Shop top categories that ship internationally
Buy used:
$8.21
$10.90 delivery January 27 - February 18. Details
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Former library book; Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other sellers on Amazon
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Age of Global Warming: A History Paperback – April 28, 2014

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 128 ratings

Rachel Carson's epoch-creating Silent Spring marked the beginnings of the environmental movement in the 1960s, its 'First Wave' peaking at the 1972 Stockholm Conference. The invention of sustainable development by Barbara Ward, along with Rachel Carson the founder of the environmental movement, created an alliance of convenience between First World environmentalism and a Third World set on rapid industrialisation. The First Wave crashed in 1973 with the Yom Kippur War and decade-long energy crisis. Revived by a warming economy of the 1980s, environmentalism found a new, political champion in 1988: Margaret Thatcher. Four years later at the Rio Earth Summit, politics settled the science. One hundred and ninety-two nations agreed that mankind was causing global warming and carbon dioxide emissions should be cut. Rio launched rounds of climate change meetings and summits, with developing nations refusing to countenance any agreement restraining their greenhouse gas emissions - their blanket exemption from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol leading to its rejection by the United States that year, and again twelve years later in Copenhagen. This therefore marked not just the collapse of the climate change negotiations, but something larger - an unprecedented humiliation for the West at the hands of the rising powers of the East.
The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now

Editorial Reviews

Review

'This is a brilliant piece of work that every climate change negotiator should have in his front pocket' --Jon Snow 'A great achievement ... Rupert Darwall has written a compelling and balanced account of a story that needs to be told' --Nigel Lawson

A definitive and clear-eyed history of global warming alarmism --Michael Barone



'Like most of those on both sides of the debate, Rupert Darwall is not a scientist. He is a wonderfully lucid historian of intellectual and political movements, which is just the job to explain what has been inflicted on us over the past thirty years or so in the name of saving the planet ... Scientists, Rupert Darwall complains, have been too ready to embrace the "subjectivity" of the future, and too often have a "cultural aversion to learning from the past". If they read this tremendous book they will see those lessons set out with painful clarity' --Charles Moore, Daily Telegraph

'A superb and compelling book' --Mail on Sunday

'This is a brilliant piece of work that every climate change negotiator should have in his front pocket' --Jon Snow

'A great achievement ... Rupert Darwall has written a compelling and balanced account of a story that needs to be told' --Nigel Lawson, former British Chancellor of the Exchequer and author of An Appeal to Reason

'A total masterpiece' --James Delingpole

'Gripping ... Darwall's book has been widely praised as a welcome addition to our understanding of this extraordinary story, which as he says reflects a historic shift in the global balance of power between the West and those fast-rising nations to the east led by China and India' --Spectator

'Rupert Darwall has told a story of frauds and fools thoroughly and well. His truth may be inconvenient for some. For the rest of us, it is a breath of fresh air' --The American Spectator --.

About the Author

Rupert Darwall read economics and history at Cambridge, after which he worked at the Conservative Research Department, then in the City as an investment analyst and in corporate finance. He has written for leading publications in the UK and the US and for London-based think tanks.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Quartet Books Ltd; Reprint edition (April 28, 2014)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 354 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0704373394
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0704373396
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.15 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.25 x 1.25 x 9 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 128 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Rupert Darwall
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
128 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book provides a thorough and informative look at the complex topic of global warming. They describe it as well-written and easy to read, with logical facts. However, opinions differ on the history, with some finding it compelling and chronological, while others feel it's a polemic dealing with politics and personalities.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

28 customers mention "Research quality"24 positive4 negative

Customers find the book provides a thorough and informative look at global warming. It provides logical facts and a good summary of the history, science, and politics. The author carefully examines the philosophical basis of the debate and puts it in context. Overall, it's a good backgrounder on the global warming movement and power politics regarding the issue.

"...The author of this book does an outstanding job of addressing and analyzing this complex sequence of events...." Read more

"...There is also a philosophical aspect to the book besides the journalistic one...." Read more

"...very well written and not very philosophical but it is a very good summary of the history not only of the global warming movement but of the long..." Read more

"...The book is a history book, with a lot of deep history. ''To this, scientists brought their cultural aversion to learning from the past...." Read more

13 customers mention "Readability"13 positive0 negative

Customers find the book readable and well-written. They appreciate the clear language and historical causality. The author's style is accessible and easy to follow.

"...It's a great book and very well researched, with tonnes of references...." Read more

"...history of people who have wrongly predicted catastrophe--so it is worth reading for that alone--" Read more

"...It is very clear and logical and most interesting and informative. I've recommended this book to my meteorologist friend...." Read more

"This is an unusual book because it is well written, the opposite of polemic, and it is reflective and historical...." Read more

8 customers mention "History"4 positive4 negative

Customers have different views on the history of the environmental movement. Some find it compelling and a chronological account of its development, including doomsday predictions and theories about global catastrophe. They also mention that it discusses the risks of mitigation and the battles within the IPCC. However, others feel that the book has a theme of hubris and is polemic, dealing with politics and personalities rather than philosophy.

"...debate and puts it in the context of past prophesies and theories about global catastrophe." Read more

"...This is a difficult and complex story to tell; partly because it involves virtually every nation on Earth, with each nation having its own problems,..." Read more

"Mr. Darwall provides an outstanding chronological history of the green movement through all of its name changes and political associations...." Read more

"This book is not very well written and not very philosophical but it is a very good summary of the history not only of the global warming movement..." Read more

The politics of climate Earth
5 out of 5 stars
The politics of climate Earth
To understand the politics of global warming, it is absolutely necessary to have knowledge of the players, related organizations and events, as they played out chronologically on the world stage. This book will provide those elements, as well as context. If believing in man made climate change is important for you, this book is not for you. It is heavily fact based as regards who or what, did what and when. Much of what the book lays out can be easily verified. Does the author have a position? Yes. It is, however, reached as a result of his research of the public record. Importantly, his thoughts in this regard, are not made in a manner of hard sell. In fact, they are secondary to the books purpose. Some persons are of the mind that no one absent a degree in a related science, should speak on a subject such as global warming. That is absurd on its face. Regardless, this book is, as stated, a history of events. It is far more based on a traditional journalistic approach than a scientific work. Read with an open mind, your reward will be a historical perspective of the age of global warming.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2014
    This book describes and examines the history of the decades-long effort by the UN IPCC (United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), various governments, and numerous NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) such as Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Oxfam, and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) to compel the nations of the world to reduce their Carbon Dioxide, CO2, emissions in hopes of minimizing the potentially catastrophic impact of `man-made global warming' on future generations.

    This is a difficult and complex story to tell; partly because it involves virtually every nation on Earth, with each nation having its own problems, priorities, and policies; but also because it has taken place over a period of more than five lustrums, during which time some claim that socialism, political bias, and the corruption of climate science have played an important role in forcing the issue, while much of the process has taken place behind closed doors.

    To illustrate, consider this brief summary: Despite the fact that there was no 'specific' evidence of global warming, or that carbon dioxide was causing it; a `consensus' was reached among climate scientists associated with the IPCC, who inferred that industrialization (US capitalism, in particular) was causing it. This led to a further consensus that if the world waited until there was clear evidence that the Earth `was', in fact, warming and that man, through his CO2 emissions, `was' causing it; it would be too late to act. So, although the Earth's temperature remained relatively stable at the time, the situation was deemed so critical that if decisive International action wasn't taken immediately to drastically reduce CO2 emissions world-wide; civilization, as we know it, was doomed --- sometime in the distant future. This led to a series of International Earth Summits, starting in Rio in 1988, and Conferences of the Parties (COPs), starting in Berlin in 1995, all aimed at forging an International agreement among all nations, both `developed' and `developing,' to drastically reduce and limit their carbon dioxide emissions. Little thought was given to the economic impacts of those reductions. The meetings are still on-going, but thus-far have been largely unproductive. The economic impacts of the changes made, thus far, however, have been severe.

    The author of this book does an outstanding job of addressing and analyzing this complex sequence of events. But, even so, you may be a bit confused as you read the book. For, in all likelihood you'll find yourself puzzling over why those pressing for immediate Global action are so fanatical when no evidence is offered to support their belief in man-made global warming. But don't despair. When you reach the book's final chapter, `Reflections', starting on page 293, much of this will be clarified to some extent. That chapter offers a succinct overview explaining `how' it all got started and `why' the true believers are so convinced.

    So, before getting into another argument over `Climate Change' around the water cooler, I strongly suggest you read this book. It will tell you everything you need to know to formulate informed and supportable arguments regarding the subject. By reading it, in fact, you may even be able to decide, once-and-for-all, whether you believe that man's activities are causing the Earth's atmospheric temperature to rise, perhaps catastrophically; or that the unstated evidence is unconvincing and that, until proven otherwise, you simply can't believe it.

    In any case: based on this read, it appears that politicians, climatologists, and ideologues will continue to meet in exotic locals around the world to solve the problem of 'climate change' until, at last, they throw up their hands in despair and give up.
    21 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2013
    I thought this book was going to be boring but boy, was I wrong.
    The author's style is clear and easy to read.
    He goes all the way back from Malthus (remember, that priest that said there wasn't going to be enough food to feed everyone) to today to show that doomsayers have always existed in the scientific community.
    His basic thesis is that whenever a theory about Earth's demise from global warming or other climate related calamity arose, part of the scientific community would always overlook the scientific process and take the warnings as truth, influencing policy debate and decisions.
    However, the last episode, which started around 1988 and ended with the ClimateGate and the Copenhagen Summitt, took that lack of regard to such new heights and got so entrenched into politics that we were lead to question the integrity and credibility of the way the scientific community made science.
    It's a great book and very well researched, with tonnes of references.

    There is also a philosophical aspect to the book besides the journalistic one.
    The author discusses Karl Popper, the Economics of climate change, the concerns about an "elitecised" (like "politicised", but as in "elite") scientific community, etc.

    There's still 30% of the book left but I can say that the case for global warming is looking weaker than ever.
    I believe we should all familiarise ourselves with arguments from both sides of a discussion before taking a side. However, in this case, I think the debate is over.
    45 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on June 18, 2014
    This book is not very well written and not very philosophical but it is a very good summary of the history not only of the global warming movement but of the long history of people who have wrongly predicted catastrophe--so it is worth reading for that alone--
    4 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

  • Silvana
    5.0 out of 5 stars A must read
    Reviewed in Canada on November 10, 2019
    An impressive, detailed historical overview of the global warming/climate change issue. A must read for believers and "deniers" alike.
  • Miklos Roth
    5.0 out of 5 stars The age of global warming
    Reviewed in Australia on September 28, 2020
    What a brilliant publication, couldn’t put it down! I wish our politicians read and most importantly learn about their folly and stop corruption and wasting taxpayers money!
  • Marchespie
    5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent study of the political side of the story
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 26, 2013
    There are many good books already published that explain the real science behind climate change - Robert Carter's "Climate: The Counter-Consensus" being perhaps the best I've read. Rupert Darwall's book is different in that it focuses on the philosophical and political history of Global Warming. In order to do so, it necessarily spends its first third discussing the evolution of environmental thinking over the last 500 years or so, describing the development of the modern environmental movement in detail - this can be a little dry at times, so bear with it. When 1988 is reached and James Hansen ignites the real birth of the Global Warming scare, the book picks up pace, culminating in a riveting description of the failure of the 2009 Copenhagen conference.

    Darwall's writing throughout is erudite and academic and supported by countless references. Rather than re-hashing the science to create another Climate Change pot-boiler, he's made an important addition to the literature and written an accessible and entertaining book. He also takes a balanced and dispassionate view of his subject, lending his ultimate conclusions much greater weight than if he had taken a more partisan position through the body of the book.

    Like many, over the last few years I have undergone a complete reversal of my views on Global Warming. Up until 2009, I believed the hype and had been thinking about the future - mine and my children's - in a negative, fatalistic way. The political and media message about impending climate disaster had so convinced me that I envisioned the next generation contending with inundated coastal cities, food shortages and wars. Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth depressed me so much that I couldn't bear to finish watching it. I was genuinely pessimistic about the Human race's future. I felt sorry for my children.

    In 2009 I decided I should find out more about this subject that had so affected me. I read two books from opposite ends of the spectrum of views - James Lovelock's "The Revenge of Gaia" and Christopher Booker's "The Real Global Warming Disaster". It was the latter that began my change of view - one that has been supported by devouring just about every book published on the subject, and paying daily visits to Anthony Watts's excellent blog. It's clear to me now that, far from the science being "settled", as we are told, the science behind the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis is so debatable that it does not even meet the basic scientific qualifications to be termed a theory.

    The most instructive thing for me has come from the behaviour and language used by those on either side of the debate. The Skeptical views are overwhelmingly presented in a reasoned way, typically by those with the courage to speak out against the prevailing consensus and look objectively at the facts. In complete contrast, the proponents of CAGW are typically shrill, hectoring, overbearing - rather than debate the facts (where they will founder) they will attack the motives of those who argue the Skeptical view, typically by accusing them of being in denial or in the pay of "Big Oil". The very use of the term "Denier", with its connotations of holocaust denial, should sound a warning about their motives and the underlying weakness of their arguments - if you cannot attack the argument, attack the person making it. What has appalled me even more is that organisations such as the BBC and Wikipedia, supposedly voices of truth and objectivity, have become utterly compromised. Bias permeates much of the BBC's coverage of climate issues - which I might expect from an overtly left-wing source like The Guardian, but not our treasured, supposedly impartial BBC! I am not in denial and I'm not in the pay of Big Oil - I have been systematically deceived and I am angry about it! Once any thinking person becomes aware of this bias that surrounds us, it is impossible to miss. The scales have dropped from my eyes.

    Some reading this review may think I am just another selfish "denier" who wants to bury his head in the sand and carry on living my profligate Western way of life. If so, I urge them to read this book - and at least one of the many books on the science - and begin thinking for yourself rather than simply believing what the politicians and the media feed to you.
  • Greg Tegman
    1.0 out of 5 stars Someone needs to review the Wearhouse !
    Reviewed in Canada on July 26, 2024
    Came in today 26JUL24 If there could be a submission for ZERO stars, I'd use it !!!!!
    This book needs to be returned.
    Please email me a return receipt or advise on how to return this book.
    The front and back are scratched and has spot marks of what looks like dried cement or some type of compound.
    NOT HAAPPY !
  • Mike
    5.0 out of 5 stars The story of how unelected political cliques looked for a chance to force its ideology on the rest of us
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 2, 2013
    The author begins by covering the history of those who confidently make pessimistic predictions about the future, usually by assuming man is incapable of technological improvement or adaption from that point on. They then go on to get it spectacularly wrong.

    The modern environmental movement holds in great reverence certain individuals, such as Paul Ehrlich. He wrote books endlessly predicting chaos caused by an increasing human population, and in them he made very specific predictions - none of which came true.
    From these influences various non-elected groups were formed such as `The Club of Rome' and portentously made great pronouncements about too much economic development, too much growth, too many people etc. These anti-human beliefs chimed with the post mid-1980's Environmental movement, and they waited ... until there was thought to be enough science around to demonize CO2 and Man made Global Warming was born.
    After spreading belief in this `new age' religion in the guise of science to the highest government levels; the attempts to control CO2 world-wide have been one laughable failure after another. At the end the computer model predictions of warming ( solid science ) have not come true and the rest of us are left wondering what the hell has been going on.

    The author finishes the book with a very good warning, that even with the collapse of man-made warming/climate change ideology, the `types' who support this sort of thing will be back with another scare - scientifically based, of course - that blames wicked mankind for some sort of imagined catastrophe, and demanding unquestioning obedience and money from the rest of us.