- Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
- Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account
Other Sellers on Amazon
$11.96
Sold by:
~Delta~Breeze~
$8.00
Sold by:
Vo Books
$12.00
Sold by:
Fluffy Bunny
Have one to sell?
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
1968: The Year That Rocked the World Paperback – January 11, 2005
by
Mark Kurlansky
(Author)
|
Mark Kurlansky
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
See all formats and editions
Hide other formats and editions
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$99.99 | $28.48 |
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length480 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherRandom House Trade Paperbacks
-
Publication dateJanuary 11, 2005
-
Dimensions5.43 x 1 x 8.23 inches
-
ISBN-100345455827
-
ISBN-13978-0345455826
Yo-Yo Ma: Beginner's Mind
Hear an icon's life story, timeless music, and message. Listen free
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
1968 In America: Music, Politics, Chaos, Counterculture, and the Shaping of a GenerationHardcover
Salmon: A Fish, the Earth, and the History of Their Common FateHardcoverIn Stock.
Salt: A World HistoryPaperbackIn Stock.
The Basque History of the World: The Story of a NationPaperbackIn Stock.
Milk!: A 10,000-Year Food FracasPaperbackIn Stock.
Cod: A Biography of the Fish that Changed the WorldPaperbackIn Stock.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
The Big Oyster: History on the Half ShellPaperbackIn Stock.
1969: The Year Everything ChangedPaperbackIn Stock.
Salmon: A Fish, the Earth, and the History of Their Common FateHardcoverIn Stock.
Nineteen Sixty-Eight in America: Music, Politics, Chaos, Counterculture, and the Shaping of a GenerationPaperbackOnly 1 left in stock - order soon.
The Basque History of the World: The Story of a NationPaperbackIn Stock.
Paper: Paging Through HistoryPaperbackIn Stock.
Special offers and product promotions
Editorial Reviews
Review
“In this highly opinionated and highly readable history, Kurlansky makes a case for why 1968 has lasting relevance in the United States and around the world. Whether you agree or disagree with its points, you’ll find it makes for fascinating reading.”
—DAN RATHER, CBS News
“Highly readable . . . a rich perspective . . . Kurlansky is a writer of remarkable talents and interests.”
–San Francisco Chronicle
Carefully researched and remarkably readable . . . Kurlansky has done a yeoman’s job of amassing an incredible amount of information and making it accessible for today’s reader. . . . What a year it was.”
–The Denver Post
Splendid . . . evocative . . . No one before Kurlansky has managed to evoke so rich a set of experiences in so many different places–and to keep the story humming.”
–Chicago Tribune
Kurlansky writes with a historian’s diligence. . . . [He] traces skillfully the astounding streams of revolt converging in that historic year. . . . A colorful, highly evocative report on the awfulness and the idealism of the time.”
–The Seattle Times
“A cornucopia of astounding events and audacious originality . . . Like a reissue of a classic album or a PBS documentary, this book is about a subject it’s hard to imagine people ever tiring of revisiting. They just don’t make years like 1968 very often.”
–The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
“1968 breathes a new life into these moments. . . . Kurlansky has a flair for bringing wit and breezy intelligence to his subjects.”
–Minneapolis Star Tribune
“Fascinating . . . [Kurlansky] re-creates events with flair and drama.”
–Seattle Post-Intelligencer
—DAN RATHER, CBS News
“Highly readable . . . a rich perspective . . . Kurlansky is a writer of remarkable talents and interests.”
–San Francisco Chronicle
Carefully researched and remarkably readable . . . Kurlansky has done a yeoman’s job of amassing an incredible amount of information and making it accessible for today’s reader. . . . What a year it was.”
–The Denver Post
Splendid . . . evocative . . . No one before Kurlansky has managed to evoke so rich a set of experiences in so many different places–and to keep the story humming.”
–Chicago Tribune
Kurlansky writes with a historian’s diligence. . . . [He] traces skillfully the astounding streams of revolt converging in that historic year. . . . A colorful, highly evocative report on the awfulness and the idealism of the time.”
–The Seattle Times
“A cornucopia of astounding events and audacious originality . . . Like a reissue of a classic album or a PBS documentary, this book is about a subject it’s hard to imagine people ever tiring of revisiting. They just don’t make years like 1968 very often.”
–The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
“1968 breathes a new life into these moments. . . . Kurlansky has a flair for bringing wit and breezy intelligence to his subjects.”
–Minneapolis Star Tribune
“Fascinating . . . [Kurlansky] re-creates events with flair and drama.”
–Seattle Post-Intelligencer
From the Back Cover
To some, 1968 was the year of sex, drugs, and rock and roll. Yet it was also the year of the Martin Luther King, Jr., and Bobby Kennedy assassinations; the riots at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago; Prague Spring; the antiwar movement and the Tet Offensive; Black Power; the generation gap; avant-garde theater; the upsurge of the women's movement; and the beginning of the end for the Soviet Union.
In this monumental book," Mark Kurlansky brings to teeming life the cultural and political history of that pivotal year, when television's influence on global events first became apparent, and spontaneous uprisings occurred simultaneously around the world. Encompassing the diverse realms of youth and music, politics and war, economics and the media, "1968 shows how twelve volatile months transformed who we were as a people-and led us to where we are today.
In this monumental book," Mark Kurlansky brings to teeming life the cultural and political history of that pivotal year, when television's influence on global events first became apparent, and spontaneous uprisings occurred simultaneously around the world. Encompassing the diverse realms of youth and music, politics and war, economics and the media, "1968 shows how twelve volatile months transformed who we were as a people-and led us to where we are today.
About the Author
Mark Kurlansky is the James A. Beard Award-winning author of the New York Times bestseller Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World; Salt: A World History; The Basque History of the World; A Chosen Few: The Resurrection of European Jewry; A Continent of Islands: Searching for the Caribbean Destiny; a collection of stories, The White Man in the Tree; and a children’s book, The Cod’s Tale; as well as the editor of Choice Cuts: A Savory Selection of Food Writing from Around the World and Throughout History. He lives in New York City.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
THE WINTER OF OUR DISCONTENT
The things of the eye are done.
On the illuminated black dial,
green ciphers of a new moon-
One, two, three, four, five, six!
I breathe and cannot sleep.
Then morning comes,
saying, "This was night."
-Robert Lowell, "Myopia: a Night,"
from For the Union Dead, 1964
CHAPTER 1
THE WEEK IT BEGAN
The year 1968 began the way any well-ordered year should-on a Monday morning. It was a leap year. February would have an extra day. The headline on the front page of The New York Times read, world bids adieu to a violent year; city gets snowfall.
In Vietnam, 1968 had a quiet start. Pope Paul VI had declared January 1 a day of peace. For his day of peace, the pope had persuaded the South Vietnamese and their American allies to give a twelve-hour extension to their twenty-four-hour truce. The People's Liberation Armed Forces in South Vietnam, a pro-North Vietnamese guerrilla force in the South popularly known as the Viet Cong, announced a seventy-two-hour cease-fire. In Saigon, the South Vietnamese government had forced shop owners to display banners that predicted, "1968 Will See the Success of Allied Arms."
At the stroke of midnight in South Vietnam's Mekong Delta, the church bells in the town of Mytho rang in the new year. Ten minutes later, while the bells were still ringing, a unit of Viet Cong appeared on the edge of a rice paddy and caught the South Vietnamese 2nd Marine Battalion by surprise, killing nineteen South Vietnamese marines and wounding another seventeen.
A New York Times editorial said that although the resumption of fighting had shattered hopes for peace, another chance would come with a cease-fire in February for Tet, the Vietnamese New Year.
"L'année 1968, je la salue avec sérénité," pronounced Charles de Gaulle, the tall and regal seventy-eight-year-old president of France, on New Year's Eve. "I greet the year 1968 with serenity," he said from his ornate palace where he had been governing France since 1958. He had rewritten the constitution to make the president of France the most powerful head of state of any Western democracy. He was now three years into his second seven-year term and saw few problems on the horizon. From a gilded palace room, addressing French television-whose only two channels were entirely state controlled-he said that soon other nations would be turning to him and that he would be able to broker peace in not only Vietnam but also the Middle East. "All signs indicate, therefore, that we shall be in a position to contribute most effectively to international solutions." In recent years he had taken to referring to himself as "we."
As he gave his annual televised message to the French people, the man the French called the General or Le Grand Charles seemed "unusually mellow, almost avuncular," sparing harsh adjectives even for the United States, which of late he had been calling "odious." His tone contrasted with that of his 1967 New Year's message, when he had spoken of "the detestable unjust war" in Vietnam in which a "big nation" was destroying a small one. The French government had grown concerned at the level of animosity that France's allies had been directing at it.
France was enjoying a quiet and prosperous moment. After World War II, the Republic had fought its own Vietnam war, a fact that de Gaulle seemed to have forgotten. Ho Chi Minh, America's enemy, had been born under French colonial rule the same year as de Gaulle and had spent most of his life fighting the French. He had once lived in Paris under the pseudonym Nguyen O Phap, which means "Nguyen who hates the French." During World War II, Franklin Roosevelt had warned de Gaulle that after the war France should give Indochina its independence. But de Gaulle told Ho, even as he was enlisting his people in the fight against the Japanese, that after the war he intended to reestablish the French colony. Roosevelt argued, "The people of Indochina are entitled to something better than that." De Gaulle was determined that his Free French troops participate in any action in Indochina, saying, "French bloodshed on the soil of Indochina would constitute an impressive territorial claim."
After World War II, the French fought Ho for Vietnam and suffered bitter defeat. Then they fought and lost in Algeria. But since 1962 France had been at peace. The economy was growing, despite de Gaulle's notorious lack of interest in the fine points of economics. Between the end of the Algerian war and 1967, real wages in France rose 3.6 percent each year. There was a rapid increase in the acquisition of consumer goods-especially cars and televisions. And there was a dramatic increase in the number of young people attending universities.
De Gaulle's prime minister, Georges Pompidou, anticipated few problems for the year ahead. He predicted that the Left would be more successful in unifying than they would in actually taking power. "The opposition will harass the government this year," the prime minister announced, "but they will not succeed in provoking a crisis."
The popular weekly Paris Match placed Pompidou on a short list of politicians who would maneuver in 1968 to try to replace the General. Yet the editors predicted there would be more to watch abroad than in France. "The United States will unleash one of the fiercest electoral battles ever imagined," they announced. In addition to Vietnam, they saw the potential hot spots as a fight over gold and the dollar, growing freedom in the Soviet Union's Eastern satellite countries, and the launching of a Soviet space weapons system.
"It is impossible to see how France today could be paralyzed by crisis as she has been in the past," said de Gaulle in his New Year's message.
Paris had never looked brighter, thanks to Culture Minister André Malraux's building-cleaning campaign. The Madeleine, the Arc de Triomphe, the Pantheon, and other landmark buildings were no longer gray and charcoal but beige and buff, and this month cold-water sprays were going to remove seven hundred years of grime from Notre Dame Cathedral. It was one of the great controversies of the moment in the French capital. Would the water spray damage the building? Would it look oddly patchwork, revealing that not all the stones were originally of matching color?
De Gaulle, seated in his palace moments before midnight on the eve of 1968, was serene and optimistic. "In the midst of so many countries shaken by confusion," he promised, "ours will continue to give an example of order." France's "primordial aim" in the world is peace, the General said. "We have no enemies."
Perhaps this new Gaullian tone was influenced by dreams of a Nobel Peace Prize. Paris Match asked Pompidou if he agreed with some of the General's inner circle who had expressed outrage that de Gaulle had not already received the prize. But Pompidou answered, "Do you really think that the Nobel Prize could be meaningful to the General? The General is only concerned about history, and no jury can dictate the judgment of history."
Aside from de Gaulle, the American computer industry struck one of the new year's rare notes of optimism, predicting a record year for 1968. In the 1950s computer manufacturers had estimated that six computers could serve the needs of the entire United States. By January 1968 fifty thousand computers were operating in the country, of which fifteen thousand had been installed in the past year. The cigarette industry was also optimistic that its 2 percent growth in sales in 1967 would be repeated in 1968. The executive of one of the leading cigarette manufacturers boasted, "The more they attack us the higher our sales go."
But by most measurements, 1967 had not been a good year in the United States. A record number of violent, destructive riots had erupted in black inner cities across the country, including Boston, Kansas City, Newark, and Detroit.
1968 would be the year in which "Negroes" became "blacks." In 1965, Stokely Carmichael, an organizer for the remarkably energetic and creative civil rights group the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, or SNCC, invented the name Black Panthers, soon followed by the phrase Black Power. At the time, black, in this sense, was a rarely used poetic turn of phrase. The word started out in 1968 as a term for black militants, and by the end of the year it became the preferred term for the people. Negro had become a pejorative applied to those who would not stand up for themselves.
On the second day of 1968, Robert Clark, a thirty-seven-year-old schoolteacher, took his seat in the Mississippi House of Representatives without a challenge, the first black to gain a seat in the Mississippi State Legislature since 1894.
But in the civil rights struggle, action was shifting from the soft-spoken rural South to the hard-edged urban North. Northern blacks were different from blacks in the South. While the mostly southern followers of Martin Luther King, Jr., studied Mohandas Gandhi and his nonviolent anti-British campaign, Stokely Carmichael, who had grown up in New York City, became interested in violent rebels such as the Mau Mau, who had risen up against the British in Kenya. Carmichael, a good-humored man with a biting wit and a sense of theater that he brought from his native Trinidad, had been for years regularly jailed, threatened, and abused in the South, as had all the SNCC workers. And during those years there were always moments when the concept of nonviolence was questioned. Carmichael began hurling back abuse verbally and sometimes physically, confronting segregationists who harassed him. The King people chanted, "Freedom now!" The Carmichael people chanted, "Black Power!" King tried to persuade Carmichael to use the slogan "Black Equality" rather than "Black Power," but Carmichael kept his slogan.
Increasing numbers of black leaders wanted to fight segregation with segregation, imposing a black-only social order that at least paid lip service to excluding even white reporters from press briefings. In 1966 Carmichael became head of SNCC, replacing John Lewis, a soft-spoken southerner who advocated nonviolence. Carmichael turned SNCC into an aggressive Black Power organization, and in so doing Black Power became a national movement. In May 1967 Hubert "Rap" Brown, who had not been a well-known figure in the civil rights movement, replaced Carmichael as the head of SNCC, which by now was nonviolent in name only. In that summer of bloody riots, Brown said at a press conference, "I say you better get a gun. Violence is necessary-it is as American as cherry pie."
King was losing control over a badly divided civil rights movement in which many believed nonviolence had outlived its usefulness. 1968 seemed certain to be the year of Black Power, and the police were readying themselves. By the beginning of 1968 most American cities were preparing for war-building up their arsenals, sending undercover agents into black neighborhoods like spies into enemy territory, recruiting citizenry as a standing reserve army. The city of Los Angeles, where thirty-four people had been killed in an August 1965 riot in the Watts section, was contemplating the purchase of bulletproof armored vehicles, each of which could be armed with a .30-caliber machine gun; a choice of smoke screen, tear gas, or fire-extinguishing launchers; and a siren so loud it was said to disable rioters. "When I look at this thing, I think, My God, I hope we'll never have to use it," said Los Angeles deputy chief Daryl Gates, "but then I realize how valuable it would have been in Watts, where we had nothing to protect us from sniper fire when we tried to rescue our wounded officers." Such talk had become good politics since California governor Pat Brown had been defeated the year before by Ronald Reagan, largely because of the Watts riots. The problem was that the vehicles cost $35,000 each. The Los Angeles Sheriff's Office had a more cost-effective idea-a surplus army M-8 armored car for only $2,500.
In Detroit, where forty-three people died in race riots in 1967, the police already had five armored vehicles but were stockpiling tear gas and gas masks and were requesting antisniper rifles, carbines, shotguns, and 150,000 rounds of ammunition. One Detroit suburb had purchased an army half-track-a quasi tank. The city of Chicago purchased helicopters for its police force and started training 11,500 policemen in using heavy weapons and crowd control techniques in preparation for the year 1968. From the outset of the year, the United States seemed to be run by fear.
On January 4, thirty-four-year-old playwright LeRoi Jones, an outspoken Black Power advocate, was sentenced to two and a half to three years in the New Jersey State Penitentiary and fined $1,000 for illegal possession of two revolvers during the Newark riots the previous summer. In explaining why he had imposed the maximum sentence, Essex County judge Leon W. Kapp said that he suspected Jones was "a participant in formulating a plot" to burn Newark on the night he was arrested. Decades later, known as Amiri Baraka, Jones became the poet laureate of New Jersey.
In Vietnam, the war U.S. officials were forever telling correspondents was about to end still seemed far from over.
When the French had left in 1954, Vietnam was divided into a North Vietnam ruled by Ho Chi Minh, who had largely controlled the region anyway, and a South Vietnam left in the hands of anti-communist factions. By 1961 the Northern communists had gained control of half the territory of South Vietnam through the Viet Cong, which met with little resistance from the Southern population. That year the North began sending troops of their regular army south along what became known as the Ho Chi Minh Trail to complete the takeover. The U.S. responded with increased involvement though it had always been involved-in 1954 the U.S. had been financing an estimated four-fifths of the cost of the French war effort. In 1964 with North Vietnam's position steadily strengthening, Johnson had used an alleged naval attack in the Gulf of Tonkin as the pretext for open warfare. From that point on, the Americans expanded their military presence each year.
In 1967, 9,353 Americans were killed in Vietnam, more than doubling the total number of Americans previously killed, which now stood at 15,997, with another 99,742 Americans wounded. Newspapers ran weekly hometown casualty reports. And the war was also taking a toll on the economy, at a cost of an estimated $2 billion to $3 billion a month. During the summer, President Johnson had asked for a large tax increase to stanch the growing debt. The Great Society, the massive social spending program that Johnson had begun as a memorial to his fallen predecessor, was dying from lack of funds. A book published at the beginning of 1968 called The Great Society Reader: The Failure of American Liberalism contended that the Great Society and liberalism itself were dying.
The things of the eye are done.
On the illuminated black dial,
green ciphers of a new moon-
One, two, three, four, five, six!
I breathe and cannot sleep.
Then morning comes,
saying, "This was night."
-Robert Lowell, "Myopia: a Night,"
from For the Union Dead, 1964
CHAPTER 1
THE WEEK IT BEGAN
The year 1968 began the way any well-ordered year should-on a Monday morning. It was a leap year. February would have an extra day. The headline on the front page of The New York Times read, world bids adieu to a violent year; city gets snowfall.
In Vietnam, 1968 had a quiet start. Pope Paul VI had declared January 1 a day of peace. For his day of peace, the pope had persuaded the South Vietnamese and their American allies to give a twelve-hour extension to their twenty-four-hour truce. The People's Liberation Armed Forces in South Vietnam, a pro-North Vietnamese guerrilla force in the South popularly known as the Viet Cong, announced a seventy-two-hour cease-fire. In Saigon, the South Vietnamese government had forced shop owners to display banners that predicted, "1968 Will See the Success of Allied Arms."
At the stroke of midnight in South Vietnam's Mekong Delta, the church bells in the town of Mytho rang in the new year. Ten minutes later, while the bells were still ringing, a unit of Viet Cong appeared on the edge of a rice paddy and caught the South Vietnamese 2nd Marine Battalion by surprise, killing nineteen South Vietnamese marines and wounding another seventeen.
A New York Times editorial said that although the resumption of fighting had shattered hopes for peace, another chance would come with a cease-fire in February for Tet, the Vietnamese New Year.
"L'année 1968, je la salue avec sérénité," pronounced Charles de Gaulle, the tall and regal seventy-eight-year-old president of France, on New Year's Eve. "I greet the year 1968 with serenity," he said from his ornate palace where he had been governing France since 1958. He had rewritten the constitution to make the president of France the most powerful head of state of any Western democracy. He was now three years into his second seven-year term and saw few problems on the horizon. From a gilded palace room, addressing French television-whose only two channels were entirely state controlled-he said that soon other nations would be turning to him and that he would be able to broker peace in not only Vietnam but also the Middle East. "All signs indicate, therefore, that we shall be in a position to contribute most effectively to international solutions." In recent years he had taken to referring to himself as "we."
As he gave his annual televised message to the French people, the man the French called the General or Le Grand Charles seemed "unusually mellow, almost avuncular," sparing harsh adjectives even for the United States, which of late he had been calling "odious." His tone contrasted with that of his 1967 New Year's message, when he had spoken of "the detestable unjust war" in Vietnam in which a "big nation" was destroying a small one. The French government had grown concerned at the level of animosity that France's allies had been directing at it.
France was enjoying a quiet and prosperous moment. After World War II, the Republic had fought its own Vietnam war, a fact that de Gaulle seemed to have forgotten. Ho Chi Minh, America's enemy, had been born under French colonial rule the same year as de Gaulle and had spent most of his life fighting the French. He had once lived in Paris under the pseudonym Nguyen O Phap, which means "Nguyen who hates the French." During World War II, Franklin Roosevelt had warned de Gaulle that after the war France should give Indochina its independence. But de Gaulle told Ho, even as he was enlisting his people in the fight against the Japanese, that after the war he intended to reestablish the French colony. Roosevelt argued, "The people of Indochina are entitled to something better than that." De Gaulle was determined that his Free French troops participate in any action in Indochina, saying, "French bloodshed on the soil of Indochina would constitute an impressive territorial claim."
After World War II, the French fought Ho for Vietnam and suffered bitter defeat. Then they fought and lost in Algeria. But since 1962 France had been at peace. The economy was growing, despite de Gaulle's notorious lack of interest in the fine points of economics. Between the end of the Algerian war and 1967, real wages in France rose 3.6 percent each year. There was a rapid increase in the acquisition of consumer goods-especially cars and televisions. And there was a dramatic increase in the number of young people attending universities.
De Gaulle's prime minister, Georges Pompidou, anticipated few problems for the year ahead. He predicted that the Left would be more successful in unifying than they would in actually taking power. "The opposition will harass the government this year," the prime minister announced, "but they will not succeed in provoking a crisis."
The popular weekly Paris Match placed Pompidou on a short list of politicians who would maneuver in 1968 to try to replace the General. Yet the editors predicted there would be more to watch abroad than in France. "The United States will unleash one of the fiercest electoral battles ever imagined," they announced. In addition to Vietnam, they saw the potential hot spots as a fight over gold and the dollar, growing freedom in the Soviet Union's Eastern satellite countries, and the launching of a Soviet space weapons system.
"It is impossible to see how France today could be paralyzed by crisis as she has been in the past," said de Gaulle in his New Year's message.
Paris had never looked brighter, thanks to Culture Minister André Malraux's building-cleaning campaign. The Madeleine, the Arc de Triomphe, the Pantheon, and other landmark buildings were no longer gray and charcoal but beige and buff, and this month cold-water sprays were going to remove seven hundred years of grime from Notre Dame Cathedral. It was one of the great controversies of the moment in the French capital. Would the water spray damage the building? Would it look oddly patchwork, revealing that not all the stones were originally of matching color?
De Gaulle, seated in his palace moments before midnight on the eve of 1968, was serene and optimistic. "In the midst of so many countries shaken by confusion," he promised, "ours will continue to give an example of order." France's "primordial aim" in the world is peace, the General said. "We have no enemies."
Perhaps this new Gaullian tone was influenced by dreams of a Nobel Peace Prize. Paris Match asked Pompidou if he agreed with some of the General's inner circle who had expressed outrage that de Gaulle had not already received the prize. But Pompidou answered, "Do you really think that the Nobel Prize could be meaningful to the General? The General is only concerned about history, and no jury can dictate the judgment of history."
Aside from de Gaulle, the American computer industry struck one of the new year's rare notes of optimism, predicting a record year for 1968. In the 1950s computer manufacturers had estimated that six computers could serve the needs of the entire United States. By January 1968 fifty thousand computers were operating in the country, of which fifteen thousand had been installed in the past year. The cigarette industry was also optimistic that its 2 percent growth in sales in 1967 would be repeated in 1968. The executive of one of the leading cigarette manufacturers boasted, "The more they attack us the higher our sales go."
But by most measurements, 1967 had not been a good year in the United States. A record number of violent, destructive riots had erupted in black inner cities across the country, including Boston, Kansas City, Newark, and Detroit.
1968 would be the year in which "Negroes" became "blacks." In 1965, Stokely Carmichael, an organizer for the remarkably energetic and creative civil rights group the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, or SNCC, invented the name Black Panthers, soon followed by the phrase Black Power. At the time, black, in this sense, was a rarely used poetic turn of phrase. The word started out in 1968 as a term for black militants, and by the end of the year it became the preferred term for the people. Negro had become a pejorative applied to those who would not stand up for themselves.
On the second day of 1968, Robert Clark, a thirty-seven-year-old schoolteacher, took his seat in the Mississippi House of Representatives without a challenge, the first black to gain a seat in the Mississippi State Legislature since 1894.
But in the civil rights struggle, action was shifting from the soft-spoken rural South to the hard-edged urban North. Northern blacks were different from blacks in the South. While the mostly southern followers of Martin Luther King, Jr., studied Mohandas Gandhi and his nonviolent anti-British campaign, Stokely Carmichael, who had grown up in New York City, became interested in violent rebels such as the Mau Mau, who had risen up against the British in Kenya. Carmichael, a good-humored man with a biting wit and a sense of theater that he brought from his native Trinidad, had been for years regularly jailed, threatened, and abused in the South, as had all the SNCC workers. And during those years there were always moments when the concept of nonviolence was questioned. Carmichael began hurling back abuse verbally and sometimes physically, confronting segregationists who harassed him. The King people chanted, "Freedom now!" The Carmichael people chanted, "Black Power!" King tried to persuade Carmichael to use the slogan "Black Equality" rather than "Black Power," but Carmichael kept his slogan.
Increasing numbers of black leaders wanted to fight segregation with segregation, imposing a black-only social order that at least paid lip service to excluding even white reporters from press briefings. In 1966 Carmichael became head of SNCC, replacing John Lewis, a soft-spoken southerner who advocated nonviolence. Carmichael turned SNCC into an aggressive Black Power organization, and in so doing Black Power became a national movement. In May 1967 Hubert "Rap" Brown, who had not been a well-known figure in the civil rights movement, replaced Carmichael as the head of SNCC, which by now was nonviolent in name only. In that summer of bloody riots, Brown said at a press conference, "I say you better get a gun. Violence is necessary-it is as American as cherry pie."
King was losing control over a badly divided civil rights movement in which many believed nonviolence had outlived its usefulness. 1968 seemed certain to be the year of Black Power, and the police were readying themselves. By the beginning of 1968 most American cities were preparing for war-building up their arsenals, sending undercover agents into black neighborhoods like spies into enemy territory, recruiting citizenry as a standing reserve army. The city of Los Angeles, where thirty-four people had been killed in an August 1965 riot in the Watts section, was contemplating the purchase of bulletproof armored vehicles, each of which could be armed with a .30-caliber machine gun; a choice of smoke screen, tear gas, or fire-extinguishing launchers; and a siren so loud it was said to disable rioters. "When I look at this thing, I think, My God, I hope we'll never have to use it," said Los Angeles deputy chief Daryl Gates, "but then I realize how valuable it would have been in Watts, where we had nothing to protect us from sniper fire when we tried to rescue our wounded officers." Such talk had become good politics since California governor Pat Brown had been defeated the year before by Ronald Reagan, largely because of the Watts riots. The problem was that the vehicles cost $35,000 each. The Los Angeles Sheriff's Office had a more cost-effective idea-a surplus army M-8 armored car for only $2,500.
In Detroit, where forty-three people died in race riots in 1967, the police already had five armored vehicles but were stockpiling tear gas and gas masks and were requesting antisniper rifles, carbines, shotguns, and 150,000 rounds of ammunition. One Detroit suburb had purchased an army half-track-a quasi tank. The city of Chicago purchased helicopters for its police force and started training 11,500 policemen in using heavy weapons and crowd control techniques in preparation for the year 1968. From the outset of the year, the United States seemed to be run by fear.
On January 4, thirty-four-year-old playwright LeRoi Jones, an outspoken Black Power advocate, was sentenced to two and a half to three years in the New Jersey State Penitentiary and fined $1,000 for illegal possession of two revolvers during the Newark riots the previous summer. In explaining why he had imposed the maximum sentence, Essex County judge Leon W. Kapp said that he suspected Jones was "a participant in formulating a plot" to burn Newark on the night he was arrested. Decades later, known as Amiri Baraka, Jones became the poet laureate of New Jersey.
In Vietnam, the war U.S. officials were forever telling correspondents was about to end still seemed far from over.
When the French had left in 1954, Vietnam was divided into a North Vietnam ruled by Ho Chi Minh, who had largely controlled the region anyway, and a South Vietnam left in the hands of anti-communist factions. By 1961 the Northern communists had gained control of half the territory of South Vietnam through the Viet Cong, which met with little resistance from the Southern population. That year the North began sending troops of their regular army south along what became known as the Ho Chi Minh Trail to complete the takeover. The U.S. responded with increased involvement though it had always been involved-in 1954 the U.S. had been financing an estimated four-fifths of the cost of the French war effort. In 1964 with North Vietnam's position steadily strengthening, Johnson had used an alleged naval attack in the Gulf of Tonkin as the pretext for open warfare. From that point on, the Americans expanded their military presence each year.
In 1967, 9,353 Americans were killed in Vietnam, more than doubling the total number of Americans previously killed, which now stood at 15,997, with another 99,742 Americans wounded. Newspapers ran weekly hometown casualty reports. And the war was also taking a toll on the economy, at a cost of an estimated $2 billion to $3 billion a month. During the summer, President Johnson had asked for a large tax increase to stanch the growing debt. The Great Society, the massive social spending program that Johnson had begun as a memorial to his fallen predecessor, was dying from lack of funds. A book published at the beginning of 1968 called The Great Society Reader: The Failure of American Liberalism contended that the Great Society and liberalism itself were dying.
Start reading 1968: The Year That Rocked the World on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Random House Trade Paperbacks; 59352nd edition (January 11, 2005)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 480 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0345455827
- ISBN-13 : 978-0345455826
- Item Weight : 13.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.43 x 1 x 8.23 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#96,276 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #134 in French History (Books)
- #708 in Asian History (Books)
- #2,156 in Military History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
286 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2018
Verified Purchase
Excellent book, his chapter on the Chicago convention was concise, informative, and pulled no punches regarding the culpability of some rabble-rousing protesters AND the police rampage. Even Governor Wallace!!! said the police went too far. I was also intrigued by the student protests in Germany. I turned 16 in August "68, I remember the whole stormy year like it was yesterday. But it was exhilirating and chilling reading. It had a profound impact on most of us.
17 people found this helpful
Report abuse
5.0 out of 5 stars
Hope of Where We Could Have Been-Disappointment at Our Failure to Get There in 50 Years
Reviewed in the United States on December 28, 2018Verified Purchase
1968: The Year That Rocked the World by Mark Kurlansky is the book I wish I had started reading on January 1st of this year, rather than being one of the last books I read in 2018. The book brought back many memories of a tumultuous time, much like the turmoil of the past two years. Early in the book the author states “From the outset of the year, the United States seemed to be run by fear.” To me, that sounds much like what has been happening all around the world for the past few years but is especially applicable to the current President of the US. The book also discusses the war against the press fostered by the government in 1968, again similar to what is happening now.
I was ten years and 11 days old on January 1, 1968. While I was too young to be an active participant in the societal and political events of that year, I recognize that my worldview has been deeply influenced by 1968. Reading the book gave me an opportunity to refresh those beliefs and memories and to learn some things I did not know.
Kurlansky’s 1968: The Year That Rocked the World does not just examine the USA during 1968 but looks at what was happening throughout the entire world. There is a section on Czechoslovakia and The Prague Spring, Alexander Dubcek’s attempt to democratize and humanize Communism in Czechoslovakia, against the desires of the Soviet Union. That resulted in the Soviet and Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia in September of 1968, which was credited with being the beginning of the end for the Soviet Union. This was especially interesting to me as my ancestry is 50% Czech.
The author also examines the role the press played in the events of 1968 and how TV coupled with violence, became the way for protesters to get their message picked up and delivered by the mass media (If both sides are nonviolent, there is no story.) Another similarity to what is happening today.
“…because television likes drama, television likes conflict, and anything that indicates conflict was a candidate for something that might get on the air—on the Cronkite show that evening, which was what we were all trying to do.” The presence of cameras started to have a noticeable impact on civility in debates. Schorr recalled in covering the Senate, “They frequently raised their voice for no reason at all, just because they knew that it would get our attention by doing that.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 815-818). ]
No book about 1968 would be complete without examining the Vietnam War and how the worlds changing attitude toward that war influenced what was happening. Growing up in Madison, Wisconsin at the time I recall my father watching the news every night and how often demonstrations at Madison’s own UW campus made the national news. The book reviews the student movements throughout the world and how they influenced many events in 1968. Special attention is given to New York’s Columbia University.
“Violence requires few ideas, but nonviolent resistance requires imagination. That is one of the reasons so few rebels are willing to embrace it. The American civil rights movement learned as it went along, making many mistakes. But by the mid-1960s the movement, especially SNCC, had thrilled the world with its imagination and the daring of its ideas, inspiring students as far away as Poland to stage sit-ins. By 1968, all over the world, people with causes wanted to copy the civil rights movement.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 1550-1553).]
“Youth around the globe saw the world being squeezed by two equal and unsavory forces. American youth had learned that it was important to stand up to both the communists and the anticommunists. The Port Huron Statement recognized that communism should be opposed: “The Soviet Union, as a system, rests on the total repression of organized opposition, as well as a vision of the future in the name of which much human life had been sacrificed, and numerous small and large denials of human dignity rationalized.” But according to the Port Huron Statement, anticommunist forces in America were more harmful than helpful. The statement cautions that “an unreasoning anti-Communism has become a major social problem.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 1859-1864).]
America’s Presidential election in 1968 is also discussed, starting with the premise that while Nixon would be the likely GOP candidate, he would have little chance of winning. That changed as the year went on, with LBJ choosing not to run and Eugene McCarthy and Robert F. Kennedy entering the race. While the polls suggested Gov. Nelson Rockefeller would be the GOP’s candidate we know that did not happen. Instead, Nixon became their candidate, and 1968 marked the end of the liberal to moderate wing of the Republican party.
I often wonder how different the world would be today if RFK has not been assassinated and if he would have become the Democratic candidate and beat Nixon. I have long been a fan of Robert F. Kennedy, and the following quote, of with which I was not familiar with, is cited in the book. It makes me yearn even more for someone like Bobby Kennedy in the White House and in every seat in Congress.
“We will find neither national purpose nor personal satisfaction in a mere continuation of economic progress, in an endless amassing of worldly goods. We cannot measure national spirit by the Dow Jones Average, nor national achievement by the Gross National Product. For the Gross National Product includes air pollution, and ambulances to clear our highways from carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and jails for the people who break them. The Gross National Product includes the destruction of the redwoods and the death of Lake Superior. It grows with the production of napalm and missiles and nuclear warheads. . . . It includes . . . the broadcasting of television programs which glorify violence to sell goods to our children.
And if the Gross National Product includes all this, there is much that it does not comprehend. It does not allow for the health of our families, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play. It is indifferent to the decency of our factories and the safety of our streets alike. It does not include the beauty of our poetry, or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials . . . the Gross National Product measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country. It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile, and it can tell us everything about America—except whether we are proud to be Americans.” – Sen. Robert F. Kennedy [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 2547-2558)].
The author discusses some of the predictions made for the near future, and they are in retrospect, quite comical.
“In the 1950s computer manufacturers had estimated that six computers could serve the needs of the entire United States. By January 1968 fifty thousand computers were operating in the country, of which fifteen thousand had been installed in the past year.” – [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 173-174)]
If we consider that the average smartphone is more powerful than any computer from the 1950s and that there as of 2016 there were 2.1 billion smartphones in use, that above prediction was way off.
“One study by the Southern California Research Council claimed that by the year 1985 most Americans would have to work only half the year to maintain their current standard of living and warned that recreational facilities were woefully underdeveloped for all the leisure time facing the new generation. These conclusions were based on the rising individual share of the gross national product. If the total value of goods and services was divided by the total population, including nonearners, the resulting figure was projected to double between 1968 and 1985.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 3322-3326).]
What a wonderful world it would be if all of humanity had a decent standard of living and excess leisure time.
“In thirty years, Servan-Schreiber predicted, “America will be a post-industrial society with a per capita income of $7,500. There will be only four work days a week of seven hours per day. The year will be comprised of 39 work weeks and 13 weeks of vacation.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 3808-3810)]
So, on the one hand, we have exceeded the above prediction; “In 2016, median income per capita was $33,205. That's the highest in U.S. history. In fact, it was more than 10 times greater than in 1967, when median per capita income was only $2,464;” however, many of us are still working five days or more per week and more than eight hours per day. Even with a median capita income more than $33,000, half of the population falls below that. If we look at the levels of food insecurity and homelessness, we have not made as much progress as we would like to think we have made or what was predicted.
The change in America’s two predominant political parties started in 1968 and is well documented in the book.
“1968 was the year in which the Republican Party became a far more ideological party—a conservative party in which promising moderates have been marginalized.” – [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 4766-4767)]
Even the battle for the Supreme Court was being waged in 1968.
“But cronyism was not the main issue; it was the right of Johnson to appoint Supreme Court justices. Republicans, who had been in the White House only eight of the past thirty-six years, felt they had a good chance of taking over in 1968, and some Republicans wanted their own judges. Robert Griffin, Republican from Michigan, got nineteen Republican senators to sign a petition saying that Johnson, with only seven months left in office, should not get to pick two judges.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 6369-6372)]
And, even back in 1968, electing the President via the electoral college was unpopular.
“In fact, a Gallup poll showed that 81 percent of Americans favored dropping the electoral college and having the president elected by popular vote.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 6509-6510)]
1968: The Year That Rocked the World by Mark Kurlansky concludes with a quote from Astronaut Michael Collins explaining what he felt as he orbited the moon while it was explored by colleagues Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. On one hand, the quote makes me feel good because it professes a view that I believe that most of us from the 60’s believed would be a reality by now. At the same time, I am disappointed. When I see how little progress humanity has made in; ending war and violence, ending poverty, hunger/food insecurity, homelessness, lack of adequate healthcare, and income inequality, ending racism, bigotry, sexism and domestic abuse and violence, ending the destruction of our planet and the environment, ending the concept of nationalism, tribalism and borders and moving towards a unified humanity where we are all working to help one another.
“I really believe that if the political leaders of the world could see their planet from a distance of, let’s say, 100,000 miles, their outlook could be fundamentally changed. That all-important border would be invisible, that noisy argument suddenly silenced. The tiny globe would continue to turn, serenely ignoring its subdivisions, presenting a unified facade that would cry out for unified understanding, for homogeneous treatment. The earth must become as it appears: blue and white, not capitalist or Communist; blue and white, not rich or poor; blue and white, not envious or envied.” – Astronaut Michael Collins, Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 6823-6827)
If you want some historical perspective on where humanity has been since the 1960s and where we are today, I encourage you to read 1968: The Year That Rocked the World by Mark Kurlansky. Hopefully, it will inspire you, as it has me, on our need to do much better, if humanity is to survive.
I was ten years and 11 days old on January 1, 1968. While I was too young to be an active participant in the societal and political events of that year, I recognize that my worldview has been deeply influenced by 1968. Reading the book gave me an opportunity to refresh those beliefs and memories and to learn some things I did not know.
Kurlansky’s 1968: The Year That Rocked the World does not just examine the USA during 1968 but looks at what was happening throughout the entire world. There is a section on Czechoslovakia and The Prague Spring, Alexander Dubcek’s attempt to democratize and humanize Communism in Czechoslovakia, against the desires of the Soviet Union. That resulted in the Soviet and Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia in September of 1968, which was credited with being the beginning of the end for the Soviet Union. This was especially interesting to me as my ancestry is 50% Czech.
The author also examines the role the press played in the events of 1968 and how TV coupled with violence, became the way for protesters to get their message picked up and delivered by the mass media (If both sides are nonviolent, there is no story.) Another similarity to what is happening today.
“…because television likes drama, television likes conflict, and anything that indicates conflict was a candidate for something that might get on the air—on the Cronkite show that evening, which was what we were all trying to do.” The presence of cameras started to have a noticeable impact on civility in debates. Schorr recalled in covering the Senate, “They frequently raised their voice for no reason at all, just because they knew that it would get our attention by doing that.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 815-818). ]
No book about 1968 would be complete without examining the Vietnam War and how the worlds changing attitude toward that war influenced what was happening. Growing up in Madison, Wisconsin at the time I recall my father watching the news every night and how often demonstrations at Madison’s own UW campus made the national news. The book reviews the student movements throughout the world and how they influenced many events in 1968. Special attention is given to New York’s Columbia University.
“Violence requires few ideas, but nonviolent resistance requires imagination. That is one of the reasons so few rebels are willing to embrace it. The American civil rights movement learned as it went along, making many mistakes. But by the mid-1960s the movement, especially SNCC, had thrilled the world with its imagination and the daring of its ideas, inspiring students as far away as Poland to stage sit-ins. By 1968, all over the world, people with causes wanted to copy the civil rights movement.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 1550-1553).]
“Youth around the globe saw the world being squeezed by two equal and unsavory forces. American youth had learned that it was important to stand up to both the communists and the anticommunists. The Port Huron Statement recognized that communism should be opposed: “The Soviet Union, as a system, rests on the total repression of organized opposition, as well as a vision of the future in the name of which much human life had been sacrificed, and numerous small and large denials of human dignity rationalized.” But according to the Port Huron Statement, anticommunist forces in America were more harmful than helpful. The statement cautions that “an unreasoning anti-Communism has become a major social problem.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 1859-1864).]
America’s Presidential election in 1968 is also discussed, starting with the premise that while Nixon would be the likely GOP candidate, he would have little chance of winning. That changed as the year went on, with LBJ choosing not to run and Eugene McCarthy and Robert F. Kennedy entering the race. While the polls suggested Gov. Nelson Rockefeller would be the GOP’s candidate we know that did not happen. Instead, Nixon became their candidate, and 1968 marked the end of the liberal to moderate wing of the Republican party.
I often wonder how different the world would be today if RFK has not been assassinated and if he would have become the Democratic candidate and beat Nixon. I have long been a fan of Robert F. Kennedy, and the following quote, of with which I was not familiar with, is cited in the book. It makes me yearn even more for someone like Bobby Kennedy in the White House and in every seat in Congress.
“We will find neither national purpose nor personal satisfaction in a mere continuation of economic progress, in an endless amassing of worldly goods. We cannot measure national spirit by the Dow Jones Average, nor national achievement by the Gross National Product. For the Gross National Product includes air pollution, and ambulances to clear our highways from carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and jails for the people who break them. The Gross National Product includes the destruction of the redwoods and the death of Lake Superior. It grows with the production of napalm and missiles and nuclear warheads. . . . It includes . . . the broadcasting of television programs which glorify violence to sell goods to our children.
And if the Gross National Product includes all this, there is much that it does not comprehend. It does not allow for the health of our families, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play. It is indifferent to the decency of our factories and the safety of our streets alike. It does not include the beauty of our poetry, or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials . . . the Gross National Product measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country. It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile, and it can tell us everything about America—except whether we are proud to be Americans.” – Sen. Robert F. Kennedy [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 2547-2558)].
The author discusses some of the predictions made for the near future, and they are in retrospect, quite comical.
“In the 1950s computer manufacturers had estimated that six computers could serve the needs of the entire United States. By January 1968 fifty thousand computers were operating in the country, of which fifteen thousand had been installed in the past year.” – [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 173-174)]
If we consider that the average smartphone is more powerful than any computer from the 1950s and that there as of 2016 there were 2.1 billion smartphones in use, that above prediction was way off.
“One study by the Southern California Research Council claimed that by the year 1985 most Americans would have to work only half the year to maintain their current standard of living and warned that recreational facilities were woefully underdeveloped for all the leisure time facing the new generation. These conclusions were based on the rising individual share of the gross national product. If the total value of goods and services was divided by the total population, including nonearners, the resulting figure was projected to double between 1968 and 1985.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 3322-3326).]
What a wonderful world it would be if all of humanity had a decent standard of living and excess leisure time.
“In thirty years, Servan-Schreiber predicted, “America will be a post-industrial society with a per capita income of $7,500. There will be only four work days a week of seven hours per day. The year will be comprised of 39 work weeks and 13 weeks of vacation.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 3808-3810)]
So, on the one hand, we have exceeded the above prediction; “In 2016, median income per capita was $33,205. That's the highest in U.S. history. In fact, it was more than 10 times greater than in 1967, when median per capita income was only $2,464;” however, many of us are still working five days or more per week and more than eight hours per day. Even with a median capita income more than $33,000, half of the population falls below that. If we look at the levels of food insecurity and homelessness, we have not made as much progress as we would like to think we have made or what was predicted.
The change in America’s two predominant political parties started in 1968 and is well documented in the book.
“1968 was the year in which the Republican Party became a far more ideological party—a conservative party in which promising moderates have been marginalized.” – [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 4766-4767)]
Even the battle for the Supreme Court was being waged in 1968.
“But cronyism was not the main issue; it was the right of Johnson to appoint Supreme Court justices. Republicans, who had been in the White House only eight of the past thirty-six years, felt they had a good chance of taking over in 1968, and some Republicans wanted their own judges. Robert Griffin, Republican from Michigan, got nineteen Republican senators to sign a petition saying that Johnson, with only seven months left in office, should not get to pick two judges.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 6369-6372)]
And, even back in 1968, electing the President via the electoral college was unpopular.
“In fact, a Gallup poll showed that 81 percent of Americans favored dropping the electoral college and having the president elected by popular vote.” [Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 6509-6510)]
1968: The Year That Rocked the World by Mark Kurlansky concludes with a quote from Astronaut Michael Collins explaining what he felt as he orbited the moon while it was explored by colleagues Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. On one hand, the quote makes me feel good because it professes a view that I believe that most of us from the 60’s believed would be a reality by now. At the same time, I am disappointed. When I see how little progress humanity has made in; ending war and violence, ending poverty, hunger/food insecurity, homelessness, lack of adequate healthcare, and income inequality, ending racism, bigotry, sexism and domestic abuse and violence, ending the destruction of our planet and the environment, ending the concept of nationalism, tribalism and borders and moving towards a unified humanity where we are all working to help one another.
“I really believe that if the political leaders of the world could see their planet from a distance of, let’s say, 100,000 miles, their outlook could be fundamentally changed. That all-important border would be invisible, that noisy argument suddenly silenced. The tiny globe would continue to turn, serenely ignoring its subdivisions, presenting a unified facade that would cry out for unified understanding, for homogeneous treatment. The earth must become as it appears: blue and white, not capitalist or Communist; blue and white, not rich or poor; blue and white, not envious or envied.” – Astronaut Michael Collins, Kurlansky, Mark. 1968 (Kindle Locations 6823-6827)
If you want some historical perspective on where humanity has been since the 1960s and where we are today, I encourage you to read 1968: The Year That Rocked the World by Mark Kurlansky. Hopefully, it will inspire you, as it has me, on our need to do much better, if humanity is to survive.
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2018
Verified Purchase
I was born in 1974, so all of this was history by the time I got around to learning about it. I have always considered the events of 1968 to have been a significant, if not THE defining, year in US history since the end of the Civil War. Kurlansky rightly calls it a tipping point. If you lived through 1968, I think you might enjoy this book, though it might dredge up painful memories. If you were born when I was (or after) I think it’s imperative that you read this and focus both on how the world was different and how it is comparatively the same now. Certainly worth a read if only for the global perspective of this seminal year in history.
17 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2018
Verified Purchase
Was in Vietnam in 1968/69. This book did a great job in expressing the events and frustrations of my generation. Those who think the political environment is bad in 2017/18 should read this book. There are many lessons to be learned!
12 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2018
Verified Purchase
"1968: The Year That Rocked the World" provided an in-depth account an analysis of the historic events of the year 1968. Mark used his own knowledge and experience as a journalist to tell us about the events of 1968, and to let us know why they were important. It was very interesting, and described events that I was familiar with as well as those that I was unaware of when I was a young teenager in 1968. The book was helpful to me as I wrote my own book, "1968 + 50: Looking back at the historic, tumultuous year of 1968."
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2018
Verified Purchase
Fifty years later we are up against the same issues. Have we learned anything? In rereading this time in history, a time of turbulence and insecurity, I am convinced we are now dealing with the next level of societal advancement. Change comes with strife. Growth comes from change and strife. It seems worse now because the issues are far more complex. I am glad I lived through 1968 and that I am challenged to live and learn this time round. So much of 1968 is reminiscent of today, and yet today is more complicated with all the advances we have made. Those advances could destroy us or make us better. I believe we got better, but the undercurrent of discontent by those who feel left out continues to be our greatest obstacles. How do we engage those people? We still haven't figured that out.
Read this book. Well researched and balanced in its presentation. I was reliving 1968 and learning about the world outside the US at the time. More internationally aware now, I appreciate the full global attention given to 1968.
This brought back memories and conflicts and issues in a more substantive way than just trying to remember and trying to make sense of all that happened. This book gives those times a perspective from which to rethink, rehash, and come to terms with.
Read this book. Well researched and balanced in its presentation. I was reliving 1968 and learning about the world outside the US at the time. More internationally aware now, I appreciate the full global attention given to 1968.
This brought back memories and conflicts and issues in a more substantive way than just trying to remember and trying to make sense of all that happened. This book gives those times a perspective from which to rethink, rehash, and come to terms with.
13 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2018
Verified Purchase
It took me quite a while to get thru this book. Mr. Kurlansky was quite comprehensive in his review of the year.
However, a couple things - the facts are somewhat frequently commented on by left-leaning opinions of the author. Also, the end of the book seemed to just sputter and peter out. Maybe the year actually ended that way as well.
I did learn of quite a few international happenings that I was unaware of, and I think the insight into the liberal thought process was quite interesting for me as well.
However, a couple things - the facts are somewhat frequently commented on by left-leaning opinions of the author. Also, the end of the book seemed to just sputter and peter out. Maybe the year actually ended that way as well.
I did learn of quite a few international happenings that I was unaware of, and I think the insight into the liberal thought process was quite interesting for me as well.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
John G
5.0 out of 5 stars
The year in the 1960s which made all the difference.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 14, 2016Verified Purchase
I read this as research for a book I was writing about start of account planning in the 1960s. And the pivotal year was 1968 - so a very useful book. The author is clearly besotted with his subject - so much disruption happens around the world that it is stronger on descriptions that causes. But this book is a mine of information - the material on live satellite broadcasting and the limits of video clips driving a new way of news reporting - that was a particular highlight. Really useful and highly recommended.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
pip
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent overview
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 4, 2018Verified Purchase
The writer really catches the mood of the '60s, all the hope - particularly in the Prague Spring section. A really good buy.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Geoff M.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Accessible History
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 16, 2019Verified Purchase
Great read well researched So much happened that year that I’d forgotten
Mr Savage
5.0 out of 5 stars
Secret Santa
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 24, 2016Verified Purchase
Bought this item as part of a Secret Santa package (we are doing decades of birth). I'm sure the recipient will enjoy this as it is jam packed with facts and headlines.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Secret Santa
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 24, 2016
Bought this item as part of a Secret Santa package (we are doing decades of birth). I'm sure the recipient will enjoy this as it is jam packed with facts and headlines.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 24, 2016
Images in this review
deborah wallis
4.0 out of 5 stars
Four Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 9, 2017Verified Purchase
Another brilliantly researched book by Kurlansky
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: vietnam history, discover the world, books about king
