Your Garage botysf16 Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it Recess Monkey Fire TV Stick Sun Care Patriotic Picks Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer WienerDog WienerDog WienerDog  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis Segway miniPro
Customer Review

190 of 200 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars appropriate reimagining of classic text, September 15, 2005
This review is from: William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet (Special Edition) (DVD)
I think a lot of reviews of this film have been unduly harsh. I have had a fair amount of Shakespearean exposure (I was an English major in college), and I am actually impressed with Baz Luhrmann's interpretation of the text. Some people are so blinded by the seeming erudite stuffiness of Shakespeare's work that they forget what this play is really about. `Romeo and Juliet' is a teenage melodrama! With that said, this film works well.

* To begin with, Leonardo DiCaprio and Clare Danes come off just right as the "star-crossed lovers." They handle their lines - perhaps - a bit awkwardly, and their key scenes are overacted. But as far as I'm concerned, their somewhat `poor' performances are actually perfect. In the reality of the play - Romeo and Juliet's behavior (though arguably passionate) is less than genuine. They are young, fickle, and full of hormones, and what might seem like acts of heart-felt love and desire are actually just curious explorations of subversive behavior.

* Many have lamented that the dialogue in this film (essentially) mirrors the original text ... but changing the text (in any major way) would be a huge mistake. Shakespeare's plays are not famous because they have a great story line - they are famous because of the unbelievable writing. It would, therefore, be pointless to modernize the dialogue. Shakespeare's plays ARE the dialogue.

* Although this film - compared with other renditions of the play - is decidedly modern, certain elements do contribute to a sort of timely ambiguity. The cars, guns, drugs, and music suggest 1996 (or thereabouts), whereas the gothic mansions, the ball, the feuding families, and the oppressive presence of the Church seem somewhat anachronistic. I think this ambiguity speaks to the universality of Shakespeare's work. Does it even matter when this play takes place? Have hot-blooded teenagers changed that much over the years?

* Lastly, the ambience of Lurhmann's film is intoxicating: zipping, choppy cinematography, an over-abundance of gaudy electric lighting, and an intriguing soundtrack. It's very titillating in an adolescent sort of way. Anyone who does not find the scene - where DiCaprio is dragging on a cigarette against an orangey sunscape, with Radiohead's "Talk Show Host" slowly pulsing in the background - sentimentally sexy - well, you must not remember what it's like to be 15.

All in all, this is an ingenious approach to a classic text - not to mention an entertaining film.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 2 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 19 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Mar 3, 2009 4:46:42 AM PST
BH says:
What a well-written review!

Posted on Dec 7, 2009 10:46:01 PM PST
Opera Ghost says:
"The Church" is hardly oppressive.

Posted on Dec 28, 2009 11:48:06 AM PST
R. French says:
BRAVO!!!
I agree wholeheartedly with your review.

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 8, 2011 2:50:42 PM PST
Daniel Boon says:
Every church is oppressive

Posted on Feb 8, 2011 2:54:25 PM PST
Daniel Boon says:
I appreciate your sensitivities to the nuances of such a work. I just finished reading the Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet this day. I am going to now see this film again and continue my immersion, albeit adjustedly. Your comments have expressed what I migt have considered my own positive regard of the film. Surely, it will help me to appreciate it even more fully. Thank you

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 8, 2011 3:00:36 PM PST
Daniel Boon says:
I folly in interpretation! Rather, I agree - it is oppressive, in a hard way.

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 11, 2011 11:04:28 PM PST
Opera Ghost says:
To know that, you'd have to know every church.

Clearly, you don't.

And it's the "Lamentable Tragedie."

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 11, 2011 11:04:53 PM PST
Opera Ghost says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Nov 1, 2011 5:42:38 AM PDT
Rhett says:
I recently saw this movie again, and in looking out of curiosity to see if there was a director's cut, came across your review. I have to give you kudos . . . you raise some excellent points that I've always thought about when reading negatives about this movie. I've always felt that most of this film's detractors are probably Shakespeare purists who bristle at the thought of Lurhmann "camping up" R&J by . . . say . . . portraying Mercutio as a black drag queen (which I thought was astoundingly clever - as was the conceit of Queen Mab as ecstasy), or prostitutes dancing to "Talk Show Host" (isn't that the world's OLDEST profession? - why not pair it with a NEW song for some interest? One might argue that it is an extended oxymoron - a literary device with which Shakespeare is closely associated). You are absolutely right about the reason Shakespeare has (more than) stood the test of time - it's not so much about the story lines, but his incomparable mastery of the English language. Here, the lines are authentic (if rearranged a bit here and there), and I thought Leo and Claire did an very good job of conveying the impetuous nature of teenage infatuation - matched by Dennehy and Sorvino ("He shall be endured") as the greedy, amoral "clan masters" (godfathers). I don't consider the settings and props anachronistic as much as universal and ambiguous (I believe the setting was actually a pastiche of Mexico City, Miami, and L.A.)
Although I still consider the 1968 version the best, this version certainly delivers a creative take on the play. Some might find Lurhmann's signature style - dizzyingly florid, highly ornate and choreographed - a bit distracting, but, like I said, I thought it worked. And I loved the music - I bought the (extended) soundtrack - which is always a hit when I put it on at parties. And you are also right about the scene where Leo, morose in front of a beautiful sunset, writes one of Shakespeare's most famous soliloquies in his journal - very sexy and evocative. Besides, we get the "classical" Shakespearean treatment from Postlethwaite. All in all, an excellent and creative adaptation of a classic. And those who wrote that "The church is hardly oppressve" must have missed the gargantuan Jesus statue "lording over" so many scenes!

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 1, 2011 6:07:06 AM PDT
Rhett says:
On the title page of the 1599 (second) quarto - generally considered the "definitive" text by The Shakespeare Institute at The University of Birmingham (a copy of which I have) - it was "The Most Excellent and Lamentable Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet" (words translated to reflect modern English spellings).
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›