Winter Driving Best Books of the Month Valentine's Day Shop Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon King Bose SoundLink AE All-New Amazon Fire TV Luxury Beauty Valentine's Day Cards Find the Best Purina Pro Plan for Your Pet Amazon Gift Card Offer chiraq chiraq chiraq  Amazon Echo All-New Fire Kindle Paperwhite Prime Exclusive Savings in Video Games Shop Now SnS
Customer Review

15 of 37 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Questionable, February 6, 2012
By 
This review is from: The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Founding Fathers (The Politically Incorrect Guides) (Paperback)
The premise of the book is sound, and I dare say academically useful, if not necessary. (I write as a full professor of government and law at a medium size university). But it's utility is diminished, if not undermined, by its focus: it would have been better if it had been written objectively rather than from a pre-determined point of view. Of course the author finds in the founding fathers exactly what he's looking for because, just as in interpreting the Constitution itself, interpreting the founding fathers is also an inexact science, not the precise act that the author would like us to believe. Indeed, as in any interpretative effort, the author had to pick and choose which of the founders to use and to omit, and what of their writing to use and omit.

And what of the founders who said one thing in 1789 at the convention and changed their views entirely by 1805? That would include Madison and Hamilton, of course, and even Jefferson (if one wishes to include him as a founding father), as his ideas expressed in writing and actions before 1801 are very much at odds with how he governed after 1801. How does one *really* decide which view point is the *correct* one? I found it "interesting" and a signal to how he approached the issues by a statement on the inside flap, which excoriates the "hopelessly liberal and self-serving" members of Congress -- yet as the book was published in 2009, during the years he was writing the volume, both Houses of Congress and the White House were in the hands of the conservative GOP majorities. Self-serving they may have been, but I would suggest that many, if not all, of the GOP majority was hardly liberal, hopelessly or otherwise.

Finally, obviously anything published by the Regnery Press is the first sign that the book is not an objective work intended to educate and elucidate, but just another politically biased effort to indoctrinate the non-thinking into the conservative mind-set.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Feb 2, 2013 12:17:30 PM PST
So indoctrinating conservatism is the problem with public school and higher education in America?

Wijid, the fact that you are a full professor of Government is frightening when you illogically correlate the period leading up to 2009 with a Republican controlled congress. Would that be the same Republican Congress led by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi? The ones that still held power as Barack Obama was sworn into office? This leads one to wonder what kind of interpretations you feed the minds full of mush that sit in your classroom? I see by your logic that any interpretation of history can only be correct when it is done by non-conservatives, that historical people are not allowed to change their views and any point along the timeline of their life, and finally, since you eschew anything published by Regency Press, that you did not read the book.

Posted on Jun 16, 2013 2:49:07 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 16, 2013 3:04:10 PM PDT
Mr. Kafka says:
Mr Powers beat me to what I was going to say, but it is worth reinforcing. What kind of an idiot "professor" doesn't know that Pelosi and Reed led the demagogue-crats control of both houses of congress during Bush's last years?
‹ Previous 1 Next ›