Suppose Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Communist Party of China, addressed the people of his nation and announced that the Han Chinese, by far the largest ethnic group in the country today, will become a minority in China later during this century. Then, imagine the audience, composed chiefly of Han, applauding! And then Xi’s response to the change: to better educate the new people who will replace the Han. Of course, the scene is hard to imagine, because if Xi were to make such a speech, he would be ousted from power within a week.
Imagine India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi speaking to his nation – he looks forward to the time when Indians will become a minority in India! And an Indian audience applauding! Such an announcement would be the death knell for Modi’s political party, and Modi would be driven from office in shame. But these two suppositions are simply inconceivable in reality, for neither Xi nor Modi would ever make such pronouncements.
On Bastille Day, 14 July 1997, then President Bill Clinton of the United States presented the commencement address at the Univ. of California, San Diego. He said, “Today, the State of Hawaii, …, has no majority racial or ethnic group. It is a wonderful place of exuberance and friendship and patriotism. Within the next 3 years, here in California no single race or ethnic group will make up a majority of the State's population…. A half-century from now, when your own grandchildren are in college, there will be no majority race in America.” Clinton’s audience applauded the notion that whites would become a minority by 2050. Whites, who had been the vast majority and dominant population in the US since its origins, and who composed 90% of the American population when Bill Clinton was born, were scheduled to become a minority in approximately 50 years. What was Clinton’s response? Appoint a commission to conduct a dialog on race (but John Hope Franklin, appointed to lead the group, demanded no dissent from his left-wing views on race), and Clinton urged better education for those who would be replacing the whites. Clinton’s approach was more like that of Jews in 1930s Germany, who as their factories were being confiscated, were to train the Aryans who were entering to replace them.
How could Americans applaud Clinton’s speech? Why did he and others not see the demographic statistics he presented as a threat to the Americans who had built America? Why did Clinton not react as Modi would if it applied to India? Or Xi if it applied to China?
Suppose there is a county near the Mexican border, we will call it Angoland; its population at the last census was 10,000 all Anglos. Suppose that since then there have been major border crossings, and for the next census, it appears the total population of the county will be 20,000, half of whom are basically illiterate in English (many just as illiterate in Spanish). Suddenly, there are demands for Spanish teachers in the schools. The courts require translators for the many new cases of drugs, drunk driving, driving without a license, stolen cars, etc. Then the liberals fight back – why are there no Hispanic police? Protests demand 50% of the police and fire departments be Hispanic. Appeals are made to the EEOC, and an agreement is made so no new Anglos will be hired in the civil service until the Hispanics have their “fair share” of 50% of the county’s jobs. If most of the new Hispanics are incapable of passing the exams that have been used for decades, the Feds will demand that those exams be scrapped; only simple exams that almost anyone can pass will be used. And then the racial quotas will determine who is hired, and the new hire will be declared “basically qualified,” (but never the best qualified). The same process will occur in schools and the community college. Moreover, hereafter new hires will have to be fluent in Spanish (not knowing that language is clearly discrimination against half the county’s residents.) Indeed, new hires should be bi-lingual (that is Spanish-English, no other languages will be considered). If most old residents do not know Spanish, they will have to learn it if they want a civil service job, or even as a clerk in Target or Burger King (because, to the newcomer, English monolingualism means discrimination). This will provide even more reasons to hire illegals. And never question their immigration status, for that is racial profiling, which the Feds deem discrimination, and they will fine any employer who engages is such an evil practice.
The result: in a short time Angoland County will be unrecognizable, from Angoland to Espanterra in a few years. This happens not only in an imaginary county – this is what is occurring all over America. Why?
Coulter begins her book by noting that the political fight over immigration is one of the elite against the American public (p. 1), and concludes that the public, despite its clear opposition to massive immigration, has been unable to change the open border policies.(270)
Of course, Coulter is persuasive with her zingers – why is the crowd who assure us that fences are ineffective live in gaited communities? She quotes various politicians with their counter-zingers: show me a 10-foot fence and I’ll show you an 11-foot latter. She counters, if the fences are so ineffective, why are the pro-immigration crowd so opposed to border fences? Israel has one, and it works. East Germany had one, and very few illegal immigrants got into, or out of, the old GDR. Border fences can work. That is why the elite so fiercely oppose them.
Of course the academedia complex, almost all leftwing, cover-up and lie about the immigration disaster. “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” Coulter adds to the lefty lies, “If you like your country, you can keep your country.” She exposes the deception used by the Democrats when they proposed the 1965 change in the immigration law – the assurances that it would not alter the ethnic composition of the US. In a later period, Coulter also exposes the many lies of the Republicans who run for election opposing massive immigration, but once elected, lobby for and vote for various forms of amnesty. In several place in the book, Coulter reveals some of the hypocrisy of Republican Sen. Marco Rubio on this issue.
One thing I learned from Coulter’s new book is how sections of America are already occupied territory of the Mexicans. Parts of our national parks are closed to American citizens because they have become too dangerous, areas where drugs are grown, and sometimes refined and manufactured. Americans get out – this park is Mexican cartel country! Other areas are no longer the domain of American hikers, campers, and tourists; these American parks are the pathways to welfare for Mexican invaders. If they fear exposure from tourists or park officials, they will light matches intentionally trying to set wild fires. The Park Service then has to worry about the costly fires and abandon any attempt to halt the invaders. And what does the conservationist Sierra Club think of the invaders who seize American parks and burn our forests? They were opposed, of course, until a rich, pro-immigration donor presented the Sierra Club with a huge gift – so long as the SC avoided the immigration issue. Bottom line – Sierra Club sold out.
And the New York Times, which once opposed the open borders and massive illegal flow of immigrants changed its tune also. As the Times neared bankruptcy, Mexican millionaire Carlos Slim bailed out the newspaper of record. Then, suddenly, the Times became pro-immigration and opposed to border fences. Bottom line.
The influx of immigrants is made worse because of the dominant, left-wing, politically-correct culture. In the past, immigrants were expected to learn English and adapt to American ways. But now, under the absurd theory that all cultures are equal (except Western civilization, which is identified with racism, colonialism, sexism, and all forms of oppression), immigrants need not assimilate to such a rotten culture. Today’s immigrants need not adapt to American customs; Americans must adapt to theirs. So now, to get a job in the city, one may have to be bi-lingual (good at Spanish, barely tolerable at English). If you see your Hmong neighbor clubbing a puppy to death, don’t be alarmed. He is trying to save a sick relative through animal sacrifice, just as in the old country. (And did they use human sacrifice in the old country? If so, we should not be judgmental and adapt. Diversity is out strength!) Gang rapes? We must understand that such is common in various cultures. Honor killings? We must understand. Terrorism? We must understand…
Coulter makes the point – we must understand what kind of immigrants we are importing. If we do not stop it, America will become another 3rd world hellhole.
One reviewer on amazon complained that though Coulter’s book is excellent, it may be too late to stop the 3rd world invasion. Excellent as Adios, America! is, it is not the first such book. Recall anti-Vietnam war crusader, the liberal Democratic Minnesota Senator who in 1968 challenged Pres. Lyndon Johnson in the New Hampshire primary. Sen. Eugene McCarthy did so well, that Pres. Johnson withdrew from the race. Sen. Robert Kennedy entered and fought McCarthy in various primaries. Finally, Kennedy won in California, only to be murdered that very night by a Palestinian immigrant. In 1993 liberal Eugene McCarthy published a book, A Colony of the World: the USA Today, stressing how we had lost control of our borders and were in many ways now a colony. That same year, and expert on civil rights legislation, Hugh Davis Graham, a liberal, published a tedious but fact-filled volume, The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America. And in 1995 legal English immigrant Peter Brimelow published Alien Nation: Common Sense about America’s Immigration Disaster. We have been warned for at least 2 decades about the mounting crisis. What have we done about it?
The cost in crime and welfare and lost jobs to citizens because of an invasion by millions of illegals is a disaster. Coulter asks, what if all this money spent on invaders had been spent on Blacks? I ask, what if it had been spent on all of America’s poor citizens?
In 1965 we were duped by Ted Kennedy and the left into changing our immigration law, one that had worked well for 40 years. We were assured the new immigrants would be much like the old, and the numbers would not increase significantly. Lies. When average American citizens experienced the real changes, the loss of income, the new competition, the lower wages, the changes in the schools (wearing a USA t-shirt gets you suspended from some California schools for the shirt may offend Mexican invaders!), the rise in crimes, etc., they sought to stop the flow and close the border. But will America’s elite, the academedia Left and the corporate globalists, continue to thwart the desire of the American people? If the people do not force a major change in immigration policy soon, then the American people will no longer be the people of America.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Frequently bought together
- +
- +
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Choose items to buy together.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Products related to this item
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
The WALL: You'll want it after reading
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2016
Those who are familiar with Ann Coulter's work, already know that she does extensive research and cites all her sources. This book's citation section is almost a quarter of the book (88 pages).She unveils how the US media, using subtle techniques, hide the truth about immigrants (illegal and legal) and the crimes they commit. You will be SHOCKED to find out how even US criminal justice system treats immigrant crime differently (more lenient). Even law enforcement officers are retrained to think and approach immigrant criminals differently. I bet you thought the US judicial system was designed to be fair and unbiased (hence the Lady Justice having a blindfold)? Well, it seems you and I were LIED to in school growing up.If you like America this book will anger you. Be forewarned.If you are pro-environment Coulter will show you how, when and why the so called pro-environmental organizations changed their stance from pro border-control to pro mass-immigration and amnesty (e.g., Sierra Club). Wildfires destroying US National Parks bother you? Care to guess the majority cause of said wildfires? That's chapter 12 for the tree-hugger in you.Coulter shows how every government program from H-1B visa program -- misused to import essentially "slaves" to work at restaurants and even underaged girls as concubines for a multimillionaire, -- to 1986 agricultural amnesty (Chuck Schummer) -- used by some of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing terrorists -- are inundated with fraud. Crazy eh?Chapter 13 is another goodie, where you will learn how, when and why the New York Times shifts its criticizing stance on lack of border enforcement to pro-mass-immigration.This book is pretty depressing -- again, only if you like America, the idea behind what America is and what has made it, possibly, the greatest nation in human history -- but Coulter's wit, sprinkled here and there, help the reader through. As it has been quoted many times, it is great to have a heart, but you also need to have a brain! otherwise, it is ¡Adios, America!
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2016
Images in this review
Top reviews from other countries
cartoisb
Exposes the truth about immigration in the US
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 4, 2017
shufti
Slays the immigration taboo
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 23, 2018J.P.Gomes
The demise of America as we know it?
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 27, 2018
