Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Absolute Recoil: Towards A New Foundation Of Dialectical Materialism Paperback – October 6, 2015
In the process, the dominant tradition in Western philosophy lost its moorings. To bring materialism up to date, iek – himself a committed materialist and communist – proposes a radical revision of our intellectual heritage. He argues that dialectical materialism is the only true philosophical inheritor of what Hegel designated the “speculative” approach in thought.
Absolute Recoil is a startling reformulation of the basis and possibilities of contemporary philosophy. While focusing on how to overcome the transcendental approach without regressing to naïve, pre-Kantian realism, iek offers a series of excursions into today’s political, artistic, and ideological landscape, from Arnold Schoenberg’s music to the films of Ernst Lubitsch.
- Print length448 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherVerso
- Publication dateOctober 6, 2015
- Dimensions5.44 x 1.26 x 8.27 inches
- ISBN-109781781686829
- ISBN-13978-1784781996
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchased | Highest ratedin this set of products
The Sublime Object of Ideology (The Essential Zizek)Slavoj ZizekPaperback$10.21 shipping - Lowest Pricein this set of products
First as Tragedy, Then as Farce (Essential Zizek)Slavoj ZizekPaperback$9.95 shipping
Less Than Nothing: Hegel And The Shadow Of Dialectical MaterialismSlavoj ZizekPaperback$11.91 shipping
Editorial Reviews
Review
“The excitable fluency, ursine congeniality and gleeful readiness to provoke and offend all feed the sense of authentic sponanaeity and energy that has made iek somethig like European philosophy’s punk icon, packing out auditoriums around the world.”
—Josh Cohen, New Statesman
““Few thinkers illustrate the contradictions of contemporary capitalism better than Slavoj iek ... one of the world’s best-known public intellectuals.”
—John Gray, New York Review of Books
“A gifted speaker—tumultuous, emphatic, direct—he writes as he speaks.”
—Jonathan Rée, Guardian
“Like Socrates on steroids ... breathtakingly perceptive.”
—Terry Eagleton
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 1784781991
- Publisher : Verso; Reprint edition (October 6, 2015)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 448 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781781686829
- ISBN-13 : 978-1784781996
- Item Weight : 1.22 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.44 x 1.26 x 8.27 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,731,434 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #849 in Philosophy Criticism (Books)
- #2,535 in Communism & Socialism (Books)
- #7,201 in Literary Criticism & Theory
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

"The most dangerous philosopher in the West," (says Adam Kirsch of The New Republic) Slavoj Zizek is a Slovenian philosopher and cultural critic. He is a professor at the European Graduate School, International Director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities, Birkbeck College, University of London, and a senior researcher at the Institute of Sociology, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. His books include "First as Tragedy, Then as Farce;" "Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle;" "In Defense of Lost Causes;" "Living in the End Times;" and many more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on May 19, 2023
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As in the earlier book Zizek proceeds by way of illustration through literature and film. He uses many of the same stories (and jokes) and a few new ones. As with the earlier book, religion, particularly Christianity receives the most in depth treatment as "fictional illustration" of the turning of nothing into less than nothing and from that which appears to a subject (itself a lack in being existing by way of an absence in being itself) to be something into the contrast between nothing and less than nothing. Zizek seems not to perceive that this particular treatment is the least meaningful of all. If God is real then it would be obvious that Zizek's reading of the Christian story must be false. God cannot die, and in point of fact Zizek particularly ignores (it is notable for its absence) the story of the Resurrection. If God is not real then none of the Christian story can mean what Zizek thinks it means anyway. It cannot be an allegory of the creation (first of the world and then of the human subject) any more than any other creation myth or for that matter any other fictional narrative; Jesus' death on the cross can have no more metaphysical meaning than any other of thousands of Roman executions by crucifixion. Here his examination of Freud and Lacan (both feature prominently here, Badiou appears less in this one) at least has some backstop. We are commonsensically real to ourselves although that reality (for Zizek a "lack in the One" must emerge in a withdrawal from "the Real of the One".
All of his various threads are summed up in a final dramatic chapter which carries everything up from the appearance-as-negative of the human subject to the origins of the universe. In all of this, Zizek refers back always to Hegel whose system, as interpreted by Zizek, can accommodate all the various nuances of literature and psychology he explores. If my review here seems full of obscure metaphor I have succeeded in illustrating Zizek's impenetrability by realist philosophers such as myself.
I have no problem with restatements, philosophers do this all the time. My own third book is a restatement of my first. One hopes that having worked further through a subject, subsequent statements of its themes will be more concise and clearly laid down. "Absolute Recoil" might be a more concise statement of "Less than Nothing" but if it is it is hard for me to see it because all of this is couched in Continental anti-realist language which is utterly alien to me. But if you are a Zizek fan, and if you could follow "Less than Nothing" then you will likely enjoy this slightly less ponderous re-working of it.
After having read both Less Than Nothing and this one (plus many of his other books), now I know I'm not up to the task of ever realizing my own dream (and Philosophy has always been my biggest inspiration in life). Whatever I do, Zizek is always infinitely ahead of me in both insight and knowledge.
There is a fool among this book's reviewers who honestly believes to have a "supplement" for Zizek's Dialectical Materialism, but the poor bastard does not seem to know to what real extent (despite what he may think of himself) is Zizek a master of the "dialectical serpent", always ready to flex/bend its own muscles against its own structure, and successfully strike back (and with full force) its attacker.
Resistance is indeed futile here. There are only bad critics of Zizek's work - and that even includes Adrian Johnston. Zizek seems to know everything there is to know by heart (and he always possess brilliant insights for everything he knows). I'm officially admiting defeat and leaving for the master the task of redefining what it means to be a philosophical materialist for the 21st century.
Thanks for screwing with my lifelong dream, Slavoj. The more I have viciously studied you for the last 3 1/2 years, the more painfully clear it became to me that you are in a completely different level; an overall level of your own. Here, take your 5 stars.
With these under the belt, reading Absolute Recoil is a breeze and extremely pleasurable. Without them, in the words of Lacan in Kant avec Sade: Those of my readers who are in this virgin relationship to the Critique (of Practical Reason) of not having read it - please put this article down and come back to it after having read it. I don't believe one would be able to understand much of what the author is saying without having been plugged into the stream of his thought over the years. If one has, however, another delightful journey awaits and it is not to be missed.
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2023
Top reviews from other countries
http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/640
Slavoj Žižek shows in his book Absolute Recoil (and previous Hegelian works such as Less than Nothing) the importance of repeating Hegel’s dialectical philosophy in contemporary capitalism. Žižek contributes especially to a reconceptualisation of dialectical logic and based on it the dialectic of history. The reflections in this paper stress that the dialectic is only the absolute recoil, a sublation that posits its own presuppositions, by working as a living fire that extinguishes and kindles itself. I point out that a new foundation of dialectical materialism needs a proper Heraclitusian foundation. I discuss Žižek’s version of the dialectic that stresses the absolute recoil and the logic of retroactivity and point out its implications for the concept of history as well as Žižek’s own theoretical ambiguities that oscillate between postmodern relativism and mechanical materialism. I argue that Žižek’s version of the dialectic should be brought into a dialogue with the dialectical philosophies of the German Marxists Hans Heinz Holz and Herbert Hörz. Žižek’s achievement is that he helps keeping alive the fire of dialectical materialism in the 21st century. Such a dialectical fire is needed for a proper revolutionary theory.
Hegel’s dialectical philosophy has in the course of the 20th century lost influence in Marxist theory. Too many theorists repeated the bourgeois and postmodern reflex to dismiss Hegel as having a deterministic, closed and totalitarian system of philosophy. The merit of Žižek’s recent work, including Absolute Recoil, is that he has massively strived to bring back Hegel to the attention of critical theory. Recent discussions about how to use Hegel’s Logic for reading Marx’s Capital and critically understanding capitalism (show how important Hegel’s dialectic remains in 21st century capitalism.
In this paper, I reflect on Žižek’s version of Hegelian dialectics and ask the question what kind of Hegelian dialectic is most appropriate today. I first discuss Žižek’s logic of the dialectic as retroactivity (section 2). Section 3 moves from Žižek’s dialectical materialism to the discussion of his version of historical materialism. In section 4, I suggest amendments to Žižek’s dialectical logic. Sections 5 and 6 analyse the implications of Žižek’s historical dialectic, first in general (section 5) and second by asking how we should interpret Auschwitz and what the implications of Žižek’s historical-dialectical materialism are in this respect (section 6).





