Amazon.com: Carol Anderson's review of CNN Presents: Black in America
Customer Review

 
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars SOLEDAD O'BRIAN & CNN should be ASHAMED !!!, September 18, 2008
SOLEDAD O'BRIAN AND CNN SHOULD BE ASHAMED!!!
(I wanted to rate this ZERO stars, but one star was the minimum allowed.)

One example will speak volumes about the quality of this project:
Mrs. O'Brian spends MORE THAN AN HOUR, in multiple segments, talking with a young, little known, Black economist, Roland Fryer, who has never conducted/published any study on health care disparities. (The guy is an economist!) Still, O'Brien used him as the 'expert' on the disparity between the health of White Americans and Black Americans. Fryer told O'Brien that he was looking at an old book, and saw a picture of a White person "licking" the face of a Black slave at a slave auction. Fryer said the photo convinced him that SALT in Black people is the reason for health disparities between White people and Black people.

Maybe you should buy this video just for the incredible experience of HEARING this kind of STRUTTING STUPIDITY!

O'Brien acted as if Fryer had actually solved the issue. It is difficult to believe that O'Brien would accept such a ludicrous theory - - or the ludicrous way that Fryer came up with the theory - - but she accepted it without debate. CNN/O'Brien did not present any of the myriad of experts in this field. And, CNN/O'Brien did not present any of the widely researched, proven theories for the health disparities.

A 5TH GRADER WOULD HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB OF RESEARCHING DATA!!! Don't they have access to the INTERNET at CNN???

The Black community and the scientific/medical community responded with shock and disappointment to this so-called documentary:

In reponse to Fryer's salt theory, Dr. Thomas LaVeist, Director of the Center for Health Disparities Solutions at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, said, "...to expose an audience to this theory is very troubling and disappointing." Read Dr. LaVeist's full response and real data, at http://www.fleshandstone.net/healthandsciencenews/blackinamerica.html.

Actually, you can just Google 'CNN Black in America" and read a ton of negative responses.

This 'documentary' reinforced the negative stereotypes that propagate 'modern racism.' CNN chose O'Brien, an unqualified (and powerless?) Black reporter to lead this farce. There are many Black journalists who have the research skills, wisdom, insight, and intellectual power to do justice to this enormous task. Obviously, that's not what CNN wanted.

Perhaps some Republican agenda influenced the production of this banal 'view' of Black America during an election year when a Black man is on the ticket. At least Fox News hits us in the face. CNN has stabbed us in the back.
Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Review Details
Item

3.1 out of 5 stars (11 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (5)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (5)
 
 
 
$29.95
Add to cart Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Location: North Carolina

New Reviewer Rank: 880,077
Classic Reviewer Rank: 314,116

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments



Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Sep 19, 2008 9:16 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 19, 2008 3:29 PM PDT
Re: >CNN chose O'Brien, an unqualified (and powerless?) Black reporter to lead this farce.

This is a hard-hitting review, worth the read. But S.O'Brien is Black? If she is, I guess it's only fractionally, since from her physical presence on TV, it never occurred to me that she may be of mixed Black background. If she is indeed of some-part Black heritage that underscores how subtle racial distinctions can be and why racial prejudice of any kind is as absurd as it is abhorrent. When I see Soledad on TV, I see an engaging female reporter and personality. When I see Barack Obama, I see an earnest and engaging politician. When I see Sarah Palin, however, I shudder to think she could possibly (only in America, as is said) become President if the marbles eventually roll that way. And that has nothing to do with her gender since had Hillary Clinton been on the ticket, I would have been supportive. I have always hoped that when it comes to social and political concerns, our America will eventually become entirely "color blind". We've come a very long way since WWII, and are maturing rapidly.

Still, there are pockets of stupidity about racial and ethnic backgrounds, but that will never disappear entirely. It will most likely, however, soon cease to be of much concern to the flow of the nation. The USA has become so rich in its variegated heritage that there is increasingly little room left for baseless prejudice based on race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity or religious convictions {as long as the latter doesn't become so rabid as to interfere with the general interests of what has been designed to be a politically secular nation (hence my concerns about all the Sarah Palin types in national politics)}. That said, excessive "political correctness" itself can be stifling and counterproductive...maybe that subject could also make for worthwhile documentary material. Meanwhile, I suppose we'll all "stay tuned". As with everything, documentaries not excepted, some productions are thoughtfully produced gems while others scour the bushes for a sufficiently low common demoninator that will likely appease the mass-market popularity seekers and their financial-incentive driven promotors. Some things never change and probably never will.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
     
   
     

Where's My Stuff?

Shipping & Returns

Need Help?

Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates