nice that her role isn't some small cameo either.

The film itself is rather unremarkable even though it is enjoyable. I think it may end up being only a bit more remembered than the 1994 version of this tale only because of it's cast as the direction, effects, music, and photography are all rather pedestrian. In addition, many may recall this film for NOT having the infamous "pods" for which this tale is so well-known for. While this makes this take a bit unique, I think it's a flaw as it treats the invasion more as an infection and less than an interglatic fight to exist as we are and not as another being would have us be and that is ironically the focus of this film even though that isn't played up until near the end (as if it were an after-thought).

This tale continues to be haunting even with the lackadaisical approach here because this tale speaks to us in this era that seems to suggest that everyone not exactly like one group is wrong or bad. We have become in this era rather ethnocentric and this film lightly explores how if we were all alike there would be no more wars, distrust, hate and so forth, but for that kind of world we must give up our souls. In the end, this film attempts to redeem it's own pointlessness by throwing in the question of whether is it better to have wars over religion, status, wealth, etc. or have peace at the cost of not being who we are and our right to express that.

The film wastes the talents of all by only hinting on this theme rather than exploring it with more depth and sincerity as the previous versions explored their visions of paranoia, isolationism, and the deadening of emotions in an ever increasingly violent world. For this lack of seriousness and earnestness this film is all too much like the 1994 version which was more like this one in that it had a good cast and was appropriately chilling, but lacked significant punch and/or influence.

This film is mild popcorn fun and the whole family can see it, but don't expect it to hold up to the first two far superior versions of this timeless tale.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 20 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Aug 22, 2007 8:25:58 AM PDT
Persuasive review, Steve. I like comparing it to the one I just read by Chris P. Great point-by-point analysis. JP

In reply to an earlier post on Aug 22, 2007 9:54:11 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Aug 22, 2007 9:54:11 AM PDT]

Posted on Aug 25, 2007 5:29:52 AM PDT
D. Pawl says:
I was wondering how THE INVASION would fare with audiences. Your candid review is much-appreciated and was very well-written, Steve. It's hard to recreate a film that was so good the first time, as well as rich with references to the state of the society. Thank you for sharing your insight with us.

In reply to an earlier post on Aug 25, 2007 8:05:17 AM PDT
Dittos to D. Pawl. JP

In reply to an earlier post on Aug 25, 2007 10:39:37 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Aug 25, 2007 10:39:37 AM PDT]

Posted on Aug 26, 2007 11:49:16 AM PDT
- Kasia S. says:
I love your coverage on all the movies that touch on this subject, it makes your review richer than the rest.

Posted on Nov 5, 2007 7:01:27 AM PST
Khemin says:
This review confuses Veronica Cartwright with Angela Cartwright. While Veronica is in this movie and was also in "Alien," it was Angela Cartwright who was Penny in "Lost in Space" and Brigitta Von Trapp in "The Sound of Music."

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 6, 2007 4:49:41 AM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Nov 6, 2007 4:49:41 AM PST]

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 6, 2008 7:04:28 PM PST
Ed says:
I disagree. It's not only one of the better remakes of Invasion of the Body Snatchers but its also one of the better sci-fi remakes. This movie succeeds where the new War of the Worlds and Time Machine failed. Its too bad people are too stupid to get it tho. The only other Body Snatchers remake that came close was the seventies one but that was slow. The third remake was horrible. This one was atleast better than that gimme a break. As far as remakes go this is gold. People need to lower their standards just a tad. But I mean if you'd rather watch I Am Legend with that hack Will Smith thats your funeral.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 14, 2008 4:49:52 AM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Jan 14, 2008 4:49:52 AM PST]
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details

Item not available
Reviewer


Location: Somewhere "East of Eden"

Top Reviewer Ranking: 110,329