Buy used:
$6.18
FREE delivery May 17 - 20. Details
Or fastest delivery May 13 - 15. Details
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Former library book; Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Amazon book clubs early access

Join or create book clubs

Choose books together

Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Alias Shakespeare Hardcover – May 7, 1997

4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 54 ratings

Reexamines the authorship controversy surrounding the plays of Shakespeare and provides evidence that the classic works were written by Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford
Read more Read less

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

The debate over the true authorship of Shakespeare's plays has raged for more than a century, fueled by fans like the National Review's Joseph Sobran, who cannot accept that a country bumpkin like William Shakespeare could ever have written the rich plays full of high literary references, intimate knowledge of court politics, and familiarity with personalities in foreign lands. Like many before him, Sobran fingers Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. Where Sobran makes a useful addition to the so-called Oxfordian debate is his sober, Holmes-like laying out of the evidence, especially as found in two useful appendices that contain the full text of the real Shakespeare's flatfooted will, contrasted with specimens of Oxford's own acknowledged poetry, which contains many locutions similar to those found in Shakespeare's plays.

From the Publisher

Who wrote Shakespeare's plays? Today, the long-standing and impassioned debate about the so-called authorship question is perceived by Shakespearean scholars as the preserve of eccentrics and cranks. But in this contrarian work of literary detection, author Joseph Sobran boldly reopens this debate and allows the members of Shakespeare's vast contemporary public to weigh all the evidence and decide for themselves.

An enormous shelf of biographical scholarship has grown up over the past 300 years around the "Swan of Avon." But what are these histories based on? Revealing that no more than a handful of fragmentary documents attest to Shakespeare's existence -- and virtually none which link him to the plays themselves -- Sobran delightfully debunks this elaborate egalitarian myth concocted in equal parts of speculation, wishfulness, and fantasy.

More importantly, Sobran shows how many questions the myth leaves unanswered: How could a provincial actor from Stratford gain such an intimate knowledge of court life? How could he know so much of classical authors and not own a single book? How could he write compromising love sonnets to his social superior, the powerful Earl of Southampton? How could he know so much of Italy, a place he never visited? Why was there no notice of the famous writer's death in 1616? Why, in short, does Shakespeare remain such an obscure and shadowy figure?

Methodically demolishing the case for "Mr. Shakspere," Sobran shows it is highly implausible that he wrote the-poems and plays we know as The Works of William Shakespeare. Other candidates exist, of course, including Ben Jonson, Christopher Marlowe, and Francis Bacon. Sobran dispenses with these claimants, then sets forth the startingly persuasive case for Edward de Vere, the seventeenth Earl of Oxford.

Oxford was a widely traveled, classically educated member of the Elizabethan court. A swashbuckling spendthrift, he swung high and low in the eyes of his peers. Having spent most of his fortune on adventures in Italy and elsewhere on the Continent -- like Hamlet he was captured by pirates in the English Channel -- he fell into disrepute for reasons that included rumors about his homosexuality. Still he topped many lists of the best Elizabethan poets at the time, even ranking above Edmund Spenser and Sir Philip Sidney. He was an avid book collector, and a love of the literary arts ran in his family. His uncle not only pioneered the sonnet form that came to be known as Shakespearean, he also translated the English edition of Ovid that indisputably guided Shakespeare's pen. More strikingly, Oxford was the ward of Lord Burghley -- the man widely acknowledged as the model for the character Polonius in Hamlet. Ultimately, Sobran shows us why a disgraced nobleman such as Oxford would have sought solace in the anonymity of writing pseudonymous plays and poetry.

This riveting solution to the Shakespeare puzzle will not please Stratford's tourist industry or many academics devoted to the status quo. Yet for those who are open-minded and curious, and have a healthy disregard for conventional wisdom, Joseph Sobran is a genial and entertaining guide through a mystery that promises to reinvent the greatest poet and dramatist of the English language.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Free Press; First Edition (May 7, 1997)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 320 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0684826585
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0684826585
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.35 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.75 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 54 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Joseph Sobran
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
54 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on January 26, 2024
Item delivered ahead of schedule and product was very well described! Would definitely buy from seller again!
Reviewed in the United States on September 30, 2022
Sobran's Alias Shakespeare and Mark Anderson's, Shakespeare by Another Name, have converted me to the de Vere authorship of the plays, poems, and sonnets. It is a pleasure to read the plays again with the knowledge that the author has populated them with characters from the court of Queen Elizabeth, has infused them with his extensive classical education, his love of botany and music, his knowledge of Italy where he traveled, and his ease with the law that he studied at Gray's Inn. The bawdiness in some of his works and the gender switching are so interesting when juxtaposed with the flamboyant and unique character of the 17th Earl of Oxford. Plus, I never quite got how the ship in The Tempest on a voyage from Tunis to Naples in the Mediterranean ends up shipwrecked in Bermuda. Stratfordians must look at a map. I think The Tempest takes place on an island near Sicily, in the Aeolian archipelago between Tunis and Naples, Italy where the sand is yellow and there's sulfur in the air from the Stromboli volcano. The Bermoothes was an area in London with stills and the "dew" is the alcohol once distilled. This is where Ariel was sent to get some dew for Prospero.
4 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2001
"Alias Shakespeare" is one of those books that very subtly alters your perspective on history, literature, and how greatness can come from misinformation just as often as from fact. I held a relatively open mind about the Who Wrote Shakespeare discussion until I read this completely believable, unerringly well-presented and well-documented argument that Shakespeare, as we know him, is actually no one we know at all.
By the end of the book you truly won't know what to think-Mr. Sobran has taken a volatile, passionately contested topic and presented his ideas clearly, concisely and with sincere conviction. He uses very straightforward logic and circumstantial evidence to demonstrate the great number of similarities in the Earl of Oxford's life to the topics and themes of Shakespearean plays and poetry, and then goes on to examine how the circumstances of William Shakespeare's life argue against his authoring the plays. There's also a wonderful appendix featuring the Earl of Oxford's early poetry (he stopped publishing at his peak-which is curious) to help you `get a feel' for his similarities to Shakespeare's published works. It's fascinating and great fun to delve so deeply into what is a great puzzle of style and authorship. What a great way to exicte a new reader about the plays!
29 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 20, 2019
Interesting, well-written study of the case for Oxford as the real author of the plays attributed to Will Shaksper of Stratford.
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2000
I had never even heard of the Earl of Oxford before picking up the book. I likend the authorship question to fantasies like 'Where is Elvis' and 'Roswell, New Mexico.' Sobran presents a good deal of circumstantial evidence for Oxford. History records little circumstantial evidence for Shakspere, other than he shares the same name with the bard and he was an actor in some of these plays. Ghost writers are common. As a nobleman, Oxford had two reasons to stay quiet. 1) It was beneath his dignity to write plays 2) He could more easily satire his court friends (and enemies) with anonymity.
Oxford's experiences seem to reflect the experiences of the playwright in many cases. Numerous phrases from Oxford's private letters, appear again in Shakespeare's plays. Sobran offers better and more specific arguments than these. If I were a Shakespeare scholar, I would no doubt be angry at any probing book debunking the accepted theory, but this study is a well-made case for the Duke of Oxford.
50 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2021
Early and complete answer to obvious problem that the actual playwright Shakespeare is certainly not Shakspere of Stratford Upon Avon but in spite of various objections almost certainly Edward De Vere. Author has realistic and honest tone and covers all major aspects.
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on August 13, 2016
Factual and entertaining. Not an exhaustive treatment but makes the point. Have read perhaps 20 books on the subject of the Shakespeare authorship question. It is high time for the Stratford tourist industry to give up the ghost and honor the incomparable Edward De Vere for his extraordinary gifts to humanity.
4 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 2, 2013
Sobran's analysis of Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, and why he believes de Vere is Shakespeare is the most succinct & compelling of the many books I have read on the subject.
7 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

gary killeen
5.0 out of 5 stars well written, reading it was time well spent.
Reviewed in Canada on March 14, 2018
well written, reading it was time well spent.
Peter Buckley
5.0 out of 5 stars The greatest literary hoax for 400 years...
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 8, 2010
Joseph Sobran was originally an orthodox (Stratfordian) scholar who became increasingly puzzled by the complete failure of 'William Shakespeare' to leave even the faintest trace of his life or personality on the works of poetry and drama bearing his name. Sobran cites numerous 'biographies' of extraordinary length (one over 600 pages), all of which has been constructed on factual information sufficient to fill four sides of A4 paper. This is literally all that is definitely known of the man Sobran identifies for clarity as 'Mr Shakspere', one of 39 possible spellings. These biographies tend to be filled with suppositions relating to what the person who wrote the plays must have done, all attempts to make Shakespeare as interesting as even the least of his works fail miserably..
Does this question of who wrote the plays and sonnets really matter? We have the plays...personally I find the plays a great deal more interesting having followed the fascinating links to the plays to be found in the life of Oxford as researched by Sobran, first proposed by J T Looney (pronounced Lone-e) in '"Shakespeare" Identified', published in 1920. How did 'Mr Shakspere' know so much about the Danish royal court at Elsinore (Hamlet)? Did he know somebody there? Oxford's brother-in-law was Elizabeth's ambassador. How did `Mr Shakspere' know Lord Burghley well enough to parody him as Polonius (Hamlet)? Oxford knew him better than most, he was Burghley's son-in-law. Why are ten plays set in Italy, revealing an intimate knowledge of that country, when no one even suggests that `Mr Shakspere' ever went there? Perhaps because the real author loved Italy and visited many times. Was `Mr Shakspere's' imagination informed by his own experience when he describes Hamlet, kidnapped by pirates in the English Channel and released unharmed for no better reason than that the pirates liked him? Even were Oxford the author this would seem like pure fiction...yet this really did happen to Oxford. There are many more such links to the plays and that is before we start on the sonnets.
In fairness to those who claim that the sonnets cannot possibly contain consistent source material in the life of a real person, they certainly don't find any resonance in the life of 'Mr Shakspere' of Stratford. What of the Earl of Oxford? Once again the parallels are quite extraordinary. His relationship with the Earl of Southampton fits very precisely the tone and content of those sonnets addressed to him (even orthodox Stratfordians mostly acknowledge Southampton as 'Mr W.H.') The idea of a poor poet urging his noble patron to; 'Make thee another self, for love of me' is absurd. These sonnets were, as Sobran demonstrates ably and repeatedly, addressed to one of equal rank.
Sonnet 125 describes the poet as having 'borne the canopy' - it is a matter of historical record that Oxford would have carried the royal canopy of both Elizabeth and James I.
'Alias Shakespeare' is a book which deserves to be read whatever opinion one may hold regarding the authorship question. It is highly entertaining yet meticulously researched, iconoclastic but always reasonable. 'Is it not just another conspiracy theory?' You may ask. Maybe, but in this case a 400 year old conspiracy to 'conceal and protect' the true author of Shakespeare's works, or, a conspiracy of academic inflexibility in the face of growing evidence? Read and see.
3 people found this helpful
Report