Buy new:
$37.95$37.95
FREE delivery:
Friday, July 14
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Z&Z STORE
Buy used: $12.00
Other Sellers on Amazon
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Against Deconstruction 0th Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
Purchase options and add-ons
"The focus of any genuinely new piece of criticism or interpretation must be on the creative act of finding the new, but deconstruction puts the matter the other way around: its emphasis is on debunking the old. But aside from the fact that this program is inherently uninteresting, it is, in fact, not at all clear that it is possible. . . . [T]he naïvetê of the crowd is deconstruction's very starting point, and its subsequent move is as much an emotional as an intellectual leap to a position that feels different as much in the one way as the other. . . ." --From the book
- ISBN-100691014841
- ISBN-13978-0691014845
- Edition0
- PublisherPrinceton University Press
- Publication dateFebruary 1, 1990
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5 x 0.45 x 8 inches
- Print length184 pages
"Where Wild Peaches Grow: A Novel" by Cade Bentley for $8.63
In a deeply emotional novel of family, cultural heritage, and forgiveness, estranged sisters wrestle with the choices they’ve made and confront circumstances beyond their control.| Learn more
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
Review
From the Back Cover
"Ellis's elegant and absolutely unsentimental book can serve as a sort of solvent in today's critical debates. Not much remains intact: binary oppositions, 'alternative logic,' texts as 'play,' and 'performance,' are all subject to rigorous examination. In the process, Ellis lucidly restores Saussurean categories (so battered and reduced in contemporary criticism) to their original complexity. Appalled by the growth of a class of critics who appear to risk nothing when they take on a literary text, Ellis challenges every reader under the spell of new vocabularies to stop and think. Rarely has scholarly exasperation been put to better or more timely use."--Caryl Emerson, Princeton University
Product details
- Publisher : Princeton University Press; 0 edition (February 1, 1990)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 184 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0691014841
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691014845
- Item Weight : 7 ounces
- Dimensions : 5 x 0.45 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,248,496 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #277 in Deconstructivist Philosophy
- #419 in Literary Theory
- #6,243 in Philosophy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Strengths: Ellis raises powerful objections to the privilege with which "deconstruction" is treated by its adherents. Specifically, through this text the author makes it quite clear, even early on, that "deconstruction" may be read as self-undermining, both in presentation and execution. Even more particularly, Ellis's observation that there are better and worse interpretations of deconstruction, evinced by both Derrida and his commentators, directly flies in the face of the central "deconstructive" tenet that authorial intent can not be a controlling factor.
Ellis also admirably calls to question some of Derrida's rhetorical movements, especially those key movements on which major points turn. For example, Ellis points out the habit of switching out terms for other terms, in supposed demonstration of validity, while no such successful demonstration may actually be taking place. I am thinking specifically of Ellis's discussion of the "language:speech/writing" translation, by Derrida, to "writing:phonic/graphic". This observation is quite prudent.
The chapter on the utility of "deconstruction" as criticism is among the best in the book. I recommend this chapter be read along with the writings of Gasché (against the possibility of "deconstructive" criticism) as well as the writings of someone like de Man or Norris (for the possibility).
Weaknesses: There are several, but of most notable interest to me was the early discussion of what Ellis takes to be a confused understanding of Saussure by Derrida. I do want to emphasize that on much of this material concerning a historical and conceptual analysis of Saussure, Ellis is quite spot-on; for example, his discussion of the "garbling" of 'sign', 'signifier', and 'signified' on the part of Derrida and his commentators is remarkably keen and one of the most poignant contributions he brings to the discussion. I hope that many readers, especially those committed to Derrida's "project", pay close attention to these passages. Elsewhere, however, I take it that Ellis is misconstruing things. For example, Ellis offers evidence that he takes to directly call into question the idea of ethnocentric logocentrism, in particular that Saussure offered a groundbreaking response to the Western tradition of preference for the written (strictly-speaking, not the written in any expansive Derridean sense of the term) in an ostensibly total lack of awareness of Plato's opinion on the matter --- and this is very much an area to which Derrida, following Nietzsche before him, looks to respond. Here Ellis takes Derrida to commit the offense which he condemns in Saussure -- privileging the written over the oral, but this is decidedly off-base.
The text also looks to be too selective for a deep critique. For example, some of the passages withdrawn from Spivak's translation of Grammatology are encapsulated within a lack of original context, and in some cases the questionable points of argumentation hold much more weight when taken within the entire essay or chapter within which they are found. This, alas, can be a struggle in the composition of any critical response to a text. I also have small concerns about the extent to which Ellis really went through the original French versions on his own -- being no issue had he not explicitly noted in a footnote on p. 18 that he had done so. I think that, at points, some passages fall victim to poor translation into English. Of course, this burden may not be exclusively placed upon Ellis, but if he is able to read the French, I see it as a less excusable error than it would be with the lack of French ability.
In a word: This is an extremely valuable text but like any other it cannot offer any final word on the matter of the "deconstructive" possibility. I would recommend this book more to dogmatic followers of Derrida than I would to those who have already dismissed his project, although this text should be read by philosophers and lit critics alike, not to mention anyone else working within the humanities or social sciences.



