Prime Exclusive Deal
$9.12$9.12
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Buy new:
$9.60$9.60
FREE delivery: Tuesday, Oct 17 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
-
-
VIDEO -
-
We Have Always Lived in the Castle (Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition) Paperback – Deckle Edge, October 31, 2006
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$5.95
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
|
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry" | $11.95 | $10.96 |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $12.96 | $9.99 |
- Kindle
$0.80 Read with our Free App -
Audiobook
$5.95 $5.95 with discounted Audible membership - Hardcover
$21.8518 Used from $14.95 34 New from $16.51 - Paperback
$9.1266 Used from $3.85 48 New from $9.60 - Mass Market Paperback
$14.955 Used from $10.96 8 New from $11.95 - Audio CD
$12.962 Used from $9.99 2 New from $12.96
Taking readers deep into a labyrinth of dark neurosis, We Have Always Lived in the Castle is a deliciously unsettling novel about a perverse, isolated, and possibly murderous family and the struggle that ensues when a cousin arrives at their estate. This edition features a new introduction by Jonathan Lethem.
For more than seventy years, Penguin has been the leading publisher of classic literature in the English-speaking world. With more than 1,700 titles, Penguin Classics represents a global bookshelf of the best works throughout history and across genres and disciplines. Readers trust the series to provide authoritative texts enhanced by introductions and notes by distinguished scholars and contemporary authors, as well as up-to-date translations by award-winning translators.
- Print length146 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPenguin Classics
- Publication dateOctober 31, 2006
- Dimensions5.64 x 0.47 x 8.35 inches
- ISBN-109780143039976
- ISBN-13978-0143039976
- Lexile measure920L
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A witch’s brew of eerie power and startling novelty” —The New York Times
“I was thrilled by the genuine but meaningful strangeness of Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle.” —George Saunders
“Jackson’s novel is so wonderfully creepy that students usually feel subversive just for reading it. Add to that one of the most brilliantly realized unreliable narrators in fiction and the book becomes irresistible.” —Marlon James
About the Author
Jonathan Lethem is the author of numerous acclaimed novels, including Motherless Brooklyn and The Fortress of Solitude.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Table of Contents
WE HAVE ALWAYS LIVED IN THE CASTLE
Title Page
Copyright Page
Introduction
Dedication
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
WE HAVE ALWAYS LIVED IN THE CASTLE
SHIRLEY JACKSON was born in San Francisco in 1916. She first received wide critical acclaim for her short story “The Lottery,” which was published in 1949. Her novels—which include The Sundial, The Bird’s Nest, Hangsaman, The Road through the Wall, and The Haunting of Hill House (Penguin), in addition to We Have Always Lived in the Castle (Penguin)—are characterized by her use of realistic settings for tales that often involve elements of horror and the occult. Raising Demons and Life among the Savages (Penguin) are her two works of nonfiction. She died in 1965. Come Along With Me (Penguin) is a collection of stories, lectures, and part of the novel she was working on when she died in 1965.
JONATHAN LETHEM is the author of Motherless Brooklyn, which won the National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction, as well as the novels The Fortress of Solitude; Gun, with Occasional Music; As She Climbed Across the Table; Girl in Landscape ; and Amnesia Moon. He has also published stories (Men and Cartoons) and essays (The Disappointment Artist).
Product details
- ASIN : 0143039970
- Publisher : Penguin Classics; Deluxe edition (October 31, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 146 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780143039976
- ISBN-13 : 978-0143039976
- Lexile measure : 920L
- Item Weight : 6.7 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.64 x 0.47 x 8.35 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,462 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #13 in Gothic Fiction
- #15 in Contemporary Literature & Fiction
- #112 in Literary Fiction (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the authors

Shirley Jackson was born in San Francisco in 1916. She first received wide critical acclaim for her short story "The Lottery," which was published in 1948. Her novels--which include The Sundial, The Bird's Nest, Hangsaman, The Road through the Wall, We Have Always Lived in the Castle and The Haunting of Hill House--are characterized by her use of realistic settings for tales that often involve elements of horror and the occult. Raising Demons and Life Among the Savages are her two works of nonfiction. Come Along With Me is a collection of stories, lectures, and part of the novel she was working on when she died in 1965. All are currently in print (Penguin). Two posthumous volumes of her short fiction are Just An Ordinary Day (Bantam) and Let Me Tell You (Random House). A graphic novel adaptation of "The Lottery" by Miles Hyman, her grandson, was published in 2016 (Farrar-Straus-Giroux). Also in 2016: Dark Tales by Shirley Jackson (Penguin Classics) and an authorized biography by Ruth Franklin: Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life (Norton).

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This short novel is about a young girl Merricat now eighteen when the story begins, and her older sister Constance Blackwood, the sole survivors of their intimate family circle, and their elderly Uncle Julian, a now addled invalid confined to his chair, busy with his papers documenting the purported crime that his niece Constance was accused of, that of polishing off her family with a serving of berries and arsenic-laced sugar. Merricat, thirteen at the time of the tragedy, had been sent to her room without supper for some infraction and thus survived; their Uncle Julian only barely, having asked for a modest sprinkling of sugar on his dessert. Constance was acquitted after the trial was over and the case was closed, but the village people remain hostile to her and the house, and she rarely ventures outdoors. Merricat has to go once a week to the the village for groceries, attracting hostile stares from the locals and meeting up with the village bully, Jim Donell, an arrogant man who enjoys his attempts to rattle and tease her.
Occasionally some young boys from the village on a dare, creep up at night and throw stones at the windows of the Blackwood house, chanting their little mockeries before running away as fast as they can and this local legend continues to grow among them. And, then one day a cousin of the family, Charles, a first-time visitor shows up in the midst of their quiet existence, moves into the house, courts Constance and starts to make changes with a firm agenda in mind. Havoc ensues as a result of this intruder.
Merricat narrates the story, and after I finished this mysterious, magical and dark delight, for that was my interpretation at a young age, I wanted to join her as a playmate, and her intriguing unusual voice in the telling of her adventures and forays into nature drew me in right away. Merricat in fact will remain forever thirteen.
Many years later when I picked Jackson's novel up again, it was with finer clarity and a more mature and experienced eye. Words such as creepy, depressing and weird are some of the comments one finds among new and younger readers today and while they all carry validity, to my mind the word 'sinister' comes to the forefront. It is not the gentle Constance, nor the troubled Merricat, nor their ailing Uncle Julian, who are the sinister ones here, it is the collective cruelty of people banding together that is frightening. A theme which the author Shirley Jackson knew about first-hand, and addresses in this memorable and psychological masterpiece of hers, Jackson was to return to this topic in some of her other important works.
There are several defining moments that stood out on this second reading: when circumstances reach an explosive edge, Uncle Julian comes out of his reality from the past, and in a moment of rare if fatal lucidity, joins his two nieces protectively against Charles, the dangerous and manipulative trespasser. There is a tinge of unexpected conviction laced with pathos to be found here. The turning point in the story, however, is perhaps when the leader of the village, Jim Donell, after removing his professional hat, picks up a rock as a sign to the pack of malicious onlookers to have fun, and the destructive party begins.
A tragedy? Reflections on the subject of collective shame? A horrifying tale? All of the above, and more perhaps. Some of the reviewers are able to articulate it better. On a side note, the author Eric Hoffer was to say that he was doubtful about 'collective shame' on the basis that association with others is almost always felt as an association with one's betters, and to sin with one's betters cannot be productive of a crushing shame. And, yet Shirley Jackson goes on to show that there are such cases as the above in this famous novel of hers.
One might feel, after reading this classic, like joining the village people in the aftermath of their actions, in leaving a pot of jam, or some fresh bread, a small token of some kindness on the door-steps of this household now at peace while moving quietly away again. There are slight tinges of redemption to be found here as well. Known for her extraordinary Gothic novels, Shirley Jackson was also a fine psychologist of the human condition, and her own life, by all accounts, was not always a happy one although she could be wicked and witty at times especially when it came to her own family anecdotes and her short stories.
To D. Friedlander, moderate and steady in his views, yet passionate in spirit; his wry humor and fine perception; his reasoned clarifications on important life issues, the many laughs and complexities we experienced over the years, and for explaining to me why Shirley Jackson's enduring short story "The Lottery", best remembered of all her writings today, caused such a furor among people when published in 1948. She will always be a favorite of mine
I wished they were all dead and I was walking on their bodies. - Merricat
The stars of the story are obviously Merricat and Constance. These two have a weird relationship in that at first it seems normal and sweet, but then as the story goes on, the psychological elements come into play. Obviously, Merricat is a twisted child harboring dark thoughts about hurting others. Mental health issues may also come into play as she spends a lot of time going over rituals she believes will protect herself, Constance, and Uncle Julian. I found her behavior obviously odd and, at times, just plain irritating. Constance, on the other hand, just caters to Merricat’s every whim. At first this could be seen as family love and survival, but it could also be something darker.
“Poor strangers. They have so much to be afraid of.” - Merricat
I guess the best thing I can say about this short novel is that regardless of how repetitive and dull the story can be at times, it still forced me to think at a deeper level about whether things really do seem to appear as they are, or is there a darker tone underneath that the author wishes for the readers to decode? Why is there hardly any interaction between Merricat and Uncle Julian, and why must she always remind herself to be “nicer” to him? Can we really trust the words of Merricat with Constance being damaged as she is and Uncle Julian who has lost his memories? In a way, I have more questions than answers after having completed this short novel, and for once in a long while, I find that actually okay.
Top reviews from other countries
At the beginning of the book we meet Mary Katherine Blackwood (known by her family as Merricat) a strange, dark, daydreaming, 18 year old girl who lives with the remaining members of her family in an old house on the outskirts of town. From the outset of the book it is obvious the townsfolk hate the Blackwood family and apart from Merricat no-one else from the family ever ventures outside. Six years before the beginning of the book most of Merricat's family were murdered and the culprit was never brought to justice. The murders happened in the same house they live in now which only adds to the intriguing and unsettling nature of the story.
The four central characters are wonderfully written out although not always likeable. The character of Charles, the unwelcome cousin, is delightfully repulsive and devious. Constance herself is a troubled character; forced by circumstance to become the head of the family at the young age of 22. Uncle Julian is a survivor of the murder attempt but it has left him wheelchair bound and suffering from what appears to be the onset of dementia. He is often confused but also has remarkably lucid moments. There is a surprising amount of humour in the book most of which comes from Julian. He is brilliantly irreverent and always speaks his mind.
One of the most interesting parts for me is to see a story from the outcasts point of view rather than the frightened townsfolk. It put me in mind a little of stories like 'To Kill A Mockingbird' and the film 'The Burbs' both of which contain social outcasts as main characters with the main difference that these stories focus on the point of view of the outsiders looking in as opposed to the hermits looking out.
The story ends in an unusual way which I wasn't quite expecting. Once I had thought about it for a while I decided I liked the ending. Haven't we all been in a situation where we would love to shut out the outside world even for a short while? I know I have and this book speaks to that part of me.
Esta novela fue escrita en 1962, algo que hay que tener en cuenta.
Desarrollada en un entorno rural británico, en una época indeterminada, en el que las clases sociales estaban fuertemente diferenciadas, la novela comienza de una manera opresiva y siniestra.
Lentamente, vamos conociendo la vida simple de la familia Blackwood, más bien lo que queda de ella: dos hermanas y un tío de ellas: Merricat, Constance y tío Julian. Viven en una mansión, con tierras alrededor, aislados, pero en una situación muy extraña, pues no salen ni se relacionan con nadie, excepto por alguna visita puntual. Solo Merricat sale, muy a su pesar, dos veces a la semana al pueblo, a hacer la compra y coger libros de la biblioteca.
Está escrita en primera persona por Mary Katherine, es decir, Merricat es una chica de 18 años, con un trastorno que la hace infantil, obsesiva y maniática. Constance tiene 28 años, es coherente y agradable, se ocupa de la casa, de cocinar y del huerto y jardín. Y de cuidar a Julian, que ya es mayor, va en silla de ruedas y está perdiendo la memoria.
Los tres viven solos y confinados desde que los padres de ellas, su hermano y su tía, la mujer de Julian, murieron envenenados seis años atrás.
Constance fue acusada del crimen, pero fue absuelta.
Un buen día, aparece el primo Charles de visita, a quien no veían desde antes del fatídico día. Y todo empieza a descontrolarse poco a poco y ocurre algo terrible.
Hasta aquí puedo contar.
No le pongo cinco estrellas porque me esperaba otro final más elaborado. Aún así, es una buena lectura. 👍
In Jackson’s short novel We Have Always Lived in The Castle the story is told by Merricat (Mary Katherine). So heavily is the narrative dominated by Merricat that of its 148 pages, for some 100 pages the reader is entirely within the internal monologues of Merricat. We have to be, because in the gospel according to Merricat, power is everything, and that means controlling everybody and everything around her. When she feels that she hasn’t entirely got control she is ‘chilled’ (that’s in the old sense of the word – not the new), and sometimes feels a great weight pressing on her, and it’s then that she employs her own brand of witchery to regain control. To stop people entering the huge house in which her family, the Blackwoods have lived for many years she is ever vigilant about doors, keys and locks. She buries things in the garden and nearby woods, nails books to trees, and if these ‘safeguards’ - as she refers to them – fail then she takes more severe steps to reassert her power.
Merricat has no responsibility, effectively she’s a ‘great child’ – eighteen she tells us on page 1, that’s ten years younger than her sister Constance with whom she lives together with their Uncle Julian. They are the sole survivors of the Blackwood family whose other members died, all on the same evening by poisoning – arsenic put in the sugar. Uncle Julian survived because he ‘never takes much sugar,’ Constance because she ‘doesn’t like sugar on her blackberries,’ and Merricat because that evening – six years ago when she was twelve – she had been ‘sent to bed without any supper,’ and as the reader soon discovers; ‘Mary Katherine must never be punished, we must all bow down to her.’ Constance, it seemed washed the sugar bowl before the police arrived, but that did not stop her being put on trial for multiple murder, a crime for which she was acquitted due to lack of substantial evidence. Merricat was sent to an orphanage from which she returned after the trial to live with Constance. The bond of love between them is seemingly all powerful. Merricat rarely helps Constance in the house, in fact she is not allowed to do certain things like prepare food or handle knives, or go in certain places like Uncle Julian’s room. Constance makes all Merricat’s meals, as if she were still a baby. Uncle Julian has been traumatised by the poisoning and appears to have some degree of dementia.
Here are some examples of Jackson's sublime writing; giving sentience to non sentient things, 'dim and rich, in the kind of knowing possessive way trees have of pressing closer,' or existential 'but I had no reason to expect that the creek would be there since I had never visited it on a Tuesday morning,' or 'I hoped that the house, injured, might reject him all by itself,' and 'perhaps Charles and money found each other, no matter how far apart they were.'
So, in terms of a crime novel, the reader finds themselves in the aftermath of the crime - possibly - of the century (I assume it’s set in late 1950s , and perhaps in the Bay area of San Francisco where Jackson was born - or is it just one of those quaint old-fashioned self-contained 'small town America' type communities?) and it’s obvious who the real culprit is. But this isn’t a crime novel it’s a psychological drama. It’s blindingly obvious that Merricat has psychiatric – what we would call today – ‘issues,’ wisely undefined and quite possibly even without a name in 1962. The real fear of this novel is that the reader is not only forced to bear witness to Merricat’s power but is sucked in by way of her super astuteness, her weird and at times touching humour. When their boorish cousin Charles arrives at the house and tries to take over, he finds he’s bitten off more than he can chew. Merricat spots straight away he’s incapable of doing any useful DIY jobs around the house, that he’s failed to make a decent career and it’s obvious he’s on the make. He’s going to make changes, and changes to Merricat are like sunlight and cuxifixes to vampires. Charles is incensed by Merricat’s delinquent behaviour, he’s right, but the alarming thing is that the reader finds themselves siding with Merricat. I did, I admit it. There’s a stand off between the two of them including a glorious scene when Merricat taunts him with her knowledge of poisons. It's as if what enables Merricat to have such enormous powers of analysis is that she appears unencumbered by human emotion. Perhaps she lives vicariously off the emotions of Constance, Uncle Julian, and Charles when he takes up residence? When her various fetishes seem to fail to expel Charles, Merricat goes elemental and employs her razor-sharp opportunism to trigger a cataclysmic event. But the story doesn’t end there, it enters yet another sad but sinister phase which leaves the reader simultaneously laughing and shuddering.
The start was okay. I liked how uncomfortable the reader feels when the villagers observe and speak to Merricat running her weekly errands - that atmosphere of hatred, concealed in public yet always present, was really well done and communicates just how prejudice and misunderstanding can create a twisted distance between other people. While Constance suffers from agoraphobia, unable to venture beyond the confines of her garden due to the way she was treated, Merricat herself has a form of social phobia, preferring the company of Jonas the cat, refusing to eat in front of other people, and painting tortured scenes in her head to overcome her fear of what the villagers are thinking.
But then my interest faded and the narrative became a bland, monotonous string of blissful domestic events. [spoiler alert] While the arrival of cousin Charles offered a brief reprieve from this tedium, more interested in money than the women's well-being, there wasn't really much there in terms of plot and development. I guess you could say that the story is a study of how society can stigmatise mental illness. I think the villagers wanted to help Merricat and Constance, but they can't overcome this uneasiness regarding the women's background. Based on what we've seen and heard from the locals in the village, there is nobody there like the Blackwoods around. In wanting to know what had happened and never knowing the answers, in wanting to help yet having their efforts rebuffed, the villagers have descended into a sullen acceptance of the Blackwood tragedy, until their frustrations eventually overcome the house of Merricat and Constance, tearing it apart as the building smokes and burns.
It's good that the villagers repent for their actions, even if they're secretly doing this at night, but the story already reached the end a long time ago: when Merricat admits to murdering her relatives (and I knew this a while ago). I kept reading and reading, waiting for the story to finish up and end, only to find myself disappointed with the ending and faced with a superfluous essay by Joyce Carol Oates - sorry, but that essay wasn't a comfort. It analyses the story, trying to inflate Jackson's flat and dismal conclusion with references to other greater works of fiction. However, as a former graduate of English Literature, I know a good essay when I see one, and Oates merely served us a lukewarm dish that isn't worth the price of this e-book at all.
To be honest, this is the first e-book where I wish I hadn't paid a single pence. You're better off going to the library and borrowing the paperback for free! And it's not a modern classic. It's Penguin's way of saying they didn't make enough from this book.
The writing is beautiful, it's almost lyrical in its imagery. The life we see through Merrikat's eyes is a glimpse into (I'm guessing) a non-neurorypical view. Full of routines, and patterns and OCD-like repetitions and thought processes. When Merrikat speaks three words into a glass and then fills it with water and drinks them I was moved with the beauty of it. Another of my favourite bits was when she buried Uncle Julia's yellow pencil next to the creek, so that the water would always speak his name. Just fantastic poetic vision into the thoughts of a nuerodiverse brain.
Half murder mystery, half social commentary but 100% gothic and beautiful in its ruin I was honestly spellbound by this book. 10/10.


















