Buy new:
-7% $21.38$21.38
Delivery Thursday, January 9
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$13.28$13.28
Delivery Thursday, January 9
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Double Ace
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The 900 Days: The Siege Of Leningrad Paperback – September 18, 2003
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length672 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherDa Capo
- Publication dateSeptember 18, 2003
- Dimensions8.99 x 6.05 x 1.35 inches
- ISBN-100306812983
- ISBN-13978-0306812989
Frequently bought together

Similar items that ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Harrison E. Salisbury is the author of American in Russia, Moscow Journal, and other books.
Product details
- Publisher : Da Capo; 2nd edition (September 18, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 672 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0306812983
- ISBN-13 : 978-0306812989
- Item Weight : 2.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 8.99 x 6.05 x 1.35 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #194,986 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #311 in Russian History (Books)
- #1,481 in World War II History (Books)
- #3,725 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book's information detailed and thorough. They describe it as a great account of history that provides an insight and better understanding of the Russian people. However, opinions differ on the writing style - some find it well-written and gripping, while others report errors and missing pages. There are mixed reviews on the narrative quality - some find it convincing and reassuring, while others feel it lacks human emotion.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book provides a detailed account of history with interesting descriptions. It gives them an insight and better understanding of the Russian people and the siege of Leningrad. Readers describe it as informative, well-researched, and one of the most powerful nonfiction books they have ever read.
"...It is one of the most powerful nonfiction books you will ever read...." Read more
"This is a well researched account of the siege of Leningrad by a journalist who knew was personally familiar with Leningrad and many of the..." Read more
"...It is extraordinarily well documented with facts to support every conclusion the author reaches...." Read more
"...I agree inasmuch as Salisbury did a brilliant job of maintaining a meaningful timeline of events...." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's depth. They find it thorough, detailed, and well-documented. The large Kindle Fire makes it easy to read and enjoy.
"...Glad I did though. Very painstakingly , thorough, detail on the siege of Lenningrad. I learned a lot about this epic WWII event." Read more
"The book is very well researched. It's quite detailed...." Read more
"It's quite thorough, I'll give him that. The section about the winter of 1941-42 was truly horrific. I didn't know how bad the Russians had suffered." Read more
"Excellent Documentation..." Read more
Customers find the pictures clear and fantastic. They appreciate the larger, clearer maps from the period.
"...This one surpasses my expectations : the maps are so much larger and more clear. The Siege lingers in my thoughts, making wasting food unthinkable...." Read more
"...leaders, and soldiers, including stunning aggregate data, painting a detailed picture of one of the most important events of the Second World War." Read more
"...condition, worth 5 stars for me if I could read Russian, pictures are clear and fantastic." Read more
"...It has pictures from the period and is extremely informative." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the writing style. Some find it well-written and engaging, with powerful words and poetry. Others mention missing pages, mistakes, and a detailed description of Soviet shortcomings and failures. Overall, the writing style is described as good but not light reading.
"Very concise description of the beginning of the Nazi war on the Soviets and the ensuing seige of Leningrad...." Read more
"...saw a journalistic account that is riddled in places with factual inaccuracies or mistakes, some of which it is clear that the author never bothered..." Read more
"...The book reads like a novel. And the subject is worthy of the extended treatment. The city measured about 2.5 million...." Read more
"...It also reads like a suspense novel. I read a lot of history and this is truly a cut way above the usual historical account...." Read more
Customers have different views on the narrative quality. Some find it convincing and gripping, reassuring that they're getting a wide variety of information. Others feel the narrative lacks human emotion and is not as entertaining as expected.
"...and personal connection with events and people are touching and convincing...." Read more
"...Hoever the Kindle edition of it is a farce, and must have been edited by an illiterate. There are countless mistakes in the text (OCR errors?)..." Read more
"...Very reassuring for the reader that you're getting a wide variety of information and that he's not holding back. It also reads like a suspense novel...." Read more
"...The narrative is lacking any human emotion." Read more
Reviews with images
Horrific story of WWII Leningrad siege
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 10, 2019I first read "The 900 Days" more than 20 years ago and finally own my own copy. It is one of the most powerful nonfiction books you will ever read. 25 years after his own visit to Leningrad at the end of the siege in 1944, American journalist Harrison Salisbury set out to tell the definitive story of one of World War II's most consequential battles.
The millions of Germans and Central Europeans who invaded the USSR in June 1941 were divided into three major groups. Army Group Nord was tasked with capturing Leningrad and at first it appeared they would succeed. Indeed, I am forced to the conclusion that holding Leningrad after it was besieged was wasteful of lives. But what choice did the Soviets have? Salisbury notes that the Germans had been ordered to keep attacking Leningrad even if it surrendered.
The level of suffering and starvation in Leningrad in the winter and spring of 1942 is comparable to what was happening in Auschwitz at roughly the same time. The people of Leningrad starved because they were Russians, the prisoners in Auschwitz were gassed because they were mostly Jews; and the Nazis believed neither group had any place in Europe. Such suffering is the ultimate argument against the existence of God just as the fact the Nazis were finally defeated is the ultimate argument for His existence.
If you have any interest in World War II or the history of Russia generally, please read "The 900 Days." It and the siege of Leningrad are a monument to the human spirit for all time.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2024If your eyesight is not great you will have trouble with the very small font. I'd prefer a larger font even though it would mean more pages and a higher price!
- Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2016"While from the proud tower in the town, death looks gigantically down"-Edgar Allen Poe (1809-1849) from his poem titled "The City in the Sea." Such a phrase could describe Leningrad in May, 1941. Little did the Leningraders know that by the end of the year, these people would be in a life-and-death struggle against the Germans, famine, disease, and bitter cold. Although the the bitter cold helped save the Leningrad survivors. Harrison Salisbury's book THE 900 Days is well researched book describing the courage and perseverance of the Leningrad citizens and Red Army troops who successfully defended Leningrad for 900 days against overwhelming odds.
Salisbury began his book an idyllic view of Leningrad in May, 1941. Students finished final examinations. Young lovers strolled the parks arm-in-arm. Parents and children enjoyed the long hours of daylight not knowing what they would face by the end of the year. Joy and happiness were followed by death, famine, fatal illness, and, as mentioned above, bitter cold.
When Hitler & co. started Operation Barbarossa on June 22, 1941, Stalin & co. were caught unprepared even though the signs were obvious. German air force pilots invaded Soviet air space. Some German air force pilots accidentally landed at Soviet airports. Reports of a mass German mobilization close to the USSR were ignored by Stalin. For some reason, Stalin feared Hitler and the Germans. Stalin thought Hitler would honor the Non Aggression Pact of 1939. Those who mentioned possible invasion, and, as Salisbury noted, were charged as saboteurs and provokers and threatened with firing squads. When the Germans began their invasion, Salisbury wrote that Stalin thought that some German commanders were too exuberant and that the invasion was a skirmish even though the Germans were bombing areas deep in Soviet territory.
When Stalin FINALLY realized the serious desperate situation and retreated to his dacha. When Stalin finally regained his nerve, he learned to listen and shut his mouth while listening experienced military commanders. Leningrad was obviously one of the targets of the German invasion along with Moscow and Stalingrad-now Volgograd. The first few days of the German attacks on Leningrad were not very dramatic. However, as Red Army troops retreated and the Germans took control of islands and towns close to Leningrad, the Leningrad situation deteriorated quickly. The worse disaster was the German bombing of the food warehouses in the Badayev region of Leningrad. The Leningraders immediately know the the disaster that struck. Salisbury was clear that the potential for widespread famine was well known in spite of false assurances of some Communist Party bureaucrats and leaders.
Salisbury gave good detailed data as to the reduction of rations which, for many Leningraders was below subsistence levels. Factory workers and Red Army troops got far better rations than other civilians especially the very young and the elderly. As Salisbury wrote, famine led to desperation whereby corn seed, wall paper and other mixtures were concocted for food. Pets, birds, and other animals disappeared for food. Famine led to crime. Forged ration cards were used, and those who printed ration cards forged extras for themselves. Finally the NKVD and NKGB put an end to these forgeries by shooting those guilty. Another type of crime the Soviet secret police faced was the fact that otherwise law abiding citizens murdered to get ration cards. As efficient and thorough as the Soviet secret police were, the latter crimes were much more difficult to solve.
Aside from Soviet unpreparedness at the start of WW II, another problem was the initial command ineptness of the Red Army in 1941. Some commanders were shot. Those politically connected including Kulik and Beria were incompetent but were able to shift blame for their stupidity. While the Red Army troops fought bravely, inept command caused huge casualties. Lack of big guns and ammunition contributed to the woes of Leningrad. The only consolation was that the brave Red Army troops inflicted huge casualties on the German invaders.
What may surprise readers is that the Leningraders "joined the fray." Young Communists, factory workers, musicians, artists, and college students went to the front where many died due to lack of training and not enough arms or ammunition. The great Russian Shostakovich lost many of his musicians due to either privation or in combat when they were not practicing. When the Leningraders knew that the Germans could get into the city, they stored arms, Molotov cocktails, grenades, and planted mine fields to welcome any German intruders. Parts of Leningrad were armed camps.
The section titled Children's Sleds was indicative of the high death rates. Children's sleds were used as hearses to carry the dead to mass graves. Those who were too weak to walked were often transported by stronger people to get to homes and shelters. A photo of two men in a park appeared as someone sitting and one lying in snow. Both men were dead. An angry woman scolded a pharmacist for now not helping a poor soul, and the pharmacist said she was a pharmacist and not a medic. The poor soul was already dead. Salisbury noted that a man dying from famine refused to be helped by a police officer. The doomed man said he just wanted to be left alone and to die in peace.
Again, as noted above, General Winter helped the cause. Lake Ladoga, the largest lake in Europe, froze in 20 to 30 below zero degrees. Soviet physicists calculated the thickness of the ice for transport of troops, food, weapons, ammunition, and fuel into Leningrad. While some of this effort failed, the effort was effective to prevent complete death. Also the bitter cold weather took its toll on German troops who were not supplied with winter gear.
As the siege ended, the Leningraders regained their confidence. These people fully realized what they achieved in defiantly preventing German invasion of the city. The Leningraders argued that Leningrad was afraid of death. However, death now feared Leningrad. The Leningraders were not defending Communist ideology. They were defending the Russian Motherland and more important their city. The people were defending THEIR CITY. They were defending the home of Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, and other great Russian literary figures. They were defending the residences of famous Russian scientists and and mathematicians.
Tragically,. when WW II was over, Stalin's paranoia led to purges of the surviving Leningrad heroes. Monuments, memorials, and museums praising the heroism of Leningrad were ruined or relocated. Only in 1957 did Khrushchev & co. posthumously rehabilitated Leningrad's heroes and heroines. While museums and memorials were restored on a smaller scale, the fact is that recently larger memorials and tourist museums have been erected to honor Leningrad's heroes.
As previously noted, the people of Leningrad thought of Leningrad as THEIR CITY.. Hitler was so confident that he planned to have a major celebration party in Leningrad. He then planned to raze what was left of the city and turn Leningrad into an artificial lake which the undersigned mentioned in another review. The fact is that Hitler never had his celebration. Hitler is dead, but the memory of the courage of Leningrad is alive as part of history.
James E. Egolf
May 4, 2016
- Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2009Very concise description of the beginning of the Nazi war on the Soviets and the ensuing seige of Leningrad. First it is amazing how Stalin misread Hitler's intentions towards the Soviets during the Nazi-Soviet pact. Because of his fear of giving the Nazis an excuse for breaking the pact, Stalin did not allow any defensive measures to be taken and even had some officers shot for carrying out defensive preparations. The Soviets even had orders not to return fire from any Nazi forces be they air intrusions or attacks or ground shelling or shots, and as a result of taking any of these measures there was a firing squad waiting. When the war finally really did break out, Stalin sort of disappeared for about a month as, I imagine, he struggled with his sanity in face of his obvious deadly misconception. But rather than confronting Stalin, the men close to him covered for him and , ironically, when he finally came out of his retreat a mix of Russian chauvanism and Stalin's own "cult of the personality" probably brought the forces together that were necessary to put up a defense and later an offense. But during these terrible times there were cultural voices and gov't policy that spent much time and resources to protect everything of cultural value including the Heritage Museum collection. A wonderful demonstration of the dedication to preservation of culture on an equal basis as the dedication to the military destruction of Nazism,
Top reviews from other countries
Carol G.Reviewed in Canada on May 16, 20245.0 out of 5 stars The past is prologue.
'History might not repeat itself, but it does rhyme' as the saying goes. Fast forward to current 2024: Putin is making all kinds of threats of mayhem, etc using petroleum as a weapon. Between the pipeline that 'mysreriously' was blown up and Germany's need for petroleum to run its industries, it looks like at some time in the future Russia will antagonize Germany and we'll see another tit-for-tat likely along the same lines (if not for the same reasons as the siege of Leningrad) but no doubt the end result will be very similar.
I first read this book in the early 70s, and have been keeping an eye on what's happening with all that Putin's doing, especially his need/want to re-create the old Soviet Socialist Republic...threatening invasion of Poland, Belorussia, Moldova and even England and Ireland. We've already seen what he's capable of doing to a sovereign Ukraine and her quiet conservative people. I should know. I have family over there.
So, using the precept of the past being prologue, I thought it time to buy this book and read up looking for parallels and similarities. It's a good history book and I highly recommend it for several reasons once of which is you'd get a clear idea what that country's leader(s) are quite capable of.
-
glucaReviewed in Italy on August 22, 20234.0 out of 5 stars Dettagliato e ben scritto
Un libro che narra di una tragedia poco nota al pubblico occidentale, ma anche dell'eroismo di chi ha salvato la città dall'assedio nazista. Ricchissimo di dettagli nel raccontare tutto quello che è successo nei 900 giorni di assedio, non risparmia al lettore né le sofferenze né gli episodi brutali e disumani. Piacerà sicuramente al lettore appassionato della seconda guerra mondiale abituato a letture molto lunghe. Unica critica dal mio punto di vista, al fine di dare una visione completa di tutti gli aspetti, il libro segue il punto di vista di innumerevoli personaggi, narrando brevemente moltissime storie personali in parallelo, il che potrebbe disorientare il lettore.
Wayne CReviewed in Australia on October 29, 20245.0 out of 5 stars Exceptional
A hard to put down book... A rivetting and compelling account of the Siege of Leningrad... includes personal accounts from numerous people fro top leadership right down to ordinary citizens on the front lines., .. paints a very broad raning, detailed picture of events... gives a great understanding of the situation
Amazon CustomerReviewed in India on August 5, 20185.0 out of 5 stars Collector's Item
A must read! Awesome book! Get it if you haven't as yet.
Juliane ColsmanReviewed in Germany on October 16, 20135.0 out of 5 stars Excellent, sweeping account of the Siege of Leningrad
An extraordinary book! From the painstaking analysis of why the Soviet Union was so overrun by the German Barbarossa offensive and of how the rings of siege were laid around Leningrad to a detailed, deeply moving description of the combined horrors of dark, cold, hunger and death and the heroism of Leningraders, those who survived and those who did not. Clearly a journalist rather than a historian, the author strikes just the right balance between presenting the stark facts and placing a gentle, sometimes poetic emphasis on what man is capable of when put to extremes. It is a harrowing account, superbly written, leaving the reader time and again aghast at what humans do to each other.







