Buy new:
-45% $16.00
FREE delivery January 16 - 21
Ships from: FIRST COLONY BOOKS
Sold by: FIRST COLONY BOOKS
$16.00 with 45 percent savings
List Price: $29.00
FREE delivery January 16 - 21. Details
Or fastest delivery Thursday, January 16. Details
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$16.00 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$16.00
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
FIRST COLONY BOOKS
FIRST COLONY BOOKS
Ships from
FIRST COLONY BOOKS
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. You may receive a partial or no refund on used, damaged or materially different returns.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
$8.27
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
Clean copy. No major flaws. No highlighting, writing or underlining. Light to moderate shelf wear. Hassle-free returns. Email with any questions. Your satisfaction is our top priority. Clean copy. No major flaws. No highlighting, writing or underlining. Light to moderate shelf wear. Hassle-free returns. Email with any questions. Your satisfaction is our top priority. See less
FREE delivery Thursday, January 16 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35. Order within 21 hrs 32 mins
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$16.00 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$16.00
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
$20.18 with 30 percent savings
List Price: $29.00
FREE pickup Thursday, January 16 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest pickup Tuesday, January 14. Order within 21 hrs 32 mins

1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147

How pickup works
Pick up from nearby pickup location
Step 1: Place Your Order
Select the “Pickup” option on the product page or during checkout.
Step 2: Receive Notification
Once your package is ready for pickup, you'll receive an email and app notification.
Step 3: Pick up
Bring your order ID or pickup code (if applicable) to your chosen pickup location to pick up your package.
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$16.00 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$16.00
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Sold by
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the authors

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses 1st Edition

4.0 4.0 out of 5 stars 145 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$16.00","priceAmount":16.00,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"16","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"00","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"XXbkgnZlHgCMSPkpnfaXKXP2ej32dGSlYhIrf22%2FdQKJ6%2BbM5pUtxD2WMzWR862mYuDn0Ym7P2Pwc1mm3sJusx%2BRXk8%2FR18Zut7MDz4YY7zr0yewekt3%2BstVFcpZ4bd7z%2Bp8hf2puJ2uwLQ8A6ywt3gAF6yiJKZ0ub6sSwIF6yDzpwq42vClyQiFHm2hf2EK","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$8.27","priceAmount":8.27,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"8","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"27","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"XXbkgnZlHgCMSPkpnfaXKXP2ej32dGSlFmHGJAvuUNFweMrNn31ZmheM%2B74Qjjo%2FQBeXTkRjZyWA7czzX0yJPmm8p%2F3lbyS2I51pebeWkxLvrKfAuntljda3oHShrixjyEGi3qbMh1RC75k7F9LfE0TLroFPv%2FsapB%2B2%2FjrSmF4EKhFu0NpuvfFTjt98yw9B","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}],"desktop_buybox_group_2":[{"displayPrice":"$20.18","priceAmount":20.18,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"20","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"18","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"XXbkgnZlHgCMSPkpnfaXKXP2ej32dGSlFcignecAc8QajKtbC%2FfXU0h%2FGCk0dS8z6W2FthuruvujDSMK4Ij5aw276D5CZ6TQKyymJdB4gsv%2BPonH1wF8q1EFTe7zU7sh%2BH8bPOD0dno70%2FHPv%2B5tuU1Vrp2%2Fn9q8WdYGd48GgDVqlmdXEO6ppMK9EfHHsmFM","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"PICKUP","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":2}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

In spite of soaring tuition costs, more and more students go to college every year. A bachelor's degree is now required for entry into a growing number of professions. And some parents begin planning for the expense of sending their kids to college when they're born.

Almost everyone strives to go, but almost no one asks the fundamental question posed by
Academically Adrift: are undergraduates really learning anything once they get there? For a large proportion of students, Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa's answer to that question is a definitive "no."

Their extensive research draws on survey responses, transcript data, and, for the first time, the state-of-the-art Collegiate Learning Assessment, a standardized test administered to students in their first semester and then again at the end of their second year. According to their analysis of more than 2,300 undergraduates at twenty-four institutions, forty-five percent of these students demonstrate no significant improvement in a range of skills - including critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing - during their first two years of college. As troubling as their findings are, Arum and Roksa argue that for many faculty and administrators they will come as no surprise - instead, they are the expected result of a student body distracted by socializing or working and an institutional culture that puts undergraduate learning close to the bottom of the priority list.

Academically Adrift holds sobering lessons for students, faculty, administrators, policy makers, and parents - all of whom are implicated in promoting or at least ignoring contemporary campus culture. Higher education faces crises on a number of fronts, but Arum and Roksa's report that colleges are failing at their most basic mission will demand the attention of us all.

Frequently bought together

This item: Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses
$16.00
Get it Jan 16 - 21
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Ships from and sold by FIRST COLONY BOOKS.
+
$27.11
Get it as soon as Thursday, Jan 16
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$18.99
Get it as soon as Thursday, Jan 16
Only 4 left in stock - order soon.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price: $00
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
spCSRF_Treatment
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.

Customer reviews

4 out of 5 stars
145 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book interesting and important. They appreciate the good points and research on college faculty in the 21st century. However, opinions differ on the scholarly content, writing style, and thesis. Some readers find the book well-researched and well-documented, while others feel it's a tough read with a dense academic style.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

28 customers mention "Readability"28 positive0 negative

Customers find the book accessible and interesting. They say it's an important read that puts a spotlight on corruption. The content and scholarship are excellent. However, some find it a tough read that doesn't keep their attention.

"This is a thoughtful and interesting book, but readers should be wary of the reviews, responses and attention that it has received...." Read more

"...This is a thought-provoking book that is well-worth your time. Highly recommended!" Read more

"...After hearing some criticism from my peers, I reconsidered. It's good, but overreaching...." Read more

"...A realistic and good book." Read more

40 customers mention "Scholarly content"26 positive14 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the scholarly content. Some find it provides excellent research and well-documented analysis on the state of undergraduate education. They appreciate the powerful data and reputable social science. However, others feel that the thesis is not really convincing, and that some college students are not studying very much.

"...and in great detail, with full awareness that the authors are providing reputable social science, not an apodictic proof that will absolutely compel..." Read more

"...to evaluate a student's abilities in critical thinking, analytical reasoning, problem solving and writing...." Read more

"...I think it is significant that this study "was organized by the Social Science Research Council as part of its collaborative partnership with the..." Read more

"...It will help you grow as a student and help you surround yourself with students that are scholars, and not party goers." Read more

11 customers mention "Writing style"7 positive4 negative

Customers have different views on the writing style. Some find it well-written, easy to read, and clear. Others find it a tough read with a dense academic style that doesn't keep their attention.

"...and Roksa are well aware of their work and they present it clearly and effectively...." Read more

"This is a difficult book to read, but I think it is a worthwhile one for several reasons...." Read more

"...'s critical thinking, analytical reasoning, problem solving and writing skills. And what Arum and Roksa discovered is certainly cause for alarm...." Read more

"...'s abilities in critical thinking, analytical reasoning, problem solving and writing...." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2011
    This is a thoughtful and interesting book, but readers should be wary of the reviews, responses and attention that it has received. It was hyped mightily in the pages of The Chronicle of Higher Education and it has received a great deal of attention in the popular press and throughout the media. Variously characterized as somewhere between cataclysmic and apocalyptic, it has since been attacked as the (educational establishment) empire struck back.

    Basically, the book looks at the results of the CLA (Collegiate Learning Assessment) instrument that was administered over several years to 2,000+ students at two dozen diverse American colleges/universities. The CLA instrument does not assess content; it assesses the takers' ability to understand information, sort through it and propose answers/interpretations/solutions in clear and persuasive prose. In short, it measures those skills (written communication, critical thinking, problem solving, etc.) that the educational establishment in general and individual institutions in particular claim to be enhanced, refined and expanded by the college experience.

    The bottom line is that for many students these skills are not expanded in the course of their undergraduate experience. This epiphany is an epiphany only in the sense that it has been supported by elaborate testing and elaborate, skilled analysis. There are, of course, loopholes. Not all institutions and not all students were tested. How could they be? And, of course, whenever we are talking about human performance or behavior there are a multiplicity of possible reasons that can be adduced as being causal. Critics, including defenders of the current situation, have seized upon these loopholes in an attempt to reduce the force of Arum and Roksa's argument.

    The main point that I would make is that that argument is made very convincingly and in great detail, with full awareness that the authors are providing reputable social science, not an apodictic proof that will absolutely compel belief and silence any possible opponents. Readers should be aware that this is a piece of thoughtful research (supported by a 60+ pp. methodological appendix), not a polemic, not a screed, not a phillipic.

    The reasons for students' lack of academic progress (in this particular sense and area) has been addressed by dozens of commentators. Arum and Roksa are well aware of their work and they present it clearly and effectively. Very little of this work is counter-intuitive and very few if any of Arum and Roksa's own conclusions are counter-intuitive. The conclusions do, however, step on toes. Some of the conclusions include the following: a) more progress is made by students of the sciences, social sciences and humanities than by students in business, education and social work; b) individual study is generally more effective than group study; c) participation in the activities of sororities and fraternities does not notably enhance the learning process; d) students are not being challenged by faculty in the ways that they should be challenged; e) students are often avoiding courses that involve decent levels of writing (20 pp. per course) and reading (40 pp. per week), and so on.

    For the most part, the book confirms what many have long known and believed. It does so within the context of multiple applications of an important assessment instrument, but it also adduces a great deal of other evidence that is part of the ongoing research into the experience of students in the contemporary American college or university.
    21 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2012
    "Current cultural norms among U.S. undergraduates support a conception of schooling as an important, but part-time activity. Other parts of life, notably social and leisure activities, are at least as important." This observation from the sociologist Steven Brint should certainly come as no surprise to anyone who is paying the least bit of attention to what is happening on our nation's college campuses. Several months ago I began exploring the state of higher education in America by reading Naomi Shaefer Riley's fine book "The Faculty Lounges: And Other Reasons Why You Won't Get The College Education You Paid For". That book focused on the pros and cons of tenure for college professors. Riley believes that the tenure system increases costs and demonstrates why it often results in inferior classroom instruction as well. I was left eager to learn even more about the state of higher education in America. Recently, I heard about Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa's new offering "Academically Adrift: Limited Learning On College Campuses". I knew immediately that this was a book I simply had to read.

    The main focus of "Academically Adrift" is a standardized test known as the Collegiate Learning Assessment or CLA. This particular study was conducted among 2,300 undergraduate students from 24 different universities across the nation. The CLA is definitely not your typical multiple choice test. Rather, the CLA consists of three open-ended assessment components: a performance task and two analytical writing tasks. The purpose of this test is to try to evaluate a student's critical thinking, analytical reasoning, problem solving and writing skills. And what Arum and Roksa discovered is certainly cause for alarm. Essentially, the results of this study strongly suggest that after two years of college the vast majority of students show precious little improvement in their capacity for critical thinking, complex reasoning and writing. While it is extremely important for students to master the material presented in textbooks and in class shouldn't we expect more from our colleges and universities?

    As part of the research project that led to "Academically Adrift" Arum and Roksa also conducted a 26 question survey of the participating students that appears in the appendix of the book. Very revealing indeed! The results of this survey underscores the importance of rigorous coursework requirements, high faculty expectations, time devoted to studying and the potentially negative impact of employment and extracurricular activities. In altogether too many cases academics takes a back seat to working, socializing with friends and participating in campus activities. Too many students seem to buy into the notion of doing the least amount of work just to get by. According to statistics cited by the authors today's students spend considerably less time studying than their peers did 25 and 50 years ago. Furthermore, the study also found that half of students did not take a single course requiring 20 pages of writing during the prior semester and one-third did not take a single course requiring 40 pages of reading per week. Does this sound like college-level work to you? In doing some research for this review I came across a website from Alfred University. In commenting on Arum and Roksa's study an assistant professor of media studies joked "40 pages of what? How much would be gained if I were to assign 40 pages of comic books a week?" As far as I am concerned this is precisely the kind of attitude that we need to change. Trust me, there is an awful to chew on this book and time will simply not permit me to touch on all of the important issues the authors dicuss.

    Finally, reading "Academically Adrift: Limited Learning On College Campuses" may also cause you to rethink the whole subject of higher education in America. For example, has the time finally come to discard the "college for all" philosophy that has been in vogue in this country for the past 30 or 40 years? Clearly not everyone belongs in college and buying into this philosophy only serves to prop up an extremely bloated system. When I was in high school guidance counselors served as "gatekeepers" pointing the less academically gifted students in the direction of vocational schools and other career opportunities. Let's face it, there is an awful lot of money to be made in the trades these days. Furthermore, I believe it is time to reexamine the wisdom in taking out college loans in order to finance an education. A shocking number of students never even graduate and are left with nothing but a mountain of debt to show for it. At the same time, many students emerging from four year institutions are not only poorly educated but also find themselves tens of thousands of dollars in debt to boot. I think there is an awful lot of wisdom in going the community college route. And what kind of a market is there for those individuals who choose to major in subjects like "area, ethnic, cultural and gender studies"? If these folks can't find a job please don't blame me or society-at-large. Frankly, we don't want to hear it! Finally, if parents and students make the decision to go to college it is extremely important that the student is fully focused on what he/she really wants to accomplish in school. All too often Arum and Roksa found students who had absolutely no idea what they were doing in college and really were "academically adrift". At the end of the day Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa have given us a very scholarly and well-researched book. Since I am not from academia I found myself struggling with terminology from time to time. "Academically Adrift: Limited Learning On College Campuses" will challenge much of what you believe about higher education in the United States. This is a thought-provoking book that is well-worth your time. Highly recommended!
    16 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

  • Andrew Dalby
    2.0 out of 5 stars Started the conversation but fatally flawed
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 26, 2014
    This book has had a significant impact on thinking in Higher Education and so I wanted to read it to see what the evidence is about students being left "academically adrift" and the answer is not very much. This is an expanded scientific paper made into a book. The authors believe that student progress can be measured using an assessment of their critical thinking skills. To get a cross-institution and cross cohort study you need to develop some sort of standardised test to measure there skills and so they use the CLA to carry this out. They also compare this to other standardised tests used to assess university entry. Each chapter then documents a different aspect of the analysis taking into account social factors, educational background, race, financial background and so on. By controlling for each of the variables they try to isolate terms related to the schools (where the students are going to university) and the teaching.

    The main finding is that more than half the students do not see an improvement on there CLA scores over the first two years of university and so they are academically adrift. Now taking this as a rigorous statistical study I have some problems.

    It is very post hoc - First they ideologically assume they are "academically adrift" then they find the evidence. Nowhere is the evidence presented as showing that this drift exists. Evidence is presented the conclusion is drawn but there is no relation between the results and the conclusion - there is no linking discussion as to why this evidence means that they are academically adrift other than this means CLA is not going up. So this raises the question is CLA a good measure? What is it actually measuring? Why doe some subjects do better than others (science for example compared to social care and engineering). So this suggests the test is flawed and subject dependent unless all engineering colleges are rubbish. Second thought in my mind is, this is a scientific paper so why is it not in a peer reviewed journal? Why is it in a book where it cannot be rejected as methodologically unsound? The third worrying factor is why are there two authors when each chapter says oh X helped to write this. So it doesn't have 2 authors it has five authors but three are research assistants and so they don't count in the world of academia.

    Given all of these methodological and to my mind ethical problems with the way the book is written there is one further weakness. The authors seem to fit into the traditionalist school of education. School is there for discipline and to instil morals etc. The book actually has striking similarities to the "Black Books" arguments about education from the UK in the 1970s. So from a Haidt perspective this desire for authority morality and respect puts the authors on the conservative part of the spectrum. Now this might or might not be the right way to educate but there is another view, that of the progressives (I confess I am on that side). These liberals believe that personal development is more important and that students need to find their own way - so if they are adrift that is because they are exploring. Now progressives are not new (Plato was one) but education moves between the liberal and conservative approaches almost continuously. This is why the book to me feels like the authors had decided what it was going to find before they even looked at the data.
  • PoddleMeister
    4.0 out of 5 stars sad reading...
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 11, 2013
    This is an academic paper expanded into a book, which makes it a little dry at times. Much of the statistical content is presented within inelegant graphs with long litanies of statistics (30% this, but 28% that...). That aside, the findings are fascinating, particularly that many students get through their degrees without a lot of effort and don't get a lot out of it, particularly in terms of generic skills in critical thinking, complex reasoning and writing. And to top this off, whilst your background matters, what the universities do also matters. But it is sad that a book written by academics for the academic community has to point out that learning is important and universities should try and do this well. UK institutions take note...