Customer Review

9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Some of the "Perspectives" are Weak / Unbalanced, October 10, 2012
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views (Paperback)
Individually, I would rate the essays as follows. My overall ranking is based on an average of these:
Wallace: Five stars (*****)
Robinson: Three stars (***)
Elliott: Three stars (***)
Black: One star (*)

Wallace made the best case for his position, by far. He is strong not only in his handling of the evidence, but also in his carful identification of the presuppositions inherent in the debate. He raised several important points I had not previously considered and also introduced pieces of evidence that the other contributors seemed unaware of.

Robinson makes a few good points. He draws a number of interesting literary parallels, but most of the ones I actually checked by looking them up in my Bible seem much less convincing than he makes them out to be. The essay is marred heavily by the fact that all the subject headings are taken from Marianne Moore's poem, "Poetry," producing an essay that appears to be organized in an entirely nonsensical manner. His use of this poem as an analogy for different versions of Mark is especially unconvincing.

Elliott makes some interesting points about internal evidence as well, and in some ways he is almost a foil to Robinson's essay. However, he is far too dismissive of external testimony. He also proposes a theory that Mark is "damaged at both ends" which I find to be implausible in light of the dearth of textual evidence for this position. The essay's main redeeming quality is the discussion of canonicity at the end of it.

Black's essay is easily the worst. I have enjoyed reading some of Black's material in the past, and I was hoping to read some actual evidence for 16:9-20 as a Markan addition. However, what I got instead was an extremely speculative and unhelpful "solution" to the Synoptic problem. He proposes that Mark was actually a collection of sermons preached by Peter in Rome, largely dependent on Matthew and Luke, but excluding a resurrection sermon (which Mark adds later). Black presents almost no evidence for this theory. His argument is essentially, "this is how it could have happened," instead of "this is the most likely scenario based on the evidence."

Bock concludes the book by addressing several points from the essays and asserting his support for Wallace's view. In my judgment, this makes the book somewhat unbalanced. I would have appreciated seeing the contributors actually respond to each other's essays, or at the very least seeing a different person write the final response essay who would make a stronger case for one of the other perspectives instead of giving Wallace's view a second go-around. (In the interests of full disclosure, I actually agree with Wallace, although somewhat cautiously).

I would recommend this book to someone looking to survey the issues surrounding Mark's ending, but with the caveats listed above. This book does not answer all of the pertinent questions, regardless of what view you take.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Aug 19, 2013 8:27:51 AM PDT
Your review pretty much matches my thoughts after reading the book. (Disclosure: This is the first full book I've read on the topic, so I'm no expert.) Black's essay was interesting--his hypothesis is appealing and, if read in isolation from the other essays, would be plausible. But very little real evidence is provided to support his view. I almost feel sorry for him, since he's the editor of this book, was not planning to include his own essay until nudged to do so by the head of his school, and admits that he is not an expert in the field. Bock's final reflections are helpful, but not as much as I had hoped. I wish he had weighed the evidence in the various essays more thoroughly.

Anyway, take this comment as another reader affirming your sense of the book. Glad I read it.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

4.2 out of 5 stars (9 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (4)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
$19.99 $17.37
Add to cart Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Top Reviewer Ranking: 216,975