Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State. Paperback – September 1, 2001
Purchase options and add-ons
In this trenchant challenge to social engineering, Paul Gottfried analyzes a patricide: the slaying of nineteenth-century liberalism by the managerial state. Many people, of course, realize that liberalism no longer connotes distributed powers and bourgeois moral standards, the need to protect civil society from an encroaching state, or the virtues of vigorous self-government. Many also know that today's "liberals" have far different goals from those of their predecessors, aiming as they do largely to combat prejudice, to provide social services and welfare benefits, and to defend expressive and "lifestyle" freedoms. Paul Gottfried does more than analyze these historical facts, however. He builds on them to show why it matters that the managerial state has replaced traditional liberalism: the new regimes of social engineers, he maintains, are elitists, and their rule is consensual only in the sense that it is unopposed by any widespread organized opposition.
Throughout the western world, increasingly uprooted populations unthinkingly accept centralized controls in exchange for a variety of entitlements. In their frightening passivity, Gottfried locates the quandary for traditionalist and populist adversaries of the welfare state. How can opponents of administrative elites show the public that those who provide, however ineptly, for their material needs are the enemies of democratic self-rule and of independent decision making in family life? If we do not wake up, Gottfried warns, the political debate may soon be over, despite sporadic and ideologically confused populist rumblings in both Europe and the United States.
- Print length200 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPrinceton University Press
- Publication dateSeptember 1, 2001
- Dimensions5.9 x 0.51 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100691089825
- ISBN-13978-0691089829
- Lexile measure1570L
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Frequently purchased items with fast delivery
Editorial Reviews
Review
"The central fact of the nineteenth century was the emergence of the working class. The central fact of the twentieth century is the emergence of a managerial "New Class" elite, reshaping all modern democracies in its own interest. Gottfried's is a gold-standard analysis of this extraordinary phenomenon, heavily encrusted with sparkling jewels of intellectual history."---Peter Brimelow, Senior Editor, Forbes Magazine
"Well-written, very learned, and informative."---Paul Seaton, Society
Review
"This brilliant and disquieting book should reshape current debates and be essential reading for all who seek to understand them."―Elizabeth Fox-Genovese
"This thoughtful work reflects the intellectual qualities of an erudite political philosopher whose knowledge of European political philosophy in the twentieth century is particularly impressive."―John Lukacs
From the Back Cover
"Although I disagree with the author on many of his points, I strongly recommend it. Gottfried's thesis is refreshingly novel, strongly advanced, and clearly presented. Whether one is interested in the future of the welfare state or family values, or the economic and social future of America, this is a book one wishes to read."--Amitai Etzioni, author of The New Golden Rule
"This brilliant and disquieting book should reshape current debates and be essential reading for all who seek to understand them."--Elizabeth Fox-Genovese
"This thoughtful work reflects the intellectual qualities of an erudite political philosopher whose knowledge of European political philosophy in the twentieth century is particularly impressive."--John Lukacs
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Princeton University Press
- Publication date : September 1, 2001
- Edition : Reprint
- Language : English
- Print length : 200 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0691089825
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691089829
- Item Weight : 11 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.9 x 0.51 x 9 inches
- Part of series : New Forum Books
- Lexile measure : 1570L
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,617,274 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,115 in Democracy (Books)
- #5,013 in Political Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 14, 2004Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase_After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State_ by Paul Gottfried is a very powerful and important book which shows specifically how a discontinuity existing between nineteenth century liberalism and its twentieth century version has made possible the rise of a "managerial state". Such a state has made self determination an impossibility, given the rise of a managerial elite to safeguard the public from its own "authoritarian" tendencies. Gottfried traces the corruption and discontinuity in liberalism to such figures as Jean Jacques Rousseau (who felt that man must be "forced to be free"), John Stuart Mill (who ended up advocating socialist policies), and especially John Dewey - all of whom abandoned the free market principles of original liberals. The influence of Dewey among the educational establishment cannot be underestimated. In the twentieth century the two world wars brought out a conflict between three separate types of state: the fascist state of Mussolini (which had "gone beserk" allying itself with Adolf Hitler), the communist state of Josef Stalin, and the modern managerial/welfare state brought about through New Deal legislation by FDR. During the war, the communists joined the side of the Allies and destroyed fascism, only later to die a death of their own subsequently that century. This leaves us today with the managerial state, which seeks to spread a "global democratic faith" throughout the world, while negating and containing the influences of traditional sources of community, particularly religion. The new state is pluralistic and multiculturalist (meaning that any friction that arises between different races and ethnic groups must be curtailed in alignment with the "moralistic" teachings of the managerial elite). Also, the elite seek to redistribute income by means of democracy and stoking the flames of class warfare and envy. In the United States in particular, but even more so in the European nations, the nation has been coopted by elites as a global location for massive immigration from the third world (justified by appealing to the rhetoric of "human rights", invented by the New Class precisely for this purpose). Any attempt at dissent from the dominating paradigm is shouted down as "insensitivity" or worse as outright "fascism" - a term which is consistently abused and used to stigmatize all those who adhere to traditional notions of self government. According to Gottfried, both socialist Left and neoconservative "Right" adhere strongly to these principles regarding them as near articles of faith because they allow the two dominant parties of the elite to maintain their power. Gottfried also points to a Jewish-Puritanical influence which has sought to contain dissent, particularly through moralism (which amounts to preaching an anti-racist, sensitivity-based social gospel), and shows how all beliefs contrary to this value system are deemed to be a product of "mental illness", thereby giving a therapeutic role to the elite. Such a case is particularly emblematic of Adorno's post-World War II studies in the "authoritarian personality". With the rise of political correctness in the university system, coupled with a racist national policy of affirmative action, which can be arbitrarily extended, education has been subverted and all means of dissent have been stifled. Amazingly however, the populace does not support generally the goals of the elite, which has led many who are particularly disturbed by New Class social engineering to appeal to direct democracy. Gottfried also shows how populist resistance to the managerial state has built up and found expression in movements both in the United States and Europe. For example, Gottfried cites former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan, who appealed to the tradition of an isolationist, nationalist "Old Right" as well as traditional Catholicism, and the National Front of Le Pen in France which sought to deal effectively with the immigration problem for France. Also, Gottfried notes that "postmodernist rightists" such as Alain de Benoist in France successful criticize the current state, despite disgusting attempts by postmodernist leftists such as Jacques Derrida to entirely censor them. Indeed, Gottfried provides several examples of precisely how "anti-hate legislation" is used as a weapon of tyranny by the elite managerial class to maintain their power. Unfortunately, while populist resistance does exist, it has also been severely marginalized. Gottfried seems unable to fully predict the future of the managerial state, though he obviously supports populist resistance and secessionary movements. One issue that remains important though I believe is not fully dealt with by Gottfried is how to rectify calls for a completely free market with cultural conservativism and restoration of tradition. Afterall, a completely free market would presumably have no restrictions on such things as drugs, abortions, pornography, or prostitution, things which would have to be prevented by appeals to traditional morality and religion. Also, it is difficult to see how such a thing could avoid falling into outright barbarism. In sum, however, while the future for democratic liberalism and self-determination looks bleak, given the rise of an elite class who intend to enforce their values on all citizens, populist resistance is possible, and is perhaps the only way towards counter-revolution.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2014Format: PaperbackConcise and well-written, without obfuscating academic jargon, but not condescending towards readers. The book is the most useful diagnosis of the current statue of the Western society. It is not an ideological screed, although Paul Gottfried is relentlessly painted by numerous ideological adversaries as a right-wing extremist. It would be more useful for a conservative-leaning reader as a thoughtful tract to clarify basic tenets of the corpus of conservative ideas then as a proselytizing pamphlet. The tone is calm, the prose flows, the learning is immense, the formulations are precise, the facts are true.
As with other books of such caliber, one would find reading it helpful to clarify issues one is concerned with, but which are not actually mentioned in the book. One line of reasoning I found particularly illuminating is the extensive treatment of the nexus between the welfare state, insistent on purely procedural democracy, adherence to “scientific” managerial solutions and missionary globalist zeal. I have found the it illuminating if applied to such issues, never treated specifically by Paul Gottfried, as the implacable rejection of Francoist Spain by Western democracies, the irresistible desire to engage in senseless foreign adventures that bring misery all around and leave everyone worse off (think Libya), the future of UKIP.
In short, a pleasant reading, strongly recommended.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2000Format: HardcoverIn this sobering analysis of the pluralist welfare state,Professor Gottfried castigates statists for dishonesty inexpropriating the term "liberal" from its original meaning as defending individual property rights and maintaining a civil order with culturally and religiously formed social expectations to marginalizing any dissent from the managerial welfare state and its deliberate undermining of once commonly shared moral precepts. He explains how democracy became subverted from community-based self-rule with restricted participation to a mass plebiscite that votes itself largesse from the public treasury. By diluting civic participation from direct involvement in community affairs to a universal right to vote without further responsibility, cultural insurgents were better able to elect demagogues who could promise something for nothing. And Gottfried warns the reader that despite some populist grumbling, the elitist nomenklatura controlling the levers of political power and media influence operate largely without significant opposition to the goals of transforming society from the independent and culturally homogenous bourgeois classes that honor values of thrift, industry and propriety with a motley crowd of peoples who share no common interest except demands for special favors bestowed by an ever expanding and intrusive centralizing government that deliberately blurs distinctions between state functions and public involvement in civic affairs.
After Liberalism describes the pedigree of traditional liberal political philosophy, which included support of a free market and restraints on undisciplined appetites, primarily by informal enforcement of social and cultural norms. The government was afforded the limited rôles of civil order and martial pursuits. Readers of Adam Smith, John Locke, Alexander Hamilton, Ludwig von Mises and F. A. Hayek are aware of this expropriation of the term "liberal" to mean a therapeutic, intrusive, egalitarian and moral-relativist welfare state envisioned by J. S. Mill and John Dewey among others, although on occasion a natural harmony between democracy and market economy was alleged. Gottfried plumbs the minds of both advocates and critics of custodial pluralism.
Top reviews from other countries
advokatReviewed in the United Kingdom on May 7, 20145.0 out of 5 stars A book for our times
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseConcise and well-written, without obfuscating academic jargon, but not condescending towards readers. The book is the most useful diagnosis of the current statue of the Western society. It is not an ideological screed, although Paul Gottfried is relentlessly painted by numerous ideological adversaries as a right-wing extremist. It would be more useful for a conservative-leaning reader as a thoughtful tract to clarify basic tenets of the corpus of conservative ideas then as a proselytizing pamphlet. The tone is calm, the prose flows, the learning is immense, the formulations are precise, the facts are true.
As with other books of such caliber, one would find reading it helpful to clarify issues one is concerned with, but which are not actually mentioned in the book. One line of reasoning I found particularly illuminating is the extensive treatment of the nexus between the welfare state, insistent on purely procedural democracy, adherence to “scientific” managerial solutions and missionary globalist zeal. I have found the it illuminating if applied to such issues, never treated specifically by Paul Gottfried, as the implacable rejection of Francoist Spain by Western democracies, the irresistible desire to engage in senseless foreign adventures that bring misery all around and leave everyone worse off (think Libya), the future of UKIP.
In short, a pleasant reading, strongly recommended.








