Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Alias Shakespeare Hardcover – May 7, 1997
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFree Press
- Publication dateMay 7, 1997
- Dimensions6.75 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100684826585
- ISBN-13978-0684826585
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
From the Publisher
Who wrote Shakespeare's plays? Today, the long-standing and impassioned debate about the so-called authorship question is perceived by Shakespearean scholars as the preserve of eccentrics and cranks. But in this contrarian work of literary detection, author Joseph Sobran boldly reopens this debate and allows the members of Shakespeare's vast contemporary public to weigh all the evidence and decide for themselves.
An enormous shelf of biographical scholarship has grown up over the past 300 years around the "Swan of Avon." But what are these histories based on? Revealing that no more than a handful of fragmentary documents attest to Shakespeare's existence -- and virtually none which link him to the plays themselves -- Sobran delightfully debunks this elaborate egalitarian myth concocted in equal parts of speculation, wishfulness, and fantasy.
More importantly, Sobran shows how many questions the myth leaves unanswered: How could a provincial actor from Stratford gain such an intimate knowledge of court life? How could he know so much of classical authors and not own a single book? How could he write compromising love sonnets to his social superior, the powerful Earl of Southampton? How could he know so much of Italy, a place he never visited? Why was there no notice of the famous writer's death in 1616? Why, in short, does Shakespeare remain such an obscure and shadowy figure?
Methodically demolishing the case for "Mr. Shakspere," Sobran shows it is highly implausible that he wrote the-poems and plays we know as The Works of William Shakespeare. Other candidates exist, of course, including Ben Jonson, Christopher Marlowe, and Francis Bacon. Sobran dispenses with these claimants, then sets forth the startingly persuasive case for Edward de Vere, the seventeenth Earl of Oxford.
Oxford was a widely traveled, classically educated member of the Elizabethan court. A swashbuckling spendthrift, he swung high and low in the eyes of his peers. Having spent most of his fortune on adventures in Italy and elsewhere on the Continent -- like Hamlet he was captured by pirates in the English Channel -- he fell into disrepute for reasons that included rumors about his homosexuality. Still he topped many lists of the best Elizabethan poets at the time, even ranking above Edmund Spenser and Sir Philip Sidney. He was an avid book collector, and a love of the literary arts ran in his family. His uncle not only pioneered the sonnet form that came to be known as Shakespearean, he also translated the English edition of Ovid that indisputably guided Shakespeare's pen. More strikingly, Oxford was the ward of Lord Burghley -- the man widely acknowledged as the model for the character Polonius in Hamlet. Ultimately, Sobran shows us why a disgraced nobleman such as Oxford would have sought solace in the anonymity of writing pseudonymous plays and poetry.
This riveting solution to the Shakespeare puzzle will not please Stratford's tourist industry or many academics devoted to the status quo. Yet for those who are open-minded and curious, and have a healthy disregard for conventional wisdom, Joseph Sobran is a genial and entertaining guide through a mystery that promises to reinvent the greatest poet and dramatist of the English language.
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; First Edition (May 7, 1997)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0684826585
- ISBN-13 : 978-0684826585
- Item Weight : 1.35 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.75 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #994,972 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #358 in Drama Literary Criticism
- #3,706 in Literary Criticism & Theory
- #4,990 in Author Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
By the end of the book you truly won't know what to think-Mr. Sobran has taken a volatile, passionately contested topic and presented his ideas clearly, concisely and with sincere conviction. He uses very straightforward logic and circumstantial evidence to demonstrate the great number of similarities in the Earl of Oxford's life to the topics and themes of Shakespearean plays and poetry, and then goes on to examine how the circumstances of William Shakespeare's life argue against his authoring the plays. There's also a wonderful appendix featuring the Earl of Oxford's early poetry (he stopped publishing at his peak-which is curious) to help you `get a feel' for his similarities to Shakespeare's published works. It's fascinating and great fun to delve so deeply into what is a great puzzle of style and authorship. What a great way to exicte a new reader about the plays!
Oxford's experiences seem to reflect the experiences of the playwright in many cases. Numerous phrases from Oxford's private letters, appear again in Shakespeare's plays. Sobran offers better and more specific arguments than these. If I were a Shakespeare scholar, I would no doubt be angry at any probing book debunking the accepted theory, but this study is a well-made case for the Duke of Oxford.
Top reviews from other countries
Does this question of who wrote the plays and sonnets really matter? We have the plays...personally I find the plays a great deal more interesting having followed the fascinating links to the plays to be found in the life of Oxford as researched by Sobran, first proposed by J T Looney (pronounced Lone-e) in '"Shakespeare" Identified', published in 1920. How did 'Mr Shakspere' know so much about the Danish royal court at Elsinore (Hamlet)? Did he know somebody there? Oxford's brother-in-law was Elizabeth's ambassador. How did `Mr Shakspere' know Lord Burghley well enough to parody him as Polonius (Hamlet)? Oxford knew him better than most, he was Burghley's son-in-law. Why are ten plays set in Italy, revealing an intimate knowledge of that country, when no one even suggests that `Mr Shakspere' ever went there? Perhaps because the real author loved Italy and visited many times. Was `Mr Shakspere's' imagination informed by his own experience when he describes Hamlet, kidnapped by pirates in the English Channel and released unharmed for no better reason than that the pirates liked him? Even were Oxford the author this would seem like pure fiction...yet this really did happen to Oxford. There are many more such links to the plays and that is before we start on the sonnets.
In fairness to those who claim that the sonnets cannot possibly contain consistent source material in the life of a real person, they certainly don't find any resonance in the life of 'Mr Shakspere' of Stratford. What of the Earl of Oxford? Once again the parallels are quite extraordinary. His relationship with the Earl of Southampton fits very precisely the tone and content of those sonnets addressed to him (even orthodox Stratfordians mostly acknowledge Southampton as 'Mr W.H.') The idea of a poor poet urging his noble patron to; 'Make thee another self, for love of me' is absurd. These sonnets were, as Sobran demonstrates ably and repeatedly, addressed to one of equal rank.
Sonnet 125 describes the poet as having 'borne the canopy' - it is a matter of historical record that Oxford would have carried the royal canopy of both Elizabeth and James I.
'Alias Shakespeare' is a book which deserves to be read whatever opinion one may hold regarding the authorship question. It is highly entertaining yet meticulously researched, iconoclastic but always reasonable. 'Is it not just another conspiracy theory?' You may ask. Maybe, but in this case a 400 year old conspiracy to 'conceal and protect' the true author of Shakespeare's works, or, a conspiracy of academic inflexibility in the face of growing evidence? Read and see.


