262 of 273 people found the following review helpful
Happy so far. Compared to Olympus Pen Mini E-PM1,
This review is from: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3KK 12 MP Micro 4/3 Mirrorless Digital Camera with 3-Inch Touchscreen LCD and 14-42mm Zoom Lens (Black) (Discontinued by Manufacturer) (Electronics)
Forgot to check Amazon reviews before buying this, but glad I didn't because the camera is quite good for my needs and I might not have bought it based on the mixed and sparse reviews on Amazon. I did look at "professional" reviews on photographyblog and dpreview, which were much more positive.
I was deciding between the new Olympus Pen Mini E-PM1, Sony NEX C3, and GF3. Tried out the Olympus and GF3, and decided on the GF3. I got a better price on the GF3 than I could for the Pen Mini, but that was just icing on the cake, because the features on the GF3 meet my needs better.
Similarities between GF3 and E-PM1:
--body size about the same
--similar price range
--Micro Four-Thirds sensor
--both are the budget, easy-to-use version of their respective camera families
--instant-record movie button
--kit zoom lens 14-42mm
--to my layman eyes the photo quality was about the same, as was auto-focus speed, though E-PM1 is billed as having the fastest auto-focus in this category.
The features that put the GF3 over the top for me:
--Price. I got a great deal on the GF3. Sony was just too expensive, though I've read great things about photo quality
--GF3 touchscreen, while not very responsive (resistive screen you have to press down on, rather than capacitive screen like iPhone), is very useful for quick adjustments. It just makes the camera easier to use, much like an iPad is easier to use than a laptop. Deleting batches of photos is much easier than using buttons. So is scrolling around a photo you're reviewing in close-up. You can also touch to change the subject of focus, like on an iPhone.
--Flash is built in--not so on the Pen Mini or NEX. I'm not an "enthusiast" and have no intention of ever buying an external flash or viewfinder, so lack of a hotshoe was not an issue. Flash can also be tilted up to the ceiling (with some finger dexterity) to do a bounce-flash that brightens up indoor photos without that nasty flash look. Other 2 cameras come with a small add-on flash, but that's just too much trouble.
--I like the physical on-off switch rather than the Pen Mini's button
--Menus and options were slightly more intuitive, though I admit my previous camera was a Panasonic as well, so I may be used to their menus.
--In addition to dedicated movie button, there's a dedicated "iA" full-auto button, which my wife can press to go to full-auto mode without digging into menus (it lights up).
--Big lens cap seems easier to handle.
--Comes with lens hood, which I might not use but is nice to be included.
--Battery charger is a one-piece mini brick with prongs built in, making it very portable. E-PM1 comes with a brick with power cord attachment.
I can't speak to other reviewers' issues with the pancake lens (since I don't have it) nor the flash durability (since I've only had the camera a week).
About the Pen Mini:
--Body is about the same size as the GF3, but the kit zoom lens is smaller (shorter and narrower)
--Stabilization is in the body, not the lens like GF3. From what I read this is supposed to be an advantage, but I think it was adding noises to the videos I took (turning off stabilization stopped the noises). I haven't noticed similar noises in GF3 videos with stabilization on.
--Lock on the lens to close it (but not open it) started to get annoying quickly.
--Flash was impressive--power is adjustable, and I think it auto-adjusts based on subject distance. From what I can see of the GF3, it fires full-power all the time, which can make photos look washed out. Fortunately the bounce-flash trick mentioned above avoids that problem.
--Neck strap attachment loops are hinged and tends to kind of make click-clack noises when handling the camera.
About me: my main photo subject is my 2 yr old daughter, so I was looking for a camera that would focus quickly, take decent pics in indoor light without flash, and still be small enough to throw in the diaper bag with room to spare for, well, diapers and stuff. These criteria rule out bulky SLRs, and most point-and-shoots. For my daughter's first 2 years I had the Panasonic LX-3, a "high-end point-and-shoot". The LX-3 produces great pics in good light, and decent pics in low light, but I find the focus is too slow (esp. in low light) now that my daughter is moving around (a LOT).
Long review and naturally biased toward the GF3, but I hope it helps your decision process!
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-9 of 9 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Dec 17, 2011 8:49:35 PM PST
K Yeh says:
~Very~ helpful and in-depth review of exactly the things that matter to me as well. My father is looking for a camera to capture the grandkids, and his current Panasonic point and shoot just can't keep up. Especially helpful to hear about the little things that the professional review sites tend not to mention, such as the size of the charger and the size of the lens cap. Thank you for your review!
Posted on Dec 30, 2011 9:04:47 PM PST
Thanks to the detailed review. I just ordered one. :)
My subject is my one year old daughter primarily so your needs are similar to mine. Thanks for the detail.
Posted on Jun 25, 2012 6:35:19 AM PDT
reviews again says:
looking at product pics the lens is clearly of O.I.S type, meaning the image stabilization comes from the lens, NOT the body as you imply
In reply to an earlier post on Jul 13, 2012 11:28:42 AM PDT
I think you misread the review. "Stabilization is in the body" refers to the Olympus Pen Mini, not the GF3.
Posted on Apr 18, 2013 4:47:29 AM PDT
Sarah F. Melcher says:
This was very helpful. I take photos of my cats which is a lot like photographing small children and I am tired of the vast majority of pictures being blurry because the camera can't focus fast enough.
Posted on Mar 16, 2014 11:53:48 AM PDT
When you do head to head comparisons the E-PM1 trumps the GF3 as far as Image Quality, Color Depth, Dynamic Range and a couple of others. The GF3 is a good camera but in the end the E-PM1 is a better camera. The touch screen is ok but not as easy to navigate as one might think. It has been proven to be confusing for those moving up from point and shoot.
Posted on Sep 13, 2014 1:49:04 PM PDT
Amazon Customer says:
great review. yes it really helps my decision. thank you.
Posted on Apr 7, 2016 8:16:48 PM PDT
Mr. Wazowski says:
Holy hell. I cannot thank you enough for the bouncing flash trick; I cannot believe I did not think of it! I have an older Olympus M-Zukio 14-42 kit lens mounted, and that sucker is 3.5" extended. The flash left a big dark spot in all my photos, but now (at least indoors with a light ceiling) that won't happen! Thank you so much!
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 7, 2016 8:18:03 PM PDT
Mr. Wazowski says:
It's kinda hard to "prove" subjective things like that. I love the quick menu and mode dial on the touchscreen - they made me give up my reservations about the lack of external controls. YMMV.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›