Top critical review
on September 15, 2009
I must side with the book-skeptics who are sick of "revelatory" books and 9-11 websites that mix generous amounts of *obvious* and *known* disinformation with useful points. That storm of confusion is most likely a PART of the coverup. That's how a State crime must be concealed in the Information Age --- lots and lots and lots and lots of "information". It's a form of evasiveness, well known to your average con artist or TV news director.
To be blunt, the reason there are "unanswered questions" is because most of these questions are "unanswerable", short of a confession.
My own main questions is this: WHY has the Congress, Executive, Police, Military, FBI, and all the media has ignored the coincidence of three or more written publications by public relations firms which advocated FOR an attack on American soil, prior to Sept 11?
Some of our most highly regarded "pundits" and "opinion makers" as well as government advisors with classified access were *eager* to have America attacked, and this was said to be VITAL for their (America's) goals. These might have been obscure to the average TV watcher, but not to Washington beat reporters, where these "think tanks" were located and where they badgered Congress and the President since at least 1996 to start a war with Iraq.
Of course there can be no answer which makes sense or is more than a lame excuse.
The FBI pulled a 15-year-old girl out of school in California over a MySpace page, which she had long taken down, over some lame "threat" against George W. Bush in a childish drawing. The FBI found this girl and grilled her and threatened her, without her parents present, and without a lawyer.
Yet the FBI found no interest in grilling Michael Ledeen about promoting a "lucky" and "providential" attack on America, back in 1999? FBI found no interest in grilling Richard Perle and Kristol and Wolfowitz and other PNAC members about their 2000 Magnum Opus how ONLY an attack "like Pearl Harbor" would permit their vital plans for global hegemony (New American Century) to go forward? The FBI was uninterested in the fact that these people were part of a regime that helped arm and train Islamic radical terrorists to fight the USSR, in the Reagan era? Who has more factual and provable Al-Qaeda connections but Bush-2 and his cronies, other than Bush-1 and Zbigniew Brzezinski (who sponsored the Mujahideen starting in July 3, 1979)?
(Clinton is not excluded, there was a Senate Republican report on Kosovo concerning the Pentagon working with Al-Qaeda in the 90s.)
That must be intentional disinterest on the part of Law Enforcement. One does not need a physics degree to sort it out.