Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
93% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
89% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Aggressive Nationalism: McCulloch v. Maryland and the Foundation of Federal Authority in the Young Republic 1st Edition
| Richard E. Ellis (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
Placing the decision and the public reaction to it in their proper historical context, Richard E. Ellis finds that Maryland, though unopposed to the Bank, helped to bring the case before the Court and a sympathetic Chief Justice, who worked behind the scenes to save the embattled institution. Almost all treatments of the case consider it solely from Marshall's perspective, yet a careful examination reveals other, even more important issues that the Chief Justice chose to ignore. Ellis demonstrates that the points which mattered most to the States were not treated by the Court's decision: the private, profit-making nature of the Second Bank, its right to establish branches wherever it wanted with immunity from state taxation, and the right of the States to tax the Bank simply for revenue purposes. Addressing these issues would have undercut Marshall's nationalist view of the Constitution, and his unwillingness to adequately deal with them produced immediate, widespread, and varied
dissatisfaction among the States. Ellis argues that Marshall's "aggressive nationalism" was ultimately counter-productive: his overreaching led to Jackson's democratic rejection of the decision and failed to reconcile states' rights to the effective operation of the institutions of federal governance.
Elegantly written, full of new information, and the first in-depth examination of McCulloch v. Maryland, Aggressive Nationalism offers an incisive, fresh interpretation of this familiar decision central to understanding the shifting politics of the early republic as well as the development of federal-state relations, a source of constant division in American politics, past and present.
- ISBN-100195323564
- ISBN-13978-0195323566
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateAugust 22, 2007
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions8.9 x 0.8 x 6.2 inches
- Print length280 pages
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A firm narrative that will be fascinating to the general reader"--Maryland Historical Magazine
"Richard E. Ellis has once again earned great admiration from all students of American history. Lucid, forceful, and important, Aggressive Nationalism will fundamentally change the standard views of emerging American nationalism and the fascinating politics that lay behind it. It is a major contribution from a consistently impressive and pioneering historian."--Sean Wilentz, Princeton University
"Richard Ellis always finds new ways of understanding familiar topics - with the added, singular virtue of being so right. A judicious historian, Ellis determinedly renders historical events in real time and place. John Marshall's McCulloch v. Maryland opinion--long a chestnut of constitutional interpretation and analysis--endures as a bold statement for perennial problems of federalism and constitutional interpretation (despite Justice Scalia's misguided disdain). Ellis effectively challenges Marshall's questionable determination to protect the Bank of the United States; but Ellis also properly recognizes that Marshall's striking language remains the standard for a wise, pragmatic, and evolving interpretation of the Constitution. We can be grateful for this extraordinary book."--Stanley Kutler, author of Privilege and Creative Destruction: The Charles River Bridge Case
"Both scholarly and readable, this study puts the great case of McCulloch v. Maryland in a clear historical context. It will enlighten both students and specialists."--Michael Les Benedict, Ohio State University
"The Ellis text offers insightful analysis of how individual states fared before, during, and after the national bank controversy."--Law and Politics Book Review
"a detailed account of one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases in the early nineteenth century...Ellis is adept at using the story of McCulloch to illuminate the broader politics of the middle Jeffersonian era...Ellis's careful attention to the conflicted feelings about the loss of control over credit and revenue in the states in the 1810s is most welcome."--The Journal of American History
"Ellis's book should be read for its valuable exploration of sub-state versus federal constitutional politics."--The American Historical Review
About the Author
Richard E. Ellis is Professor of History at the University of Buffalo, SUNY. Among his published works are The Jeffersonian Crisis: Courts and Politics in the Young Republic (1971) and The Union at Risk: Jacksonian Democracy, State's Rights, and the Nullification Crisis (1987). He has held grants from The John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the American Council of Learned Societies.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (August 22, 2007)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 280 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195323564
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195323566
- Item Weight : 1.18 pounds
- Dimensions : 8.9 x 0.8 x 6.2 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,315,605 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,467 in Constitutional Law (Books)
- #3,548 in Legal History (Books)
- #4,248 in Linguistics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The case was really about the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States, a public/private partnership that some believed represented a gross overstepping of legitimate federal power. At a fundamental level it represented a debate over national prerogative versus states' rights. Marshall ignored in his opinion many of the points that seemed to be of the most concern to the defendants. Those included the propriety of the federal government chartering a private, profit-making national bank, that bank's authority to conduct its business wherever it wished, its imperviousness to taxation and regulation, and a host of other concerns. Looked at in this manner, the state of Maryland had an important matter for resolution that Marshall decided not to address.
Instead John Marshall reemphasized the power of the federal government to the exclusion of the rights of the states. This important contention would consume national/state relations through the Civil War era and some might say that it is still far from settled. "Aggressive Nationalism" is a good title for this book as Marshall defended that to the exclusion of any sense of state prerogative.
