Buy new:
-24% $12.11$12.11
Delivery Wednesday, December 11
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$8.98$8.98
Delivery Thursday, December 12
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror (A World Politics Bestseller) Paperback – Unabridged, September 21, 2004
Purchase options and add-ons
With all-new excerpts from Richard Clarke's dramatic public testimony, and revealing corroboration from The 9/11 Commission Report
From the 9/11 Commission Report:
"On the day of the meeting [September 4, 2001], Clarke sent Rice an impassioned personal note. He criticized U.S. counterterrorism efforts past and present. The 'real question' before the principals, he wrote, was 'are we serious about dealing with the al Qida threat?...Is al Qida a big deal?...Decision makers should imagine themselves on a future day when the CSG has not succeeded in stopping al Qida attacks and hundreds of Americans lay dead in several countries, including the US,' Clarke wrote. 'What would those decision makers wish that they had done earlier? That future day could happen at any time.'"
- Print length352 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateSeptember 21, 2004
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.9 x 8.44 inches
- ISBN-109780743260459
- ISBN-13978-0743260459
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA's War on TerrorismPaperback$10.30 shippingGet it as soon as Thursday, Dec 12Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 0743260457
- Publisher : Free Press; Reprint edition (September 21, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 352 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780743260459
- ISBN-13 : 978-0743260459
- Item Weight : 11.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.9 x 8.44 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #326,117 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #316 in Terrorism (Books)
- #324 in National & International Security (Books)
- #457 in United States Executive Government
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

I started writing books after a thirty year career in government writing bureaucratic papers. It was quite a shift. Cyber War is my fifth book and my third non-fiction. People often ask which genre do you prefer to write, fiction or non-fiction? They are both a challenge and both are exciting to attempt. Fiction may be the greater challenge, because of the need for imagination, characterization, dialogue, and plot twists. Non-fiction may actually have some real world effects. I've posted excerpts and other information on my web page; www.richardaclarke.net.
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the content engrossing, informative, and engaging. They describe the book as an excellent, interesting read. Readers praise the writing style as well-written, articulate, and intelligent. They also find the terrorism coverage insightful, clear, and frightening.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book engrossing, informative, and compelling. They say it provides great background information for students of history or the Middle East. Readers also mention the writing is captivating and engaging. In addition, they appreciate the impressive description of the inner circle of government. Overall, they describe the book as a great book from a respected insider and one of the best history books.
"...This despite the fact that Clarke was arguably the most capable, most knowledgeable, best informed, and most accomplished fighter of terrorism in..." Read more
"...operative under four US presidents, and here he offers a compelling and revealing narrative of one of the most important periods of our lifetime...." Read more
"...Clarke lays it all out in easy to verify facts that paint a picture of neglect from Reagan to Bush Jr. Many Republicans have decried his treatment..." Read more
"...Against All Enemies" is a fascinating book about the recent history of terrorism during the presidential years of Bush senior, Bill Clinton and..." Read more
Customers find the book excellent, good, and a classic. They say it's an interesting read regarding the former U.S. government's approaches. Readers also mention the book is timely and unbiased.
"...This despite the fact that Clarke was arguably the most capable, most knowledgeable, best informed, and most accomplished fighter of terrorism in..." Read more
"...He is a remarkably brave, competent and articulate individual, and a true hero.Incredible tale with many interesting revelations...." Read more
"...It reads like a great spy novel.2. A fascinating look at the history of recent terrorist acts and our responses from the inside.3...." Read more
"...Though I feel it is still worth the read to see how our government works and hear what was being really said behind the press conferences." Read more
Customers find the writing style captivating, well-written, and intelligent. They also appreciate the level-headed and resolute vision and insight. Readers also mention the book is clear, concise, and a solid document.
"...together in convenient and well reasoned parcels, so it is a good, solid document on the issue of Islamic terrorism...." Read more
"...He is a remarkably brave, competent and articulate individual, and a true hero.Incredible tale with many interesting revelations...." Read more
"...Right War, Wrong War.Positives:1. A well-written page turner of a book from a true insider. It reads like a great spy novel...." Read more
"...the books by Franken and Moore (and others) are valuable tools, well-written and full of good points and information - but this is a book that..." Read more
Customers find the book insightful, riveting, and clear. They say it's a good read and frightening.
"...Mr. Clarke has written one of the most insightful books about terrorism." Read more
"...this book an easy, and most of the time, riveting, account of events involving terrorism over the past 20 years...." Read more
"...me say that regardless of the controversy, this book is an amazing primer on terrorism and al-Qaeda...." Read more
"It is a clear look at national security, and in particular counter terrorism operations as concerns Al Qaeda, from a principal and key insider from..." Read more
Customers find the book suspenseful and enjoyable. They say it gives them an inside look into how our government works and paints a very good picture of what it was like to be in the second Bush administration. Readers also mention they enjoy the style and contents.
"...the narrative is full of action, suspense and seemingly gives you an inside look into how our government works at its highest levels, the more I..." Read more
"...Against all enemies paints a very good picture of what it was like to be in the working in the White House during these hard times...." Read more
"...Overall a decent and interesting look if you can look past some of the shortcomings." Read more
"I enjoyed the style and contents of this book. It makes a person think more about the world around him." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Clarke traces the arc of terrorism back to 1979 and the Revolutionary government in Iran. Afghanistan's long woes and the fall of the Soviet Union figure into the equation. He discusses the transition from state sponsored terrorism which essentially ceased at the end of the Iran-Iraq war to network sponsored terrorism of the al-Qaeda kind.
Clarke establishes his credentials and his credibility. He has been a central figure working at a high level from the White House to fight terrorism since the mid 1980's. He knows the history of terrorism. He knows its motive forces. He knows the characters involved, and their modus operandi. He understands terror's consequences. He knows what it takes to prepare good responses, and understood for at least four years prior to 9/11 how woefully unprepared the US was (and is) to respond to a large scale attack.
He lambastes the FBI for completely ignoring the problem of terrorism before 9/11, though he acknowledges that the problem is partly institutional. The FBI is barred by law from investigating crimes until they occur. And he admits the historical necessity of this point. He lambastes the CIA for completely ignoring terrorism before 9/11. Here again, he points out that the reason had to do with the agency's desire for self-preservation. In this case, a cold war institution fights to preserve its status a decade after its raison d'etre has ceased. And it does so not by engaging where it is needed, but by fighting bureaucratic turf wars. Hmm.
He spends a full chapter discussing how he built an anti-terrorism program under Clinton. He discusses how supportive Clinton was to the idea. He shows how brilliant Clinton was in selling the program to staffers and high ranking scientists. He points to some of its victories.
One such victory was the prevention of Millenium disasters. The tiny knot of people he worked with noticed that there was much 'chatter' about something happening on January 1, 2000. So alert levels were heightened. But the breakthrough was almost completely accidental. An operative on a ferry from Vancouver acted suspiciously. When confronted, he ran. His car was found packed with explosives meant to be deployed at the LA airport. His interrogation led to another cell in Jordan. A third cell failed accidentally by piling too many explosives into a small boat, causing it to sink in mid-harbor.
In one way, this example illustrates how a single centralized, small group of motivated people can energize local law enforcement people to do the leg work it takes to detect terrorist acts before they occur. If this level of functionality had been in place in the Boston Airport on 9/11, we would not be discussing that date here.
And this brings us to the question of subsequent failures. By July of 2001, Clarke was so fed up with the total lack of response of the Bush administration to even discuss the issue of terrorism that Clarke had asked to be reassigned to a lower status position working on cyper security.
Bush had been neither capable of comprehending the danger nor interested in hearing about it. He was completely uninterested in terrorism, even though (or perhaps because) Clinton had told him it was his top priority. Bush aides were spouting ideas about state-sponsored terrorism that were products of conservative think-tank fantasy. These ideas were historical dinosaurs long before George Herbert Walker Bush lost the election to Bill Clinton. But they were the gospel and all the Bush team were believers.
So arrogantly and dogmatically did they hold their prejudices that they simply would not listen to anything Clarke said. This despite the fact that Clarke was arguably the most capable, most knowledgeable, best informed, and most accomplished fighter of terrorism in the USA. It was in this as it has ever been with the Bush administration "Don't confuse us with the facts, because we already know all the answers." (My words, not Clarke's)
The section on what happened on 9/11 is slim. And the ideas about what America might have done to prevent it are slimmer. Probably 9/11 would have occurred in exactly the same way had Bill Clinton been President. The thing that could have prevented it - highly qualified and motivated airport screeners - was politically impossible in the post Reagan 'shrink government until it hurts" years. Only real hurt could change this fact. In other words, the governmental problem that contributed most to making 9/11 possible was an attitude about government inherited from the Reagan years.
But even if the catastrophe was inevitable based on the political climate, the response to 9/11 would have been different under another administration. Firstly, the Clinton administration would have focussed on Afghanistan. Tora Bora would have been shut down before bin Laden got there. Clarke's team had run the game plan already and planned to be there first. And the manhunt would not have stopped until bin Laden was captured.
The war in Iraq would never have happened. The endless and fruitless departmental shuffling in Washington to secure de "Vaterland" ahem creata a "Homeland Security Agency" and a body of law turning the US into a police state in contravention to constitutional principles and bodies of international law would not have occurred.
And in the end, America would not be doing as it is now - to quote a bumper sticker - "Making enemies faster than we can kill them."
The next chapters discuss events in the Middle East, the rise of terrorism and the American response to terrorist acts during the administrations of Reagan, Bush the elder, Clinton and Baby Bush.
The book documents the distinct responses to terror threats by the Clinton and Bush administrations: Clinton issued an Executive Order in 1995 designed to go after terrorist funding and another in 1998 specifically to go after bin Laden and al Qaeda, tripled the FBI counterterrorism budget, pushed for Saudi cooperation in terrorist investigations, gave major speeches about the threat of terrorism, secured additional funding for counterterrorism, intervened in Bosnia to undermine efforts by bin Laden to establish a foothold in that country, bombed al Qaeda facilities, issued orders to have bin Laden killed, created the Counterterrorism Security Group, reinforced American embassies worldwide, held dozens of Principals meetings, foiled a number of Millennium plots, and asked for a Pol-Mil plan for al Qaeda, which included planning, goals, resources, timelines and responsibilities, and was later given to Condoleeza Rice in January 2001 though it was adopted by the administration until AFTER September 11th. By 1996, knowing that al Qaeda had a presence in over 50 countries, Clinton and his people "were preoccupied with it". Clarke states that "[Clinton] had seen earlier than anyone that terrorism would be the major new threat facing America, and therefore had greatly increased funding for counterterrorism and initiated homeland protection programs." In contrast, during a time of increasing alerts and chatter, George Bush went on vacation. Clarke resigned his post in frustration, and his replacement quit after a few months because the administration was still not going after al Qaeda but was instead concentrating on Iraq and was "using the War on Terror politically". More importantly, they have not been effective in making us safer since 9-11, have weakened our military capabilities, underfunded first responders, reduced civil rights, and squandered the opportunity to unite the American people and build international alliances. While firefighters dug through the rubble of WTC, Bush & Co. were already plotting to use the horrific event for their own political ends.
Prince Bandar, in the news recently due to Bob Woddward's book, makes some interesting appearances here, as do Louis Freeh, George Tenet and many others. The FBI and the Pentagon come off especially badly here, but Clarke also gives a lot of credit to individuals who worked hard on this threat, including FBI agent John O'Neill, the counterterrorism expert who is the subject of Frontline's "The Man Who Knew", an excellent documentary about an agent obsessed with al Qaeda and bin Laden, who quit the FBI in frustration, went to work as head of security in the WTC and was killed on 9-11.
What critics do not give credit for is that Clarke was a government employee who had built a solid 30-year career and who operated behind-the-scenes. He gave up his privacy and his livelihood, knowing full well that the Bush Slime Machine (aka Karl Rove) would try to destroy his character and his life, but he still came forward because he thought this information was so important. Furthermore, his contentions have been corroborated by other insiders. We all owe this man a debt of gratitude for his actions -- before, during and since 9-11.
One thing I've not seen anyone mention is the incredible implication of the title. After dedicating the book to the murder victims of 9-11, Clarke uses the preface to discuss the Constitution. He states that the President, naturalized citizens, bureaucrats, and FBI and CIA agents all take an oath swearing to protect the Constitution "against all enemies". He says that this is our first mission, "not unnecessary wars to test personal theories or expiate personal guilt or revenge. We must also defend the Constitution against those who would use the terrorist threat to assault the liberties the Constitution enshrines . . . It is essential that we prevent further attacks and that we protect the Constitution . . . against all enemies." Wow. So Bush and Cheney and Ashcroft are some of those referred to in the title. And I couldn't agree more. What are we defending if we allow ideologues to change the essential nature of our way of life? if something is wrong, I want someone to step up and point it out, and if I were ever in trouble, I would want Richard Clarke beside me. He is a remarkably brave, competent and articulate individual, and a true hero.
Incredible tale with many interesting revelations. Essential reading. Highest recommendation.






