Your Garage Summer Reading Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it PME Fire TV Stick Subscribe & Save Patriotic Picks Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer AllOrNothingS1 AllOrNothingS1 AllOrNothingS1  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Segway miniPro
Customer Review

83 of 86 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Absolutely brilliant, but..., October 6, 2007
This review is from: The Up Series (Seven Up / 7 Plus Seven / 21 Up / 28 Up / 35 Up / 42 Up / 49 Up) (DVD)

There is no doubt that this series is one of the most interesting ever committed to film. Following the lives of a dozen Brits from the age of 7 through 49, the series is both fascinating and heartbreaking. It's impossible to watch the series without engaging in a guessing game, wondering where in life each will be when the next film in the series is released. It's also impossible to watch the series and not identify with the participants, seeing yourself in each of them. Few films have had the sociological impact of the Up Series.

However, while watching each of the films back-to-back, an uncomfortable feeling began to settle in. Despite director Michael Apted's insightful approach, at times he seems to ignore the fact that a documentarian's role is to serve as an impartial participant and that his opinion has no place in the telling of the story.

Apted often conducts his interviews with those from working-class backgrounds, and are still living in working-class environs, with the assumption that they must be miserable. Presumably, this is due to his own set of experiences. Though Apted was raised in a lower-income section of London, he managed to secure a scholarship to the City of London School and then studied law and history at Cambridge University. His attitude at times appears to say, "I succeeded, so why can't you?" Several times he asks these working-class participants if they aren't capable of more than what they are currently doing, not recognizing that several of them are either quite content with their lives or simply haven't had the opportunities or means to build better lives for themselves. He seems unable, or unwilling, to recognize the other riches in their lives, such as family, friends and community involvement, and often dismisses these achievements rather than celebrating them.

The most flagrant examples of Apted's prejudice take place in "35 Up" in his interview with Tony, and in "49 Up" in his interview with Jackie. In the interview with Tony, Apted comments that everything Tony has ever attempted in his life has been a failure, ignoring Tony's stunning achievements, especially in consideration of his working-class roots. (At the time of "35 Up," Tony had realized his dream of being a professional jockey, an actor, he owned his own business, owned his own home, and had been married for 13 years with 3 children. Hardly what anyone would call a failure.) At times, Apted appears unable to recognize that the courage required to attempt new ventures is success in itself regardless of the outcome.

In his interview with Jackie in "49 Up," Apted asks Jackie whether her son is similar to her at his age. When Jackie says that he is, Apted asks Jackie if that is a worry, implying that Jackie's life is less than admirable. Justifiably, Jackie becomes upset by the question prompting her to respond with, "I never said that he picked up all of my traits, only my best traits."

Even with its flaws, the Up Series is a fascinating study of class structure and human evolution. Highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-5 of 5 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Sep 28, 2008 7:27:39 AM PDT
In fact, documentary film makers have revealed their "prejudices" in their documentary films as long as there has been documentary film. The notion that documentary is "objective" and "neutral", of course, has always been controversial. In fact, "objective" and "neutral" documentary filmmaking is probably not possible. The documentary filmmakers choice of topic almost certainly reveals his or her "prejudices". The way documentary filmmakers edit their documentary almost certainly reveal their "prejudices". Even a stationary camera without a camera person making choices about what to shoot (selectivity) selects what to shoot in its very placement since it can't be everywhere. Isn't it time we gave up this myth of "objectivity"?

Posted on Nov 21, 2008 5:08:40 AM PST
ARGHYA B says:
Hi there,
I wanted to check one important thing about this Up Series (till 49up) - is it closed-captioned? The DVD description does not mention anywhere about closed captioning, even though the earlier release (till 42 up), seems to be closed-captioned. Will be helpful if you can let me know.


In reply to an earlier post on Jan 2, 2011 2:40:22 PM PST
None of these discs are closed captioned.

Posted on May 23, 2011 1:04:55 PM PDT
I loved when one of the rich kids, as an adult, his first name John, gives it to Michael Apted about how Apted makes the rich kids seem as if they have a "breezy birthright" and that Apted leaves out all the work and hours and nights of studying to make it.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 15, 2013 12:46:56 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 15, 2013 12:48:37 AM PDT
Rutherford says:
Perhaps, but GTinsdale's comments regarding the classist bigotry in some of the questions are still valid.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›