AIDS Inc. Paperback – December 12, 2003

In his usual top-down, pull no punches fashion, Jon Rappoport dives into the deep end of Big Medica territory and sets enough depth charges to shake the very strata of conventional medicine.Rappoport's regular readers already know what kind of investigative reporter he is.For those that don't know, Rappoport [NoMoreFakeNews.com | JonRappoport.wordpress.com] is the type of person that won't back down when he sees something amyss. That says A LOT in our era of controlled, cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all, mainstream media manipulation reality that's been carved for us all. To that end, Rappoport stands clear above the rest, bringing credibility to countless issues that truly need it.Another great appeal from this researcher is that he's not a fear-monger. Rappoport tells it how it is, which is how it should be - even though some people don't like to be told the truth - but also relentlessly brings about core issues to the individual level.As if that were not enough, Rappoport also shows us how important it is for individuals, cognizant of their endless imagination which he speaks about at length, to unleash their creative consciousness to solve any type of issues as well as creating their very reality.In fact, one could argue all of Rappoport's work is about showing individuals what reality TRULY is about, and what the individual can unleash to help crack that reality egg, and create a new one from the ground up.In that sense, AIDS Inc. - Scandal Of The Century by Jon Rappoport is one of those books whose main thesis is so audacious, so phenomenal that it make you question the very fabric of reality.Why so?Because it challenges everything we've ever known about viruses.Because it goes places no one would ever dream lies would come from within the mainstream media establishment.Because the work of Robert Gallo, who was the person that claimed to have found the cause of AIDS, comes into question in an extremely disturbing manner.Rappoport, in his usual no-holds-barred approach, shows that Gallo's work regarding viruses wasn't as ironclad as he would have liked us to believe. In fact, his work wasn't ironclad in no way shape or form.In order to be able to prove that HIV is the cause of AIDS, Gallo should have been able to isolate HIV constantly - EVERY SINGLE TIME. This was not the case however.Through his research, Rappoport shows us that not only do many scientists disagree with the mainstream official scenario regarding AIDS, but one in particular was even willing to go on record.Peter Deusberg.Duesberg, who is a molecular biologist and is the author of Inventing The AIDS Virus was interviewed at length by Rappoport, and sung like a canary.Duesberg not only is in thorough disagreement with the official AIDS theory, which is a complete fabrication, but also notes the issues with Gallo's work, the NIH's warped view of viruses as well as other issues with virology and such. That excerpt by Rappoport of the interview with Deusberg alone is worth the price of the book.Additionally, as Rappoport touches upon a few times, and Deusberg mentions in the interview, the health decline experienced by the individuals who were diagnosed with HIV/AIDS have other causal factors.If folks are still having trouble believing what might be possible once the veil of lies is pierced, we'll quote a small passage from the book to outline the crux of the issue.To quote the man himself, Rappoport:"Traditionally, in order to establish that a germ causes a condition, medical researchers invoke what are called Koch's postulates.These postulates describe a formula: From people with a given disease, remove the same germ in every case; then inject this germ into animals and in every case bring about all the symptoms of the disease.Having accomplished this, one says that germ A causes disease B.With HIV, this has not been done. First, depending on which study you read, you find HIV itself has been isolated in roughly 50-80% of those people diagnosed with full-blown AIDS. Second about a hundred chimps in the US, held in sterile isolation chambers, have been injected with high volumes of HIV. Two chimps immediately developed infected lymph glands; this condition lasted for thirty weeks and then returned to normal. In those two chimps, no new symptoms then appeared. In all the other chimps, no AIDS-like symptoms developed at all." [P83][Bold Emphasis Added]As individuals can see, if AIDS/HIV operated as the establishment claims it did, the above should not be possible.If that's not bad enough, as Rappoport has noted quite often in his website and has spoken about quite a few times, the Elisa & Western Blot tests that are used to verify HIV have their inherent flaws. In fact, the tests could end up positive for reasons not connected to HIV whatsoever. Hear that? That's more depth charges going of.Unfortunately ,the issue doesn't start and end with HIV/AIDS. This pervasive dilemma has actually evolved.Ebola and the Zika virus are now being brought to the forefront for ultra-fearmongering in the same manner. Predictably, if one sifts deep through the data with a fine-toothed comb, allegations of people being diagnosed with these viruses are fraught with issues. And as we've learned from the HIV/AIDS smokescreen, the health issues that the individuals are experiencing with Ebola/Zika can be explained by other factors that are not virus-related.Now you have to ask yourself, if we've been lied to about all THAT, what ELSE have we been lied to about?Kindest Regards,-Zy MarquiezTheBreakaway.wordpress.com