Buy new:
$19.00$19.00
FREE delivery: Feb 11 - 13 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $14.36
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
85% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
85% positive over last 12 months

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


Alpha God: The Psychology of Religious Violence and Oppression Paperback – March 10, 2015
Price | New from | Used from |
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial |
- Kindle
$13.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial - Paperback
$19.00
Enhance your purchase
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPrometheus
- Publication dateMarch 10, 2015
- Dimensions5.4 x 0.6 x 8.34 inches
- ISBN-101633880206
- ISBN-13978-1633880207
Frequently bought together
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
—SEBASTIAN JUNGER, author of the bestselling books War and The Perfect Storm
“Alpha God is ambitious, provocative, and eminently engaging. Garcia proposes a novel Darwinian hypothesis on a topic—religious violence—that is central to our times. While the details will be disturbing to many, religious violence is an area of inquiry that cannot be ignored, and Garcia offers an abundance of intriguing ideas that will keep researchers busy for years to come.”
—RICHARD SOSIS, James Barnett Professor of Humanistic Anthropology, University of Connecticut; cofounder and coeditor of Religion, Brain & Behavior
"Original, bold, and beautifully written, Alpha God offers a groundbreaking and eye-opening evolutionary analysis of human religion, explaining not only why religion exists but also why it is the way it is. Armed with broad knowledge of the history, principles, and scriptures of human religions and a deep understanding of evolutionary psychology and nonhuman primate behavior, Hector A. Garcia convincingly argues that religion is built on—and takes advantage of—human (and especially men’s) evolved psychology, particularly our obsession with dominance/submission and sex.”
—DARIO MAESTRIPIERI, author of Macachiavellian Intelligence and Games Primates Play
“I can already hear the true believers and religious apologists snorting that God is more subtle than the dominant alpha male portrayed by Hector A. Garcia, just as we can anticipate the claim that humanity’s sense of God comes not from evolution but from, well, God himself! (Note, by the way, the implication that God is not only male but also a personalized actor.) But the overwhelming majority of believers do in fact personalize God as a dominant alpha male, and, moreover, as this book demonstrates so effectively, our species is predisposed by its evolutionary history to do just this. My guess is that there is more—that is, more biology—behind religious belief than merely the allure of an alpha God, but nonetheless Alpha God goes a long way toward explaining our peculiar vulnerability to such illusions. It’s a superb overview of a compelling hypothesis for the evolution of religion.”
—DAVID P. BARASH, professor of psychology, University of Washington; author of Buddhist Biology: Ancient Eastern Wisdom Meets Modern Western Science
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Prometheus; 1st edition (March 10, 2015)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1633880206
- ISBN-13 : 978-1633880207
- Item Weight : 12 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.4 x 0.6 x 8.34 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #599,005 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #138 in Evolutionary Psychology (Books)
- #1,002 in Medical Social Psychology & Interactions
- #1,746 in Popular Social Psychology & Interactions
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Dr. Hector Garcia is a clinical psychologist, researcher, and Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. He is also the author of the books: Alpha God: The Psychology of Religious Violence and Oppression, and; Sex, Power and Partisanship. He publishes on the evolutionary psychology of religion, warfare, politics, and PTSD. Dr. Garcia has been featured on TED, PBS, and CSPAN.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
“Alpha God” is an excellent book that examines religious violence and oppression through evolutionary psychology. Clinical psychologist Hector A Garcia makes the compelling case that “God” has been drawn in human form, with behaviors inherited from our primate ancestors. This persuasive 290-page book includes the following ten chapters: 1. Enter God the Dominant Ape, 2. Evolutionary Mechanisms: Etiology, 3. The Protector God, 4. Sexual Dominance: From Apes to Men to Gods, 5. Cooperative Killing, In-group Identity, and God, 6. What It Means to Kneel, 7. Maladaptive Submission to the Godhead, 8. The Fearsome Reputations of Apes, Men, and Gods, 9. God’s Territory, and 10. Righting Ourselves.
Positives:
1. Well-written and well-reasoned book.
2. An interesting topic, the psychology of religious violence and oppression. “Dominant apes and men have a long history of securing such biological treasure by perpetrating violence and oppression on lower-ranking members of their societies. Once we observe that God, too, is portrayed as having great interest in these kinds of resources, and as securing them through similar means, it becomes increasingly clear that He has emerged as neither more nor less than the highest-ranking male of all.”
3. Great use of logic and evolutionary psychology to persuade the readers at an accessible level. Garcia has great command of the topic.
4. Good reading rhythm, the author does a good job of making persuasive statements backed by science and sound logic. “Arguably the best way to understand the ultimate basis for male violence and oppression is through the evolutionary sciences.”
5. Provocative statements abound. “Human potential is so vast, but we may have limited ourselves by the gods we created.”
6. Examines dominance and its implications on behavior. “With larger populations, the roles of gods began to reflect social concerns rather than the forces of nature. Notably, gods began to more actively regulate social interactions and punish breeches of morality and cooperation.”
7. Connects dots throughout the book. “It is worth noting that this business of marking over the territorial markers of one's rivals is known to primates and proliferated among the gods of the biblical age.”
8. Describes how politics and religion intertwine. “In a political environment run by strongmen, one needs a god based on strongman psychology, one equipped for maneuvering within the dominance hierarchies of men.”
9. Describes how the grand theory of evolution shaped the mind to anthropomorphize the natural world and how this tendency resulted in man-based gods. “Of note, some theorists in these disciplines describe religion as an adaptation that facilitated cooperation among early humans. Some describe it as a by-product of existing, evolved cognitive capacities. And still others describe it as both.” “
10. The protector “God” explained. “Because the primeval social environments in which our brains evolved required us to seek protection from powerful males against dangerous predators, such a role in male gods is emotionally intuitive. The natural extension is that gods now protect us from predation.” “The results suggest that the tendency to gravitate toward powerful leaders is independent of political affiliation, and thus potentially very ancient.”
11. The concept of eternity. “What better way of assuaging fears of death than with the promise of eternal life? And as we might expect, it is a dominant male savior who provides not only protection from death by predation but protection from death itself.”
12. Sexual domination. “Violence is a prevailing strategy for winning access to females among primates, including the great apes.” “Gods in religions worldwide share an interest in sex, and the male gods seek and acquire sex in patterned, dominant-male style, with a noted preference for virgins—females free of the genes of rival males.”
13. Generous usage of biblical scripture and passages from the Koran to make compelling arguments regarding the author’s theories of violence and oppression. “The Bible is especially frank in claiming that God wants women to submit to men, for example: “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.” (Col. 3:18).”
14. The concept of patriarchal altruism. “Like secular culture, religions can engender great empathy and collaboration, but they can also bring about remorseless killing. This pattern of in-group altruism and out-group enmity has been termed parochial altruism.”
15. Many examples of a biblical violence. “He totally destroyed them, as Moses the servant of the LORD had commanded…. The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, but all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, not sparing anyone that breathed. (Josh.11:12, 14)”
16. Religion as a source for control. “Similarly, Christianity has a long history of codified ideological control, with one example among Catholics being the dogma of papal infallibility. This dogma was promulgated by the Catholic Church at the First Vatican Council of 1870 and states that any dogmatic teaching that the pope conceives of is infallible. Such teachings are considered to be imparted directly from God and are therefore uncontestable.”
17. Depression as a form adaptation. “Evolutionary researchers have argued that self-esteem is a kind of “gauge” or “index” designed to inform adaptive goals. Such a gauge is critical in social hierarchies where individuals must understand their rank status and choose social behaviors according to their rank, particularly in regard to social competition—for example, not challenging a more dangerous, higher-ranking individual or submitting to a weaker, lower-ranking one.”
18. The origins of reputation. “Like men, God is exceedingly intolerant of threats to his reputation, most seminally in the third commandment: “Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain.” (Exod. 20:7). Words spoken against God (or disrespecting, slighting, or otherwise not showing proper reverence) are thereafter forbidden and considered a crime known as blasphemy. This crime is also punishable by death.”
19. Legitimacy of power. “One means of ensuring the legitimacy of God's position of power has been to forbid the questioning of religious doctrines that support it.”
20. The impact od rank and power on the planet. “In sum, the research cited above finds that hierarchical, male-driven societies tend to behave in ways detrimental to the worldwide ecosystem.”
21. Links to notes.
Negatives:
1. Lack of visual supplementary material.
2. A bit repetitive.
3. Needed a little more emphasis on neuroscience.
4. I was hoping to know more about male violence. Is there a genetic difference?
In summary, a 4.5 star book. A very interesting topic done justice by the persuasive arguments made by Garcia. He makes the compelling case that there is an evolutionary connection between our primate ancestors and humans. Furthermore, humans have used hierarchy and religion to impose control on societies. A lot to like here, I highly recommend it!
Further suggestions: “God: The Most Unpleasant Character in All Fiction” by Dan Barker, “Drunk with Blood: God’s Killings in the Bible” by Steve Wells, “The End of Faith” by Sam Harris, “The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture” by Darrel Ray, “The Christian Delusion” by John W. Loftus, “Fighting Words” by Hector Avalos, “Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible” by Jerry A. Coyne, “God and the Multiverse” by Victor J. Stenger, “Science and Religion” by Daniel C. Dennett, “Why People Believe Weird Things” by Michael Shermer, “The Soul Fallacy” by Julien Musolino, “Nonbeliever Nation” by David Niose, “Freethinkers” by Susan Jacoby, “Nailed” by David Fitzgerald, and “Think” by Guy P. Harrison.
Thus, the dead now became stronger than the living had been, since God at bottom is nothing but an exalted father. In fact, the deification of the murdered father was a serious attempt at expiation. A double-sided ideal arose according to which men had access to the fullness of power and the freedom from restriction of the conquered primal father, as well as the willingness to subject themselves to him. Freud says that "the revenge of the deposed and reinstated father has been very cruel; it culminated in the dominance of authority" (ibid.).
Garcia follows Freud's line of thought and argues that religion has a biological foundation, building on primitive models of genetic propagation. The Alpha God is based on the ancestral alpha male who establishes sexual dominion. The problem is that there is no evidence that homo sapiens nor homo erectus have ever lived in a primal horde where one male had recourse to all the females. Yet, Garcia claims that males are essentially promiscuous and want to monopolize all the women. But this is really characteristic of psychopathic and narcissistic men, such as Benito Mussolini, Muammar Gaddafi, and Martin Luther King. On the other hand, it is well-known that introverted men tend to be strongly monogamous.
The author exemplifies with certain debauched popes who fell to greed and promiscuity, but he makes no mention of the many pious and righteous popes. Likewise, most emperors of Rome were diligent bureaucrats who worked all day for the best of Rome, thinking little of themselves. They weren't at all like Caligula. Nor is the gorilla patriarch an egoistic despot--he is better described as a gentle giant who takes responsibility for the flock. He fetches the strayed child back to the flock and steps in to allay conflicts between the females. Should the group be attacked, he is prepared to sacrifice his own life. His incentive is not merely to propagate his own genes. This view depends on a misunderstanding of the "selfish gene" concept. The gorilla isn't selfish, it is the gorilla genes that are selfish. As a matter of fact, the male patriarch works for the survival of the gorilla species and the gorilla way of life.
It is clear that the author takes an overly negative view of the "patriarchal ruler". Indeed, Moses, Joshua, David, etc., are portrayed as psychopaths in the bible. But according to historical research these biblical massacres never occurred. They are greatly exaggerated literary fabrications, designed to compensate inferiority and to instil "fear of God". If the Exodus occurred at all, the group that left Egypt likely consisted of a dozen individuals. Jericho lay in ruins long before the little group of Jewish refugees entered the Holy Land, where they joined the poor Palestinians living in the mountains, who had already begun developing Jewish religion.
Garcia claims that the ritual offering of food derives from an archaic instinct to surrender food to the powerful male. However, as Freud explains, the sacrificial meal was eaten by all participants, God included. Since they took part of the same meal, it meant that all participants were of one substance (cf. Freud, ibid.). Religious communion implies a confirmation of social community and of the assumption of mutual obligations. When Jesus dined with sinners it meant that he became one with them, which is why it was regarded outrageous conduct. As a consequence he was infected with their sin.
This should answer Garcia's question, which he keeps returning to. Since God doesn't need to eat, why does he need food? In point of fact, the sacrifice did not simply mean to appease an angry God by surrendering food. The ritual means to dine with God, and by sharing the same substance the celebrants become one with him. The original conception of the sacrifice was an act of social fellowship between the deity and his worshipper. It must be understood as a symbolic act and not as primitive magic.
Garcia says that the scene in the Garden of Eden is easy to understand. It means that Adam and Eve evoked the alpha God's rage when they stole his food (cf. Garcia, Kindle Loc. 2666f). Supposedly, the myth builds on an instinctual residue. It pictures the archaic alpha male's defensiveness about food resources. But this is a naive interpretation. It is really a myth of the acquirement of ego consciousness, which is a divine resource. Yet, conscious advancement caused us to be thrown out of original childlike wholeness. To be God's child is a blissful experience; so the rise of consciousness is portrayed as a sin. But as St. Augustine says, it is really a felix culpa.
Is there any sense in Freud's understanding of religion? As the king is one with the kingdom so is God one with the Garden. The destruction of the Garden followed upon the eating of the fruit, which caused the eyes of humanity to be opened. Thus, the destruction of original wholeness in Paradise could be understood as a patricide. To rectify this sin, humanity must contribute to the resurrection of the Father by joining together in the worship of the Son.
If reinterpreted along these lines, there is some sense in Freud's notion of patricide. The problem is that it revolves around sexual dominance in the primal horde, when it is better understood in archetypal terms. In the primal condition humanity remained unconscious like children and were at one with God. The Oedipal sin is to open one's eyes and become conscious (to solve the riddle of the Sphinx), because this is really the same as the ousting of the Father.
In essence, the book argues that religion builds on the notion of surrendering food or sex to soothe the rages of a dominant being--behaviours that reach back to the primordial savannah. Yet instincts of sexual competition, territorial wars, and kinship altruism exist wholly independently of religion. On Garcia's view, we have become fixated on these aspects of our nature thanks to patriarchal religion, which has elevated alpha male conduct and alpha male social relations to religious dogma. Yet statistics show that the warlike aspects of our nature took an even greater toll before the emergence of the great civilizations (cf. Azar Gat, "War in Human Civilization").
Garcia focuses predominantly on the dark aspect of religion--the way in which the tail has come to wag the dog, as in political Islam. Religion often promotes sexual abstinence and ascetic practices. The author sees this as a religious imitation of the concession that was made to the primordial alpha male, who was given exclusive sexual rights. In fact, a sound version of ascetic self-constraint and humility leads the spiritual disciple back to the primordial Fatherland. Religion is an expression of the longing to reunite with the Father--to again become like a child in the Garden of Eden. An ascetic life-style that involves prayer and meditation, and which includes the avoidance of worldly life, relates to the spiritual drive, which is perhaps even stronger than sexuality. There is within the human soul a longing to reach back to a blissful form of "conscious unconsciousness"; a deep feeling of contentment, as in the samadhi experience of Buddhism and Hinduism. On the other hand, as soon as we loose ourselves in the world, we tend to become like automatons, always searching out new gratifications. Yet, the worldly person often shows signs of spiritual frustration due to a lack of genuine meaning in life.
The author's view of asceticism and sexual abstinence is overly negative, because he sees only the dark aspect of the practice, which occasionally becomes excessive. In the same vein, he observes that religion often frowns upon worldly knowledge and concludes that this attitude serves the purpose of alpha God dominance. Ignorance may function as effectively as cognitive impairment in keeping the weaker individual out of unwinnable conflicts (cf. Garcia, Kindle Loc. 2734ff). Again, he takes the reductive view and focuses on the dark side of the phenomenon, the way in which ignorance in the population makes life easier for the despotic ruler.
Knowledge stands for the development of consciousness, which once resulted in the demise of Paradisal existence. Therefore mankind has always looked upon knowledge with suspicion, as the alluring fruit of the devil. Spiritual wholeness requires a simple consciousness. Spiritual simpleness is the positive side of "ignorance". The Bodhisattva has no need for worldly knowledge. On the other hand, to dive headlong into a world of knowledge evokes a passion that may lead the individual astray. In the general population, knowledge has also a good side and a bad, for what good use is the knowledge of making bombs and hacking into computers? Knowledge, just as sexuality and all the other worldly allures, is often overestimated. It easily develops into an obsession, leading to an over-differentiation of consciousness to the detriment of our unconscious side, the realm of the 'vox Dei'.
The book peddles a reductionistic and one-sided view of religion. As a consequence, it does not contribute much to our understanding, especially since these ideas have already been formulated by Freud (in certain ways better). On the other hand, the author has given an excellent account of the dark aspects of human nature, and how religion has been utilized for purposes of greed, power and domination. The problem is that some of the knowledge is of the bad kind, misinterpretations that risk leading people astray.
M. Winther
Top reviews from other countries



He demonstrates how man-created religious fiction follows the same male dominance patterns as is found among primates. Religions create order among ever larger groups of believers, binding together ever more diverse cultures under the various religious roofs. Like it or not, religions describe God and his rules very similar to the behavior patterns of male chimpanzees, except of course in super size.
The religious order are built on in-group solidarity, charity and mutual support. Followers are called brothers and sisters of the same father.
Religions depend equally on out-group segregation and violence up to extermination. Per Hector A. Garcia, the Bible lists 2,475,636 people killed righteously in the name of the Lord, while the Devil managed to kill only 10. Unbelievers are called dogs, pigs, wolves, devils and the like, and should be marginalized or killed.
Does this sound enraging? You want to learn about the evidence? I highly recommend Garcia’s book.


![]() |