Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
Against Democracy Hardcover – September 6, 2016
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
"A brash, well-argued diatribe against the democratic system. ...Brennan makes the compelling argument that politics as currently practiced make us 'situational enemies.' Sure to cause howls of disagreement, but in the current toxic partisan climate, Brennan's polemic is as worth weighing as any other." --Kirkus Reviews.
Brennan has a bright, pugilistic style, and he takes a sportsman's pleasure in upsetting pieties and demolishing weak logic. Voting rights may happen to signify human dignity to us, he writes, but corpse-eating once signified respect for the dead among the Fore tribe of Papua New Guinea. To him, our faith in the ennobling power of political debate is no more well grounded than the supposition that college fraternities build character.
--Caleb Crain, The New Yorker
Jason Brennan's Against Democracy seems scarily prescient today. Writing well before the twin shocks of the Brexit and the U.S. elections, the Georgetown political scientist makes a powerful case that popular democracy can be dangerous--and, provocatively, that irrational and incompetent voters should be excluded from democratic decision-making. The case for elitism in governance never read so well.
From the Back Cover
"Jason Brennan is a marvel: a brilliant philosopher who scrupulously studies the facts before he moralizes. In Against Democracy, his elegant method leads to the contrarian conclusion that democratic participation prompts human beings to forget common sense and common decency. Voting does not ennoble us; it tests the virtue of the best, and brings out the worst in the rest."--Bryan Caplan, author of The Myth of the Rational Voter
"The great temptation of political philosophy is to sacralize politics, and we urgently need work that teaches us not to succumb. In this valuable and bracing book, Jason Brennan challenges comfortable pieties and debunks familiar myths about political life in general and democratic rule in particular. I expect that most readers will find plenty with which to disagree--I certainly do--but also that most will find Brennan's arguments unsettlingly difficult to resist with certainty."--Jacob T. Levy, McGill University
"Against Democracy makes a useful set of challenges to both conventional wisdom and dominant trends in political philosophy and political theory, particularly democratic theory. Engagingly written, it is a lively and entertaining read."--Alexander Guerrero, University of Pennsylvania
Browse award-winning titles. See more
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
He says there are three broad categories of voters, only one of which provides valid input. Hobbits know and are pleased to know nothing. Their input is worse than flipping a coin. Hooligans hold tightly to political positions despite the facts. Their votes are fixed and wasted. Vulcans analyze, are open to new sources and can convincingly take different sides. They seek correction so as not to appear in error.
Brennan’s solution is an epistocracy. The epistocracy is a collection of the brightest Vulcans. They have to pass a test: economics, immigration, environment – everything. Only they get to vote. It keeps politics away from the masses, and (in Brennan’s theory) leads to more effective government.
The main problem with epistocracy is visible today. The Supreme Court is made up of nine people: educated, bright, sharp, beyond politics (theoretically) or bribery. Yet they predictably come down on ideological sides every time. Most of them can stay home because we know how they’re going to vote. All we really need is to hear from the swing voter. This is epistocracy at work.
The other problem is that democracy was never intended to be the most efficacious system. It’s like the post office: never intended to be profitable, it was a service that united the country for the benefit of all. So with democracy; it gives voters the feeling of belonging and making a difference. Epistocracy addresses solutions democracy never intended to match. Brennan is right: the math for democracy doesn’t work. But it isn’t meant to.
There are two terrific reasons to read Against Democracy. Brennan is challenging. He attacks the sacred foundations fearlessly, logically and thoroughly. You are always on your toes looking for faults, loopholes and disagreement. And he is direct. I particularly like his critiques of other authorities. He just comes out and says they are wrong. And then he tells you why. It is not qualified with “I must take issue with” or “They might be missing a point here”. They are out and out wrong. That is refreshing from a philosopher.
The basic difficulty I have with Brennan’s quest is that it seeks truth. Voters don’t do that. They choose who they want, not what is correct or best. There is no analysis, no meeting of the minds, no informed decision. So yes, our democracy is mostly sham. Voters are not qualified to decide, and nothing they decide will affect the outcome anyway. It’s just an opiate. What’s wrong with Brennan’s whole thesis is that I might not want him in the epistocracy.
He also makes a powerful argument that participation in politics makes us citizens worse not better. He provides empirical and theoretical arguments for this position as well but to me the evidence stares everyone in the face in contemporary America. I thought about taking off a star due to the weakness of his argument for his epistocracy, but overall the book is so good it deserves five stars. Highly recommended.
I see that some negative reviewers have regurgitated a non sequitur Churchill quote, if they actually finish reading the book- they would see how daft his statement is.
The majority is quite mad
Some good arguments for looking for a better system. Some of the metaphors are overdone, but probably helps to make the reader understand that beeing elected is not a guarantee for beeing a "good ruler".