Alexander, Revisited: The Final Cut (Two-Disc Special Edition)
Buy New
$10.99$10.99
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: muboutletstore
Return this item for free
We offer easy, convenient returns with at least one free return option: no shipping charges. All returns must comply with our returns policy.
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select your preferred free shipping option
- Drop off and leave!
| Returnable | Yes |
|---|---|
| Resolutions | Eligible for refund or replacement |
| Return Window | 30 days from delivery |
| Refund Timelines | Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here. |
| Late fee | A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’. |
| Restocking fee | A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here. |
Return instructions
| Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information. |
| Returnable | Yes |
|---|---|
| Resolutions | Eligible for refund or replacement |
| Return Window | 30 days from delivery |
| Refund Timelines | Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here. |
| Late fee | A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’. |
| Restocking fee | A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here. |
Return instructions
| Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information. |
Save with Used - Very Good
$8.15$8.15
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: R_Mann Books & Media
Return this item for free
We offer easy, convenient returns with at least one free return option: no shipping charges. All returns must comply with our returns policy.
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select your preferred free shipping option
- Drop off and leave!
Return this item for free
We offer easy, convenient returns with at least one free return option: no shipping charges. All returns must comply with our returns policy.
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select your preferred free shipping option
- Drop off and leave!
| Returnable | Yes |
|---|---|
| Resolutions | Eligible for refund or replacement |
| Return Window | 30 days from delivery |
| Refund Timelines | Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here. |
| Late fee | A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’. |
| Restocking fee | A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here. |
Return instructions
| Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information. |
| Returnable | Yes |
|---|---|
| Resolutions | Eligible for refund or replacement |
| Return Window | 30 days from delivery |
| Refund Timelines | Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here. |
| Late fee | A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’. |
| Restocking fee | A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here. |
Return instructions
| Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information. |
Other sellers on Amazon
Details
Multiple Formats, Color, AC-3, Closed-captioned, Director's Cut, Dolby, Widescreen, Subtitled, NTSC
Colin Farrell, Angelina Jolie, Oliver Stone, Moritz Borman, Iain Smith, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Gary Stretch, Anthony Hopkins, Thomas Schühly, Jared Leto, Christopher Kyle, Laeta Kalogridis, Jon Kilik, Rosario Dawson, Val Kilmer
Frequently bought together
Frequently bought together

Description
Amazon.com
For better or worse (and in this case, it's mostly for better), Oliver Stone's Alexander Revisited should stand as the definitive version of Stone's much-maligned epic about the great Asian conqueror. Following the DVD release of his previous Director's Cut, Stone offers a video introduction here, explaining why he felt a third and final attempt at refining his film was necessary. Essentially, he's using this opportunity to re-create the "road show" format of the Biblical epics of the 1950s and '60s, with a three-and-a-half-hour running time (with an intermission at the two-hour mark) including 45 minutes of previously unseen footage. Stone has also significantly restructured the film, resulting in substantial (if not exactly redemptive) improvements in its narrative flow. Alexander (played in a torrent of emotions by Colin Farrell) is dying as the film opens, his final moments serving to bookend the film's epic story, which incorporates flashback sequences to flesh out the Macedonian king's back-story involving the turbulent battle of fate between his father, King Philip (Val Kilmer) and his scheming sorceress mother Olympia (Angelina Jolie, ridiculous accent and all), who insists that Alexander is literally a child of the gods.
In Stone's final cut, epic battles remain chaotic (although Alexander's strategy is somewhat easier to follow, with on-screen titles indicating left, right, and center during his army's greatest maneuvers) and the ultra-violent battles are more graphically gory than ever (hence their "unrated" status). The animalistic lovemaking of Alexander and his barbarian bride Roxana (Rosario Dawson) is slightly extended (with Dawson as ravishing as ever), and Stone's additional footage also improves the overall arc of Alexander's relationship with his closest generals and male companions, although his most intimate homosexual encounters remain mostly discreet. As Alexander Revisited makes clear, the film's weaknesses remain unavoidable, but Stone deserves credit for recognizing how a longer running time, and more disciplined narrative structure, would bring Alexander closer to the respect it never earned from critics and filmgoers alike. This is unquestionably a better film than it used to be, leaving us to wonder why it took three separate efforts to shape Alexander into its best possible presentation. --Jeff Shannon
Product Description
Alexander Revisited: (Unrated) Final Cut, The (Dbl DVD) A completely unrated version of Oliver Stone's incredible epic film, loaded with nearly 40 minutes of additional never-before-seen footage, that takes the film to a new level of realism and intensity!
Product information
| Run time | 3 hours and 34 minutes |
|---|---|
| Number of discs | 2 |
| Media Format | Multiple Formats, Color, AC-3, Closed-captioned, Director's Cut, Dolby, Widescreen, Subtitled, NTSC |
| Language | Unqualified (DTS ES 6.1), English (Dolby Digital 5.1) |
| Actors | Colin Farrell, Angelina Jolie, Val Kilmer, Anthony Hopkins, Jared Leto |
| Aspect Ratio | Unknown |
| Studio | WarnerBrothers |
| Release date | January 8, 2008 |
| ASIN | B000MGB6NM |
| Customer Reviews | 4.4 out of 5 stars 310Reviews |
-
Best Sellers Rank:#34,506 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)#516 in Military & War (Movies & TV)#3,538 in Action & Adventure DVDs#5,780 in Drama DVDs
Additional Information
Customers who bought this item also bought
Reviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.Top reviews from the United States
If you think about it, Mr. Stone had a Herculean Labor here: To bring Alexander "The Great" down from the ivory pedestal he's resided upon in bust for 2300 years, into our modern times so that we might try to understand him as "The Man" inside four hours. No other figure in human history has been so guilded by legend, or obscured by such legendary true accomplishments. How does one begin to get a sense of this man--his thoughts, feelings, vulnerabilities, that secret inner life? Yes, we know what he DID. But who WAS he?
This film delivers on all that.
So kindly overlook the at-times overmatched acting by Colin Farrell and his youthful peers. Turn a blind eye toward the gross miscasting of Val Kilmer as Alexander's father, Phillip II. Cover your ears as Angelina Jolie snarls and claws her way through one overbearing scene after another, even as she looks every inch Alexander's mother Olympias. Bear with Alexander's old general Ptolemy, ably played as usual by Sir Anthony Hopkins, as he meanders through his own ruminations about who Alexander was in the course of narration. Lie back on the couch and breathe as Oliver Stone beats the Oedipal horse into pudding.
The truth is, even those numerous flaws fail to detract from the impact of this film: To put you down on the earth as it was in Alexander's day, and experience what it might have been like to be him--in battle, in love, in friendship, in tragedy, conquering most of the known world. By the end, you will feel as if you've really KNOWN the man. That's what epic filmmaking is all about.
And if it took Olie three tries to get it right, so what? What matters is that he got it RIGHT. And we get to enjoy it.
(P.S.: The packaging and overall production quality are superb. Really beautiful. That it's selling for about five bucks is itself a wonder of the world.)
Stone went for the heart and for the glory that Alexander was in life, start to finish, and to me, he did not disappoint in this Cut. It's kind of funny to me, that the reviews I've found for this movie always seem to: 1) glorify Val Kilmer's performance [and it was good], 2) vilify Angelina Jolie's performance [I found her true to Olympias, who always seemed to have an agenda], 3) complain about the homosexual tendencies [do you know ANYTHING about Alexander or ancient Greece?], and 4) moan about the movie being boring [how the hell is a war movie boring?] Kilmer as Phillip II was amazing; I alternately hated Phillip and felt him tender at the same time, and Kilmer doesn't usually do it for me, but he was AWESOME in this role. Jolie--I always like her acting, and to me, she did the snake worshipping Olympias justice, even if the snake worshipping Olympias was weird unto herself; one thing is for certain-- she loved her son... how is a different story. Farrell's Alexander was amazing, but then again, I'm not sure that Colin Farrell has a bad turn of a role, usually it's a script that gets him. Leto as Hephaistion was beautifully done, and I'm not usually a Leto fan when it comes to him and movies.
How the hell do people find a movie about conquering the world boring? Especially when, as Aristotle puts it in the movie, "the known world" was pretty small? Alexander was way ahead of his time, and to watch his destiny unfold before his eyes, to watch each decision he made, whether or not it was one everyone agreed with, affect the WORLD, had to be mind-blowing. Ptolemy spoke of his death at the end of the movie, saying that "Alexander's great heart finally gave out." I think that was a perfect way to describe it: from what I've read from Plutarch and Arrian and Curtius-- people who never met the man, but relied on writings we've mostly never seen to make their own-- Alexander had such a big heart and such a keen mind for strategy, and when he put those two together, there was nothing he couldn't accomplish.
Stone and Farrell captured that perfectly in this film.
Jared Leto was very convincing as Alexander's general and lover Hephaestian, not to mention that he was gorgeous. I am sorry Francisco Bosch who played the eunuch Bagoas didn't get a higher billing as his character was important and he did a great job. I think they could have found someone more suited than Colin Farrell to play Alexander. For one thing, he looked nothing like him. Alexander was "more beautiful" than that. The horse that played Alexander's horse Bucephalus was an incredibly majestic animal! What a warrier!
I read in one review that Stone didn't stick to the facts. I disagree. It isn't easy to cram a life like that in three and a half hours, but the few things he altered were either to adher to the time limit or possibly for effect. The way Alexander found Bagoas was "simplified," and Bucephalus did not die in battle, but of old age at thirty. The general Cassander was one of the few of Alexander's boyhood companions not in his army because they hated each other. But I'm glad Stone included him because Jonathan Rhys Myers who played that role is one of my favorites. I'm sorry they didn't make more of the death of Hephaestian as in truth Alexander went into what some called a psychotic rage that lasted for sometime and had far-reaching consequences. Angelina Jolie as Alexander's mother Olympius was magnificant, and again, authentic, even down to the snakes.
Still, Stone's production is better (the good parts are far better than many people were capable of recognizing) than many critics and too many audience members thought. There are reasons for this.
Over the years, I have conducted extensive research on Alexander. Also, my having worked as a mental-health therapist for nearly 30 years, I once engaged it what might be called a "forensic psychological analysis" of Alexander and came to some interesting conclusions. So I have been able to compare and contrast the film with the film industry's "preferred approach" to script writing, directing, and production as described to me by my friend who is a university instructor in film.
The second version "Director's Cut" was an improvement over the initial theater version. This final version has some further improvements yet suffers from the same, inevitable difficulties of the first two.
In an effort to integrate the divers elements of the film into an organic whole, Stone made the choice to move frequently forward or backward in time. A multi-part docudrama, run chronologically, would have been far easier for most of the public to follow. Some critics complained about the addition of narration throughout the film, a possibly cumbersome element for an entertainment film. The additional information was a necessary addition, however, considering the limited length of the film and also the limited historical knowledge of most movie goers.
The docudrama elements of Stone's film are historically accurate. Yet in his attempt to make an entertainment film, Stone engaged in compression of, and skewing of, events, especially in the later battle parts of the film. Those in the audience who prefer dramatic action to fact may have been more pleased; however, those members who were capable of appreciating the historically accurate parts of the film may have been a little uncomfortable with this conflict between the two approaches.
In "Alexander - Revisited," Stone finally was free to include additional dialogue and scene extensions that never should have been omitted in the first two versions, undoubtedly against Stone's wishes. The pressure on Stone to omit these segments apparently was worry about the film being "too talky" and also, frankly, from ignorance and prejudice. A therapist must attempt to promote acceptance of fact and reality over beliefs that not only defy fact and reality but also have the potential to be harmful. One of my patients was very upset and angry (along with many viewers and even some Greeks, who should know better) that Stone "forced upon the viewing public a false, made-up version of Alexander's sexual orientation." Stone's portrayal of Alexander and Hepheastion's life-long relationship is accurate, and their expressions of love for each other are done with taste and sensitivity. I have not read from those persons who were offended by the gentle kiss between Bagoas and Alexander in this third version any comments about the overtly sexual scene with Alexander and Roxanne in all three versions. Stone, therefore, should be commended for including the scenes with Alexander and Hepheastion and also the additional footage of Bagoas.
I own and have watched all three DVD versions of Stone's film. The second defintely is better than the first. Although I need to view the second and third versions more in order to come to a more detailed comparison, the additional film footage in "Alexander - Revisited" may tip the evaluation scales in its favor, despite the somewhat disjointed feeling resulting from its editing.
The battle scenes are as chaotic and bloody as one might imagine an actual battle would be in those times. What I found interesting was the labeling of the lines, such as "Macedonian Center", etc., plus the sweeping aerial shots in the desert scene, so one had the sense of strategy on the battlefield.
Costuming, armor and the depiction of cities such as Babylon appeared to be historically accurate, or at least attempted to do so.
However, I think the memory of Alexander the Great would have been better served if there were more exposition of the battles and the strategies employed by Alexander which got him to the starting point of the movie, the Battle of Gaugemela. Given the length of this version, it was disappointing that so little attention was given to Alexander's mind, and deep understanding of tactics.
Instead, we were subjected to a soap opera of love and intrigue, of high emotions and sub-plots, which degraded the victories of Alexander almost to the level of "luck". The constant pedal point of sexuality, bi-sexuality, homosexuality and an (implied) incestuous relationship between Alexander and his mother, was a diversion from the story of the history of Alexander's accomplishments.
The music had the potential of conveying great moments in a warrior's life; moments of humanity and true nobility of spirit. However, it was underutilized throughout.
The accents were ridiculous - WHAT is that accent of Jolie's??! It really started to get on my nerves. We hear others with Irish brogues or cultivated British accents. What the heck?!
And the camera work - don't get me started! The extreme close-ups, over and over again, are also tiresome. Do we really need to see the pores in their faces and their nose-hairs??? And, in the India battle scene, after Alexander is wounded, all of a sudden we're thrown back into a 1960's LSD-type effect of wild colors and sharp contrasts, which very nearly had me expect to hear "Strawberry Fields Forever" at any moment. "Wha-a-a-a-a-a- the---?!"
And, I have to agree with other reviewers re: the flashbacks. Although the years are subtitled, and Anthony Hopkins' voice over gives some context, it is overall very disjointed and truly doesn't function in the telling of a story.
I was very disappointed in this movie; it had so much potential to truly be great; to bring a bit of Alexander - the concepts of strategic warfare and nation-building (and LIBRARIES!) - to present generations.
At the end, despite some interesting observations by Hopkins' Ptolemy, we are still left wondering, "SO....uh, what did Alexander do and HOW DID HE DO IT?
Hollywood is a poor substitute for actual history; it were better that we visit our local library, and crack open a book or two to glean some of the wisdom from Alexander the Great's life.
Yes, the movie, like its subject, has numerous flaws. It is unwieldy, there are probably too many flashbacks and melodramatic moments. But there are many scenes that I will never forget - and have not forgotten since I saw the original version in the theater. I think Ptolemy said it best: (paraphrasing) "Oliver Stone's Alexander is a failure, but his failure towers over the successes of others." It is probably impossible to do justice to Alexander the Great's life in a movie, but Stone came closer than I would have thought possible.
Top reviews from other countries
Giudizio negativo per le informazioni sbagliate, non per il prodotto in sè. Non lo restituisco perché avendolo pagato 6 euro probabilmente mi costerebbe di più.
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon

![Alexander the Great [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71vweHZW2EL._AC_UL70_SR70,70_.jpg)
![Mission:Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81GPGLvD+TL._AC_UL200_SR200,200_.jpg)

![Alexander the Great [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71vweHZW2EL._AC_UL200_SR200,200_.jpg)


