David Ray Griffin has written a dozen books on 9/11, presenting the overwhelming evidence that the official account of the attacks on New York and Washington on September 11, 2001, was an infantile story foisted on a traumatised nation by media deeply complicit in the cover-up and suppression of dissent.
Largely as a result of Griffin’s masterly work, for many years it has become obvious that 19 Muslims armed with box cutters did not outwit and overcome the defences of the United States military and bring down three World Trade Center towers with only two airplanes.
9/11 Unmasked, co-authored by Elizabeth Woodworth, takes a different approach. As the back blurb says, it is result from a “six-year investigation by an international review panel, which has provided 51 points illustrating the problematic status of all the major claims in the official account of the 9/11 attacks, some of which are obviously false”. People who have read The New Pearl Harbor but still reject the evidence on purely emotional grounds will find it even more difficult reject the sober analysis of the 23 expert reviewers on the review panel.
Each of the 51 short chapters deals with a particularly problematic aspect of 9/11, dealing first with the official account, and then showing how the best evidence renders it untenable. I think it is the simplicity of this approach that makes the book such a powerful indictment of the 9/11 Commission Report and the media that have so resolutely and straight-facedly supported it.
As Griffin and Woodworth say in their concluding remarks, the most fateful example of 'fake news' of this century has been the official treatment of 9/11. Their book is an invaluable antidote to this fake news, and thoroughly deserves five stars. It should be read by everyone who is concerned about what little remains of freedom and democracy.
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
$11.29
Get it as soon as Friday, Jul 12
Only 18 left in stock (more on the way).
+
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Choose items to buy together.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Reviews with images
"9/11 Unmasked" Calls For an Immediate Grand Jury Investigation
On the evening of September 11, 2001, I saw seasoned investigative journalist, Dan Rather, replay the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building ( aka WTC-7). During the video replay, Rather made an astonishing report suggesting the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC-7 was achieved by deliberate demolition:"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."Two key conclusions from page 227 of this book confirms Dan Rather's observations are correct:1) "The Twin Towers could not have been brought down by the airplane impacts and the resulting fires; there had to be materials producing very powerful explosions"2) WTC-7 could not have been brought down by office fires caused by inflammatory material from one of the Twin Towers."This is only one example of conclusive evidence to demonstrate the official story cannot possibly be true.I also support the "Lawyer's Committee For 9/11 Inquiry" who filed a Grand Jury Petition with the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, NY on April 10, 2018.
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2018
Reviewed in the United States on October 9, 2018
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2018
"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
Two key conclusions from page 227 of this book confirms Dan Rather's observations are correct:
1) "The Twin Towers could not have been brought down by the airplane impacts and the resulting fires; there had to be materials producing very powerful explosions"
2) WTC-7 could not have been brought down by office fires caused by inflammatory material from one of the Twin Towers."
This is only one example of conclusive evidence to demonstrate the official story cannot possibly be true.
I also support the "Lawyer's Committee For 9/11 Inquiry" who filed a Grand Jury Petition with the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, NY on April 10, 2018.
"9/11 Unmasked" Calls For an Immediate Grand Jury Investigation
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2018
On the evening of September 11, 2001, I saw seasoned investigative journalist, Dan Rather, replay the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building ( aka WTC-7). During the video replay, Rather made an astonishing report suggesting the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC-7 was achieved by deliberate demolition:Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2018
"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
Two key conclusions from page 227 of this book confirms Dan Rather's observations are correct:
1) "The Twin Towers could not have been brought down by the airplane impacts and the resulting fires; there had to be materials producing very powerful explosions"
2) WTC-7 could not have been brought down by office fires caused by inflammatory material from one of the Twin Towers."
This is only one example of conclusive evidence to demonstrate the official story cannot possibly be true.
I also support the "Lawyer's Committee For 9/11 Inquiry" who filed a Grand Jury Petition with the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, NY on April 10, 2018.
Images in this review
Top reviews from other countries
Arthur E. Gooding
Great read, well researched. Finally some answers.
Reviewed in Canada on March 24, 2019