- Paperback: 278 pages
- Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (June 23, 2016)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1533470464
- ISBN-13: 978-1533470461
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.6 x 9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 13 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,709,428 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
ACT ONE, Scene One-MURDER Paperback – June 23, 2016
|New from||Used from|
See the Best Books of 2018
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
About the Author
A.H. RICHARDSON IS AN OUTSTANDING STORYTELLER, whose unlimited imagination conjures up challenging and unforgettable characters, both good and evil, weaving them into a murder mystery full of suspects and unexpected twists and turns. Born in England (she grew up on Agatha Christie stories), the author has always loved tales of murder and mayhem. She is the daughter of the famous composer, Clive Richardson, who always encouraged her to write, even as a small child. She paints and sculpts, plays guitar, trained dressage competitors, is a linguist, and acted on stage, film and television. What actor could resist writing a murder mystery about a cast of stage thespians? She is the proud mother of three grown sons and grandmother to three adorable grandchildren. Her adopted home is in Tennessee near the picturesque Smoky Mountains, where she writes, gardens, cooks for visiting students, and supports an Earth-saving community.
Try the Kindle edition and experience these great reading features:
Showing 1-4 of 13 reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I have just a few quibbles that keep this from a full four-star rating. First: coincidence takes the action back to the area near Little Shendon (scene of our heroes' first adventure). But there's really no good reason for this other than we decided to give Mr. Symeon, the playwright, a huge old house there. We don't even make much of Sir Victor's aunt in this story--her house serves as not much more than a hotel where Sir Victor can spend the night. Lady Armstrong is such a colorful character; it's a shame that she doesn't play a more integral part (especially since we took all the trouble to have the murder take place in her neighborhood, so to speak).
Second, while Richardson does make a great effort to follow in the footsteps of the Golden Age (with much success in a number of ways), I can't say that the plot is completely fair in its cluing. It is possible to spot the culprit, but I don't think the clues really explain the motive. There are hints, yes, though tiny. But looking back, I don't (as is often the case with Christie and others) say "Oh, yes, when so-and-so said that, I should have known that X needed to get rid of Y because Z." At the end of the book, we know that X needed to get rid of Y because Inspector Burgess received a packet of information from the Yard that told him so...and he doesn't tell us until after the culprit has been hauled away and we're having our little wrap-up scene.
My last quibble is the same as with the first book. In fact I can pretty much lift the words from the previous review: "the formatting is distracting. It is formatted with double-spacing between every paragraph. Absolutely unnecessary in a novel and it breaks up the page as well as the reading flow. It's as if it was decided ahead of time that we MUST have at least 270 pages [in this book] using this particular font size and, by golly, if we've got to double-space to get there, then we will." And, again, the paragraphs are, generally speaking, very short. The combination makes the book feel choppy. It's a bit better in this second outing, but still a distraction.
[The book was offered to me for impartial review by Book Publicity Services and I have received no payment of any kind. All comments in this review are entirely my own honest opinion.]
The writing style is so lovely! I'm just a sucker for the classic styled mysteries! This book was so humorous and the banter between the characters is so well-written. The descriptions of the people and surrounding areas were wonderful. And oh my gosh... the description of food made my mouth water!
I loved all of the little hints that were dropped throughout. I thought I had a pretty good guess at who the murderer was, but because of the wonderful writing from this author, I was also second guessing myself! Only once the three gentlemen laid it all out, did all the little hints and such finally fall into place.
This book certainly had a bit of a Clue-vibe going on, and of course I loved every second of it! I couldn't wait to learn more at the same time that the three gentlemen did to see if I could figure the mystery out myself!
(From the Publisher): Talk about drama! To celebrate the opening of his new play, the playwright invites the entire cast to his mysteriously medieval mansion for a gala dinner. As the curtain rises on this festive feast, a scene of chaos occurs when the leading man is murdered. Who could have done it? And why? Old friends — Inspector Stan Burgess, Actor Berry Beresford, and Sir Victor Hazlitt — question an outlandish cast of frightened actors and household staff. The plot thickens with yet another murder occurs, and the intrigue continues until…
To say that this book is a mixed bag would be an understatement. On the whole, it’s still a mostly enjoyable read that provides an interesting twist on a monumentally overdone mystery trope (The one where a group of people is locked in a house as they are killed off one-by-one (Clue, And Then There Were None, etc)). Unfortunately, every problem I had with the first book in the series, Murder in Little Shendon, are very much still present in this one. Add to that a collection of chapter titles that are, at times, so hokey that they draw you right out of the story, a mystery that takes a quarter of the book to actually begin, a huge cast of characters full of unlikable people, and an unsolvable mystery, and you’ve got Act One, Scene One – Murder.
Here’s the thing: I wanted to like this book. I enjoyed the first one, grammatical issues aside, but this one just couldn’t grip me the way the first one did. I don’t know if it’s the fact that the pacing for the first quarter of the novel is so slow that it took me actual weeks to get through, the fact that I didn’t particularly enjoy any of the new characters, my increasingly busy offline life, or a combination of the three that made me so unreceptive to this book, but whatever the case, I just didn’t enjoy it as much as I enjoyed the first one. It’s not a bad book at all. There are plenty of redeemable parts of the book. Particularly the spin on the setting. It’s a lot of fun following a group of actors who have gotten tangled up in the mystery, even if they aren’t particularly distinguishable from one another.
Like the first one, Act One, Scene One – Murder‘s strongest aspect is its character work. Again, Victor Hazlitt and Berry Beresford are easily the best parts of the novel. Unfortunately, they’re in this one a lot less than the first one, especially once the mystery is actually set in motion. So much time is spent with the acting troupe that the actual main characters of the story sort of fall by the wayside. This would almost be forgivable if the acting troupe was developed enough that the characters felt distinct and whole. But, that’s not the case. I read the whole book, and I still couldn’t tell you which character was named what and which backstory went with which character. Once the murder is revealed, I had to look at the book with a blank face as I tried to figure out which character it was.
Speaking of the murderer, the audience is completely unable to figure out who it is. Hazlitt, Beresford, and Inspector Burgess make some huge leaps in logic to end up at the solution, and it’s a shame. The only clues that point to the ultimate culprit are fairly minuscule and easily missed. And even if you do pick up on them, it’s nowhere near enough to actually point you in the direction of the culprit. By the time you reach the last chapter, you sit there genuinely having no idea who did it and once you find out who did it, you sit there just wondering how on earth Hazlitt, Beresford, and Burgess figured it out. (Spoiler: there’s basically a deus ex machina in the form of some research done by an outside party that connects the dots, but the audience isn’t privy to how that research is gathered, so we are forced to take it all at face value). Good mysteries only work when the audience is able to figure it out along with the detective, and Act One, Scene One – Murder fails in this regard.
So, what do I think of Act One, Scene One – Murder? Well, it’s disappointing. It’s not bad, or anything, but it’s a definite step down in quality from the first novel. There’s not as much character development or time spent with the main characters, the mystery takes forever to get started and isn’t actually solvable by the reader, and, while the twist of having the suspects all be actors is a nice touch, it doesn’t do enough to actually differentiate itself from the countless other mysteries that have this same premise. There are plenty of fun moments, and once the mystery actually gets started, the pacing does pick up. The book, like the first one, continues to be in dire need of a copyeditor as grammatical errors are littered throughout and it was sort of a slog for me to actually finish the book. It’s not a hard read or anything, I was just bored. If you really liked the first one or are really into any and all mystery novels – especially ones that feature premises similar to And Then There Were None, then you’ll probably enjoy this book. It is still a lot of fun and it’s enjoyable enough. It just wasn’t for me.
3 out of 5 wands
NOTE: I was provided a free review copy of the book from the publisher in return for a fair review.