| Digital List Price: | $16.00 |
| Kindle Price: | $12.49 Save $3.51 (22%) |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy Kindle Edition
wounded dozens. They were widely blamed on extremist Muslims and
their backers and used to support the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
They were also used to justify and hasten the passage of the USA
PATRIOT Act, which was being presented to Congress just as the first
anthrax victim grew ill.
In October 2001, one of the hypotheses that gained ground was that of
the Double Perpetrator, the claim that al-Qaeda was carrying out the
attacks with the support of Iraq. Much evidence was put forth to support
this Double Perpetrator hypothesis but independent scientists soon
discovered that the anthrax spores came from a domestic lab in the US
serving the military and intelligence communities, not from al-Qaeda or
Iraq.
The FBI then quickly claimed that an individual was responsible for the
attacks and began noisily looking for this “lone wolf.†In 2008 the Bureau
named Dr. Bruce Ivins of the US Army Medical Institute of Infectious
Disease as the “anthrax killer.†Although the FBI remains committed to
the Ivins hypothesis, the case has been disintegrating for the last three
years. Currently, it is justly held in contempt not merely by scientists who
worked with Ivins but by many journalists as well as several US senators.
But this raises the question: if Ivins did not commit this crime, who did?
This book presents evidence to support the following points:
(a) The anthrax attacks were carried out by a group of perpetrators, not
by a “lone wolf.†The attacks were, therefore, the result of a conspiracy—
by definition a plan by two or more people, made in secret and resulting
in an immoral or illegal act.
(b) The group that carried out this crime consisted, in whole or in part, of
insiders deep within the US state apparatus.
(c) These insiders were the same people who planned the 9/11 attacks
(d) The anthrax attacks were meant to facilitate a seizure of power by the
executive branch of government through intimidation of Congress and
US civil society. They were also designed to achieve public acquiescence
to and support for the redefinition of US foreign policy, replacing the Cold
War with a new and aggressive global conflict framework, the Global War
on Terror.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherClarity Press
- Publication dateSeptember 19, 2015
- File size1205 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
Meryl Nass, MD, consultant on bioterrorism for
the Director of National Intelligence and the World Bank
"This deeply troubling book should be read by thinking Americans, and even more so by the majority that do not."-- Denis J. Halliday, UN Assistant Secretary-General 1994-98
"Graeme MacQueen provides abundant evidence that the anthrax attacks and the
9/11 attacks, both of which scared the American people into war, were carried out
by the same people ― people highly placed in the U.S. government."
David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited
About the Author
Harvard University and taught in the Religious Studies Department of McMaster
University for 30 years. While at McMaster he became founding Director of the Centre
for Peace Studies at McMaster, after which he helped develop the B.A. program in Peace
Studies and oversaw the development of peace-building projects in Sri Lanka, Gaza,
Croatia and Afghanistan. Graeme was a member of the organizing committee of the Toronto Hearings held on the
10th anniversary of 9/11 and is co-editor of The Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The same investigators cast further doubt on the contention that Ivins had
deliberately misled the FBI when making a sample submission to them. They said, basing their findings on documents made public after the NAS review, that the FBI's claim was misleading and that, moreover, the FBI knew it was misleading.44
Doubts about the time required to prepare the anthrax spores were also
expressed by researchers. In an interview with ProPublica, Dr. Henry Heine, a former supervisor of Ivins at USAMRIID, said that the period in Ivins' schedule identified by the FBI as his opportunity to prepare the spores (the "34 more hours in the B3 suite than his combined total for the previous seven months") wascompletely inadequate for the task the FBI alleges he was performing. The 34 hours, Heine said, are "more than 8,000 hours (close to a year) short of what he would have needed to grow the anthrax."45 Heine added that it would have been impossible for Ivins to have prepared the anthrax without his colleagues being aware of it.
What, then, in the light of all these developments, is the state of the DOJ's
case against Ivins today? The official position of the Department and its
investigative agency, the FBI, is that Ivins was the anthrax killer and the case is closed. But many scientists are unconvinced, as are several important elected officials. Representative Holt, unsatisfied with the FBI's investigation, has been trying for some time to initiate a new, formal investigation.46 The fact that these doubts are shared by some within the DOJ and are discussed frankly and seriously in the mainstream media indicates that the standing of the DOJ's case very low.
Product details
- ASIN : B00OZ57TVE
- Publisher : Clarity Press (September 19, 2015)
- Publication date : September 19, 2015
- Language : English
- File size : 1205 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 216 pages
- Page numbers source ISBN : 0986073121
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,180,836 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #554 in Propaganda & Political Psychology
- #560 in Terrorism (Kindle Store)
- #802 in Intelligence & Espionage (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book well-researched, well-organized, and clear to read. They also appreciate the consistent, solid objective and clear objective.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book well-researched, persuasive, and logical. They also say it brings a Zen-like clarity to the telling of the story.
"...luckily I was not one of them. This is the best evidence of what really occurred...." Read more
"Anvery well researched book very distressing very timely...." Read more
"This is very persuasive account of the post-9/11 anthrax attacks from a seasoned expert in 9/11 studies...." Read more
"...) and it was an engrossing and quick read despite the scholarly quality of the book and the voluminous footnotes...." Read more
Customers find the book well-written, clear, and easy to read. They also appreciate the consistent, solid, and clear objective.
"...planned, fairly well executed, and had a consistant, solid and clear objective...aka...replacing the defunct and CIA "propped-up" USSR as..." Read more
"Very clear and well-written review of the facts surrounding the anthrax attacks and an appropriate analysis. Very persuasive. Highly recommended." Read more
"...well ordered mind, clearly written, easy to read. Important because it lays bare an evil that lay hidden and nearly forgotten for 14 years...." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
the tainted letter passed through. I know the people infected. luckily I was not one of them. This is the best evidence of what really occurred. The truth may surprise you, if you choose to read it and accept it.
I worked for years with people where in denial. They simply couldn’t believe who was really responsible.
I won’t spoil it for you. I was worth every penny to me to confirm my suspicions.
MacQueen traces a clear line between the anthrax attacks, which served to divert the FBI's investigative resources from the 9/11 attacks to this matter, and 9/11 proper. In his study, he clears the convenient patsy, Dr Bruce Ivins. Other commentators have been prepared to accept Ivins' guilt, by virtue of weak circumstantial evidence and his (apparent) suicide. Ivins might have been a strange fish, but that doesn't of necessity make him the culprit. Indeed, the science tends to exonerate him.
MacQueen's chief contribution here is to demonstrate the intended connection between the anthrax attacks and the perpetrators of 9/11. Though the science necessitates a conclusion that the anthrax attacks were perpetrated by elements within the US military-security complex, the overt efforts to link the anthrax attacks to 9/11 and the Florida hijacker nexus, persuasively demonstrate that the two events are inextricably connected at the planning level.
MacQueen's work packs a great deal into a short compass. He writes, as always, with a lean style that has no padding, conveying the essence of his arguments with admirable academic rigor. Whether you accept his conclusions or not, this is a work that anyone interested in 9/11 should read and contemplate.
Top reviews from other countries
Die Erkenntnis, dass die 9/11 Anschläge und die Anthrax-Anschläge zweifelsohne in täterschaftlicher Verbindung stehen, die Anthrax-Anschläge jedoch hochwahrscheinlich einer amerikanischen geheimdienstlichen Operation zu zuordnen sind, wirft weitere Fragen auf, die jedoch an anderer Stelle geklärt werden müssen.
He makes a highly compelling case that these attacks could not have been the work of arab terrorists, but must have come from a US chemical weapons laboratory (he names the most likely lab), and that the notes, the Modus Operandi and the sequence of events all point to powerful insiders who were terrorising senators, the media and the greater public, into rushing into a war with Iraq.
It is very simply and persuasively written. The case seems really water-tight. It's full of surprises (stuff that you just would not know just from the media) and very interesting leaps of inference that show that it really is much more plausible that powerful American operatives got everything they wanted from these attacks, and that it would have been impossible for terrorists to follow the highly intricate sequence of events (including choice of targets), choice of messages, and even misspellings.
All in all, a very good read, and it's scandalous that a work of this quality, depth and integrity, is not reviewed in the mainstream press.






