Buy new:
$24.95$24.95
FREE delivery: Friday, Dec 23 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $22.25
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
86% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Against Method Paperback – Illustrated, May 11, 2010
| Paul Feyerabend (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
This updated edition of the classic text includes a new introduction by Ian Hacking, one of the most important contemporary philosophers of science. Hacking reflects on both Feyerabend’s life and personality as well as the broader significance of the book for current discussions.
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherVerso
- Publication dateMay 11, 2010
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.85 x 8.3 inches
- ISBN-101844674428
- ISBN-13978-1844674428
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A brilliant polemic.”—New Scientist
“Since it was first published in 1975, Against Method has followed Popper’s The Logic of Scientific Discovery and Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions into becoming a classic text in the debate about scientific methodology and scientific reasoning.”—The Philosopher
“A powerful critique.”—London Review of Books
“Against Method is more than a book: it is an event.”—Archives de Philosophie
About the Author
Ian Hacking is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Toronto. He is the author of Historical Ontology, Scientific Revolutions, and The Emergence of Probability.
Product details
- Publisher : Verso; Fourth Edition (May 11, 2010)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1844674428
- ISBN-13 : 978-1844674428
- Item Weight : 14.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.85 x 8.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #151,139 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #22 in Anarchism
- #34 in Philosophy Criticism (Books)
- #477 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
He also front loads a lot of his useful points. I got halfway through the book and found that to be convincing enough for my tastes.
Some people might not like him swinging with hot takes right away, but I found it to be helpful since it establishes the apparent absurdity of his claims and the difficulty of defending his position.
Some claims he makes:
- science is essential anarchic
- truth is discovered by comparison and not analysis
- we should take the sophists maxim to always be striving to make the weaker argument stronger
- a theory could clash with its evidence because the evidence is contaminated
- No theory is consistent with all the facts. “There is no theory that is not in some trouble or other”
At this point I’ll stop. I hope you get the idea. The guy is sometimes touted as a kooky anarchist. I personally don’t find anarchic philosophies endearing, and I don’t think this description does him justice.
Needless to say, our current system is the exact opposite of this, and Feyerabend would likely despise (and rightly so) the granting systems of NIH, or other federal organizations. The book was originally publishes in 1975, following the decades of probably the most successful medical advances (optimization of antibiotics, chemotherapy, discovery of the DNA structure, etc). Those conditions (abundant funding, absolute meritocracy, little corporate influence) were likely unimaginable for todays scientist, who mostly work on writing grants for "mechanistic" research. Did Francis Collins read Against method? Doubtful.
Brilliant book, strongly recommended.
For the 1st time for me, Feyerabend lays bare the follies of the scientific method, the damage it does, and the new, creative ideas it attempts to squash in the name of method - really, though, in the name of power, control, and arrogant hierarchies. I've felt that most new, good, ground-breaking science has come in spite of the method - from outliers, amateurs, radicals and radical approaches. He is right on - very focusing for me. And, with science in need of a new view of science, of people, of the planet, and a new approach - his is a refreshing and necessary effort if we are to move ahead into the real world of diversity, equality, and quality, esp. with Natuarla Systems, complex situations, and chaos - which is where the big problems facing us lie.
Bravo for brave new ideas against an establishment long over-due for a "reset" and which would allow brave new proposals leading to world-changing and world-view changing results.
Bravo
Dick Pierce
Myself, this is helpful as I see medical / biological / health care research desperately grabbing for methodological security from the "gold standard" of the RCT, the peer-reviewed journal, the imprimatur of the "expert as in climate science lately, and so on, while ignoring and even detracting from more fruitful pursuits. Lately, commentors have gently noted this, and have gently urged more exploration of "pragmatic trials," subset analysis, post-hoc exploartional analysis, and so on. But it is vauable to have the Feyerabend viewpoint put forth strongly.
Normally, I dislike reading various "critical," or "structural," or marxist evaluations of various topics, but it works here - back on Hegel's home turf of epistemology.
Top reviews from other countries
However, after reading Thomas S. Kuhn's: "The structure of scientific revolutions" on paradigm theory (read this first), I felt I had to study Feyerabend's take. After doing this, I can at least concede that I have taken on board some of his relativist criticisms albeit I have done so with a large pinch/grain of salt. I am still by no means a postmodernist and as usual I stay close by to my copy of "beyond the hoax".
A quick word of warning about most pre-postmodernist "dada" or any postmodernist literature, it can be very wordy at times, so to those very lost lay-men out there...watch out! I think that with a good head on your shoulders you should be able manage it while it coincides with your A levels.
Also be very careful when reading this book, always approach it with a skeptical mind because it is very tempting to fall for 'woo' when it is written so well. If you feel you are falling for empty rhetoric return to your Sokal immediately.
Five stars for the sheer cheek of Feyerabend!
You know how Galieo fought against “the man” (evil Church) and won? You know how that proves how great “science” is? Feyerabend argues this is a lie. He was basically a troll who used every means at his disposal (including trickery and propaganda) to convince people he was right. In many ways, the Church followed “science” in saying he was wrong. They didn’t know back in the day that telescopes were good at. The image they provided was significantly distorted compared to the naked eye. It wasn’t until later when optics were studied more that this was figured out and corrected.
By following methods of any capacity, we limit ourselves. We limit the ideas we can have and the explanations we can produce. We don’t know what is “right” or a “fact” now, and many people believe the case could be proven to be wrong. Consistency with the past is often a hindrance. There is many opportunities if you take up Feyerabend’s motto of “anything goes.” Have more crazy ideas.
"There is no idea, however ancient and absurd, that is not capable of improving our knowledge."







