1 new from $3.66

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

90° Spring Loaded Latches, Chrome

4.5 out of 5 stars 3 customer reviews

Available from these sellers.
1 new from $3.66

Specifications for this item
Brand Name RSC
Part Number HH-363
System of Measurement Inch
Item Weight 4 ounces
UNSPSC Code 31162407

Amazon Business Amazon Business


Product Description

Steel construction with either black enamel or chrome finish. 90degrees or straight mounting options. Keeper included.

Product Details

  • Item Weight: 4 ounces
  • Shipping Weight: 4 ounces
  • ASIN: B002I001CC
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #89,333 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
67%
4 star
33%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
These latches were ordered to replace the original chrome, and very rusty, engine cover latches on a Crown fire truck. They were an exact replacement and are equal to the high quality of the original.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
These latches are just right for tool boxes on my rig. They matched the other latches to a T. I looked hi and low for these, even if you could find them else where you couldn't beet the price.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Worked great for a couple of years now. We purchased these for my husband antique car hood and they work properly just like they are supposed to do.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse