Qty:1
$2.33 + Free Shipping
Only 10 left in stock. Sold by DTEPStore

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Super Absorbent & Lint Free Wipes (Reusable Paper-Towel Substitute) Pack of 4

1.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $2.33 & FREE Shipping
Only 10 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by DTEPStore.
    This fits your .
  • Enter your model number to make sure this fits.
  • Great for messy clean ups
  • Reduces the need for paper towels
  • Super absorbent and lint free good quality wipes
  • Includes 1 pack (4 wipes in a pack)
  • Each wipe measures: 13.75 inches x 20.05 inches
$2.33 & FREE Shipping Only 10 left in stock. Ships from and sold by DTEPStore.

Product Description

Includes 1 pack (4 wipes in a pack). Each wipe measures: 13.75 inches x 20.05 inches. Great for messy clean ups. Reduces the need for paper towels. Super absorbent and lint free good quality wipes.

Product Information

Shipping Weight 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Manufacturer Lint Free Wipes
ASIN B004QIT0P8
Item model number Wipes Lint-Free
Customer Reviews
1.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

1.0 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #2,864,058 in Home and Kitchen (See Top 100 in Home and Kitchen)
#2,184 in Home & Kitchen > Kitchen & Dining > Food Service Equipment & Supplies > Disposables > Paper Towels
#37,948 in Health & Personal Care > House Supplies > Paper & Plastic

Feedback

Would you like to give feedback on images?
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
100%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By L. Lehrman on August 17, 2013
I usually use the other brand of wipes which a 6 pack will last about 6 months with machine washing.

These wipes only made one washing and started disintegrating after just a few days of use. Terrible, I will never buy these again.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse