Your Garage Best Books of the Month Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc blink-182 Fire TV Stick Sun Care Patriotic Picks Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer AllOrNothingS1 AllOrNothingS1 AllOrNothingS1  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Segway miniPro
Customer Review

203 of 245 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars This is NOT the Duke Nukem I grew up with., June 14, 2011
= Fun:2.0 out of 5 stars 
This review is from: Duke Nukem Forever - PC (Video Game)
To quote Duke Nukem from this actual game... "FAIL TO THE KING, BABY"

Now I could nit pick about how bad this is... But I think other reviewers will get that just fine as I am not the only one that has been MAJORLY disappointed by this game. SO this will be MY personal single player experience with this... Turd of a game.

Some of the Duke Nukem humor and such is there but nothing I really haven't heard before. They really should have asked Bruce Campbell for some new quotes since it looked like the writers couldn't think of much of their own.

I don't know why people are complaining about graphics... Why would you only play a game for the graphics? The load times for me were around 15 to 20 seconds... So get better computers then. If sitting still for under a minute makes you fly into an uncontrollable rage fit then you need some professional help.

One of the FIRST things I noticed, in comparison to the other 3D Nukem games is that there are NO SECRET AREAS or end level Nukem buttons like Duke 3D, Zero hour, and Time to Kill. This actually pissed me off the most as one of the things I liked most in the Duke Nukem games was getting to explore the levels and find hidden bad guys and secret areas and buttons that do random things and reveal special areas... It gave it this little thing that current developers seem to forget about called RE-PLAYABILITY!!!!!!... "Unf unf unf unf Where is it!?!" But there is none of that in this game! You can only carry TWO weapons! No jet pack! The path you take is pretty much standard SUPER LINEAR C.O.D. and Bulletstorm knockoff with bits of Prey and Half Life 2 thrown in... In fact, my friend was watching me play and kept thinking I was playing a Half Life 2 mod.

There was really nothing new added in terms of bad guys or guns. The A.I.... Oh damn the A.I. is absolutely HORRIBLE! TERRIBLE! BEYOND BAD! At one point I saw some, now shirtless, pig cops and then backpedaled into a room with huge open double doors, and in the other room they just kept shooting and throwing pipe bombs at the wall. I let the game run for 30 minutes while I went off to play Duke Nukem Time to Kill on my ps1 (because I needed a healthy dose of good Duke to make up for all the bad Duke) and not a single one came into the room I was standing defenseless in the middle of. I think the developers said something along the lines of "We want the A.I. to feel like the 90s" In all honesty I think that was their way of saying, "We really don't want to put too much effort into making this a good game for a historic gaming series because people will buy it just for the name alone."

The game starts off Duke Nukem enough but then it loses it's nostalgia really quick... It was promising at the first level or two and felt like it would be an OK Duke Nukem game... So if you want to play an OK Duke Nukem game, just play though dukes Casino/Hotel level then sell the game or turn it off or return it to the place you rented it from... It felt like the developers spent more time on the first two or three levels than the rest of the entire game, and just sort of settled for whatever came along after that. If I had wanted to play around in Las Vegas and Hover Dam I would just play Fallout New Vegas instead because this game goes nowhere else! In other Nukem games you would go from Frankenstein Castle, to an alien ship in space, to the Wild West, to an urban area, to a submarine under water, to England, a duke burger, forward and backwards in time, and many other things. This game was the exact opposite and just too predictable, there was no excitement, no anticipation for what may come next.

The most this got out of me was a halfhearted chuckle at a very few moments in the game. It is nothing like the Classic Duke 3D games where I would bust up laughing at something I couldn't believe they got away with showing or doing. Though I think the part I laughed the most in this game was Duke and The glory hole. When you do this part, just jump up and down to see who, namely what gender, is actually in the stall next to you!

Even if this game came out 10 years ago, I would still be rather critical about it because it just doesn't feel Nukem enough. In car terms it would be like Wanting a New Ford Mustang GT and then getting a Rusty Ford Pinto instead.

-No Secret areas.
-limited environment interactivity after first few levels.
-No good Rock and Roll level music.
-Duke doesn't KICK things anymore, he now does the typical weapon butt melee thing.
-A.I. that is so bad it made me twitch.
-No really new content, guns, or bad guys.
-Way too linear and predictable for a Duke Nukem 3D game.
-For over 12 years of development how can they release an under 7 hour game?!?!?
-No end level Nukem Button.
-No jetpack.
-No really good new "one liners."
-Dated Level design and graphics.
-NOT ENOUGH DUKE!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 18 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Jun 14, 2011 8:24:41 PM PDT
Gabriel says:
almost all FPS are too linear

Posted on Jun 15, 2011 2:47:39 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Jun 15, 2011 11:15:35 AM PDT]

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 15, 2011 4:25:19 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Jun 15, 2011 11:16:48 AM PDT]

Posted on Jun 15, 2011 5:12:36 AM PDT
Pretty spot on review. I kept looking for secret areas during the first couple zones but I figured out there is none! The game is pretty much on rails with plenty of crappy jumping puzzles. I felt like I was playing that old half life map where you are tiny in an oversized kitchen most of the time. The game is just bad

Posted on Jun 15, 2011 8:08:47 AM PDT
S. Smith says:
Completely agree with this review. I would have been more satisfied with the original game revamped with current graphics than this pile of garbage. Instead its revamped graphics with none of the things that made the original game shine.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 15, 2011 8:17:49 AM PDT
I get what the author is saying, but did he actually HATE the game?

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 15, 2011 9:45:29 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 15, 2011 9:46:18 AM PDT
H.Le says:
R. Johnson,

"I don't know what your problem is. I hate all the hateful, spiteful, nasty game reviewers like you. There are so many nasty people like you giving nasty reviews to almost all of the PC games."

Before you turn on the hate for your fellow PC Gamers, perhaps you should head on over to the Xbox360 DNF reviews and activate the defense force field over there as well. In the case of DNF, many Gamers on all platform are sharing the same sentiment that the Duke does live up to the hype and anticipation this time around - and Xbox360 is where the most numbers of Gamers - and anticipated $ - are at.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 16, 2011 12:39:43 PM PDT
Axle F. says:
S. Smith

I was saying the exact thing when I gave up on looking for secrets or exploring in this new one. It would have been much more fun if they took EVERYTHING from the first Duke 3D game and even the other two and just updated them with better graphics and sound and such. Add something without taking away something. It is always a kick to the yoohoos to release a NEW game with LESS content in it than the previous game. Sequels and new games should ALWAYS strive to be better than the one before.

Posted on Jun 16, 2011 8:31:41 PM PDT
This game wasn't developed over 12 years. 2k merely bought the resources from that cycle, they built all the levels/area's, content from the ground up just taking most of the engine and some of the mechanics. Not to knitpick, but this game isn't the literal culmination of a 12 year dev cycle, 85% of it was built over the course of one year.

Posted on Jun 18, 2011 5:25:50 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details