Buy new:
$11.70$11.70
$3.96
delivery:
April 12 - 16
Ships from: *best-deal* Sold by: *best-deal*
Save with Used - Good
$5.11$5.11
FREE delivery: Monday, April 15 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Books For You Today
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
93% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
All the President's Men [DVD]
Learn more
Return this item for free
Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
| Additional DVD options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
|
DVD
October 5, 2010 "Please retry" | New Packaging | 1 | $4.39 | $3.17 |
|
DVD
February 21, 2006 "Please retry" | Special Edition | 2 | $19.12 | $3.00 |
Watch Instantly with
| Rent | Buy |
Purchase options and add-ons
| Genre | Mystery & Thrillers |
| Format | DVD, Closed-captioned, Widescreen, Color, Dolby, Full Screen, NTSC, Anamorphic |
| Contributor | John McMartin, Alan J. Pakula, Bob Woodward, Jack Warden, Stephen Collins, Martin Balsam, Jason Robards, William Goldman, Robert Redford, Meredith Baxter, Dustin Hoffman, Ned Beatty, Hal Holbrook, Jane Alexander, Penny Fuller, Carl Bernstein See more |
| Language | English |
| Runtime | 2 hours and 18 minutes |
Frequently bought together
![All the President's Men [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81HMBVgv3iL._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Product Description
Product description
It helps to have one of history's greatest scoops as your factual inspiration, but journalism thrillers just don't get any better than All the President's Men. Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford are perfectly matched as (respectively) Washington
Amazon.com
It helps to have one of history's greatest scoops as your factual inspiration, but journalism thrillers just don't get any better than All the President's Men. Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford are perfectly matched as (respectively) Washington Post reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, whose investigation into the Watergate scandal set the stage for President Richard Nixon's eventual resignation. Their bestselling exposé was brilliantly adapted by screenwriter William Goldman, and director Alan Pakula crafted the film into one of the most intelligent and involving of the 1970s paranoid thrillers. Featuring Jason Robards in his Oscar-winning role as Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee, All the President's Men is the film against which all other journalism movies must be measured. --Jeff Shannon
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 1.85:1
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
- Package Dimensions : 7.4 x 5.7 x 0.5 inches; 2.4 ounces
- Director : Alan J. Pakula
- Media Format : DVD, Closed-captioned, Widescreen, Color, Dolby, Full Screen, NTSC, Anamorphic
- Run time : 2 hours and 18 minutes
- Release date : October 29, 1997
- Actors : Dustin Hoffman, Robert Redford, Jack Warden, Martin Balsam, Hal Holbrook
- Subtitles: : English, Spanish, French
- Language : English (Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo)
- Studio : Warner Home Video
- ASIN : 6304696493
- Writers : Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein, William Goldman
- Number of discs : 1
- Best Sellers Rank: #23,664 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #1,150 in Mystery & Thrillers (Movies & TV)
- #4,059 in Drama DVDs
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
From the personal to the national, the irony again, for the press did indeed, decisively, have Nixon to kick around again. Two young and hungry reporters, Carl Bernstein, played by Dustin Hoffman, and Bob Woodward, played by Robert Redford, go against the grain, even of their own newspaper, having a nose for one of the biggest stories of the 20th century, which confirm Lord Acton’s axiom about power corrupting. Jason Robards plays an excellent Ben Bradlee, the editor of the Washington Post. Tough, he is, with his “cub reporters,” but eventually he is willing to chance Katherine Graham's bosom in that old-fashioned ringer washer, one of the many threats that Bradlee received at the time, for performing his duty to himself and the American people. (She was the owner of the WP at the time.) “Run it” he would finally proclaim.
The director, Alan J. Pakula, produced a tense, fast-moving, high-charged drama that seemed to reflect journalistic standards and customs at the time: the typewriter, the crammed desks in the open office floor plan, the hustle for the scoop and meeting the deadline. And this was one of the scoops that really happened.
The fear. That is what struck me hard, yet again. The fear that we stress is more normally associated with totalitarianism: Stalin, Hitler, et al. It was SO difficult for Bernstein and Woodward to get someone to talk. Period. And for the record, virtually never. The game played by the informant, “Deep Throat,” that finally and dramatically Woodward called his hand on it. There was the fear of loss of the money for the mortgage, damage to the career… and more dramatically, the loss of life: “your lives are in danger.”
Why, oh why? If all those political operatives and their dirty-tricks gamesmanship had not appealed to Nixon’s own underhanded ways of thinking and winning elections, including the red baiting of Helen Douglas, his Democratic opponent for the Senate in 1950, he almost certainly would have won the 1972 election with “peace at hand,” He won, but ultimately lost because of the dirty tricks.
What was not in the movie, but I remember distinctly having lived through the period, was the stationing of Alexander Haig (by whom?) in the White House to prevent “unauthorized orders” being transmitted to the 82nd Airborne Division. Hum. And who determines that the Commander-in-Chief gives an unauthorized order, and how heavy are the fingerprints on the order.
The events of January 06, a year ago, confirm the truths in the cliché about history not repeating but rhyming. And since time immemorial, the loyalty (or not) of “security,” has disturbed many a leader’s sleep. An essential viewing for all who fret about the democratic process. 5-stars, plus.
To the best of our knowledge - no other sitting President ever so flaunted the rule of law, nor used the awesome power of the Executive Branch to wage war on his (real, or perceived) political enemies. This film captures the the story of Woodward and Bernstein - who at the time were relatively unknown young journalists, when the story was still fresh and America was coming to terms with the level of deception and criminality committed by a sitting President.
Because visual narrative styles in cinema have changed a great deal in the roughly 42+ years since the original release, there is little to initially draw a younger, modern audience into the story of two reporters who independently stumble upon some curious facts surrounding a break-in at the Watergate offices of the DNC during the 1972 Presidential Election. In time, Ben Bradlee (The Post's Executive Editor) corralled the two reporters into working together and the two eventually come to realize (to their horror) there was something much bigger, much more sinister at play. At almost every turn as they pursued their story they were blocked, stonewalled, and intimidated by forces they couldn't even fathom, yet alone reckon with. Only after doggedly pushing back with every journalistic tool at their disposal do they eventually realize that an otherwise minor crime was orchestrated at the highest levels within the White House.
So, why would anyone want to invest roughly 90 minutes of their life watching a movie from the bell-bottomed 70's about a scandal few people care about any longer? I would say mainly as a primer for young aspiring journalists on how to play their trade, but also because past is prologue when we look around and consider the corruption in the White House today. Nixon arguably got away with his criminal behavior (I say "arguably", because he had no choice but to resign as a consequence, but was never held legally accountable for his actions due to Ford's pardon), and there are consequences to that miscarriage of justice.
In the years since, Nixon advisor Roger Ailes later founded a "News" network to counter the mainstream news narrative in order to advance a partisan political narrative (and provide political cover for GOP shenanigans). Dick Cheney (himself the focus of "Vice") - who was a White House staffer under Nixon eventually became Chief of Staff under Ford, Sec'y of Defense, an finally VP under GWB. Alexander Haig, Nixon's Chief of Staff during Watergate became Sec'y of State under Reagan - a President who also endured a scandal (Iran-Contra) involving abuse of power and violation, outlined the rationale and helped craft the language for Nixon's eventual pardon.
But perhaps most important of all, it's important to note that an Attorney recommended to Joe McCarthy by J. Edgar Hoover named Roy Cohn, a man known for his ruthlessness and chicanery, served as an advisor to Nixon before, during, and after Watergate. Roy Cohn would later enter the private sector as a lawyer in NYC, representing (among others) none other than Donald J. Trump in a lawsuit alleging racial bias in violation of the Fair Housing Act (Trump settled), Roger Stone, and mob figures such as John Gotti. Cohn also introduced Trump to a newspaper man from Australia named Rupert Murdock, the man who runs FoxNews and who has provided a number of former employees (Bill Shine, John Bolton, and now Heather Nauert) who now work for Mr. Trump.
One cannot fully understand the corruption deep in the DNA of the Trump administration without understanding the story of Watergate, the players, and the political/cultural aftermath of the scandal. We should all listen attentively to those who compare Trump's criminality with Nixon's - and worry for the future of our Democracy when so many of the lessons learned from this period have been (conveniently) forgotten.
(Recommendation: Watch this film, along with "Mark Felt", and "Frost/Nixon" - then circle back to "Good night, and Good Luck" for a fuller picture of the issues, antecedent, and key players in this corrupt carnival of conservative cronies.)
Top reviews from other countries
Parmi tous les films que j'ai pu voir, celui ci est de loin mon préféré. Suspens haletant, enquête menée d'une main de maitre par un Robert Redford et un Dustin Hoffman tout simplement excellents...
Du début jusqu'à la fin, on est rivé devant son écran, suivant l'enquête pas à pas. C'est une histoire vraie, immense scandale aux états-Unis, et pour avoir lu l'ouvrage des deux journalistes Bob Woodward et Carl Bernstein, le film est génialement conforme. Bref, que pourrais-je dire !!! S'il existe encore des personnes qui ne le connaissent pas, alors je leur dirais de se précipiter sur leur carte bleue, ils ne pourront pas être déçus.
Bon film !!
As fascinating and just as riveting is the Revisited documentary. If the original film left you wanting, you can dig deeper with the doc. The logical destination should be Woodward and Bernstein's book, which all journalism students should read.
In a 24/7 news cycle, in-depth news takes a hit; All the President's Men should embolden journalists to get back to digging, chasing down, and taking chances to get to the truth.
The first of these gives a detailed picture of the gestation of the film and in particular the crucial role played by Redford, who was involved even before the book on which it is based was written. There are interviews with everyone involved, including Woodward and Bernstein. The film stops at the point where they had done the main part of their detective work and the remaining part of the story is shown only in a series of teleprinter messages.
The film came out only two years after the events it describes, when were still fresh in peoples' memory, but for those coming to it for the first time "All The President's Men Revisited" fleshes out its sketchy picture of later events and gives us the full story up to Nixon's resignation. There are also a number of other extras, but these tend to cover much of the same ground, and are therefore less interesting.
story as our intrepid reporters ferreted out the facts until they had a serious case against the Nixon administration.
There was also a strong supporting cast who added great depth to the story. A truly great movie.










