Amazon.com: Customer Reviews: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201)

Customer Reviews

Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) by Epson

Average Customer Rating
5 star:
 (23)
4 star:
 (15)
3 star:
 (12)
2 star:
 (5)
1 star:
 (29)
 
 
 
 
 
   
Create your own review


The Most Helpful Reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


39 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars PRINTING CD's AND DVD's
I bought this printer solely to print on printable CD's and DVD's. I have produced a number of CD's now and am very happy with the results. The included program works well, is easy to use and allows using personal full color pictures and text. This is one of the least expensive printers to accomplish this task.
Published on February 25, 2008 by F. Nederbragt

› See more 5 star, 4 star reviews
versus
79 of 86 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Poor paper handling--but see addendum
I bought this printer specifically to do holiday cards (I use a Hi-Touch dye sublimation printer for my photos). I checked the specifications, and it claimed it could do cardstock. However, it kept jamming on the cardstock. I went through the Epson website trouble shooting screens, and I discovered that the maximum paper weight it can handle is 24 pounds (that's the...
Published on December 10, 2007 by Dean L. Surkin

› See more 3 star, 2 star, 1 star reviews

All Reviews for this Item

‹ Previous | 1 29| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

 
79 of 86 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Poor paper handling--but see addendum, December 10, 2007
By Dean L. Surkin (Bronxville, NY USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I bought this printer specifically to do holiday cards (I use a Hi-Touch dye sublimation printer for my photos). I checked the specifications, and it claimed it could do cardstock. However, it kept jamming on the cardstock. I went through the Epson website trouble shooting screens, and I discovered that the maximum paper weight it can handle is 24 pounds (that's the weight of fine office stationery). Cardstock is usually 50 or 60 pound weight.

If I had discovered this earlier, I would have purchased a different printer. As it was, I think Epson made the specifications too vague, by specifying cardstock rather than the weight of usable paper.

Addendum: In the troubleshooting section of the Epson website, it suggested that paper jam could be reduced by feeding sheets one at a time. I tried it, and the printer worked like a charm--smooth paper feeding and fast printing. The only drawback is that I must stand by the printer and feed each sheet of cardstock one at a time.

I should mention that Epson, unlike many vendors, includes high-capacity ink cartridges in the box.

Please consider this a four-star, not a three-star, review.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
39 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars PRINTING CD's AND DVD's, February 25, 2008
By F. Nederbragt (California) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I bought this printer solely to print on printable CD's and DVD's. I have produced a number of CD's now and am very happy with the results. The included program works well, is easy to use and allows using personal full color pictures and text. This is one of the least expensive printers to accomplish this task.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
25 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Very impressed, esp. with the disc-printing feature, January 9, 2008
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I'm a loyal HP user for lasers, but have had trouble with my inkjets from them in the past. Since I've had good luck with my Epson scanner, I gave the R280 a shot and have been very impressed with it. There were some errors in the original setup, causing the printer to freeze during ink charging, but these vanished as mysteriously as they appeared and the printer has been working like a dream ever since. The CD printing is beautiful (FYI: CDs are supposed to be given 24 hours to dry) and a great feature to have. I love the way that the printer also completely folds up, which keeps out dust and minimizes desk space. The printer is also offered at a great price and I was even able to get it with a rebate (no longer available) that will literally reimburse me for the cost of the printer, if it comes through. Epson, you might have won a convert!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Good enough for me, November 28, 2008
By Roger Mastrude "Roger Mastrude" (Capitola, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I'm rating this 4 stars, but really that's arbitrary. This printer is good enough for me (even though I'm hassling with it right now trying to get it to locate CD print correctly under Vista.)

I like the Epson Photo Stylus series for one reason: Quality of print. Epson isn't for everyone. In particular, Epson uses a dye that sits on the surface of into the paper, and so it prints best on high-priced photo or matte papers, which have the best surfaces. The inks are brilliant and make for very appealing photos. Epson has the best nozzle technology in the business, producing tiny droplets of ink (3 picoliters as I remember.) This gives very high resolution. Inks are expensive, but they're good. Epson uses proprietary color processing firmware, which produces attractive colors, kind of like Technicolor. The Epson increases the saturation of colors in a tasteful way, and has good flesh tones. The print actually looks like dye sublimation technology, which is generally considered a higher quality, and much more expensive, process. If you want to print photos, I believe Epson Photo Stylus printers are the best choice. If you wanted to print "business graphics" such as charts and graphs, I would use a color laser printer (a lot faster) or an inkjet for which the cost of each page was less. I've heard that Kodak inkjets have a lower continuing cost.

One past problem with inkjet printers was that colors faded fast. In direct sunlight, they would be down to 30% - 40% in one day. I was in a focus group for inkjet printers for Lexmark Corporation, and color retention was the group's #1 concern. Epson says color retention with the R280 inks is much improved.

If you wanted extreme fidelity of colors, such as people I know in our local Sheriff's Crime Scene Investigation area, this would not be a good choice. But accuracy is not the same as attractiveness, and the most accurate printers often print unappealing images.

Please be aware that the ink runs if it ever gets wet. I haven't tried spray art lacquers or fixatives, but that would be a possible solution.

I primarily use the printer to print CDs. It produces very good printing, but some aspects of it are a pain. But my R280 prints CDs fine under Vista. My older R200 never would. The CD printing firmware and operation of the R280 are much, much, better than they were with earlier printers such as the R200 and R220. The CD slide is better designed and functioning is generally 1,000% better. The R200 was not really ready for prime time.

Over all, if you want quality printing, the R280 is a top choice. I've noticed that many other reviewers give extreme high or low reviews. I don't want to do that. I'm trying to help you make a reasoned choice.

I felt I should comment on this product because I was the printer specifier for a Fortune 100 company in a previous job. I had access to very skilled printer manufacturer technical staff. Actually, a representative for Lexmark Corporation told me he thought the Epson produced the highest quality printing in the business--that's praise from an unlikely source. When my R280 gives out, I'll buy another R280.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
32 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Epson Stylus Photo R280, December 15, 2007
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)

I bought the Epson Stylus R280 to supplement my older C88.

Positively:
1. It prints a lot faster, including on hi quality color mode.
2. It does a good job on CDs.
3. The 200-sheet paper tray is really handy.
4. Paper feed is superior to the C88. No jams so far.
5. It fed easily both 32 Pd paper and a 150 Pd card stock with no problems. But then, the old C88 did that too.


Negatively:

1. The initial paper feed is REALLY noisy. It doesn't just feed the paper, it slams it in, and with a clatter so strong it rocks the desk on which it sits. This is very annoying in a small office.
2. The B&W print quality isn't really much better than the old C88. Even using a magnifying glass, I couldn't see much improvement.
3. The color printing is better than the C88 but not so much as to be worth the price.

In my opinion, the only thing I got for my money different from what I already had was the ability to print CDs for my work. But when I offset that with putting up with the clatter, then I wonder if I would have been better off just using an old CD stomper.

It is a pretty cheap machine in every sense of the word. I would recommend spending a bit more on something better because as cheap as it was, it was not worth the price.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars When Defective: More Trouble Then its Worth, April 25, 2008
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
The item purchased was defective. The printer was functioning properly for about 3 weeks, (4 stars for functionality- while it was working) until I was alerted that an ink cartridge needed to be replaced (for the first time).

I purchased 6 ink cartridges from a retailer, and upon installing the specific cartridge that needed to be replaced, (Yellow), I have had nothing but trouble and an inoperable printer ever since.
At first, after the new ink cartridge was properly installed, it would not load the ink, nor even recognize that the ink cartridge had been replaced, no matter that I was following the instructions specifically. The same message occurred, communicating that the yellow ink cartridge needed to be replaced, over 2 dozen times.

After spending much time trying to solve this issue, to my surprise, another message appeared indicating that the light cyan ink cartridge needed to be replaced. I assumed that, for whatever reason, the yellow cartridge had been recognized and the ink recharged. So, I went ahead and installed a new ink cartridge for light cyan, and followed the proper procedure in charging the ink once again. To my dismay, the same problem occurred, the same message kept appearing. The new light cyan ink cartridge I installed was not recognized, the message stated I still needed to replace the light cyan cartridge. And so the ink was never charged, despite my best efforts.

In fact, the ink, to the new cartridges which I installed (both the new Yellow and Light Cyan cartridges I purchased separately), and tried to charge, were completely expended, without the printer recognizing the installation, nor without the ink being able to charge- obviously without a single page being printed. The particular product I received is clearly defective, and the manufacturer agrees.


Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great for printer for the money, March 22, 2008
By M. Schreuder (Genoa, Ohio) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I've had this printer about two weeks now and it is working great. I have printed about 70 8 1/2 x 11 sheets for dvd cases and around 50 DVDs before having to replace an ink cartridge. Have had zero problems with the CD/DVD feed tray or paper feed. Print quality on the Taiyo Yuden White Inkjet DVDs has been great.

Given the price of the ink cartridges, I will probably buy one of the continuous feed ink systems or just buy another R280 (with cartridges)for $65 - either option cheaper than $90+ for a set of cartridges.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Full ink cartridges register as empty and printer will not work!, November 19, 2008
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I bought this printer and it printed 4, 8x10 pictures very nicely. I printed a few pages of text. All was well and I was happy.

Now, the horror story. Ink cartridges register as about 90% full one day. Next day, all of the cartridges register as EMPTY.

I took them all out, cleaned the contact with alcohol, placed them back in. Again all cartridges are empty. Although, if shaken gently there is plenty of ink. The printer will not allow me to print and there is no override for this!

So, I did some research on the internet. There is a problem with the chips Epson places in the cartridges. Running the printer can place static charges on the chips. One suggestion was to unplug from the computer and the electrical source. Let it sit 24 hours so any excess static charge will dissipate. I did that.

It still did not work. I am NOT going out and buying new cartiges because the static charge buildup is a known recurring problem with this printer and fries the chip on the cartidges.

Since Epson has propriatary cartriges, sometimes the third party ones will not work either.

Next printer I get will be a printer that allows third party cartridges and does not have the chip problem that this one has.

I threw out money on this one. Maybe I should just print pictures out at Wally World.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Photo printer., June 11, 2008
By Jonathan Smith "archao-geek" (North Carolina) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I've had this printer for a few months now, so far it has performed quite well. Photos print out nice and clear on a variety of medium ranging from photo paper to watercolor paper. I only use this printer for photo printing, I have a laser printer for everyday text and office type jobs.

Something to keep in mind is that this printer is optimized for photo printing. The Claria ink is a step above the standard entry-level inks in that it's designed to be color fast for ~100 years and have less light fade and other longevity issues. For this reason ink costs a little more for this printer, but you do get what you pay for.

In summary - this is an excellent entry level photo printer. The Claria inks are good (probably the best in this price category). The next step up would be something like an R1900 - wide format and pigment based Ultrachrome inks. However, if you are mainly printing labels, text documents, and other general home/office tasks this may not be the best choice as your only printer.

Edit: March, 2009

I still say this is a great home photo printer, but I have since upgraded to an Epson 2400 and the output of the 2400 is considerably higher quality. The R280 is a great home printer, but don't expect the same quality you'd get out of a good pigment based printer.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Worst printer I ever had, October 20, 2008
This review is from: Epson Stylus Photo R280 Ultra Hi-Definition Photo Printer (C11C691201) (Electronics)
I had Epson Stylus Photo R280 Photo Printer a year ago when I bought from Fry's Electronics. This was the first Epson printer I ever bought.

The Good - Print quality was pretty good and sharp, but used too much ink compare to my previous Canon printer.

The Bad - The printer worked on the first day when I opened up, but when I tried printing another paper on the next day, it did not bother to print anymore. It claimed that my yellow ink cartridge was empty, eventhough the ink itself was still full. I was totally disappointed with this, and I just used it only once on my first day. Plus I did not get a chance to test out its CD/DVD printing function. I took it back to Fry's and got my full refund back. The employees decided to take it back after I discuss my problems about the printer. They thought the ink became dry and this printer did not attempt to print.
After several months, I decided to go to Office Depot, I was browsing for some good printers. I spotted the same printer (Epson R280) I bought several months ago. One of the employee asked me if I need help buying a printer. I replied back about the printer I had problems with and somehow he claimed that he used to work as part of Epson's worker. And here is something I wanted to hear. Epson planned this integrated chip installed in their new printers not too long ago. This means that each new ink cartridge has an expiration date which prevent users using it again eventough the cartridge is full or half way empty. I was shocked to hear that kind of explanation and concluded that Epson wants to pull consumers' money out of their pockets by putting expiration dates on the cartridges to prevent users from using them again. I thanked the employee for giving me this explanation and decided that I am not going to buy Epson's printers again.

For those who are lucky that their inks did not expired yet, consider yourselves a pat on the back.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 29| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)
 

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.