Nuevo:
-6% US$12.22US$12.22
Entrega GRATIS entre el 2 - 7 de mayo
Enviado por: FindAnyBook Vendido por: FindAnyBook
Ahorra con Usado - Bueno
US$6.60US$6.60
Enviado por: Amazon Vendido por: Zoom Books Company
Devolver gratis este producto
Ofrecemos retornos fáciles y prácticos con al menos una opción de retorno gratuito: sin gastos de envío. Todos los retornos deben cumplir con nuestra política de retornos.
Más información sobre las devoluciones gratis.- Ve a tus pedidos y empieza el proceso de devolución
- Seleccione su opción de envío gratis preferida
- Entregar y marcharse
Descarga la app de Kindle gratis y comienza a leer libros Kindle al instante desde tu smartphone, tablet o computadora, sin necesidad de ningún dispositivo Kindle.
Lee al instante desde tu navegador con Kindle para la web.
Usando la cámara de tu celular escanea el siguiente código y descarga la aplicación Kindle.
Imagen no disponible
Color:
-
-
-
- Para ver la descarga de este video Flash Player
Seguir al autor
Aceptar
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 3. Edición
Opciones de compra y productos Add-on
"Perhaps the best explanation of [the] process of discovery." —William Erwin Thompson, New York Times Book Review
"Occasionally there emerges a book which has an influence far beyond its originally intended audience. . . . Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . . . has clearly emerged as just such a work." —Ron Johnston, Times Higher Education Supplement
"Among the most influential academic books in this century." —Choice
One of "The Hundred Most Influential Books Since the Second World War," Times Literary Supplement
- ISBN-100226458083
- ISBN-13978-0226458083
- Edición3.
- EditorialUniversity of Chicago Press
- Fecha de publicación15 Diciembre 1996
- IdiomaInglés
- Dimensiones5.25 x 1.2 x 8 pulgadas
- Número de páginas212 páginas
Esta es una edición nueva de este producto :
Comprados juntos habitualmente

Los clientes que vieron este producto también vieron
Opiniones editoriales
Opinión de Amazon.es
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is indeed a paradigmatic work in the history of science. Kuhn's use of terms such as "paradigm shift" and "normal science," his ideas of how scientists move from disdain through doubt to acceptance of a new theory, his stress on social and psychological factors in science--all have had profound effects on historians, scientists, philosophers, critics, writers, business gurus, and even the cartoonist in the street.
Some scientists (such as Steven Weinberg and Ernst Mayr) are profoundly irritated by Kuhn, especially by the doubts he casts--or the way his work has been used to cast doubt--on the idea of scientific progress. Yet it has been said that the acceptance of plate tectonics in the 1960s, for instance, was sped by geologists' reluctance to be on the downside of a paradigm shift. Even Weinberg has said that "Structure has had a wider influence than any other book on the history of science." As one of Kuhn's obituaries noted, "We all live in a post-Kuhnian age." --Mary Ellen Curtin
Críticas
Biografía del autor
Thomas S. Kuhn (1922–96) was the Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His books include The Essential Tension; Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912; and The Copernican Revolution.
Detalles del producto
- Editorial : University of Chicago Press; 3. edición (15 Diciembre 1996)
- Idioma : Inglés
- Tapa blanda : 212 páginas
- ISBN-10 : 0226458083
- ISBN-13 : 978-0226458083
- Dimensiones : 5.25 x 1.2 x 8 pulgadas
- Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon: nº289,130 en Libros (Ver el Top 100 en Libros)
- nº52 en Algebra Lineal (Libros)
- nº866 en Ciencia y Matemáticas (Libros)
- nº990 en Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia (Libros)
- Opiniones de clientes:
Sobre el autor

Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)was professor emeritus of philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His many books include The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912, both published by the University of Chicago Press.
Opiniones de clientes
- 5 estrellas4 estrellas3 estrellas2 estrellas1 estrella5 estrellas76%13%5%3%3%76%
- 5 estrellas4 estrellas3 estrellas2 estrellas1 estrella4 estrellas76%13%5%3%3%13%
- 5 estrellas4 estrellas3 estrellas2 estrellas1 estrella3 estrellas76%13%5%3%3%5%
- 5 estrellas4 estrellas3 estrellas2 estrellas1 estrella2 estrellas76%13%5%3%3%3%
- 5 estrellas4 estrellas3 estrellas2 estrellas1 estrella1 estrella76%13%5%3%3%3%
Las opiniones de clientes, incluidas las valoraciones de productos ayudan a que los clientes conozcan más acerca del producto y decidan si es el producto adecuado para ellos.
Para calcular la valoración global y el desglose porcentual por estrella, no utilizamos un promedio simple. En cambio, nuestro sistema considera cosas como la actualidad de la opinión y si el revisor compró el producto en Amazon. También analiza las opiniones para verificar la confiabilidad.
Más información sobre cómo funcionan las opiniones de clientes en AmazonOpiniones destacadas de los Estados Unidos
Se produjo un problema al filtrar las opiniones. Vuelve a cargar la página.
-
Calificado en Estados Unidos el 7 de diciembre de 2003I read this book completely by accident; I found Kuhn's name and this book as a reference while looking for something completely different. When I checked out the reference a little further, I discovered that this book is generally considered a classic (anything written a half a century ago that's still cited probably has -some- staying power). So I decided to take a look at it.
The book is relatively small, which means you might think it's an easy and quick read. You'd be wrong. Kuhn's book is dense with information and thoughtful presentation, which makes it challenging to sail through quickly. However, I felt that was also one of its strong points; it forced me to work through the book and really think about what I was reading. If you're looking for fluff and pablum; look elsewhere.
So, what's the book about? As has been stated elsewhere, Kuhn's premise is that scientific progress isn't what it's typically made out to be. Generally, such as in most of my high school presentations, science is portrayed as a steadily moving river; progressing inevitably from one port of discovery to the next. Kuhn's book set that perspective on it's ear, by stating that science progresses relatively seamlessly until it gets near the edges of understanding, where it then begins fragmenting into a variety of perspectives and viewpoints. Eventually, a fundmental [paradigm] shift occurs which completely changes the world-view of that science (and which often creates an academic war to go with it). Once the dust has settled, revisionist history takes over, and we romanticize the struggle that our understanding went through in that period of growth and change.
Kuhn presents all this in a logical fashion, strengthing his argument via both a well-thought-out approach and a variety of supporting anecdotes. In particular, he doesn't rely too heavily on the Copernican revolution, which seems to be the only argument that others can present on scientific revolution. That alone contributes perhaps most heavily to the value of the argument.
So what has this got to do with change management? I worked as a management consultant for a few years, all before I read this book. Upon reading it, I was hit with the most blinding flash of the obvious; a lot of what I saw empirically in the business world echoed the issues of scientific paradigm shift that Kuhn so eloquently presented in this text. If your work involves any change to an organization; you -have- to read this book. It communicates, better than any book I've read on the subject, what's happening and why in the midst of change. The title may say "Scientific Revolutions," but the applicability is across the board. Buy it and read it.
-
Calificado en Estados Unidos el 21 de noviembre de 2024Easy to read, interesting ideas, got it to read for fun and ended up basing my philosophy dissertation on it because it is a very useful framework through which to discuss ideas in pretty much any field.
-
Calificado en Estados Unidos el 6 de junio de 2006Thomas Kuhn's book has provided comfort for me personally. There is no need to go into the details of his arguments. For example, whether the old generation has to die before paradigm shift can take place is not the issue. The issue is whether scientists resist anything new that cannot be fitted into the existing paradigm. Whether it took ten years or a lifetime for people to accept the theory of the origin of ulcers is irrelevant. I am disagreeing with the review by Peter Hobson (Groton, CT USA), 12/25/2005]. What's important is the initial reaction of the community to new ideas. I have evidence to support the observations and analysis by T. Kuhn.
Revolutionary ideas and theories gain faster acceptance if the new paradigm can quickly lead to economical and social benefits. I believe this is why the story of ulcers so quickly received the recognition of Nobel Prize in Medicine. If the idea leads to more effective treatment, who could hold up its consequences? Even the opponent would embrace it immediately because he would not want to suffer from ulcers.
The problem is that sometime the benefit of making a paradigm shift is not immediately obvious. The defendant of the old paradigm simply resists changes because the habit to tirelessly improve the old paradigm is hard to change.
It is difficult for us to appreciate the point of view expressed in Kuhn's book unless we are familiar with the process of a scientific revolution. I can verify based on my experiences, i.e., on the reactions to our work that Kuhn is "right on the money". Let me quote three remarks by the members of the community, first on my published scientific article, second on a rejected manuscript, and the third on my declined proposal to the National Science Foundation:
"To say that the conclusions drawn by the submitted article are controversial is an understatement of Herculean proportion....While scientific advancement often requires the disproving of established thought, the authors of this work attempt to do so without sufficient proof. The material responses described in this article could be ascribed to other physical processes, including those that adhere to the traditional school of thought...The urgency to abandon conventional wisdom without sound basis is disturbing."
"The Comment by xxx (two of whom are xxx Medalists) makes a very strong case for dismissing the main results of xxx (the present reviewer). Unfortunately, the Reply makes ZERO valid counterpoints and consequently should not be published. If xxx (the present reviewer) want to admit their mistakes and explain how they fell into the trap of publishing erroneous results, this might be useful so that others do not make similar mistakes in the future."
"Overall, the PI needs to calm down considerably. In this proposal and his recent papers, the PI tries valiantly to sell his work as the single most important breakthrough in the history of science! In fact, both the proposed and recent work is reasonable, but the overselling done by the PI irritates people."
I hope that people like Mr. Peter Hobson would in the future interview some people involved in scientific revolutions before making comments that could be misleading.
It is very sad that the phenomena described by Thomas Kuhn are real. I have learned to be patient and more tolerant after reading the book.
I am also very intrigued by his definition of Science as well as his statements regarding textbooks that present science as absolute truth without offering any historical perspective and describing where it comes from and who is chiefly responsible for creating it. I hope to write about these issues at another time.
-
Calificado en Estados Unidos el 23 de marzo de 2025Very enjoyable
-
Calificado en Estados Unidos el 25 de enero de 2014This book is a very difficult read, and worth the effort. More learned people than I will review the contents of this book. I will give a more personal account. I first learned of Thomas Kuhn at a lecture in the 1980s. During the Q&A someone asked about Thomas Kuhn and his relevance to the topic. From the first mention of his name, Kuhn intrigued me. It took me several years to find the book; finally in the Princeton University bookstore. It was not widely circulated at the time, certainly there was no Amazon in 1985! The first read was very difficult. I had the book on my lap with a dictionary right beneath it. The dictionary was not helpful because of all of Kuhn's specialized terminology. I read it once a year for about five years. I got the gist of his point in the first reading. But each subsequent reading gave me a more detailed understanding of his thesis and his examples were more easily understood. I bought some other books that were commentaries on "Structure". (I recommend "The Road Since Structure" especially.)
This most recent purchase of "Stricture" is a gift for a young seminarian who's first grade daughter happens to be my student the Sunday School class which I teach.
Opiniones más destacadas de otros países
-
Janie GCalificado en Reino Unido el 4 de abril de 20255.0 de 5 estrellas Unforgettable book
This is one of the best books I’ve read
-
Kwok Man TseCalificado en Canadá el 12 de junio de 20205.0 de 5 estrellas Gd seller
Gd
-
Ramkumar RevanurCalificado en Reino Unido el 4 de enero de 20205.0 de 5 estrellas Book
Average paper quality. Great content.
-
Vicente FerrerCalificado en Francia el 2 de noviembre de 20133.0 de 5 estrellas Good
A little bit damaged, but it is not a big problem (cover and stains). Arrives in time. Good price. a
-
kettlebellaCalificado en Canadá el 1 de abril de 20145.0 de 5 estrellas kettlebella
A must read this book teaches the limits of science and allows us to discern all the information out there today







